GTA IV for PC (official)


Recommended Posts

How much is that costing if you don't mind me asking? I'm tempted by i7 but dont know if its worth it.

Probably going to be about ?1,100. I've saved for about 10 months solid to get this rig. Lots of people who have Core 2's and PC's under 2 years old don't want to (or need to) upgrade which would be silly hence the price. I've had my PC now 6 years and want something brand spanking new. I would feel like I'm cheating myself now if I got a C2Q now, even though its alot cheaper.

If you have a single core PC, upgrade. If you have anything above an AMD X2 4200+ I would wait until halfway through next year when prices drop.

Probably going to be about ?1,100. I've saved for about 10 months solid to get this rig. Lots of people who have Core 2's and PC's under 2 years old don't want to (or need to) upgrade which would be silly hence the price. I've had my PC now 6 years and want something brand spanking new. I would feel like I'm cheating myself now if I got a C2Q now, even though its alot cheaper.

If you have a single core PC, upgrade. If you have anything above an AMD X2 4200+ I would wait until halfway through next year when prices drop.

Thanks for that.

I got a C2D when they first came out, and while it's weak compared to the newest CPU's, it's still quite good for games and such (my GFX card is the bottleneck)

before you know it, your 280 will be the requirement... this SUCKs... really pushing my 8800 gts. and the quad is just too much i think my e6600 will have to do.

come to think of it, the e6600 and 8800 are both almost 2 years old :(

so i guess the system reqs aren't that bad after all, they require you to have 2 year old hardware...

The specs for this game look insane. I didn't think that much of the graphics for the X360. Other than all the "relationship with other char" bull**** and the horrible gun fight gameplay (which no doubt will be a lot better on the pc) it was a really fun game. But those system requirements make me think that they aren't spending much time optimizing. You can tell they are taking the specs seriously as they took down what was originally posted.

All previous GTA games like GTA 3,Vice City and San Andreas ran better on the PC than the consoles. Better draw distances, larger textures, higher resolutions and a in-game player customised mp3 player were some of the special features that made the PC versions always superior to the console versions. San Andreas sold so much that even people with Celerons were able to enjoy the basic features of the game. It came to such a situation that GTA games were known more famously for its gameplay rather than shiny games. Of course the underlying engine was Criterion software's Renderware which has since ben acquired by EA.

Didn't expect the shiny new RAGE(Rovkstar advanced game engine) to require so much hefty spec machines to run. I wonder what is Rockstar's PC sales target? Also just a week back they released Bully for the PC. Although that game was quite playable on the old PS2, even 880O GTs were suffering from frame rate issues on higher resolutions. Looks to me that Rockstar has lost the art of optimising console games for the PC .

All previous GTA games like GTA 3,Vice City and San Andreas ran better on the PC than the consoles. Better draw distances, larger textures, higher resolutions and a in-game player customised mp3 player were some of the special features that made the PC versions always superior to the console versions. San Andreas sold so much that even people with Celerons were able to enjoy the basic features of the game. It came to such a situation that GTA games were known more famously for its gameplay rather than shiny games. Of course the underlying engine was Criterion software's Renderware which has since ben acquired by EA.

Didn't expect the shiny new RAGE(Rovkstar advanced game engine) to require so much hefty spec machines to run. I wonder what is Rockstar's PC sales target? Also just a week back they released Bully for the PC. Although that game was quite playable on the old PS2, even 880O GTs were suffering from frame rate issues on higher resolutions. Looks to me that Rockstar has lost the art of optimising console games for the PC .

I suspect a large part of the reason for that is that it's basically been the same engine for all three games, while hardware has had 7-8 years to advance. Today's Celerons are vastly superior to what was available in 2001.

But I still don't think any of the games would actually run well on a Celeron.

So because San Andreas sold so well, the in-game performance increased? :huh:

No what I meant was because the game was able to run decently on even ancient hardwares, it sold a lot.

@ The_ Decryptor: I still remember I ran San Andreas on my old notebook having a 2.8 GHz Celeron D Processor with 512MB RAM and a Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP. The game ran at a decent fps of 20-25 at a resolution of 1024x768 on 16bit color and graphics being set to medium.

No what I meant was because the game was able to run decently on even ancient hardwares, it sold a lot.

@ The_ Decryptor: I still remember I ran San Andreas on my old notebook having a 2.8 GHz Celeron D Processor with 512MB RAM and a Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP. The game ran at a decent fps of 20-25 at a resolution of 1024x768 on 16bit color and graphics being set to medium.

Since when was 20fps "decent"?

And anyway, I forgot Intel kept pumping out the celerons, the last time I set eyes on one was when I had a 900Mhz Celeron in my main system.

Some more updated news! After initially mailing to its subscribed customers that GTA IV for PC will be released world wide on 2nd December 2008, Rockstar Games have stated that GTA IV for PC will be released on 2nd Dec 2008 only in North American region. Europe is getting the next day,i.e 3rd Dec 2008. I guess it won't make much of a difference though.

It seems to me they are just being realistic with their system requirements. Even though the system requirement for Far Cry 2 and Crysis are high. They still are not playable even with recommended. I commend Rockstar for trying to be realistic.

YEY! :)

Thank god for my Quad core @ 2.4GHZ

4GB Ram

and Nvidia Geforce 8800GT

:)

Off topic: Never known true specs on me graphics card as in how much graphics memory, how can i find out? as in the adapter gives me 3 different numbers! lol :) (attached screenshot)

post-48265-1226523142_thumb.jpg

Thanks, Tim

now that is a low low end intel graphics card and prolly hardly run the game at low settings

Wow! Rockstar is not going to make a lot of sales on this product then. My computer is only a few months old and this computer is extremely powerful too. So, if this game won't work on my computer, then it mostly likely won't work on many other people's computer as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!