Officially Detailed Firmware Updates: PS3 (v2.50) / PSP (v5.00)


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, as Eric mentioned in his post yesterday, we wanted to give you a live demo of the PSP’s direct access to PlayStation Store, which will be coming with the 5.00 firmware update. Now whenever your PSP is connected to the Internet over WiFi, you’ll be able to download and enjoy the latest games, demos and trailers on the go without needing to sync up to your PS3 or PC. Here’s a brief walk-through of what you’ll experience.

On a related note, the PS3 firmware update (2.50) will add Flash Player 9 support to the PS3 Web browser, so you’ll be able to actually watch this video (and all of our blog videos) on your PS3 once the firmware goes live!

In addition, I want to point out that the PlayStation Network is scheduled to be unavailable in North America today from 11AM to 4PM PST due to essential maintenance work.

Video of Grace Chen showing off PSN store on PSP: http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/10/14/...n-store-on-psp/

PS Blog video support on the PS3 (due to Flash9) is just part of the whole blog being integrated to work on the PS3 I think...

Just been playing with the new update myself and i like some of the new changes/improvements.

The annoying battery overlay over the time is a pain but i am sure they will fix it soon enough.

I do like the auto-off on controllers. This will come in handy when i go off somewhere.

Just been playing with the new update myself and i like some of the new changes/improvements.

The annoying battery overlay over the time is a pain but i am sure they will fix it soon enough.

I do like the auto-off on controllers. This will come in handy when i go off somewhere.

The same bug that has been there since they added the battery overlay ? doesn't sound like fixing it is a priority :p

The same bug that has been there since they added the battery overlay ? doesn't sound like fixing it is a priority :p

I am giving hope ok!

Some of the bugs & missing features that haven't been included from day one have been pretty poor it must be said.

They are starting to finally sort things out but i think it is alittle too late when this could of been done well over a year ago.

I am giving hope ok!

Some of the bugs & missing features that haven't been included from day one have been pretty poor it must be said.

They are starting to finally sort things out but i think it is alittle too late when this could of been done well over a year ago.

Too late for who?

So now Flash 9 has gone PPC, I wonder if we'll start seeing it on the 360 and Wii :p

Yeah the Wii should get it soon!

Too late for who?

Erm....Everyone?

Auto off controllers should of been there day one. Trophies aswell arriving far far too late. Yes it's there now but it wasn't from the start was it?

That is why i branded v2.50 = v1.0 because that is essentially what this is.

Erm....Everyone?

Auto off controllers should of been there day one. Trophies aswell arriving far far too late. Yes it's there now but it wasn't from the start was it?

That is why i branded v2.50 = v1.0 because that is essentially what this is.

Everyone meaning yourself and some others?

Lots of happy people here not running around calling this 1.0, beta, saying why isn't PS3 a 360?

A good point was made earlier on the controllers - Auto off controllers would've been nicer earlier, but it wasn't as much a deal breaker as every PS3 controller is rechargeable. If they were batteries, you'd be costing people money. Still should've came sooner, no doubts, but the fuss you're making over it NOW we have it, is strange.

2.50 does not equal 1.0, stop being stupid and trolling firmware threads.

I guess when 3.0 and/or Home hit's it's 1.1? :sleep:

You're so caught up in the past it's not funny, and all the snarky comments from you/others each time we get a FW update, really show out people :whistle:

Edited by Audioboxer
Everyone meaning yourself and some others?

Lots of happy people here not running around calling this 1.0, beta, saying why isn't PS3 a 360?

A good point was made earlier on the controllers - Auto off controllers would've been nicer earlier, but it wasn't as much a deal breaker as every PS3 controller is rechargeable. If they were batteries, you'd be costing people money. Still should've came sooner, no doubts, but the fuss you're making over it NOW we have it, is strange.

2.50 does not equal 1.0, stop being stupid and trolling firmware threads.

I guess when 3.0 and/or Home hit's it's 1.1? :sleep:

You're so caught up in the past it's not funny, and all the snarky comments from you/others each time we get a FW update, really show out people :whistle:

Do you also mean yourself and some others aswell?

Please Audio, get off your high horse. We have had the firmware for less than a few hours and you are telling me everything is fine and dandy? Yeah ok, we know you love your PS3 so much it is impossible for you to actually say one bad thing about the system. I like the PS3 aswell but this late delay on features in inexcusable and had to be there day one. Yes PS3/PSN has evolved but a little late i would say.

Sony should of been focusing more actually sorting out the software side of things before rolling out the system because, if you look back to the intial launch, the system has almost nothing.

Me and others? Great. I just love to be singled out.

any word on performance and stability?

Fine so far, but don't really notice any improvements on performance :/

Store loaded a bit faster but that might just be my internet connection working well.

Do you also mean yourself and some others aswell?

Please Audio, get off your high horse. We have had the firmware for less than a few hours and you are telling me everything is fine and dandy? Yeah ok, we know you love your PS3 so much it is impossible for you to actually say one bad thing about the system. I like the PS3 aswell but this late delay on features in inexcusable and had to be there day one. Yes PS3/PSN has evolved but a little late i would say.

Sony should of been focusing more actually sorting out the software side of things before rolling out the system because, if you look back to the intial launch, the system has almost nothing.

Me and others? Great. I just love to be singled out.

I'm questioning how it's too late, you're still not giving me much ground on that.

What's my reasoning?

Only 14-15 million users, less than 2 years into a long lifespan. Getting this **** sorted out before mass market buy in is key.

Things are ramping up fairly quickly, especially this year.

You unfortunately as I said are so caught up in the past, it doesn't seem to matter when your PS3 evolves, you just keep talking about launch, day 1, firmware 1.0. Dunno why, but carry on.

Being late isn't to be let off the hook, but fixing/improving has to be applauded to some extent in my books, you can't just bash bash bash for the past.

NXE looks superior to old Dash IMO, but I'm not going to go guns blazing saying MS should have had it since day 1.

These systems evolve over time, and the PS3 does not equal a 360, they launched at different stages in where they wanted to be. 360 arguably ahead in that plan than the PS3, no doubts.

Yeah ok, we know you love your PS3 so much it is impossible for you to actually say one bad thing about the system.

No need for this at all.

But again, just showing how some members around here act.

I'm questioning how it's too late, you're still not giving me much ground on that.

What's my reasoning?

Only 14-15 million users, less than 2 years into a long lifespan. Getting this **** sorted out before mass market buy in is key.

Things are ramping up fairly quickly, especially this year.

You unfortunately as I said are so caught up in the past, it doesn't seem to matter when your PS3 evolves, you just keep talking about launch, day 1, firmware 1.0. Dunno why, but carry on.

Being late isn't to be let off the hook, but fixing/improving has to be applauded to some extent in my books, you can't just bash bash bash for the past.

NXE looks superior to old Dash IMO, but I'm not going to go guns blazing saying MS should have had it since day 1.

These systems evolve over time.

I am talking about basic features here. NXE is completely different. Its an entirely dash overhaul and somehow MS have managed to get it together is a space of 6ish months while Sony on the other hand need 3+ years for Home and it still will be in beta. Point is, the reason why PS3 had so many firmware updates 1/2 times a month is because of the 'missing features' they have 1)planned 2)decide to implement later on.

I am all for evolution, And I am really pleased the way Sony have brought the system up to the level of 360 almost, That they can be credited for. But i would of been even more impresssed if they did most of this last year but they didn't. They were still stuck in their 'HD starts when we are ready' and thought they were in no rush to do anything special and now look!? trying to compete with MS because they were falling behind. That is the only reason why PSN went free to begin with.

When Sony release PS4 i would like them to get the software/features/services up and running before attempting to rush the console out so early. You can say MS rushed 360 which they did and suffered from it with RLOD, But the services were already well into place e.g Achievements/Live/Friends List etc.

No need for this at all.

But again, just showing how some members around here act.

Oh come on. You have already stated your intensions which one you prefer. Not that i would hold it against you, but its evident.

I am talking about basic features here. NXE is completely different. Its an entire dash overhaul and somehow MS have managed to get it together is a space of 6ish months while Sony on the other hand need 3+ years for Home and it still will be in beta. Point is, the reason why PS3 had so many firmware updates 1/2 times a month is because of the 'missing features' they have 1)planned 2)decide to implement later on.

I am all for evolution, And I am really pleased the way Sony have brought the system up to the level of 360 almost, That they can be credited for. But i would of been even more impresssed if they did most of this last year but they didn't. They were still stuck in their 'HD starts when we are ready' and though they were in no rush to do anything special and now look!? trying to compete with MS because they were falling behind. That is the only reason why PSN went free to begin with.

When Sony release PS4 i would like them to get the software/features/services up and running before attempting to rush the console out so early. You can say MS rushed 360 which they did and suffered from it with RLOD, But the services were already well into place e.g Achievements/Live/Friends List etc.

NXE does not = Home.

Different services, different scopes.

I don't think many are going to say NXE is a larger scale project to try and deliver successfully than Home (and no, that is in NO way a comment on quality). Not excusing Home delays, but if you don't have a project on the scale of Home polished and ready to go, launching will be a terrible mistake.

PSN sufficiently competes with Live IMO, one will probably always be better, or at least always preferred. Try getting a 50/50 on preference vote on any gaming board and I'll be surprised.

Point is both will move at their own pace, make their own changes and become their own individual services. They do not equal each other and will deliver things at different times, based on importance scales for each other. I just pointed out how chargeable controllers made auto off slightly less important for Sony than MS (who while having charge packs launched with batteries), doesn't mean you can slack off, but it's to point out each console will have varying levels or priority for things.

This console generation is young, which is why I don't understand all the "time is out" comments.

The 360 is having it's big overhaul in it's 3rd year, Sony seemingly in their 2nd - Although yeah, Sony do need it earlier due to launching a more primitive service.

Oh come on. You have already stated your intensions which one you prefer. Not that i would hold it against you, but its evident.

Yes, but the way you aimed that comment at me suggested I'm somehow in the wrong for having preference.

I enjoy all 3 of my platforms and look for the good in each, or else I'd of sold what I didn't want.

I'm critical of missing elements/bugs/inefficient aspects of services, but I'm quick to forget if they're fixed to a high standard within what I deem a suitable time frame I guess.

You can say MS rushed 360 which they did and suffered from it with RLOD, But the services were already well into place e.g Achievements/Live/Friends List etc.

Which yeah is a fair analogy.

MS fixed hardware issues, should be commended, and people should move on. Get your existing 360 fixed - for free/Buy a new 360 RROD "proof" and why should you waste your time reveling in the past?

Sony are fixing software issues, should be commended, and people should move on, or at least get ready to move on since "launch day". Buy a new PS3/update your existing and why should you waste your time reveling in the past?

I think both of them are getting it sorted out in very fair time scales in relation to where the generation is (see above, install bases a fraction of what they will be, 2/3 years out of a possible 10 year cycle), which I guess is why I'm saying what I'm saying.

edit: I do realize once hardware is fixed, it's fixed. Software is on an ongoing improvement scale, but still Sony have shown great strides and improvements and a picture is clear of where they would like to go, still have to wait a bit longer to see if that's where they end up - So yeah you still have to be critical of the OS on the PS3 and ask for more (where as criticism isn't needed of the 360 hardware anymore), but I think you're going way off track with comments like 2.50 = 1.0, or 2.50 = what should have been in since day 1.

Edited by Audioboxer
A good point was made earlier on the controllers - Auto off controllers would've been nicer earlier, but it wasn't as much a deal breaker as every PS3 controller is rechargeable. If they were batteries, you'd be costing people money. Still should've came sooner, no doubts, but the fuss you're making over it NOW we have it, is strange.

Ever heard of rechargeable batteries/play and charge kit? :p

It was still a pain having to plug in your controller so often :/ finally it's fixed (Y)

Ever heard of rechargeable batteries/play and charge kit? :p

It was still a pain having to plug in your controller so often :/ finally it's fixed (Y)

Yeah I commented on that in my post :p

And yeah, no doubts, was a pain.

I just pointed out how chargeable controllers made auto off slightly less important for Sony than MS (who while having charge packs launched with batteries), doesn't mean you can slack off, but it's to point out each console will have varying levels or priority for things.

PS3 chargeable controllers were with everything, MS charge packs were an optional expense (although I dunno about new SKUs?).

PS3 chargeable controllers were with everything, MS charge packs were an optional expense (although I dunno about new SKUs?).

Yeah, still optional. I bought one once for my first 360, 15? with NiMH batteries. A friend of mine bought a cheaper one from another brand, came with a lithium battery and allowed for mini USB charging instead of MS's proprietary connector.

Now I'm using standard rechargeable batteries, still deciding if I'm gonna buy another one of those.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!