• 0

Spotify - Amazing Legal music App


Question

I came across www.spotify.com a few days ago, and I must say it's amazing! Been using it ever since, and haven't had a need to open itunes at all. Has pretty much every song I search for, and plays instantly with no buffering or problems etc, for a beta its very good. Anyway, it was invite only but today it's gone public so anyone and everyone can sign up. Give it a go, see what you think, i think it's a new revolution in how we will listen to music in the future.

Here's a review: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=LQC2eBQ7Lsk

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/706348-spotify-amazing-legal-music-app/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

It seems they're bringing it to the USA soon - bear in mind though that while legal artists get paid virtually nothing: I can't find the infographic but it's something like 0.0000015p / play compared to a few £ per retail album.

Still, it's better than stealing outright and gives an artist the possibility to have a much wider audience. Personally I've found a couple of albums on it I've liked and have gone out and bought them - so maybe artists should look at it as a loss-leader.

  • 0

It seems they're bringing it to the USA soon - bear in mind though that while legal artists get paid virtually nothing: I can't find the infographic but it's something like 0.0000015p / play compared to a few ? per retail album.

well an album is more than one song, and you only get paid once for the album :p

  • 0

It seems they're bringing it to the USA soon - bear in mind though that while legal artists get paid virtually nothing: I can't find the infographic but it's something like 0.0000015p / play compared to a few £ per retail album.

Think of how many thousand, tens of thousand or even hundreds of thousands of people who buy the album they dont get extra money every time the album is played, now say 100,000 people play one of your songs from one of your albums per day on spotify and for arguments sake say your figures are correct thats 15p per song then times that by how many songs are on the album just think how many times your album will be played over months/years, then tell me they get paid virtually nothing. You dont have the added costs of reprinting an old album, no marketing, no wages to pay, its free money.

Then look at the alternative, piracy. 0p for a long long time.

  • 0

Spotify used to be good (not great as there was quite a bit of music they didnt have), but nowadays instead of maybe 1 advert every 30 minutes it seems like there is a 30 second ad every other song and to make matters worse its usually the same annoying ad - over and over again.

As a result i've moved on - shame though..

  • 0

its updated

can now use your personal library (on hdd) on it and friends can access your personal library on it (i think)

best program ever lol

ive got an account - Glp1992

i want to give an invite to my friend james, i have 0 invites

can someone spare me an invite?

  • 0

Spotify used to be good (not great as there was quite a bit of music they didnt have), but nowadays instead of maybe 1 advert every 30 minutes it seems like there is a 30 second ad every other song and to make matters worse its usually the same annoying ad - over and over again.

As a result i've moved on - shame though..

harsh.. i thought it so good that i paid for it (and that's a rarity i can tell you!)

do the same?

  • 0

harsh.. i thought it so good that i paid for it (and that's a rarity i can tell you!)

do the same?

I think they've definitely increased the frequency of the adverts. Totally understandable from a business point of view though, that's where they get their income from.

Once the new update rolls out for me, I'm thinking about subscribing and adding my locally stored music. That was the one major feature blocking my full time use of Spotify.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!