Recommended Posts

I just wish the price of the movies would come down. I picked up a player a few weeks ago for $300 and I'm happy with that. I went browsing through the movies at the local Best Buy and most are set at $29.95 or more. They're on sale for $24.95 for the first few days and then get jacked up again. I know everyone is trying to capitalize, but with DVDs still on the shelves, the distributors have got to make it worth my while to pick up the BluRay instead. They're price gouging themselves into oblivion.

I just wish the price of the movies would come down. I picked up a player a few weeks ago for $300 and I'm happy with that. I went browsing through the movies at the local Best Buy and most are set at $29.95 or more. They're on sale for $24.95 for the first few days and then get jacked up again. I know everyone is trying to capitalize, but with DVDs still on the shelves, the distributors have got to make it worth my while to pick up the BluRay instead. They're price gouging themselves into oblivion.

thats what got us in the credit crunch business. Greed.

*SIGH*

The REAL problem is exactly people are NOT letting DVD go!!! They think it's cheaper, but quality is now really bad! $16 for 480p Quality? I RATHER have a 6x Better quality for $10 more!!!

You CAN'T have a Cheap Blu-Ray right now, with still Expensive DVDs customers still Embracing Ignorantly!!!

It's just LOGIC and Common Sense man! (They can NOT be the same price, or close, and Never will with such difference in Quality!) Customer NEED to stop embracing SD DVDs, and then DEMAND Blu-ray prices to drop, then it will! :|

Edited by JediXAngel
I've never watched a movie via a Blu-Ray disk. I find it obserd to pay $45+ for a movie simply to get a little better quality. DVD's work fine for me and my family :).

$45+?? where are you getting those numbers from? even in retail stores theyre like $29.99, unless you go to the mall in those smaller stores where theyre a ridiculous $39.99.

i've never once paid more than $20 any HD DVD or Blu-ray movie i own. you have to be crafty and buy them during special sales or on ebay...

*SIGH*

The REAL problem is exactly people are NOT letting DVD go!!! They think it's cheaper, but quality is now really bad! $16 for 480p Quality? I RATHER have a 6x Better quality for $10 more!!!

You CAN'T have a Cheap Blu-Ray right now, with still Expensive DVDs customers still Embracing Ignorantly!!!

It's just LOGIC and Common Sense man! :|

ROFL

quality is NOW really bad? why? did someone go around and scratch all the DVDs in stores?

upscaling too much hassle?

to be honest BR quality is better, yes, but prices dont reflect the increment in quality at all, unless you're an enthusiast.

Where are you guys purchasing Blu-Ray movies for 45? I get them all for 29 at wal-mart unless it's a special boxed version. Every new movie (last few months) that I have purchased has come with a Digital DVD backup copy which I find very nice...

Digital downloads work great for music and lower quality movies, but until everyone is on fibre I don't see how downloading HD movies works... A vast majority of the united states is only on DSL/Cable granted that is fast, but not nearly the speeds you would want downloading such a large file... I hate downloading 4GB ISO and playing COD4 online.. just doesn't work at times..

Another great reason I love Blu-Ray movies is that my kids (under 5) can easily load up a movie and not SCRATCH it, unlike DVD. I can't tell you how many times I had to reburn a DVD (from backup) that they destoryed...

I like the ability to download content vs having to buy the full price for some crap I don't always need, but with the fact of it being bundled with a digital copy now, makes me sway my vote.

Where are you guys purchasing Blu-Ray movies for 45? I get them all for 29 at wal-mart unless it's a special boxed version. Every new movie (last few months) that I have purchased has come with a Digital DVD backup copy which I find very nice...

And I get Most for FREE-$25 :)

I have a hard time seeing the difference between a proper upscaled DVD and a BR/HD-DVD disc on my 42" Pioneer, so I'm not paying almost double for the same movie.

That is such a... you know what? I am not going to insult you just ... :no: Just look at these pictures...

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1070952

You tell me if it's even CLOSE!!!

And I get Most for FREE-$25 :)

That is such a... you know what? I am not going to insult you just ... :no: Just look at these pictures...

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1070952

You tell me if it's even CLOSE!!!

so.. you get them for free or 25$? and statistically you would represent what ... 0.001% of movie buyers?

.. besides, if the difference was SOO much,people would flock to the upgrade. wonder why they dont.

evidently they dont see the benefit versus the cost, me thinks.

Hahaha, oh please, upscaled DVDs look nothing like that unless you downloaded a DVD rip :rolleyes:

never said they do, but with an upscaling DVD being 29euro and positioning quality between SD and HD... i still think its the alternative the majority of people is going for these days.

And I get Most for FREE-$25 :)

That is such a... you know what? I am not going to insult you just ... :no: Just look at these pictures...

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1070952

You tell me if it's even CLOSE!!!

I agree with you to a point. I first saw those comparisons on this 24 inch monitor at a resolution of 1920 by 1200. You could defiantly tell the difference.

Then I was going to show my parents. They were sitting on the couch in front of my 42 720P TV. So I pulled them up on the TV with a resolution of 1280 by 720. I pulled them up and I was surprised. I could of swarn they looked a lot better when I saw them the first time. I mean the Blu-Ray picture did look sharper. So I think it depends on your resolution. The guy with the 42 inch really might not of seen that much difference. I think to really see the difference you have to go with a bigger TV 50+

so.. you get them for free or 25$? and statistically you would represent what ... 0.001% of movie buyers?

.. besides, if the difference was SOO much,people would flock to the upgrade. wonder why they dont.

evidently they dont see the benefit versus the cost, me thinks.

But only 1/4 of americans have even adopted HD in their homes so far... I do agree, most ppl are not going to purchase blu-ray at a high price right now, but that will change once everyone gets used to full HD content all the time. Half the broadcasts on TV are not all HD all the time, so I can't expect ppl to want HD or see an advantage when they don't have it thrown in their face all the time.

I agree with you to a point. I first saw those comparisons on this 24 inch monitor at a resolution of 1920 by 1200. You could defiantly tell the difference.

Then I was going to show my parents. They were sitting on the couch in front of my 42 720P TV. So I pulled them up on the TV with a resolution of 1280 by 720. I pulled them up and I was surprised. I could of swarn they looked a lot better when I saw them the first time. I mean the Blu-Ray picture did look sharper. So I think it depends on your resolution. The guy with the 42 inch really might not of seen that much difference. I think to really see the difference you have to go with a bigger TV 50+

Thank you.

The way the resolution is handled on the TV is very different from a PC monitor, hence why most comparisons are null and void because people just run the movies in VLC players and take a screenshot, here the difference is enormous due to PC monitors rely so much on native resolutions and lack proper upscaling.

A TV handles video sources so much better, specially in the upscaling department. Yes HD sources look great on my HD-Ready TV but an upscaled DVD doesn't look to shabby either.

On my PC monitor the difference between SD and HD is huge but on my TV the difference is tiny.

By the way, I'm talking 720p here, NOT 1080p in case anyone wonders.

Why is it so hard for people to understand that 720x480 is lower quality than 1920x1080? It's 6X more pixels.

Upscaling a DVD to 1080p is like going into Photoshop and doing a rescale of a 720x480 picture to 1920x1080. It's only better because it fits the native resolution of HDTV, but you don't get any new information. It's more pixels with filters and sharpening, nothing else. You can't have what's not there to begin with.

And lets not go on and on about compression ratio and bitrate. We all know that Internet download or streaming use aggressive compression and low bitrate and most are 720p max. So again, FAR from the quality found on a Blu-Ray disc.

NOW, the one and only problem with Blu-Ray is the cost. Cost of the player and movies. Unless it's now too hard to handle a physical media because we deal with a bunch of lazy people.....

Thank you.

The way the resolution is handled on the TV is very different from a PC monitor, hence why most comparisons are null and void because people just run the movies in VLC players and take a screenshot, here the difference is enormous due to PC monitors rely so much on native resolutions and lack proper upscaling.

A TV handles video sources so much better, specially in the upscaling department. Yes HD sources look great on my HD-Ready TV but an upscaled DVD doesn't look to shabby either.

On my PC monitor the difference between SD and HD is huge but on my TV the difference is tiny.

I agree, I enjoy upscaled DVDs from redbox on my PS3, but after I watch a Blu-Ray movie and pop in one of the kids DVD's it does look significantly different only because my eyes become acute to the higher quality... Now when I wait a few and watch another upscaled it's not to bad... But again this goes to my point, once HD because a standard on TV as it is, ppl may respect the higher quality, and it should be cheaper by then...

on a side note Even HDTV from comast doesn't have the same effect as Blu-Ray at times...

For me, I get my HD movies from premium channels and pay-pre-view. I have very little desire to watch a movie more than once. Frankly, the higher resolution doesn't help me enjoy the movie any more. The differences between VHS and DVD were like night and day. The differences between DVD and Bluray are pretty marginal to Joe the plummer.

Digitial Distribution over Blu Ray is dumb. Anyone who really cares about quality knows this. If you just like the bigger picture and nicer audio, sure its good enough, but the real quality obsessive people will want Blu Ray or until its successor comes. There's just too much compression done with digital downloads and digital cable boxes ect. Blu Ray is the only way to get the absolute best quality. So no its not dead, I buy Blu Ray movies all the time and rip them onto my mac (gotta use windows to do it though :angry:)

But for the sake of the argument, most people are perfectly happy with compressed HD, as few people are as obsessive as myself. Blu Ray will eventually die, but only to be replaced by a non disc format. Digital Downloads won't go away, and thats good, but I'll always opt for buying my HD movies/shows physically then overtheair. I hate discs as much as the next guy so I just rip em and then store the originals in my closet. :)

Also Shadrack, it depends on what your watching it on and what movie it is. Older movies I agree not a big impact, but newer ones meant for HD do look exceptional, but importantly all look much nicer on a large screen, the bottom line is the smaller it is, the more stretching required. Less stretching, better picture. But on a 20-40" screen you probably won't notice a massive difference between dvd to blu ray, but when you start getting into the 60-70" you really do.

Digitial Distribution over Blu Ray is dumb. Anyone who really cares about quality knows this. If you just like the bigger picture and nicer audio, sure its good enough, but the real quality obsessive people will want Blu Ray or until its successor comes. There's just too much compression done with digital downloads and digital cable boxes ect. Blu Ray is the only way to get the absolute best quality. So no its not dead, I buy Blu Ray movies all the time and rip them onto my mac (gotta use windows to do it though :angry:)

But for the sake of the argument, most people are perfectly happy with compressed HD, as few people are as obsessive as myself. Blu Ray will eventually die, but only to be replaced by a non disc format. Digital Downloads won't go away, and thats good, but I'll always opt for buying my HD movies/shows physically then overtheair. I hate discs as much as the next guy so I just rip em and then store the originals in my closet. :)

Also Shadrack, it depends on what your watching it on and what movie it is. Older movies I agree not a big impact, but newer ones meant for HD do look exceptional, but importantly all look much nicer on a large screen, the bottom line is the smaller it is, the more stretching required. Less stretching, better picture. But on a 20-40" screen you probably won't notice a massive difference between dvd to blu ray, but when you start getting into the 60-70" you really do.

and that 60-70" HDTV will set you off how much exactly in good old Europe??

am i the only one on the continent that doesnt see himself being able to afford one before 5 or 6 years, when a 37" (and not a great one at that) is still around 1000euro?

For me, I get my HD movies from premium channels and pay-pre-view. I have very little desire to watch a movie more than once. Frankly, the higher resolution doesn't help me enjoy the movie any more. The differences between VHS and DVD were like night and day. The differences between DVD and Bluray are pretty marginal to Joe the plummer.

Night and Day to me!!!

3a680e66.png

7b09a10b.png

Even on a 32" it's still clearly noticeable! You don't notice it, then you really MUST have eye sight issues!!!

You don't have a good eyesight does NOT mean that these HD resolution aren't Day & Night VS DVD!

DVD resolution, now it's blurry and out of focus. Blu-ray (HD) so Sharp and Crisp (Again, even on a 32 inch)!!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!