[Official] Gears of War 2


Recommended Posts

From my experiences Gears 2 is slower, but what's the fuss? Everyones character is slower.

Its this whole "Bigger, Better, Faster, Badass" idea that was hyped around it. Yes, it is Bigger and Badass but, lacking the other two. Gears of War is suppose to be a very fast paced game but, not like Unreal Tournament fast, correct? I really do feel like I'm going as fast as I could in Halo 1 with the running system in Gears 2 compared to Gears 1.

No I don't remember Epic ever describing GoW1/2 as fast paced :unsure:

In fact, it's supposed to be played at a slower pace where you are running from cover to cover. Obviously when you get good at it and know all the ins and outs you can speed it up. It's still not meant to be fast paced though, hence the slow aiming.

No I don't remember Epic ever describing GoW1/2 as fast paced :unsure:

In fact, it's supposed to be played at a slower pace where you are running from cover to cover. Obviously when you get good at it and know all the ins and outs you can speed it up. It's still not meant to be fast paced though, hence the slow aiming.

When I was saying fast pace I was referring to just the running system not just the whole cover system with it. I feel like I'm just playing a hiding game. I feel more energy when I'm playing GoW1 than GoW2. Like I said before it could just be me.

Its this whole "Bigger, Better, Faster, Badass" idea that was hyped around it. Yes, it is Bigger and Badass but, lacking the other two. Gears of War is suppose to be a very fast paced game but, not like Unreal Tournament fast, correct? I really do feel like I'm going as fast as I could in Halo 1 with the running system in Gears 2 compared to Gears 1.

I don't remember hearing that...

No I don't remember Epic ever describing GoW1/2 as fast paced :unsure:

In fact, it's supposed to be played at a slower pace where you are running from cover to cover. Obviously when you get good at it and know all the ins and outs you can speed it up. It's still not meant to be fast paced though, hence the slow aiming.

Regardless of the argument, it still is a cover based game.

Just got done playing with my friends and we had a good solid 2 hour session. All my friends use the shotgun except for me and the shotgun was used constantly in all most every game we played. So sure its buggy, but saying you can't use it effectively as in Gears 1 is tough. My friends use it just fine and don't complain about it. I for one, enjoy Gears 2's multiplayer. Instead of stupid roll-shoot-repeat shotgun duels, you actually have to work getting a kill.

I just don't like how when I start the chainsaw, it gives them like a few seconds for them to melee you. I've been killed like that sooo many times. I don't see how it's fair when I start the melee first, and how that counters it.

I just don't like how when I start the chainsaw, it gives them like a few seconds for them to melee you. I've been killed like that sooo many times. I don't see how it's fair when I start the melee first, and how that counters it.

Kind of confused by what your saying but it sounds like you want the chainsaw to be instantly brought up the second you hit B? The chainsaw has to rev up and that is just part of using the gun. If you hit them with it they are dead, but you are exposed when you rev it up. With melee weapons, you damage them and have to finish them off without having to "rev" your weapon. Seems like a fair trade off to me.

Kind of confused by what your saying but it sounds like you want the chainsaw to be instantly brought up the second you hit B? The chainsaw has to rev up and that is just part of using the gun. If you hit them with it they are dead, but you are exposed when you rev it up. With melee weapons, you damage them and have to finish them off without having to "rev" your weapon. Seems like a fair trade off to me.

I mean I've already revved my chainsaw, so it's in the air, and I'm right infront of the opponent. Just when I think my chainsaw move is sucessful, he melee me.

Gears Of War 2 combustible map pack will be available at 12PM PST

No idea what time that for us in the UK.

I refuse to buy until the "PATCH" is out. Of course, I'm assuming it will have a cost.

Originally Posted by x WHiCKER x

Hopefully my post gets read but either way here are my thoughts.

1. First i found the blast radius (frag, smoke) and down time (smoke grenades) to be very inconsistent.

2. The shotgun is much more balanced than before but now it seems if you blind fire without host your shots hit your feet rendering it useless.

3. Chainsaw is unstoppable, this must fixed, perhaps but lowering the chainsaw for any damage taken (1 pistol shot even). or maybe you could only chainsaw someone if you would rev with the R trigger at a precise moment (chainsaw duels would still occur without revving)

4. the sniper active 1 shot downs have been taken off witch is perfect but now unless you have active reload its almost impossible to get a head shot (unless you have host). Ive seen blood fly off peoples noses and the did not die.

5. Using a smoke grenade to get outside of a map.

6. Using the boomshield to jump through doors (pavilion) or down from sniper on DAY ONE

7. Boomshield/Meatshield any-weapon glitch. the boom shield or meatshield can be picked up and used with any weapon desired.

8. flamethrower glitches (roadie running while shooting, shooting while downed)

9. Simultaneous beat downs are random, there should be a system determining who actually hit first.

10. "2-piece" or beatdown-shotty is over used and i believe we could fix this by making you still be able to shoot while stunned from the beatdown but you wouldn't be aiming at the same place as you were before the beatdown. This would make the "2-piece" maneuver more of a risk and somewhat preventable yet still possible.

11. Weapons should only re-spawn once or twice per round, the amount of grenades used is ridiculous.

That's about all i can think of right now. hopefully epic sees this as i believe its a pretty good list of things to consider. feel free to email me for suggestions or modifications.

Post

What I've been saying for the most part.

I hope you mean AM

PST is GMT - 8 so 12 PM PST is 8 PM GMT. Unless you meant 12 AM in which case it would be 8:00 AM GMT. I'm sure you meant 12:00 AM, as it would be strange for something like a map pack to launch at noon. Midnight seems more likely, so 8:00 AM GMT.

Just logged into xbox live; it is 800 points for 3 maps!

Pretty bullsh*t if you ask me, they can go f*ck themselves till they patch the game!

lol yep. They got enough time in that month and a half to make three maps but they can't make the multiplayer actually playable.

EDIT: lmao, just noticed one of the maps is Fuel Station. For ****s sake, what is it with developers charging for remakes?

Edited by what

Before you begin reading this please let me state that this is my own personal opinion which is neither right nor wrong, there is however certain facts contained within it which are true. Please if you wish to comment on what I have said, feel free but please do so without trying to argue and tell me that I am stupid and wrong etc..

OK then lets compare it to the map pack from Gears of War which was 800 points when it first came out:

So first of all they gave us 4 maps not 3. We had:

Subway - Good map just ruined by people glitching out of the map.

Garden - Decent(ish) just not played by many people.

Process - Enjoyable map, well rounded with a reasonably symmetrical layout.

Bullet Marsh - Personally, I thought that this was pretty awful and boring, a lot of sitting back due to the two snipers at each end.

But lets not forget that we got an extra 250 achievement points to go for and they also gave us a new game mode Annex - OK so annex is sh*t but thats beside the point.

Four months later the maps were made free!

Before that map pack came out we had two maps come out for free because they were sponsored by someone the name eludes me. The two maps were:

Old Bones - Great map, loved it, wasn't popular enough though.

Raven Down - Small each team was split into four separte spawns, two for each team, the only pickup was frags, interesting but not my cup of tea, the host effectively owned this map and guaranteed his team the win if they were even a little bit good.

Now onto the new map pack which Epic have the audacity to charge us 800 points for 5 weeks after the game is released; in a broken state I herby add, which has yet to be rectified!

Fuel Station is pretty much taken from the level in Gears 1 where you pick the junker [the car thingy you drive] up from with the stranded bloke!

Gold Rush was in the PC version of Gears 1!

Flood is pretty much the only completely new map, where it features imulsion as an environmental hazard.

I say that we all boycott this map pack until the game is at least patched, because this new addition does not even represent value for money!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!