• 0

Spotify - Amazing Legal music App


Question

I came across www.spotify.com a few days ago, and I must say it's amazing! Been using it ever since, and haven't had a need to open itunes at all. Has pretty much every song I search for, and plays instantly with no buffering or problems etc, for a beta its very good. Anyway, it was invite only but today it's gone public so anyone and everyone can sign up. Give it a go, see what you think, i think it's a new revolution in how we will listen to music in the future.

Here's a review: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=LQC2eBQ7Lsk

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/706348-spotify-amazing-legal-music-app/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I know this will be a minority taste amongst those posting here, but does Spotify carry any classical music?

Yes, there's classical in there, though Spotify does not allow you to search by Genre which a shame, cause it is indeed a wonderful little application, Also remember the music you can find on it varies by country, so people in the UK might find stuff not available to Spain users and vice versa.

  • 0

I like this from their "What is Spotify page":

"And because the music plays live, there’s no need to wait for downloads and no big dent in your hard drive."

Well, everyone knows that data you stream is actually less than the data if you downloaded it

*scratches head*

yeah that sounds right...sheesh

Who wants to tell them 160kb/s Free or 320kb/s is the same streamed as downloaded ?

I would but my care factor gauge has been stuck at -infinity since the iPad was announced

Give it 6 months and it will be gone because the business model is a superhighway to failure and bankruptcy

  • 0

I like this from their "What is Spotify page":

"And because the music plays live, there?s no need to wait for downloads and no big dent in your hard drive."

Well, everyone knows that data you stream is actually less than the data if you downloaded it

*scratches head*

yeah that sounds right...sheesh

Who wants to tell them 160kb/s Free or 320kb/s is the same streamed as downloaded ?

I would but my care factor gauge has been stuck at -infinity since the iPad was announced

Give it 6 months and it will be gone because the business model is a superhighway to failure and bankruptcy

I think you are missing the point, somewhat.

  • 0

I think you are missing the point, somewhat.

What, youre going to tell me that apart from the streaming data being magically less than directly downloaded data, the time it takes to stream it is LOWER than the time it takes to directly download it as well?

Thats awesome

What point am i mising exactly????

  • 0

Does anyone in the UK have a Spotify Invite they could kindly donate to me?

PM'd :)

@Raa: It was, but they made it invite only again because it was getting too much interest (apparently) from people, and their servers couldn't cope with the surge in demand.

  • 0

What, youre going to tell me that apart from the streaming data being magically less than directly downloaded data, the time it takes to stream it is LOWER than the time it takes to directly download it as well?

Thats awesome

What point am i mising exactly????

The fact that the whole point of streaming is that the data is cached, therefore not taking up space on your hard-drive for all eternity. The cache can be flushed once finished with etc. Also - you can be listening after the first few kilobytes are downloaded (depending on the size of the track) rather than having to wait for the entire file to be present before listening to it.

If that doesn't benefit you then Spotify as a platform is pretty useless. Might as well just stick to mp3 files.

  • 0

The fact that the whole point of streaming is that the data is cached, therefore not taking up space on your hard-drive for all eternity. The cache can be flushed once finished with etc. Also - you can be listening after the first few kilobytes are downloaded (depending on the size of the track) rather than having to wait for the entire file to be present before listening to it.

If that doesn't benefit you then Spotify as a platform is pretty useless. Might as well just stick to mp3 files.

Cached or not the data size is the same, unless you exist in some quantum universe where the laws are different? :)

I dont know about you, but i rarely , actually never, listen to a song just once, i like my cache full :)

And as for listening after only a few kb's are downloaded, well you arent on dialup are you, in just 30 seconds (if that on broadband) you can have the whole song downloaded and listen to it without the glitches

I started out querying their stupidity in asserting data sizes were different when you streamed from them and them alone (Note: usual rules of data size continue to be normal for the rest of the internet) and ended up i believe reinforcing why their and the other "free" streaming music business models are doomed.

I listen to my music more than once, im not about to login every time i want to hear something and end up blowing bandwidth on return visits (thereby killing their no wait and no large filesize paradox).

I download my music, its mine

Ill be off now, i think ive made my point...

  • 0

Fantastic service. I love the no-buffering side of it. I don't mind the ads but some are just annoying, like one which plays an answer machine message and the beep from it is just really loud :/

"Leave your message after the beep... BEEP."

Overall a great service though.

Yes, there's classical in there, though Spotify does not allow you to search by Genre which a shame, cause it is indeed a wonderful little application, Also remember the music you can find on it varies by country, so people in the UK might find stuff not available to Spain users and vice versa.

You can kind of search by genre if you find a classical artist you like, it will show you some related tags at the top and if you click one which is related.

  • 0

I have 4 invitations, first four people to quote this post get one (PMing is too much hassle :p). I'll check this topic each time I'm on Neowin till invites are used.

edit: I know you'll want to keep your email private, so I'll PM you after you quote. I just can't be bothered with a flood of PMs.

  • 0

Sucks that it still isn't available in the US yet :/

I am in the US you can use spotify BTW.

Just use a proxy website once you get an invite to registrar. After reg its all gravy my dude! Use this proxy http://www.daveproxy.co.uk/

Cheers

  • 0

I would love an invite to Spotify if anyone could throw one my way. Now that 1WayJonny posted that proxy, I can actually register and use the service here in the US omg!

:p

As I said above I have 4, PM me your email address and I'll send you one.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Yeah... The root of my comment, ostensibly, is how to spin the story via the actual technical merits of the solution! * Decentralized (aka federated) solution with built-in encrypted ephemeral message transport, * Transport via Relays (intermediary servers) with no message archival, * Second configurable pathway are actual email servers (if DNS records are programmed accordingly) via IMAP protocols carriage, * "Chat-over-Email" is the design pattern adopted; it can either leverage full-blown Email Server (must use the INBOX folder) to exchange all received messages/edits/reactions (so be weary of notifications overloads) [best practice is creating a separate email acct used explicitly for federated chat purposes!] or leverage its built-in Relay Server mechanism which actually resides on-device (by default but can be configured otherwise), * By virtue of be a decentralized/federated model, all other intermediary servers who may pass-along messages (while the recipient's final relay/device is inaccessible) cannot snoop on the messages due to the encrypted nature of contents. The intermediaries may, however, analyze the metadata due to the simple fact that routing mechanisms require hints for relay destinations. Unfortunately, whomever is posting about DeltaChat across socials are misleading with "zero metadata" claims -- especially when the Relays (according to their own technical documents) mandate the addition of chat-version metadata and other decorations in order to actually transport any message. -- Based on this summary, I'd prefer if they'd better dual-path message transport (email server add-in, federated relay engine) rather than patch-on email protocols to existing federated social media frameworks. They're frankensteining something rather than extending widely-deployed technology stacks.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!