So.. for all the mac users who have tried windows 7...


Recommended Posts

If it still feels as quick and polished as it does when it rolls out to RTM I think it'll be a winner for Microsoft.

I immediately liked Windows 7 as soon as I installed the beta - all the things that bugged me about Vista were addressed and they'd put some thought into some genuinely new & useful features.

TBH I could be tempted to ditch Mac ownership and come back to a Windows PC. As I keep saying the lack of graphics performance on the iMac (with no suitable and affordable upgrade option) is already annoying me enough - now that Microsoft have unbroken what they'd done with Vista, I'd have no qualms about switching back.

Nice OS, but it has the same eccentricities of classic Windows, which I have moved on from. This means non-standard gui interfaces, non-standard keyboard shortcuts, and other little perks which separate OS X from the norm.

I have a question. Since Windows has more market share and a bigger user base... wouldn't the Apple have the non-standard gui and non-standard Keyboard shortcuts?

I have a question. Since Windows has more market share and a bigger user base... wouldn't the Apple have the non-standard gui and non-standard Keyboard shortcuts?

Windows only has a bigger market share because it's a cheap option and as hard as Microsoft tries - Windows is not a premium quality platform. It's a schizophrenic collection of ideas and implementations cobbled together into a box and labelled 'Windows'.

As far as your standard and non-standard keyboard shortcut argument, I don't get it, or was it a sarcastic comment?

I have a question. Since Windows has more market share and a bigger user base... wouldn't the Apple have the non-standard gui and non-standard Keyboard shortcuts?

You'd think so, but that's sadly not the case. User interface guidelines are just taken more seriously with third party Mac developers.

Something as simple as a universal CMD+Q (Quit application) can't even be found in the Windows world, no matter if you're using 7 or XP.

IMHO - it wasn't worth the switch back for me.

I have been fond of XP for a long time, even have tried all flavors of Vista and still no switch. For me, it isn't a Windows vs. Mac vs. Linux thing. I just found that the Mac was my cup of tea for the time as far as abilities for my requirements. Sure, a PC could do it an all, but the Mac was where I was heading to and the time was right to do it when I did. For me, most anything I could want to do on Windows, I can do on the Mac with either similar software or the same.

I wish more people would think how you do. Unfortunatly everyone thinks it is windows vs. mac. vs. linux. What it comes down to is what does the best job for you, not what bandwagoners think is the best. For me its Ubuntu and XP. When someone wants to use my pc, I start up ubuntu so they cant screw up anything :-)

Windows only has a bigger market share because it's a cheap option and as hard as Microsoft tries - Windows is not a premium quality platform. It's a schizophrenic collection of ideas and implementations cobbled together into a box and labelled 'Windows'.

As far as your standard and non-standard keyboard shortcut argument, I don't get it, or was it a sarcastic comment?

The Mac Mini is a cheap option that nobody chooses, is it not a "premium quality platform"? Apple is better at "controlling" the Mac "style" than Microsoft is the PC's platform because.... drum roll please, they DON"T control it.

They only make the Operating System, however they ARE getting better about all of Windows looking the same, still a ways to go, but better. They are working toward a more unified gui in Windows 7.

He was saying that since Microsoft has more market share and more people use Windows, wouldn't the less used keyboard short cuts be considered non-standard? Makes sense to me, but I'm a Vista/openSuse user what do I know? :)

I just don't like to see FUD being spread about operating systems, whether it's Microsoft zealots bashing Apple or Apple fans bashing Microsoft.

Then why do you post something like this:

And that fact that it appeals to everyone and their dog is the reason it owns upwards of 90% of the market.

You know damn well that people don't choose Window$. It comes pre-installed.

So you like facts? Have some:

http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.p...005010107100653

You'd think so, but that's sadly not the case. User interface guidelines are just taken more seriously with third party Mac developers.

Something as simple as a universal CMD+Q (Quit application) can't even be found in the Windows world, no matter if you're using 7 or XP.

I've never used a Windows application that didn't support Alt+F4.

Then why do you post something like this:

You know damn well that people don't choose Window$. It comes pre-installed.

So you like facts? Have some:

http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.p...005010107100653

I believe Apple sells computers every where in the world, don't they? If not they sell them online and will ship them right to you. Microsoft does not have a monopoly at my local Best Buy, I can walk right in and buy several models of laptops and both Mac Mini models.

Why are you posting legal crap about Microsoft? Apple has had their share of legal troubles, I believe their last lawsuit was against a school for it's logo. Nice!

I believe Apple sells computers every where in the world, don't they? If not they sell them online and will ship them right to you. Microsoft does not have a monopoly at my local Best Buy, I can walk right in and buy several models of laptops and both Mac Mini models.

Why are you posting legal crap about Microsoft? Apple has had their share of legal troubles, I believe their last lawsuit was against a school for it's logo. Nice!

I think his point is that Microsoft has been accused in the past of monopolistic behavior, while Apple hasn't.

If Apple had the same amount of market share people would be claiming apple is monopolistic. The problem with apple is that they are more control freak then Microsoft. Apple has not been very successful in the business sector yet although that may change if apple decides to open up.

I think his point is that Microsoft has been accused in the past of monopolistic behavior, while Apple hasn't.

Not just accused, they were found guilty.

Of course, they weren't found guilty of having a monopoly (not necessarily a bad thing), they were found guilty of abusing their power to force competitors out of the market place.

You'd think so, but that's sadly not the case. User interface guidelines are just taken more seriously with third party Mac developers.

Something as simple as a universal CMD+Q (Quit application) can't even be found in the Windows world, no matter if you're using 7 or XP.

As above, ALT+F4, it's implemented by the OS. Or how about CTRL+C?

As for using Win7 on a Mac, I've used Vista on my Macbook as the only OS since I bought it a few years ago and I've been using Win7 for the past few months. Every now and then I can't turn off the WiFi and have to restart which is annoying, other than that though all is good and battery is better than on vista. I can't asses performance though as its just a laptop, I hardly game on it, it's run as fast as I could want.

If you didn't like Vista then you won't like Windows 7 much more. The "superbar" is a step up from the task bar and mimics the Mac OS Dock.

Eye candy aside, the underlying problems with Windows when compared to Mac OS are:

1. An overly complex program installation and (more importantly) uninstallation paradigm.

2. The Control Panel has become overly complicated. There is no more "classic" view..instead things are now more buried in sub-menus and dialog boxes than they ever have been.

3. The Windows Registry still exists.... need I say more?

I like Mac OS, and wish I could use it more. But the reality is the applications that I have (as a matter of financial security) to use are Windows only.

I installed it on my iMac via Boot Camp, and so far I'm positively surprised. As has been said before: Win7 is Vista like it should have been back in 2006.

Is it good enough to make me switch back 100%? No.

Am I going to buy it after RTM and keep a dual-boot configuration? You bet.

I think his point is that Microsoft has been accused in the past of monopolistic behavior, while Apple hasn't.

Apple hasn't been accused because they have a smaller market share.

MS include IE, they get in trouble. Apple include Safari, nobody cares

MS includes WMP, they get in trouble. Apple includes iTunes, nobody cares

I've never used a Windows application that didn't support Alt+F4.

And this comes down to the different philosophies the two OSes have. Windows being traditionally document-centric, and OS X application-centric. Alt+F4 will close the current window but will not necessarily terminate the entire application and related processes.

That said, they could implement something like Windows+F4 that will close all grouped windows.

3. The Windows Registry still exists.... need I say more?

Yes, what's wrong with that? :)

What if they called it the iDatabase? Magic storage area? Would that fix it?

And this comes down to the different philosophies the two OSes have. Windows being traditionally document-centric, and OS X application-centric. Alt+F4 will close the current window but will not necessarily terminate the entire application and related processes.

That said, they could implement something like Windows+F4 that will close all grouped windows.

ALT+F4 will close the process and all associated threads of the process you ask it to terminate. If you have multiples if the same process open it will not kill all of them as they are different processes merely with the same name. So if you have two word documents open in two word processes then it will only close one of them.

.....

First, there is no such thing as "user-friendly." It's a myth. It all comes down to what each individual user is more comfortable with using. You obviously love Mac OS X, and I don't. Right away, Windows is more user-friendly for me, and it's not for you. And also please explain more about this "design culture" at Microsoft.

....

Actually, there is such a thing as user friendly. If you don't believe that, why bother with a GUI for your OS? Or a mouse? Why not go back to punch cards? Oh because it makes it easier to use in some respects...

Computers shouldn't need training courses and books. It should be obvious what to do just by looking at it or come with a lot of well written assistance built in.

I do agree that it is mostly down to personal preference, but fundamentally the people who design software need to make it easy and friendly to use. No matter how much the l33tists poo poo it because they want to feel special and hardcore, clunky and hard to use equipment doesn't benefit anyone.

.....

He was saying that since Microsoft has more market share and more people use Windows, wouldn't the less used keyboard short cuts be considered non-standard? Makes sense to me, but I'm a Vista/openSuse user what do I know? :)

I thought it was more to do with having the same standards between all applications within the OS. For example, if CMD + P opens a print dialogue box in one application, you'd expect it to do the same elsewhere.

As far as I know, Windows has a lot of "universal" shortcuts that are kept reasonably consistent, but it's not as consistent as OS X. We all also know that the GUI is not as consistent in Windows as it could be. I've not noticed any interfaces that didn't look right in OS X yet.

If Apple had the same amount of market share people would be claiming apple is monopolistic. The problem with apple is that they are more control freak then Microsoft. Apple has not been very successful in the business sector yet although that may change if apple decides to open up.

They are probably too expensive for most businesses, and a lot of specialist software is Windows only. Businesses just want the job done, as cheaply as possible.

What if they called it the iDatabase? Magic storage area? Would that fix it?

No, that wouldn't fix it. They need to figure out another way of going about a system wide database, and I'm not sure what that is. I do think, however, that programs need to be self-contained. I do not like that a program registers itself as the default program to open a particular file format (for example). That program may be nice and ask me, but it doesn't have to in order to make the change in my Windows Registry.

If I uninstall a program, all the crap it threw in my Windows Registry should be removed are reverted back to default settings. The problem with this, is that I am relying on the software author to provide this service to me. This service should be something Microsoft provides for me by having superior code in Windows that guarantees clean uninstalls of programs.

I used to be a avid PC user but got sick and tired of all the BS trying to keep it running in every aspect, I haven't had to worry about a single thing with MAC for almost 2 years now it just works so, hush your mouth.. :)

The same thing can be said for PC in the 6 years I can XP I only had to re-install once and that was due to a hard drive failure and the the OS. That PC is still running XP now serving my audio and Video to my network.

My IMac however has had the OS reloaded twice once because of a kernel panic during an update after the restart it was stuck in a constant reboot loop. I can't remember why I had to reinstall the second time. But I like both OS's and they both have there good points and bad no OS is perfect. I do like where Windows 7 is going though sofar it has run much better than I would have expected for a Beta1.

No, that wouldn't fix it. They need to figure out another way of going about a system wide database, and I'm not sure what that is. I do think, however, that programs need to be self-contained. I do not like that a program registers itself as the default program to open a particular file format (for example). That program may be nice and ask me, but it doesn't have to in order to make the change in my Windows Registry.

If I uninstall a program, all the crap it threw in my Windows Registry should be removed are reverted back to default settings. The problem with this, is that I am relying on the software author to provide this service to me. This service should be something Microsoft provides for me by having superior code in Windows that guarantees clean uninstalls of programs.

The reason why I made the comment about changing the name is if you try to replace the registry with a "better" system, you just end up making another database, and it wouldn't be any different. There seems to be this myth going around that using a registry is inherently bad, Mac will obviously store all its OS wide settings somewhere and it will probably look similar to the registry (a DB).

When it comes to applications, they can work just like on a mac if they want, they can have all their settings in a self contained folder, they can politely ask you if you want them to work with certain file types etc. The registry is option when creating programs, it is not mandatory.

You can say that Windows should manage this stuff and take power away from programs, but then programmers can't do what they want and they won't be happy either.

You can't please everybody :)

Nice OS, but it has the same eccentricities of classic Windows, which I have moved on from. This means non-standard gui interfaces, non-standard keyboard shortcuts, and other little perks which separate OS X from the norm.

In terms of actual software apps: adium, time machine, growl, terminal, bowtie, preview, fontcase, candybar, keynote, system preferences.

But all in all, I can't let go of dmg drag/drop installs, application preference files management (no registry), cmd+h, standard menubar, hot corners, column view, quick look, dialog sheets, etc.

i would agree with that, windows 7 is great, but it still feels like windows and that's why i'll prolly not use it as much as i do a mac... I think OSX is still miles ahead of windows in terms of multi tasking, but windows 7 does help.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!