Bear Grylls Injured After Antarctic Fall


Recommended Posts

i think the real issue is that all of these so called "real life" shows are edited too much to show fake drama and fake suspense. i was hoping this trend the last 10 years or so of reality tv would die off, but it's worse than ever anymore. this is the reason im always online and never watch tv.

so far the only show ive seen that is real and not fake is ghost adventures, scary stuff there.

ghost throws brick :|

Edited by smooth3006

Someone has.

Good, because there is little chance the weak or stupid will be able to die from bears or lions. We need a little natural population thinning, and if they will cause it themselves, no reason to really feel bad about it.

what does bear lie about on the show ? i admit some of the stuff i see is fake and staged but i don't see him telling me a load of crap either.

I'm talking about him staying over night in hotels, misleading viewers who think he actually spends all the time filming out on location in the wild, taming "wild animals" which aren't really wild etc etc.

Channel 4 even admitted to it all.

The knowledge is still correct regardless of how it's staged/presented.

How is it of any benefit to the viewing public to know he's actually stayed out during the night every time? Or to have you watch him actually spend 4 hours finding a snake to be eaten? What he is saying does work/help and educates.

For all of you giving the guy a hard time for absolutely no reason, go read his blog - http://beargrylls.blogspot.com/

He's a genuine guy, and knows what he's talking about.

If you claim fraudulent on all of what he teaches because it's setup in an experiment fashion at times to show you the results, then you are being ignorant.

If you can't get over the hurdle of understanding that a TV show is going to be in some way staged to be of benefit for the camera crew and workers, then that is your shortcoming.

But seriously, stop acting like the guy is somehow a discredit to society. Not to mention the amount done for charity - http://www.beargrylls.com/charity.html

I certainly call going throw this to get honey, "real" :p

bear-bees.jpg

I'm talking about him staying over night in hotels, misleading viewers who think he actually spends all the time filming out on location in the wild, taming "wild animals" which aren't really wild etc etc.

Channel 4 even admitted to it all.

i didn't know that, the show should be canceled then, that's misleading the audience.

Obviously I have no problem with tv shows being staged, but the viewer has the right to know when it is (Y)

That goes for everything, not just Bear Grylls.

i didn't know that, the show should be canceled then, that's misleading the audience.

That's what I've been saying this whole time!

Why on earth somebody feels the need to tell me to "grow up" cause I pointed that out is beyond me. They need to grow up themselves and actually bring something to the topic (Y)

Obviously I have no problem with tv shows being staged, but the viewer has the right to know when it is (Y)

That goes for everything, not just Bear Grylls.

100% agree

I certainly call going throw this to get honey, "real" :p

bear-bees.jpg

i saw that episode and i think he is an idiot for doing that, he could of died from the bee stings.

Obviously I have no problem with tv shows being staged, but the viewer has the right to know when it is (Y)

That goes for everything, not just Bear Grylls.

But the majority of those watching won't really care. What they do see is real. What happens off camera is of no real relevance.

Only those now getting hooked up on it, for whatever reason, are now stampeding a chariot on the guy, his work and all his life achievements claiming fraud, etc.

i saw that episode and i think he is an idiot for doing that, he could of died from the bee stings.

Contradiction much?

So the guys an idiot for actually doing things, but then his show should be cancelled when things are staged?

Well if we are gonna bring up his supposed SAS training again, apparently that's not even real :/

Anyways I don't have some vendetta against his show or him. I just said he was a liar and gave my reasons why. Channel 4 said they weren't honest and cleared things up so thats the end of that :)

I saw an episode where he was in South Dakota's badlands and had to put up with thunderstorms, rattlesnakes and other dangerous conditions.

Anyone with survival training in the United States Army can do that. :/

Well if we are gonna bring up his supposed SAS training again, apparently that's not even real :/

What?

1994-1997

Served with the British SAS (21 SAS). Passed UK Special Forces Selection, serving as a sabre soldier, trained in unarmed combat, desert and winter warfare, combat survival, medics, parachuting, signals, evasive driving, climbing and explosives. Served in North Africa twice. In late 1996 Bear broke his back in a free fall parachuting accident in southern Africa.

http://www.beargrylls.com/biography.html#1994

It was brought up in an interview for some magazine, I forget which.

Using his own website is hardly the greatest of sources when he can write whatever he wants on it.

Neither is claiming it's false with no sources at all.

Seriously man, now conspiracy theories against his own personal site and earlier life?

You really must have a massive issue with the guy, especially getting so involved over what goes on off the camera.

Channel 4 said this

"Born Survivor is not an observational documentary series but a 'how to' guide to basic survival techniques in extreme environments. The programme explicitly does not claim that presenter Bear Grylls's experience is one of unaided solo survival."

And it's true, he's a teacher of what he is saying first and foremost.

Not someone risking his life off camera just for your own pleasure. He does enough risking of it on camera in many cases. I'm sure the guy doesn't want to die and leave his family behind just over a TV show, and therefore reconstructs a lot of the scenarios yea, for his own benefit and life.

I have no problem with that, and find what is shown on camera to be entertaining and educational. Why I'd want the guy to suffer any more than necessary is beyond me - And what I mean by that is yeah, I want wants on camera, whether setup or not to be as real as possible, but when filming stops, I really couldn't care less if the guy goes and raises his chances of living. In many cases on camera he's already put himself at risk/pushed his body to extreme conditions in the first place.

One bee :|

Thats just crazy, reminds me of when he jumped in the water and wrestled the crocodile I think it was and he picked it up and slammed it against a tree...lol

Thats just crazy, reminds me of when he jumped in the water and wrestled the crocodile I think it was and he picked it up and slammed it against a tree...lol

Or that time he didn't get killed by a sting ray....instead he ate it. In true Bear Grylls fashion.

Call in what you like, he does still do some pretty dangerous things. Case in point; the article the OP links to.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!