[Official] Far Cry 2


Recommended Posts

Yeah, I'd have to say, Far Cry 2 is utterly amazing so far. It beats STALKER for atmosphere, and that game has that shizzle down pat. It actually runs fairly smooth on my 6600 rig here, everything on low of course. I think I may be able to knock a few items to medium though, woooo.

I'm playing with everything on the highest settings with a 9800GTX+ and 2 Gigs of ram, and never going below 30 fps. Also the first time I saw my first pale yellow Dune Buggy I near orgasmed at how quickly I could jet across the country now.

HD4850: I had to turn shadows to medium. Some areas dipped below 30fps....bah! Let me know how it runs for you guys in the desert areas...

I noticed something VERY odd with the graphics settings. Lowering some settings yielded LOWER frame rates. wtf? o_O

How do I get past Mike's bar, won't let me do anything except buy guns and upgrades

Did you get the mission to go to the bar? :p

You know I was planning on skipping Far Cry 2 (loved the first one but) as it looks extremely boring, have to say though after seeing some more screenies of the other environments in the game, my interest has been rekindled :) I was thinking of getting it on either the PS3 or 360 so I can play it maxed out, but I think I'll go PC instead :happy:

It's turning out to be an expensive month I think :p (planning on getting RA3 next week too) ah well, can never have too many games :D :laugh:

EDIT: On second though, I'm waiting for a demo (if there is even going to be one?) and see how well/bad it runs on my PC. I've already bought one game* that looked awesome, but was hugely disappointed when I took it home and it was unplayable on any setting on my PC :/ (I did check the system requirements and my PC did meet and even exceed some of them - but the thing is system requirements are purely a guide and not a guarantee it will even work).

* = No it wasn't Crysis :p that runs not too bad...well till you get to the ice levels, then it's a different ball game.

Edited by Xerxes

^ heh, it wasn't Crysis but Crysis didn't run too bad? What game was it then? :p

FC2 is not based on the Crysis engine and it seems to scale a lot better to older systems. There's tons of graphical settings you can tweak.

BTW, the AI in this game is dumb as hell. I've had enemies just stand around while I butchered their buddies. Canon fodder!!

Edited by sin-ergy
^ heh, it wasn't Crysis but Crysis didn't run too bad? What game was it then? :p

FC2 is not based on the Crysis engine and it seems to scale a lot better to older systems. There's tons of graphical settings you can tweak.

BTW, the AI in this game is dumb as hell. I've had enemies just stand around while I butchered their buddies. Canon fodder!!

haha yeah but the crysis ai isn't any better seems to be a problem with these new games. F.E.A.R had awesome A.I. wihs more games would work harder on ai intelligence instead of making them take 20 hits to kill like fc2 and crysis.

Overall though far cry 2 is a REALLY great game. I am having a blast with it. It looks beatiful and runs on ultra settings on my 9600gt with 2xaa. IMO even though the graphics aren't as good as crysis. The wolr feels more "real" and lifelike. This is one of the most immersive games I have ever played.

haha yeah but the crysis ai isn't any better seems to be a problem with these new games. F.E.A.R had awesome A.I. wihs more games would work harder on ai intelligence instead of making them take 20 hits to kill like fc2 and crysis.

Havent played Far Cry 2 but IMHO AI in current games struggle with open door environments. You can add HL2 to the list of games where I thought the AI wasn't brilliant and I've long held the oppinion that HL1's AI was more effective. Not really because HL1's was more adept or technically advanced, it wasn't...but the closed environments with plenty of cover and walls to bounce grenades off gave the AI more chance to react sensibly to threats.

In many cases in HL2 and Crysis I found the AI really had no option to stand there and shoot at you simply because the environment doesn't offer them a huge amount of cover and until the AI learns to lean against trees or go prone in bushes ect then it'll continue to stand there like cannon fodder in open maps.

Not saying they can't be better, but I think they have to make the computer players movement options alot more flexible when it comes to open world games because they cant simply use ducking behind a wall as an example of good AI and effective cover.

Even Fears outdoor areas were largely designed quite similar to the indoor ones for instance with lots of huge structures for the AI to duck behind.

Anyway, think my copy ships today.

^ heh, it wasn't Crysis but Crysis didn't run too bad? What game was it then? :p

FC2 is not based on the Crysis engine and it seems to scale a lot better to older systems. There's tons of graphical settings you can tweak.

BTW, the AI in this game is dumb as hell. I've had enemies just stand around while I butchered their buddies. Canon fodder!!

Could of sworn it was the Crytek engine. but meh. Far as I was aware it runs on the Dunia engine which was/is a heavily modded version of the engine used in Crysis (Crytek)

^ heh, it wasn't Crysis but Crysis didn't run too bad? What game was it then? :p

FC2 is not based on the Crysis engine and it seems to scale a lot better to older systems. There's tons of graphical settings you can tweak.

BTW, the AI in this game is dumb as hell. I've had enemies just stand around while I butchered their buddies. Canon fodder!!

Crysis runs well (on low settings mind you) is what I meant :p

World in Conflict was the game I was referring to, Crysis runs better then it does....was quite disappointed.

Just started playing it, runs very smoothly, anyone tried it in very high settings with an 8800 GT DX10? Still does have that same annoyning problem when it doesnt start at full screen and you have to press alt+enter, maybe it uses a similar engine to asassin's creed

obviously you must of installed the wrong game and didn't bother paying attention to the last years worth of Developer videos

Wait, let me see my check list.

1. Install the correct game - CHECK

2. Pay attention to the last years worth of Developer videos - CHECK

3. Have the same taste and opinions on games as notuptome2004 - FAIL

I'll try and do better next time.

Having problems running this properly, but its not the video, its the sound.

I cant hear any reload animations, phone conversations (the phone ringing either) and other sound anomalies. Also, if an NPC is talking, I can only hear them in either the right or the left channel only (depending where my crosshair is).

I'm using it with an Audigy SE on vista x32. Any thoughts?

It really takes the fun out and has made it unplayable for me.

Also, sorry if its been posted by theres a hotfix for this game if you got an ATI card.

The information in this article applies to the following configuration(s):

* Far Cry 2

* Radeon? HD 4800 series

* Radeon? HD 4600 series

* Radeon? HD 3800 series

* Radeon? HD 3600 series

* Radeon? HD 3400 series

* Radeon? HD 2900 series

* Radeon? HD 2600 series

* Radeon? HD 2400 series

* Radeon? X1950 series

* Radeon? X1900 series

* Radeon? X1800 series

* Radeon? X1650 series

* Radeon? X1600 series

* Windows Vista 32-bit Edition

* Windows Vista 64-bit Edition

* Windows XP Professional

* Windows XP Home Edition

* Windows XP Media Center Edition

* Windows XP Professional x64 Edition

This hotfix

* Improves performance for the DirectX 9 version of Far Cry 2 on CrossFire? compatible systems

* Improves performance for the DirectX 10 version of Far Cry 2 on both single and CrossFire? compatible systems

Far Cry 2 XP HotFix (includes XP 32-bit and 64-bit)

Far Cry 2 Vista HotFix (includes Vista 32-bit and 64-bit)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      599
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!