Bear Grylls Injured After Antarctic Fall


Recommended Posts

Daredevil SAS man-turned-explorer Bear Grylls was being airlifted to South Africa last night after being badly injured filming a TV documentary in Antarctica.

The 34-year-old adventurer broke his shoulder in a life-threatening fall and was said to be in ?shock and agony? from a serious fracture which left the bone protruding from his body.

The accident happened at 11pm British time on Friday, and Bear?s insurance company arranged for his evacuation by air ambulance for urgent medical treatment, at an estimated cost of ?60,000.

Bear was injured during the making of his latest daredevil documentary, a bid to scale an unnamed mountain after travelling across the Antarctic on jet-skis, a wind-powered kite-ski and an electric-powered para-glider. The aim of the expedition was to promote alternative energy and bioethanol as a source of power, as well as raising funds for the children?s charity Global Angels.

If successful, Bear and his team of four had planned to name the 9,000ft peak. But it is uncertain if the bid will now be possible, though Bear is reportedly determined to return to Antarctica.

The airlift operation itself was fraught with danger as it meant flying into hostile conditions with temperatures plummeting to -35C and a landscape of 1,000ft ice cliffs with 700 miles of high altitude plateau.

The Discovery Channel crew filming Bear?s expedition as part of its Man v Wild series ? much of which is re-edited and shown on Channel 4?s Born Survivor show ? travelled with him to South Africa and will now film his recovery.

The next series of Born Survivor is due to be screened on Channel 4 in the spring.

[Source]

Oh yeah big deal he didn't stay outside every single time he claimed he did.

You watch the shows for the knowledge and because they're interesting, not to get excited because he slept outside.

My point being it's pretty petty, the guy knows his stuff, just because he isn't always subjecting himself to what he's explaining doesn't really matter.

Okay, you guys go do better than him. The shows are interesting, and the guy has done a lot of good work. Better than what some of you will probably contribute to society.

Dude got injured in his line of work and everyone is coming in to be self righteous :laugh:

THAT is petty.

The guy is a fraud when he's filming yes. But you have to bare in mind (pun not intended :p) that this guy used to train the SAS on survival. SAS are some of the hardest people in the world, you'd have to be at least as hard to be able to train them to that level.

Also, at the age of 23 he was the youngest Britain to climb Everest.

So before you start crying "wah wah, he's a fraud, anyone could do that" do some background research first. The TV shows might be staged, but off camera he's solid.

Fraud my ass, that guy eats worms, grubs and live fish. Plus the point of the program is to demonstrate techniques you would use to survive in the wilderness which it clearly does.

People will eat anything if there's a reason to, be it hunger or cash. Anyway, watch this:

These are scenes which were supposedly along a route from Pu'u O'o to the Pacific Ocean in the Kilauea episode of Man vs Wild. Except for the landing site, they were, in fact, a few feet from various roads and highways used by thousands of tourists daily. Update: The original concept was that Bear Grylls would be dropped into remote areas and make his way to civilization with no help. The Discovery Channel removed this episode and several others from circulation after they were shown to be fake. Other early episodes were edited to remove fake scenes and disclose that he received help from the crew. Disclaimers on recent episodes disclose that scenes are staged.

SOURCE

Fraud my ass, that guy eats worms, grubs and live fish.

Big deal? You think you need to be SAS trained to do that? lawl..

Nobody is taking away from what he does on his shows entirely, I don't see anyone replying in that manner? Certainly nobody has said they can do better than him either.

However, someone called him a fraud and there is legit reasons why.

Reading skills ftw :yes:

He's teaching people to hunt? Its a wonder how humanity managed this long without him before he was even born then huh :rolleyes:

Please, natural instinct kicks in when you are in such situations. His show is not gonna save your life.

That's interesting, i guess i saw the episodes after all this - cos all the ones since i first started watching had a disclaimer about some situations being staged for the program, and that might have assistance on hand.

But that seemed to be pretty much common sense, throwing yourself into life-or-death situations every episode might make good TV but wont keep you healty for long lol. Luck runs out eventually ;) i mean the situations are still life-or-death he just explains how to lessen the risk and give u a better chance of survival.

Fraud? I don't think any guy who was hard enough to get into the SAS deserved to be called a fraud quite frankly.

I don't watch his show(s) but hope he pulls through!

Please, natural instinct kicks in when you are in such situations. His show is not gonna save your life.

I've seen countless things on the show that would actually save my life if I were in any of the situations.

What not to eat, how to get water in a desert, how to keep warm, what's poisonous/what isn't, etc.

So that comment couldn't be any more ignorant.

Many of the things on the shows you plain and simply wouldn't know about without being told.

Instinct doesn't substitute knowledge. In fact, instinct without knowledge will quickly = death in many of these situations. As explained by Grylls, you're hungry, see a fruit bearing tree, and you're instinct says you must eat. Bam, poisonous tree, you're dead.

So the backdrop/setting being artificially made for some shoots is understandable, it's the actual knowledge and content that's what's important, not the scenery.

Fraud my ass, that guy eats worms, grubs and live fish. Plus the point of the program is to demonstrate techniques you would use to survive in the wilderness which it clearly does.

So do those so called celebs from "I'm a celebrity get me out of here". Personally I'd rather watch Chris Ryan, I really enjoyed Hunting Chris Ryan :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why? Does anybody actually want this? The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install, just so that there’s a integrated coupon manager feels like a waste of everyone’s time
    • I remember when Louis used to just do interesting Mac/iPhone repairs, now he's boring and just launches "crusades" every week
    • A shame it don't allow people to bypass the MS account, I will stick to using Rufus.
    • Microsoft about to radically change how often your Edge browser updates by Paul Hill Microsoft has just announced that starting with Edge 152, it will be moving to a two-week release cycle for faster, smaller updates. This faster release cadence will begin on August 27. This change comes just several months after Microsoft switched Visual Studio Code to weekly updates. The company said that the Extended Stable releases will remain on an eight-week cycle and that no admin changes are needed to experience the faster release cycle on the Stable channel. The new two-week release cycle will enable the faster delivery of security updates and platform improvements, all while reducing the size and complexity of individual updates. Microsoft claims that organizations will benefit from this change as it offers predictable validation cycles. For organizations that prefer a “more deliberate pace”, the Extended Stable channel remains an option. This change will affect Edge Stable releases on Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile. The Extended Stable channel will continue to be updated every eight weeks, or every fourth Stable release, for example: versions 152, 156, 160, and 164. The Extended Stable could be a good option for organizations that don’t want the latest updates twice a month and don’t want as much hassle constantly updating browsers. In the case of Visual Studio Code, many of the updates being pushed by Microsoft are AI-related. As we all know, Microsoft Edge has a lot of AI features, so we could see Microsoft pushing more AI, thanks to the faster cycles. On the flip side, quicker releases could mean faster security updates, which is beneficial in a world where AI systems are hunting for software exploits. What do you think? Let us know in the comments. For more updates on Edge, be sure to follow Neowin's coverage. In May alone, we reported on Edge offering in-browser pop-ups to assist users with website compatibility issues, that Edge was losing Copilot Mode, and that Microsoft had fixed a plain-text password bug in Edge. Source: Microsoft 365 Admin Center
    • not yet, because at the moment it is not a threat to MS, if and I mean if it did become a threat to MS Office, then it may be a different thing. MS don't like competition
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!