Bear Grylls Injured After Antarctic Fall


Recommended Posts

i think the real issue is that all of these so called "real life" shows are edited too much to show fake drama and fake suspense. i was hoping this trend the last 10 years or so of reality tv would die off, but it's worse than ever anymore. this is the reason im always online and never watch tv.

so far the only show ive seen that is real and not fake is ghost adventures, scary stuff there.

ghost throws brick :|

Edited by smooth3006

Someone has.

Good, because there is little chance the weak or stupid will be able to die from bears or lions. We need a little natural population thinning, and if they will cause it themselves, no reason to really feel bad about it.

what does bear lie about on the show ? i admit some of the stuff i see is fake and staged but i don't see him telling me a load of crap either.

I'm talking about him staying over night in hotels, misleading viewers who think he actually spends all the time filming out on location in the wild, taming "wild animals" which aren't really wild etc etc.

Channel 4 even admitted to it all.

The knowledge is still correct regardless of how it's staged/presented.

How is it of any benefit to the viewing public to know he's actually stayed out during the night every time? Or to have you watch him actually spend 4 hours finding a snake to be eaten? What he is saying does work/help and educates.

For all of you giving the guy a hard time for absolutely no reason, go read his blog - http://beargrylls.blogspot.com/

He's a genuine guy, and knows what he's talking about.

If you claim fraudulent on all of what he teaches because it's setup in an experiment fashion at times to show you the results, then you are being ignorant.

If you can't get over the hurdle of understanding that a TV show is going to be in some way staged to be of benefit for the camera crew and workers, then that is your shortcoming.

But seriously, stop acting like the guy is somehow a discredit to society. Not to mention the amount done for charity - http://www.beargrylls.com/charity.html

I certainly call going throw this to get honey, "real" :p

bear-bees.jpg

I'm talking about him staying over night in hotels, misleading viewers who think he actually spends all the time filming out on location in the wild, taming "wild animals" which aren't really wild etc etc.

Channel 4 even admitted to it all.

i didn't know that, the show should be canceled then, that's misleading the audience.

Obviously I have no problem with tv shows being staged, but the viewer has the right to know when it is (Y)

That goes for everything, not just Bear Grylls.

i didn't know that, the show should be canceled then, that's misleading the audience.

That's what I've been saying this whole time!

Why on earth somebody feels the need to tell me to "grow up" cause I pointed that out is beyond me. They need to grow up themselves and actually bring something to the topic (Y)

Obviously I have no problem with tv shows being staged, but the viewer has the right to know when it is (Y)

That goes for everything, not just Bear Grylls.

100% agree

I certainly call going throw this to get honey, "real" :p

bear-bees.jpg

i saw that episode and i think he is an idiot for doing that, he could of died from the bee stings.

Obviously I have no problem with tv shows being staged, but the viewer has the right to know when it is (Y)

That goes for everything, not just Bear Grylls.

But the majority of those watching won't really care. What they do see is real. What happens off camera is of no real relevance.

Only those now getting hooked up on it, for whatever reason, are now stampeding a chariot on the guy, his work and all his life achievements claiming fraud, etc.

i saw that episode and i think he is an idiot for doing that, he could of died from the bee stings.

Contradiction much?

So the guys an idiot for actually doing things, but then his show should be cancelled when things are staged?

Well if we are gonna bring up his supposed SAS training again, apparently that's not even real :/

Anyways I don't have some vendetta against his show or him. I just said he was a liar and gave my reasons why. Channel 4 said they weren't honest and cleared things up so thats the end of that :)

I saw an episode where he was in South Dakota's badlands and had to put up with thunderstorms, rattlesnakes and other dangerous conditions.

Anyone with survival training in the United States Army can do that. :/

Well if we are gonna bring up his supposed SAS training again, apparently that's not even real :/

What?

1994-1997

Served with the British SAS (21 SAS). Passed UK Special Forces Selection, serving as a sabre soldier, trained in unarmed combat, desert and winter warfare, combat survival, medics, parachuting, signals, evasive driving, climbing and explosives. Served in North Africa twice. In late 1996 Bear broke his back in a free fall parachuting accident in southern Africa.

http://www.beargrylls.com/biography.html#1994

It was brought up in an interview for some magazine, I forget which.

Using his own website is hardly the greatest of sources when he can write whatever he wants on it.

Neither is claiming it's false with no sources at all.

Seriously man, now conspiracy theories against his own personal site and earlier life?

You really must have a massive issue with the guy, especially getting so involved over what goes on off the camera.

Channel 4 said this

"Born Survivor is not an observational documentary series but a 'how to' guide to basic survival techniques in extreme environments. The programme explicitly does not claim that presenter Bear Grylls's experience is one of unaided solo survival."

And it's true, he's a teacher of what he is saying first and foremost.

Not someone risking his life off camera just for your own pleasure. He does enough risking of it on camera in many cases. I'm sure the guy doesn't want to die and leave his family behind just over a TV show, and therefore reconstructs a lot of the scenarios yea, for his own benefit and life.

I have no problem with that, and find what is shown on camera to be entertaining and educational. Why I'd want the guy to suffer any more than necessary is beyond me - And what I mean by that is yeah, I want wants on camera, whether setup or not to be as real as possible, but when filming stops, I really couldn't care less if the guy goes and raises his chances of living. In many cases on camera he's already put himself at risk/pushed his body to extreme conditions in the first place.

One bee :|

Thats just crazy, reminds me of when he jumped in the water and wrestled the crocodile I think it was and he picked it up and slammed it against a tree...lol

Thats just crazy, reminds me of when he jumped in the water and wrestled the crocodile I think it was and he picked it up and slammed it against a tree...lol

Or that time he didn't get killed by a sting ray....instead he ate it. In true Bear Grylls fashion.

Call in what you like, he does still do some pretty dangerous things. Case in point; the article the OP links to.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!