Windows 7 experience


Windows 7 experience  

1826 members have voted

  1. 1. How was installation?

    • 7 - Awsome, very fast, no problems!
      1163
    • 6
      394
    • 5
      171
    • 4
      54
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Couldn't be worse. Got nasty errors, couldn't install.
      17
  2. 2. How is compatability

    • 7 - Everything compatible (programs and hardware)
      750
    • 6
      611
    • 5
      319
    • 4
      99
    • 3
      27
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Nothing at all, not even crucial things(processor, etc)
      13
  3. 3. The features

    • 7 - It has everything
      713
    • 6
      626
    • 5
      354
    • 4
      85
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      11
    • 1 - It has nothing, windows 1 was better.
      17


Recommended Posts

I'm running build 7057 on both my laptop (x86) and my desktop (x64) and am very impressed thus far!! Other than some minor glitches, it is very stable for me and can't wait for rtm!!

The only major annoyance I have is with the WEI. I'm running two 9800gx2's in sli and I only get a 5.9 score for my aero and gaming graphics. This score seems awful low to me as it was maxed out in Vista. Maybe it's just a driver issue, I don't know, will have to wait and see I guess.

While I think it's a very stable and great OS so far, I would give it all 6's as it is still beta and has some issues to work on, but thoroughly impressive, IMHO.

Installation: 7... The upgrade process worked flawlessly for me from the Beta to Build 7022 to Build 7048 to Build 7057... x86 of course.

Compatibility: 6... Almost everything I run works, except for my Brother MFC-420CN. It freezes during the driver installation, but it installs enough that I can print. Also, there's a few graphics glitches I noticed in Windows Media Player 12 and GRLevel3 1.52. There may be other programs I haven't noticed yet. I attribute it to my graphics card drivers (I've got a nVidia GeForce 7600 GS-- 181.71 driver). I think it's a great OS for a Beta. Sure it has its issues, but I find it pretty impressive so far.

Features: 7... I like the new and updated features, especially the updated Remote Desktop and the ability to change the login background. Granted there are some minor issues, but it's a Beta and glitches are bound to pop up.

Performance Wise, I noticed a 25% decrease in read speed of my SSD. On the other hand, it *might* be more stable with my SSD which has horrible write speeds. So in all, a slight downturn.

Performance Wise, Windows 7 needs some help - UI feels somewhat non-instant. Not for people with less than 2GB RAM. There is a slight pause when going from one mp3 to the next in WMP, odd.

Vanilla drivers are A Quality. No A+, there were two devices without drivers. After I installed drivers, one device does not have a driver still.

[XP FANBOIII ]Search is horrible, pathetic, and non-user friendly. What has ever happened to good ol' Classic Search, "Winkey + S" then "*.mp3" then "enter" and displayed all my music files :( [/XP FANBOIII]

I like the wallpaper change feature

UI is good though, Power Management, and features are pretty good though.

For now, stuff works without problems. Have not tested IE8.

Ummmk? The search is the same...but faster, and looks different.

Also, that *.mp3 (or any other extension) search works still - and probably in about 1/10th of the time.

With 512MB of RAM on a test machine I can report that Windows 7 is still perky, instant and responsive (unless I have HEAPS open, but expected), so I'm unsure what you mean by 'non-instant'.

As for your drivers, Windows 7 Action Center would pick them up if you were running build 7000, but you're probably not, and I've noticed it doesn't offer you them in any build above 7000, probably due to compatibility.

I suggest you give Windows 7 a bit more of a chance.

Ummmk? The search is the same...but faster, and looks different.

Also, that *.mp3 (or any other extension) search works still - and probably in about 1/10th of the time.

With 512MB of RAM on a test machine I can report that Windows 7 is still perky, instant and responsive (unless I have HEAPS open, but expected), so I'm unsure what you mean by 'non-instant'.

As for your drivers, Windows 7 Action Center would pick them up if you were running build 7000, but you're probably not, and I've noticed it doesn't offer you them in any build above 7000, probably due to compatibility.

I suggest you give Windows 7 a bit more of a chance.

What are you comparing the speed against? I am comparing the OS responsiveness against XP x64 SP2. I am also comparing speed of opening things like Photoshop CS3. It seems to take longer than in XP to go from A to B in the UI, even with those annoying animations disabled. By responsiveness I mean, the time between me clicking something and me getting a result. I don't feel like timing it, but if XP needs 1/50 of a second to open Explorer then 7 is more like 1/12 of a second... :/

Do you know how I could specify where to search (computer, etc) and how (+hidden, +system files, -zip files) before searching? Is there any way to enable classic search (Windows 2000 style) - I would love that! :D Or is there an alternative to Windows Search?

One thing that is odd is that regedit search is STILL not SMP optimized - it just does not use 100% of my both cores to search the registry - odd.

I think it needs tweaking, lot and lots of tweaking. Did anyone disable WFP?

Do not get me wrong, W7 is excellent in all departments, except diagnosing crash on boot problems and performance

Performance Wise, I noticed a 25% decrease in read speed of my SSD. On the other hand, it *might* be more stable with my SSD which has horrible write speeds. So in all, a slight downturn.

Performance Wise, Windows 7 needs some help - UI feels somewhat non-instant. Not for people with less than 2GB RAM. There is a slight pause when going from one mp3 to the next in WMP, odd.

Vanilla drivers are A Quality. No A+, there were two devices without drivers. After I installed drivers, one device does not have a driver still.

[XP FANBOIII ]Search is horrible, pathetic, and non-user friendly. What has ever happened to good ol' Classic Search, "Winkey + S" then "*.mp3" then "enter" and displayed all my music files :( [/XP FANBOIII]

I like the wallpaper change feature

UI is good though, Power Management, and features are pretty good though.

For now, stuff works without problems. Have not tested IE8.

Your drive is suffering from micro-stuttering because it doesn't have onboard cache. Another user from this board had two in a RAID-0 array and solved the problem by getting a hardware RAID controller with DDR memory which acts like a cache for the drives and the speeds went up. :)

I'm thinking about putting down ~?200 for a OCZ Apex 60GB SSD soon, haven't decided yet. I might buy one and then wait for the price drops to happen then get another and use a RAID array. But I won't need a hardware RAID because these come with 64mb of cache already.

Your drive is suffering from micro-stuttering because it doesn't have onboard cache. Another user from this board had two in a RAID-0 array and solved the problem by getting a hardware RAID controller with DDR memory which acts like a cache for the drives and the speeds went up. :)

I'm thinking about putting down ~?200 for a OCZ Apex 60GB SSD soon, haven't decided yet. I might buy one and then wait for the price drops to happen then get another and use a RAID array. But I won't need a hardware RAID because these come with 64mb of cache already.

knowledge.

Your drive is suffering from micro-stuttering because it doesn't have onboard cache. Another user from this board had two in a RAID-0 array and solved the problem by getting a hardware RAID controller with DDR memory which acts like a cache for the drives and the speeds went up. :)

I'm thinking about putting down ~?200 for a OCZ Apex 60GB SSD soon, haven't decided yet. I might buy one and then wait for the price drops to happen then get another and use a RAID array. But I won't need a hardware RAID because these come with 64mb of cache already.

What are you talking about? Seriously, not that you are fully wrong, but I do not agree with this judgment, for the following reasons,

I think that the UI speeds are dependent on the bloat level of the OS and well as more features are added the less performance one should expect from the same specs (98 vs XP for example) even if the newer OS can utilize the same hardware better (better mutlicore functionality). I think this is why performance is worse with 7, god I do not want to find out how bad it is with Vista:))

Stuttering only happens when large files (90+ MB) are written (and a good OS does not write much to a SSD/HD - it keeps itself in the RAM - Ubuntu is excellent at that IMO) unto my SSD. Windows 7 actually kinda made that better (at a cost of slowing down read speeds? ) for when I installed Adobe, system did not freeze up - only "stuttered".

Also, I am on a laptop so that would be impossible. ...or did I miss something?

EDIT: Also 7/6/7 is my rating ATM.

What are you talking about? Seriously, not that you are fully wrong, but I do not agree with this judgment, for the following reasons,

I think that the UI speeds are dependent on the bloat level of the OS and well as more features are added the less performance one should expect from the same specs (98 vs XP for example) even if the newer OS can utilize the same hardware better (better mutlicore functionality). I think this is why performance is worse with 7, god I do not want to find out how bad it is with Vista :)

Stuttering only happens when large files (90+ MB) are written (and a good OS does not write much to a SSD/HD - it keeps itself in the RAM - Ubuntu is excellent at that IMO) unto my SSD. Windows 7 actually kinda made that better (at a cost of slowing down read speeds? ) for when I installed Adobe, system did not freeze up - only "stuttered".

Also, I am on a laptop so that would be impossible. ...or did I miss something?

EDIT: Also 7/6/7 is my rating ATM.

I'm not fully wrong at all. I've done a lot of research because I am in fact considering buying a SSD. And a lot of reviewers have reported problems with earlier drives like your one.

The reason why Windows 7 is better for SSD's is because the file system has been changed to better support SSD's. The way SSD's and HDD's access data differently, so Microsoft and some other companies have worked together to try and help solve this problem.

And I'm sorry, you are indeed wrong. SSD's excel in large files, the problem is actual smaller files, somethings less than 100kb/s. Many SSD's on the market have this problem because they are MLC's (SLC's are better in this area). One solution is to use large memory caches to help speed things up by loading a lot of smaller files into the cache itself. The reason why a hardware RAID controller with memory works better is because when a a lot of smaller files get told to be written to the SSD, all the files are cached and queued in memory so fast that micro-stuttering simply goes away.

Here is a on the issue with the OCZ Core series which had a similar problem, it might help you:

http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/sh...ead.php?t=47183

Here is review of other SSD's, your SSD is actually listed in this benchmark (though, it's 128GB version): http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/storage/2...gb-ssd-review/4

Basically to put it this way. Your SSD is great at writing/reading larges files, but totally gets destroyed in random write/read performance (Btw, this applies to most SSDs, newer ones are getting better at it). Stuff like booting up are fast because the files needed to boot are organised and arranged accordingly, once it gets into Windows/Ubuntu etc, random access by programs happen and cause a problem.

I'm not fully wrong at all. I've done a lot of research because I am in fact considering buying a SSD. And a lot of reviewers have reported problems with earlier drives like your one.

The reason why Windows 7 is better for SSD's is because the file system has been changed to better support SSD's. The way SSD's and HDD's access data differently, so Microsoft and some other companies have worked together to try and help solve this problem.

And I'm sorry, you are indeed wrong. SSD's excel in large files, the problem is actual smaller files, somethings less than 100kb/s. Many SSD's on the market have this problem because they are MLC's (SLC's are better in this area). One solution is to use large memory caches to help speed things up by loading a lot of smaller files into the cache itself. The reason why a hardware RAID controller with memory works better is because when a a lot of smaller files get told to be written to the SSD, all the files are cached and queued in memory so fast that micro-stuttering simply goes away.

Here is a on the issue with the OCZ Core series which had a similar problem, it might help you:

http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/sh...ead.php?t=47183

Here is review of other SSD's, your SSD is actually listed in this benchmark (though, it's 128GB version): http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/storage/2...gb-ssd-review/4

Basically to put it this way. Your SSD is great at writing/reading larges files, but totally gets destroyed in random write/read performance (Btw, this applies to most SSDs, newer ones are getting better at it). Stuff like booting up are fast because the files needed to boot are organised and arranged accordingly, once it gets into Windows/Ubuntu etc, random access by programs happen and cause a problem.

Never experienced stuttering, just system unresponsiveness copying large files or large amounts of files. I seriously can't regret upgrading from a cruddy 7200RPM Hard Drive to an SSD. :)

From what I understand, you are saying that W7 is slower than XP because it attempts to remove SSD stuttering? For, tracing back to your original post, you state that the culprit, although I am not sure if you realize that XP is also on the same SSD.

It would be surprising to see Windows 7 actually be faster than XP as that itself would not make sense, just like it is silly to say that XP is faster than Windows 2000. My complaint about sluggishness is that I thought W7 could do better, nothing else. Ofcource if you think that XP is slower than W7, feel free to start a new thread and take this discussion elsewhere where we can discuss this, show 3DMark Scores and compare HDTUNE results :)

Quick question: Is there a way to make the drives/folders automatically expand when clicked (like Windows Explorer in XP)? I like being able to drill down the folder in that view without having to expand using the arrow.

This seems trivial but it really is so annoying when using the file explorer a lot with lots of drives and folders.

Those folder options are still there in Windows 7, just the default does not expand the treeview when first opened.

Regards,

Steve

Never experienced stuttering, just system unresponsiveness copying large files or large amounts of files. I seriously can't regret upgrading from a cruddy 7200RPM Hard Drive to an SSD. :)

From what I understand, you are saying that W7 is slower than XP because it attempts to remove SSD stuttering? For, tracing back to your original post, you state that the culprit, although I am not sure if you realize that XP is also on the same SSD.

It would be surprising to see Windows 7 actually be faster than XP as that itself would not make sense, just like it is silly to say that XP is faster than Windows 2000. My complaint about sluggishness is that I thought W7 could do better, nothing else. Ofcource if you think that XP is slower than W7, feel free to start a new thread and take this discussion elsewhere where we can discuss this, show 3DMark Scores and compare HDTUNE results :)

Windows 7 is faster than XP, why? Because Windows 7 takes advantage of SSDs, multiple CPUs (Multitasks a lot better), can make great use of free RAM (Free RAM is wasted RAM). Windows 7 as a whole is far better, the GUI is more responsive, it takes work off the CPU and lets the GPU do it (I know XP has GDI+, but it's nothing compared to DWM),

No, I never said Windows 7 was slower than XP because it tries to remove the stuttering, it's the opposite. Microsoft have said themselves that they've made changes to the NTFS filesystem to optimise for SSDs. Nearly all of todays file systems are designed for hard drives that use spindles, onboard cache (that was the real problem withthe earlier SSDs) etc.

It's not silly at all that Windows 7 is faster than XP. XP was great for it's time and hardware has matured to see it's full performance, but we are at the beginning of seeing hardware (SDDs for example) that XP wasn't designed for. XP doesn't take advantage of free RAM, why? Because back in the day, Windows was really restricted to how much RAM it could use and was designed for systems with 512MB (1GB was it's sweet spot). These days, 2/3/4GB's of memory is becoming a standard and Windows over the past few years has grown around new hardware. I'm not sure if you've ever tried using a P4 system with Windows 98. I did and the performance was sluggish, why? Most likely down to drivers, but Windows 98 couldn't take advantage of all the CPU's features.

Windows XP is fast, but it's coming to the end of it's ability and Windows 7 is taking it's lead.

Windows 7 is still in testing, and it's quite possible we'll see more performance from it because of possible debug code.

I want to see these benchmarks you keep talking about, what you are talking about and what I am experiencing are two different things. Also, I will dismiss any source like M$ for reasons of heavy bias.

I have not seen any SSD advantages with 7, in my opinion slower read speeds is not an improvement. Even though XP was not designed for SSD in mind - my HDTune benchmarks show that is much more consistent, with 0.1ms faster seek, and higher avg read. The gui requires more resources than before. Unloading it to GPU would effectively damage CUDA performance? RAM utilization is all nice, but I am not seeing it in action either.

Also there is a bug where the changing WPs stop changing, anyone else experiences this?

Edited by Udedenkz

After installing the 32bit version of Windows 7 last night, I'm still left a bit cold by it. The install was flawless and after a couple of updates everything seemed to be going well. After firing-up my PC in the evening to have another look at the OS, it just seems so "laggy" I don't know what's happened. I did install an anti-virus program (Kaspersky Beta) and did a defrag and cleaned up the install with CCleaner. I have had IE8 crash out on me a few times as well. Are there any trick for speeding up Windows 7? My Rig's spec shouldn't cause any problems:

Dell Inspiron 530

Q6600 QC

4GB DDR2 800mhz

HD4850 512mb

360gb SATA2 HD

After installing the 32bit version of Windows 7 last night, I'm still left a bit cold by it. The install was flawless and after a couple of updates everything seemed to be going well. After firing-up my PC in the evening to have another look at the OS, it just seems so "laggy" I don't know what's happened. I did install an anti-virus program (Kaspersky Beta) and did a defrag and cleaned up the install with CCleaner. I have had IE8 crash out on me a few times as well. Are there any trick for speeding up Windows 7? My Rig's spec shouldn't cause any problems:

Dell Inspiron 530

Q6600 QC

4GB DDR2 800mhz

HD4850 512mb

360gb SATA2 HD

By laggy, you mean laggy compared to XP or Vista?

I want to see these benchmarks you keep talking about, what you are talking about and what I am experiencing are two different things. Also, I will dismiss any source like M$ for reasons of heavy bias.

I have not seen any SSD advantages with 7, in my opinion slower read speeds is not an improvement. Even though XP was not designed for SSD in mind - my HDTune benchmarks show that is much more consistent, with 0.1ms faster seek, and higher avg read. The gui requires more resources than before. Unloading it to GPU would effectively damage CUDA performance? RAM utilization is all nice, but I am not seeing it in action either.

Also there is a bug where the changing WPs stop changing, anyone else experiences this?

You know it does nothing for your credibility as a technical observer when you say stupid **** like "M$" and refer to HDTune benchmarks as examples of real world I/O performance.

Tried 7068, loved it, tinkered with it, but at the end of the day, I prefer Vista due to the fact that Vista's been tweaked out by patches from Microsoft, and despite Windows 7's incredible stability, it's still a leaked OS, and an illegally leaked OS, and I'd rather run my machine on a legal, rtm'd, and stable OS.

Wow, the pigs must be flying high today, never thought I'd imagine myself saying that I'd rather stay on the rock solid stable Windows Vista, but Microsoft knows how to fix their stuff. They were slow to get going, but now Vista is incredible.

You know it does nothing for your credibility as a technical observer when you say stupid **** like "M$" and refer to HDTune benchmarks as examples of real world I/O performance.

Valid point, performancemark (unlike HDTune) shows pretty much equal scores for my SSD for both XP and 7 - then again it shows weaker scores for everything else, most noticeably 10 times slower GUI performance. Compared to XP, the UI is indeed drastically slower (I notice this when scrolling or when watching Firefox load pages- this is even with the latest build and WU nvidia drivers) and DX9 rendering performance is dramatically decreased as well (and then there is glide things like Quake III Live which renders at about 20FPS on W7 on an 8600MGT). IMO, any performance concerned individual (like a person dealing with editing of gigantic photoshop files) or DX9 hardware gamer would, at this point in time, regret switching to 7-based OS. ...and, what the hell is from with saying M$- stop being a Microsoft fanboy. I can't commend on the aids called Vista though, never used it.

Sorry, I ment by Vista's standards. It just seems to pause for a second before it does what I want. I do understand that it is a beta, but people have said that they have noticed a speed increase over Vista..........

Make sure you have latest drivers for everything and disable anything you do not use. This might help, otherwise I do not know. :(

The things that bother me most in windows 7:

* Search - simply doesnt work for me. in libraries, in indexed locations, non indexed locations - it doesnt matter - i cant find $#it. i have to start total commander whenever i want to look for something.

I have a few folders where i keep stuff i download - i added them all into a "downloads" library. when in the library, i start to type the name of a folder in the search box, and it cant find it. i then have to scroll to the folder, and find it manually. in one word: awful.

* the explorer customization options (see attachment) - i really miss the "up" (third from left) button, and the ability to add "delete" and "properties" buttons..

--

my 2 cents

post-285084-1238684836_thumb.jpg

Agreed with rMutt on both of the above points.

Search - IMO it has taken several steps backwards in terms of ease of use and effectiveness since Windows XP. Back then it was just so simple, and you could more easily find what you needed. Now, it's arguably more simple; but you can't find jack. :laugh:

Explorer options - I agree, and i think most people who were comfortable navigating with explorer really miss the "up" button. But, i think we'll eventually get used to the new method of navigation.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Indeed - drives me mad - usually because Refresh is hidden in the full menu.
    • Firefox has had rounded corners for many years. I take it you're not a fan of modern browsers?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!