Is there a PC like Mac in quality & design ?


Recommended Posts

Is that Touchsmart screen capacitive touch?

Yeah, it is. It just doesn't feel accurate or responsive though. Dragging your finger across the screen can sometimes feel very weird depending on how fingerprint dirty or Windex clean it is.

But it doesn't matter, OP doesn't care for touch. I was just throwing out my two cents.

@afusion as you said actually i want the the software side

So you want Mac OS X? Unless you have an Intel-based CPU with SSE2 and SS3, you won't be able to run Mac OS X on a PC.

EDIT: As for the Mac-like computer. I really suggest you just buy it. Apple is known for releasing proprietary hardware and products, so it will be VERY difficult to find anything identical or very similar.

The VAIO JS looks nice but not much like a iMac aside from shape and the AIO feeling. I personally think Macs are overpriced and useless really unless you don't care much about your computer. PCs look way better depending on the manufacturer and model. The new Dell XPS desktops look amazing.

EDIT: As for the Mac-like computer. I really suggest you just buy it. Apple is known for releasing proprietary hardware and products, so it will be VERY difficult to find anything identical or very similar.

what hardware in the imac is proprietary? it is really easy to mach the internals of an imac ... finding a PC which the elegance of the all in one form factor will be difficult ... apple has been working with an all in one form factor for many, many years (even before the imac) ... they have pretty much nailed it.

i would agree with others, if you love the imac buy it and whack windows on there ... make sure you look at the refurb section of the apple store as they have great deals on there ... http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/spec...mac?mco=MTMzNTY ... im assuming you are located in the US ...

Alienware is your best alternative, but they can be expensive depending on which machine you choose.

http://www.alienware.com/products/desktop-computers.aspx#

If you really want a Mac, then just buy one and dual boot it, but if you want to stay Windows only, then I recommend Alienware.

Alienware is your best alternative, but they can be expensive depending on which machine you choose.

http://www.alienware.com/products/desktop-computers.aspx#

If you really want a Mac, then just buy one and dual boot it, but if you want to stay Windows only, then I recommend Alienware.

Yes, this looks very nice, as well as their other notebooks:

http://www.alienware.com/products/area-51-...0-notebook.aspx

But their desktops look absolutely juvenile, performance aside.

@DavidM "If the mini-mac was more powerful, I'd buy one of them".( agree with you)

@Skullpture i want the software side of windows +hardware side of mac

@Denholm thanks for replay "it could be worth waiting until January and maybe look into the new Mac Mini." (good news)

@xfodder thanks for replay

@+Matrix XII thanks for replay

i can wait for the new mac mini or buy an imac ,also Alienware look interesting

Many Thanks to all of you guys :)

With the exception of the motherboard, and possibly the PSU, all the rest of the hardware you would find in a Mac is more or less the exact same hardware you an buy off the shelf for a PC as well.

"Mac Quality" is pretty meaningless ever since the switch to intel.

All Macs are nowadays are PCs in a fancy case with MACOSX installed and an ad campaign that tries to lie that they are not PCs.

PCs in a fancy case with MACOSX installed and an ad campaign that tries to lie that they are not PCs.

Ease up on the flamebait.

The OP asked for something similar to a Mac, not your opinion of them, which, incidentally is uninformed.

OOB, the only one I can think of is Sony, but Dell has made strides in design too.

As far as building your own PCs go, I love Cooler Master and Lian Li cases - my Cooler Master 690 case is quite nice, similar to a Mac Pro tower, with a mesh vent all around, but without the handles on it. And it's also black.

OOB, the only one I can think of is Sony, but Dell has made strides in design too.

As far as building your own PCs go, I love Cooler Master and Lian Li cases - my Cooler Master 690 case is quite nice, similar to a Mac Pro tower, with a mesh vent all around, but without the handles on it. And it's also black.

They *are* pretty nice . . . are these the ones?

http://www.coolermaster.com/products/produ...ail&id=2908

Ease up on the flamebait.

The OP asked for something similar to a Mac, not your opinion of them, which, incidentally is uninformed.

I was not trying to start a flameway, the OP was asking about a PC that is the same quality as a Mac, I was just saying that a typical PC and Mac are ther same quality because they use the same hardware.

So unless he wanted a pc built into a moniter or prebuilt, he could just pick a nice looking case instead fo worrying about hardware quality.

the only computers i have seen that comes in close to the quality of a mac are Sony, but they tend to be around the same price.....

The only laptop I've ever had completely die and refuse to even POST was a Sony, and that POS never left my living room. My old iBook has made it through two trips into a warzone with a friend of mine, and still works fine, albeit with a bit of dust and some scrapes.

That being said, IIRC, Asus manufactures the notebook line for Apple, and if/when I get around to purchasing yet another laptop, I plan on trying an Asus out. If you want something in the pre-built desktop variety, look no further than Falcon Northwest...although be prepared to pay for it.

They *are* pretty nice . . . are these the ones?

http://www.coolermaster.com/products/produ...ail&id=2908

Yes, the only knock is that the case weighs a ton, but it's built like a tank, and just has a ton of room on the interior, with hooks to route cables and the best ventilation in any case I've had. It's not as sterile looking as the Mac Pro case though, with just the right touch of chrome trim.

At the Sony flagship store here I saw an iMac-like desktop (box inside monitor) that looked appealing. It had glass around the monitor that was touch-enabled and had glowing icons on the glass.

I tested it out in the shop and you could touch the green glowing 'WWW' icon for example and the browser would open. Looked pretty cool. Everything was in white.

Edit: OK so I tracked them down. They have laptops and desktops. Here's some pictures of their laptop version: Above and Infront (folded).

Direct link to product pages aren't working but you can check them all out here.

They are called Sony VAIO Panel PCs.

Edited by Sacha
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!