Recommended Posts

I have a 28 Inch TV, the old fashioned kind, and I won't be upgrading to HDTV til that one is dead. When I do it'll probably be to maximum 37 Inch HDTV and only then will I consider BluRay because I don't think I'd notice any difference with DVDs on my current TV.

I posted the article because it's fun to read all the arguments! Downloads, I don't think will work because I can't see us being allowed to burn our movies to disc when our chosen movie service decides to shut up shop and invalidate the DRM used.

I believe HD Downloads will be like what PayPerView is to DVD/VHS etc.

I remember when PPV started here, all the video clubs were ******* their pants because they thought they would be destroyed by PPV. They are still around.

And as like other people pointed out, bandwidth concerns. Many more ISPs have caps now than before, because of the increased amount of people on the networks and the increased traffic, partly stemming from places like YouTube. In order to be able to handle HD streaming to the general population and sustain a heavy user base that could be competitive to physical media, would require major upgrades to the ISP and would make the services a lot more expensive. Honestly I don't see streaming being as huge a hit as some may think. Even if they stream it over the net and it was like HD PayPerView, through cable and satellite providers, again, PPV didn't destroy regular VHS/DVD.

I am a collector, owning over 400 movies/series (yes, all originals) because like like having my shelves displaying all my movies. I have bought many that I haven't even watched yet. There are also many others like me. Cutting off physical collectible media, will probably affect sales.

BluRay may survive, I do notice a difference between BluRay and upscaled DVD, but for me so far is hasn't a huge enough deal to warrant a surchase of a player at the current prices. Not to mention the current state of the economy... luxury purchases are less of a priority.

the only way HD downloads will work in the US is that we have faster Dl capabilities (wich just now Quest has Fibre).... so until that day i see BLD on top. but then again most everybody won't (or doesn't care to) see the difference to the extreme enough to spend the money to upgrade to a full 1080p experience.

Honestly, I won't be satisfied with being able to download movies or stream them until I can get all of the extra features that would be on the disc as well. Take the Iron Man Blu-Ray release for example. The movie is badass. No doubt about that. But it also has a pretty impressive list of special features and extras on the 2nd disc that I'd be missing out on if I didn't have the disc. I mean yeah, it's great to have the movie, but what about the extras and special features? I really like to watch that stuff, especially when it's a movie I like. I like to see how it was filmed and how they made it.

HD Downloads with most ISPs setting monthly caps? Uh, no thanks. I likes my blu-ray discs.

That, and the fact that (right now) digital download in HD seems limited to 720p with a bitrate lower than what it should for great quality (picture & sound).

And I love to have a physical media in my hand. Even if I rip all my AudioCD, if my HDD fail, I still have my AudioCD as backup. Same goes for DVD and Blu-Ray.

I would not mind digital download for rental, but not for owning.

But the current price of Blu-Ray player (they slowly lowers in price) and the movies are going to kill the format. Each time I want to buy a Blu-Ray movie, it feels like I'm buying a Ferrari. BD movies for $26 to $40 here and most DVD, even new release, are MAX $20... Why?? It's the same f*ken movie.

I just think the prices of the movies need to come down a bit to increase the market share... you can pick up DVDs on sale for $10 but then the same movie on blu will be $20 or $25 ... thats a huge difference for your average customer to shell out... the die hards will pick up the blu because they know the differences... for now I stick to just renting the bluray movies...

I strongly disagree with that article. As more people are buying HDTVs, more people are starting to buy Blu-ray players because it's the only way you're going to watch true 1080p content. DVDs can only be upconverted and HD cables only shows 720p content to limit the bandwidth. Once February 2009 hits, trust me. I'll bet Blu-ray sales will skyrocket.

2 things wrong with that statement; you don't need 1080p on a smaller than 37" (some even say higher) display, and upconverting players are not limited to 720p. You're mis-stating the cable issue completely. HDMI will happily pass an upconverted signal.

its because nearly everything plays dvd's. fast forward 6 years and I wouldn't be suprised to find a BD-ROM drive in everything.

Problem is, most people can't see the advantages of HD over SD until someone shows them. With VHS->DVD the difference was a little more clear.

Frankly as the article states, BD is a niche market for the videophiles. and I agree it most likely will stay that way.

People just don't see any advantage over DVD, and for the regular person, there really isn't oh yeah.. clearer picture... well they don't really care. and with services like netflix and such, I don't see regular movie watchers going to pick up obscure disc formats they don't understand when they can just stream directly, SD or HD. It's a convenience thing.

generally i think its a "way should i upgrade" factor, thats the reason my aunty and mom wont upgrade, "Whats the point, its the same as DVD" When we went from VHS to DVD there was a physical change that people could relate to, "It's better! no moving parts and smaller"

Blu-Ray will definitely be around for quite some time. It will be a long while before HD downloads will catch on especially considering the time involved to download 1080p movies. The quality of what they are calling HD is a step up from SD but nothing true to the 1080p/Uncompressed Audio that Blu-Ray gives you, not to mention what IceBreakerG said about the extra features.

As for the Jean-Luc Picard comment: I don't remember them having too many external hard drives at this time: premiered the week of September 28, 1987, ended the week of May 23, 1994. And Yes I know it was supposed to be set in the future...

It will be a long while before HD downloads will catch on especially considering the time involved to download 1080p movies.

I beg to differ.

Seeing how widely 1080p movies are made available through the 'usual' channels and their current download size, about anyone with a decent ADSL2+ line in europe can get one of these in less than 2 hours.

I beg to differ.

Seeing how widely 1080p movies are made available through the 'usual' channels and their current download size, about anyone with a decent ADSL2+ line in europe can get one of these in less than 2 hours.

True, the people who have the proper connection and knowledge can get them fine but if the downloads are going out to the masses of people that are still learning how to get a decent internet connection and don't actually know what the numbers 1080 on the outside of their TV box means will have issues.

I talk to many customers about this, and they dont want to start buying bluray after already spending alot on DVD's.

Same for myself, i have tons of DVd's and still buy DVd's. im not even ready to switch over to bluray.

You do know that most Blu-ray player can upconvert to 1080p your DVD collection and will be able to play new BD movies...

You're not losing anything, you can still enjoy your DVD's. I have tons of them but I try to buy new movies on BD now.

Holy crap! LTD and I agree on something. :D

Jean-Luc Picard didn't carry around a external hard drive. Think about that.

Nope, but Captain Kirk was quite often seen using removable media that looked quite a bit like 3.5" floppy discs, and Geordi Laforge used similar media that was about the size of an original Sony Memory Stick or an average USB flash drive.

You know what ****es me off about all these kind of articles?

Why is it always OR? Blu Ray OR DVD. Blu Ray OR HD Downloads.

Journalists should take note of the use of "AND" for once.

Nothing is dieing, we're going to have multiple options for consumers on the market for many many many years to come. Options between physical and download, spanning over SD and HD.

Market Forecast

HD: Blu Ray AND HD Downloads

SD: DVD AND SD Downloads

If there's a market, Blu Ray will continue to exist. It absolutely does not need to become as popular as DVD did (in 3-4-5 years time physical/download may be at different %'s of the market due to broadband increases). Blu Ray is the only physical choice, if you genuinely think it's going to drop off the planet, what physical choice will there be? None. That wouldn't be very wise seeing as the physical market is essential....

Please just leave things the way they are, I like to have a physical choice, and a downloadable choice.

For everyone saying SD is enough, please understand some of us want HD and have money to spend on home entertainment.

For everyone saying HD should be enforced on everyone, please understand some people are happy with SD, or can't afford to make the leap yet.

But everyone understand we all want options, stop saying "or" all the time like the market can't support multiple consumer options. That quite frankly is ridiculous and leads to these sensationalist articles and 15 page forum topics of arguments because people fight the battle of "or", and are too ignorant to understand choice is essential.

Edited by Audioboxer
Holy crap! LTD and I agree on something. :D

Jean-Luc Picard didn't carry around a external hard drive. Think about that.

What about when Picard was Borg'd? I'm sure there was a hard drive somewhere.

I find it amazing how many threads there have been on this site about the death of BD. How come no one seems to mention that you have to buy a box for the same price as a BD Player to play all of those downloaded HD Movies? Or that the downloaded movies are missing all the extra stuff that you don't get if you have a Profile 1 player(which are cheap now) that everyone complains about over and over?

I beg to differ.

Seeing how widely 1080p movies are made available through the 'usual' channels and their current download size, about anyone with a decent ADSL2+ line in europe can get one of these in less than 2 hours.

sure sure..

but.. average speed is 3Mbps in Europe. At about 20euro x month.

so.. where exactly does the 2hour thing come from please?

also, BR rentals here have just upped the price from 5.25 to 5.50 euro (per day), so to be honest, my BR player will gather a lot of dust before I go back to watching BR. I could go for it (in principle) when the prices were the same, but if this is their strategy to make people embrace the technology, they wont be able to count on my support.

Netfix is where its at.

I have a netflix account with only Blu-ray movies. its Great. Lets admit it. Most movies you watch you wouldn't want to watch again. Take Iron Man for example. Fantastic one time watch. Wouldn't want to watch it again. But I did rent it via Netflix to watch on my home theater PC (Blu-ray upgraded / 42 inch TV. Works great. Watched it one night next day sent it back the next day ... 2 days later I got another one.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!