[Official] Call of Duty: World at War


Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
Building on the success of Map Pack 1 and Map Pack 2, we?ve decided to continue support for CoDWaW and announce the upcoming release of Map Pack 3. Today, we?re happy to bring you the first details.

Call of Duty: World at War Map Pack 3 further expands the awesome COD multiplayer experience with four brand new maps.

Fight for ocean territory in "Battery," an armored island surrounded by anti-ship mines and shore to ship cannons. Watch out for sniper fire as you defend Russia's most coveted resource in "Revolution," and keep a sharp eye out through the dense, overcast city streets in "Breach," set at Berlin's historic Brandenburg Gate. Zombies return in all their undead glory with "Der Riese" (Zombie Factory), a Nazi research facility featuring the weapon upgrading Pack-A-Punch Machine. Use the teleporters to escape in an instant and fight to the death in pursuit of the map's 10 new Achievements/Trophies.

Map Pack 3 is slated for release this August. Keep an eye out here at CoDWaW.com for more information regarding Map Pack 3, and follow @JD_2020 on Twitter for the latest news as it breaks!

Map Pack 3 inbound with 10 new achievements/trophies (:

Wow, they are really pumping out the DLC for WaW.

I wonder how far along these maps were to begin with when the game shipped though. Seems odd they released Map pack 2 and now 3 what, 2 months apart?

But I guess when your map packs sell 2+ million copies, you make more, fast lol

Because their time is limited and now teh mighty IW are coming back.

Basically they are scrapping together what they can to make the last few bucks before their POS is dropped faster than....something very fast.

Can't wait to see this game finally buried

Because their time is limited and now teh mighty IW are coming back.

Basically they are scrapping together what they can to make the last few bucks before their POS is dropped faster than....something very fast.

Can't wait to see this game finally buried

Me too. The SP was pretty good. It's no COD4, but it's still pretty good. The MP is complete garbage though.

Wow, they are really pumping out the DLC for WaW.

I wonder how far along these maps were to begin with when the game shipped though. Seems odd they released Map pack 2 and now 3 what, 2 months apart?

But I guess when your map packs sell 2+ million copies, you make more, fast lol

If you look at how poorly designed Treyarch's maps are, it's no surprise that they can pump them out pretty fast.

haha at the cod waw haters entering this thread with the usual dribble, if u dont like the game, fine, move along, no need to be in here

cod waw maps take a doo doo on cod4 maps.... yes, i took it there. if u want to know what the majority of cod gamers think then just look at the online stats released every week by microsoft

p.s. i will be downloading and most likely enjoying these maps - day 1

So should I get this on PC or xbox?

If you've got a good PC, definitely buy it for PC. You can grab copies of COD:WAW on eBay for less than $20 USD, and the map packs are free! You just have to wait a couple months after they're released for the consoles..

Does World at War, like the Modern Warfare PC version store profiles locally along with ranks and all this crap? Because that was so massively fail you couldn't even begin to understand it - Servers were also filled to the brim, way above the 'proper' max level with some insane rules! If it's still like that I highly suggest the console version, despite being a PC buff. The console version is a lot more consistent.

Yes it stores them locally like MW.

As for the servers, don't blame the PC version because the 360 can't do more than 24 players on a server with it's P2P system without collapsing in on itself Sethos :) (and yes, I know there are a few games with more players, but those are dedicated servers)

The PC version can support up to 64 players (most are 32 or 48 though) and play fine. The only problem with the higher numbers on the PC is the amount of spawn points. This is a problem I'll agree, but it's not something that ruins the MP experience.

As for which version to get? That's up to you personally. There are a ton of FREE map packs (especially zombie map packs) for WaW PC, and some of them are amazingly good. The community is much bigger on the 360 obviously (which is sad) but hey, can't win em all. Either way, would you rather play it on a console with a controller, or on the PC with a mouse and keyboard? And would you rather pay money for maps, or get them ALL for free on PC? Not to mention all the custom made content you get on PC also.

Yes it stores them locally like MW.

As for the servers, don't blame the PC version because the 360 can't do more than 24 players on a server with it's P2P system without collapsing in on itself Sethos :) (and yes, I know there are a few games with more players, but those are dedicated servers)

The PC version can support up to 64 players (most are 32 or 48 though) and play fine. The only problem with the higher numbers on the PC is the amount of spawn points. This is a problem I'll agree, but it's not something that ruins the MP experience.

As for which version to get? That's up to you personally. There are a ton of FREE map packs (especially zombie map packs) for WaW PC, and some of them are amazingly good. The community is much bigger on the 360 obviously (which is sad) but hey, can't win em all. Either way, would you rather play it on a console with a controller, or on the PC with a mouse and keyboard? And would you rather pay money for maps, or get them ALL for free on PC? Not to mention all the custom made content you get on PC also.

Wait, they released the map packs free on the PC but charged on consoles? LOL

In fact I think I've read that before, but still it gives me as a big a LOL as it probably did then as it does again now.

God damnit, console online gaming has so much going for it, but at times it's just sad of some of the BS that is pulled in comparison to the PC. Bend over console gamers, so it'll be MW2 ?55 RRP, have to pay for every map pack compared to PC probably ?35 RRP, and free map packs?

Also, isn't map size an issue with 64 players? I assume the maps are the same size as on the console. When playing with that many people you really need big maps. I love playing with a lot of people, hides how **** I usually a:laugh:h: But on cramped maps it sucks.

And yes, AB you didn't know all the maps are free on PC? Sure we gotta wait a month or so later, but it's all free for us baby! The only reason why I bought the map pack for WaW (the 2nd one) was that none of my friends on PC play WaW nor will they anytime soon, and there are a ton of people playing it on the 360. So I figured, eh why not.

The maps are fine size wise with 64 players really on PC. It's just the amount of spawn points as I mentioned. Other than that, the SMALL maps like that one map in MW I can't remember that's just used as a deathmatch map and to rank up mainly. That's insane with 64 players lol

Yes it stores them locally like MW.

As for the servers, don't blame the PC version because the 360 can't do more than 24 players on a server with it's P2P system without collapsing in on itself Sethos :) (and yes, I know there are a few games with more players, but those are dedicated servers)

The PC version can support up to 64 players (most are 32 or 48 though) and play fine. The only problem with the higher numbers on the PC is the amount of spawn points. This is a problem I'll agree, but it's not something that ruins the MP experience.

As for which version to get? That's up to you personally. There are a ton of FREE map packs (especially zombie map packs) for WaW PC, and some of them are amazingly good. The community is much bigger on the 360 obviously (which is sad) but hey, can't win em all. Either way, would you rather play it on a console with a controller, or on the PC with a mouse and keyboard? And would you rather pay money for maps, or get them ALL for free on PC? Not to mention all the custom made content you get on PC also.

Oh don't you go try lecturing me on Console vs PC network infrastructure because you already got a few things wrong ;)

The maps are way too small for anything above 18 players and it DOES ruin the game because it turns into a tard-clickfest with no organization at all. Thankfully you can filter servers but that doesn't help much when you hit a 'low point' of the day and only those massive servers are populated with your preferred settings.. It's the reason why I started to love Consoles in the first place, the technical limitations of the console was actually helping in creating an organized, consistent environment where you know the server you're joining is running a default set of rules and a reasonable amount of players to keep the game at a decent pace.

Not to mention the rampant cheating on the PC that just ruins your day.

haha at the cod waw haters entering this thread with the usual dribble, if u dont like the game, fine, move along, no need to be in here

cod waw maps take a doo doo on cod4 maps.... yes, i took it there. if u want to know what the majority of cod gamers think then just look at the online stats released every week by microsoft

p.s. i will be downloading and most likely enjoying these maps - day 1

You mean the same one where Halo 3 is at the top week after week, oh yeahhhh :cool:

  • 2 weeks later...
key word was 'cod players'

in cod u can shoot someone from 1 end to the other end of almost every map with the assault rifle, thats lame

LIVE Activity for week of July 27th

Xbox 360 Top LIVE Titles (based on UU?s)

1 Halo 3

2 Call of Duty 4

3 Call of Duty: WaW

4 Gears of War 2

5 GTA IV

6 Battlefield 1943

7 Marvel vs. Capcom 2

8 1 vs 100

9 FIFA 09

10 Left 4 Dead

The top 3 stays the same every week, sometimes they get shuffled a bit, the fact that modern warfare has been out a year longer and is still being played that much means enough to me.

I didn't buy it. Most of the new maps get vetoed 9 out of 10 times. I rather spend my money on MW2 when that comes out.

That sucks, having to pay for maps then not being able to play on them is single handedly the lamest thing about consoles/matchmaking systems. Devs really need to have server browsers if they're going to charge you for maps, or do a matchmaking/server browser combo.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!