Bear Grylls Injured After Antarctic Fall


Recommended Posts

snip

I said a few replies above yours I don't have anything against him, and I don't, I'm just posting things which I have read about. What's wrong with that?

All I'm saying is if he has lied about something already, whats to say their isn't more he has lied about. That's my problem and why I have issues with anyone that lies.

There's nothing wrong with questioning things in life, which is all I'm doing.

Let me say for the last time, I have nothing against his tv show or him teaching survival tips. There has been plenty of others who have done it in the past. Please stop grasping at straws and making it seem otherwise.

so am i and i don't have my own tv show. :(

:rofl:

I challenge you to go to your garden and live there for 2 weeks with no food or drink and film it for youtube, it will be an instant hit! :p

oh em gee...

AB, rethink your arguement please!

Your ignorance is the alarming one here as you obviously never studied history/geography in any great detail! I'm talking about thousands and thousands of years ago when survival was every day life in every part of the world. We didn't have fricking Bear Grylls and his tv show to tell us and humans made it this far!

Jeez louise..

Yeah, well, those people didn't have convenient stores on every corner of their town and hospitals a short drive away, too. You spend the majority of your time safe and sound inside of a building. I don't see how you can even compare our day to day living now to what it was thousands of years ago. Their very existence depended on going out and hunting and surviving. Ours today depends on going to the grocery store 2 miles away.

Yeah...it's truly a cold cruel world today. Not.

so am i and i don't have my own tv show. :(

:rofl:

You do what he does and I'll call you a beast.

I'm amazed at how many people in this topic are essentially saying "I can do that." I don't think some of you understand how difficult much of what he does is. Who cares if he stayed in hotels? Everything that they actually show him doing is all him.

I mean, here we have an article about how he was climbing a massive mountain and suffered life threatening injuries, yet some of you people are saying "I can do that." Well, when was the last time you guys were in a situation like that? Where you were even faced with the remotest possibility of life threatening injures?

Oh yeah big deal he didn't stay outside every single time he claimed he did.

You watch the shows for the knowledge and because they're interesting, not to get excited because he slept outside.

My point being it's pretty petty, the guy knows his stuff, just because he isn't always subjecting himself to what he's explaining doesn't really matter.

Survivor Man was actual legit survival. He probably stands around while the crew does half the work.

I prefer Les Stroud's show to his. Surviorman is much more realistic. Then thing is that Bear is in amazing shape, probably in the top 1%. He is able to do things and take risks that would kill or injury the other 99% of us. In addition since he is out there with a crew, he has a safety net in case things go wrong. Some of the things that he demonstrates I would never attempt in a real survival situation. Les is out there alone and must deal with any consequences of his actions. If he burns too many calories that day then he has to deal with that. Chooses to gather food rather than build a better shelter then he risks the rain.

Hope Bear makes a full recovery. Even with all it's faults his show is still better than most of the crap on TV and better than 99% of the reality TV.

I said a few replies above yours I don't have anything against him, and I don't, I'm just posting things which I have read about. What's wrong with that?

All I'm saying is if he has lied about something already, whats to say their isn't more he has lied about. That's my problem and why I have issues with anyone that lies.

There's nothing wrong with questioning things in life, which is all I'm doing.

Let me say for the last time, I have nothing wrong with his tv show or him teaching survival tips. There has been plenty of others who have done it in the past. Please stop grasping at straws and making it seem otherwise.

Yeah man, but you made an absolute train wreck out of it challenging just about everything about the guy, starting off with bluntly calling him a fraud?!

You see enough real to know he knows what he's talking about, so I have no idea why we had to go through all the instinct talk/1000 BC lessons/geography lessons and all of that baggage.

The guy always got support from the crew, had staged events and what not, it was just never publicized on the show

“Episodes take about ten days to tape, explains Grylls: “The night stuff [shown on camera] is all done for real. But when I’m not filming I stay with the crew in some sort of base camp." Episodes now clarify when Grylls gets support from his crew and when situations are staged, “We should have done that from the start,” he says. “The more you see, the more real it feels.””

Even the other guy, Survivorman has help at hand

Man vs. Wild is similar to a competing Discovery Channel series Survivorman. In that show, however, the survival expert (Les Stroud) is not accompanied by a camera crew, but has a significant production and safety crew nearby that he communicates with at least once each day.

These people aren't trying to kill themselves, merely educate through creating lifelike scenarios, some completely 100% random and unmodified, others staged.

To actually walk away with your nose in the air strutting your feet like it somehow discredits what he's telling you as false or a lie is just daft.

If parts of it weren't staged and help wasn't at hand, it would be completely ridiculous and foolish. Why the public somehow feel "cheated" that it is, is beyond me. I see the point about being completely open irrelevant (all you should be interested in is what you see/hear), although I'm glad they now say help is at hand during this scene, or that scene, etc to keep whiners with nothing better to moan about quiet.

Anyway, that's all I need to say, it's truly saddening to see people criticizing someone in the media who's actually making a good contribution for us to enjoy (Y) Not to mention doing a load of charity work. Guy injured himself doing something for us, and all people have to do in here is become keyboard warriors on their PCs ripping him to shreds :laugh: (N)

fraud

–noun

1. deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage.

deceit

–noun

1. the act or practice of deceiving; concealment or distortion of the truth for the purpose of misleading; duplicity; fraud; cheating

He lied, what else is there to say..

This is really going around in circles now :sleep:

I'd actually pay to see Rappy do that :laugh:

How long before he breaks without tv and NW do you think :p

Edit: forgot about Twitter too lol

No....not the twitter!

:cry:

I have to agree with DM on this one too.

Ok, so he is SAS, likes to eat **** and sleep inside of camel carcasses. His show was created for ratings. Thats why Les Strouds show is like non existent. Les is the real deal, carrying camera cases and video equipment with him... BY HIMSELF. Bear Grylls is followed by a crew and a ton of people. Not to mention his youtube comparision videos, its clear that he is a fraud. People say how hardcore he is and how he does this and that, but in reality hes got first hand medical attention and anything he needs at the spur of any life threatening situation.

Its terrible he has gotten injured. His TV show is fake and laughable.

but in reality hes got first hand medical attention and anything he needs at the spur of any life threatening situation.

Because it would make him so much more "hardcore" if he didn't yeah?

What a bad ass he would be! It's all about death! I want people on the brink of dyeing with no help!

Man some of you crack me up, if you genuinely followed the guys work and what he does you wouldn't be so petty in your claims.

Human beings sometimes (N) :no: :laugh:

Oh and

His show was created for ratings.

Well, you know, if you want your show to stay on TV it does need to entertain and be watched.

That's the mechanic of the medium that is television broadcasting.

Part of the show is to entertain people, but being dismissive of the content due to that is just stupid and makes me wonder if some of you do watch, or just catch onto the media storm to kick up a fuss.

snipped

If Les Stroud was in a life threatening situation he wouldn't have a camera crew and a ton of people to help him, see what i'm saying? He doesn't stay in hotel rooms and doesn't film a half a mile away from civilization.

snipped

Like i said, it was created for ratings. Why do you have to reiterate that? Sorry you're sucked into his reality. Like DM said, this is going in circles and circles.

edit- And i did watch Bear's show for awhile until I saw Survivorman, even before all those facts surfaces about Bear

If Les Stroud was in a life threatening situation he wouldn't have a camera crew and a ton of people to help him, see what i'm saying? He doesn't stay in hotel rooms and doesn't film a half a mile away from civilization.

Like i said, it was created for ratings. Why do you have to reiterate that? Sorry you're sucked into his reality. Like DM said, this is going in circles and circles.

edit- And i did watch Bear's show for awhile until I saw Survivorman, even before all those facts surfaces about Bear

And your point?

It doesn't make Grylls fake, and I already posted Les Stroud makes contact with camp once a day to make sure he's okay.

The purpose is not for these guys to die, it's to educate us.

If you're striving for people to get seriously injured and be left without help you're watching the wrong type of TV.

Grylls can still get seriously hurt, but he has help to you know, save his life.

I'm not sucked into any reality, what I take in is useful information, and I get enjoyment out of being entertained.

But to call the guy out like some of you are is incredibly ignorant, and I cannot fathom where your hate comes from?

Such anger filled people just wanting to make fun of someone who is in fact a very respectable person who's achieved a lot in his life, and knows what he's talking about.

:rofl:

i just laughed soo hard i spit water out my nose.

now thats smooth ;)

And your point?

It doesn't make Grylls fake, and I already posted Les Stroud makes contact with camp once a day to make sure he's okay.

The purpose is not for these guys to die, it's to educate us.

If you're striving for people to get seriously injured and be left without help you're watching the wrong type of TV.

Grylls can still get seriously hurt, but he has help to you know, save his life.

I'm not sucked into any reality, what I take in is useful information, and I get enjoyment out of being entertained.

But to call the guy out like some of you are is incredibly ignorant, and I cannot fathom where your hate comes from?

Such anger filled people just wanting to make fun of someone who is in fact a very respectable person who's achieved a lot in his life, and knows what he's talking about.

my hate comes from all the years that i was raised by sasquatch in the hills of Idaho..He taught me how to survive by living off the land and foraging to survive...Being away from civilization all that time had a deep impact on my pyschi and i developed all that pent up hate inside...damn bear..he never held a stitch on how well the sasquatch knew how to survive out there

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!