DEFINITIVE: Which Linux Distro? (poll for 2009)


The Definitive Linux Poll for 2009!  

809 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Linux Distro? (multiples allowed, if you use a couple)

    • Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu/*buntu
      361
    • Debian/Mepis/Knoppix/Kanotix/Xandros/Elive/Other Debian
      50
    • Fedora Core/Redhat/RHEL/CentOS/WBEL
      78
    • OpenSUSE/SUSE/Novell
      53
    • Gentoo/Sabayon
      32
    • Mandriva/PCLinuxOS
      22
    • Slackware/Slax/Zenwalk
      18
    • Arch/Shift
      66
    • Linspire/Freespire
      3
    • Damn Small/Puppy
      12
  2. 2. Which destop environment / window manager? (multiples allowed)

    • GNOME
      366
    • KDE
      135
    • XFCE
      57
    • fluxbox/blackbox/openbox/LXDE
      48
    • Enlightenment/E17
      13
    • IceWM
      4
    • TWM or something equally basic
      5
    • GUI? pft. CLI or die!
      23
    • other
      18
    • whatever my distro came with. Is there a choice?
      15
  3. 3. I use Linux for... (multiples allowed)

    • Desktop (for school, work, home, games)
      359
    • Media Centre (primarily for videos & music)
      113
    • Server (web,ftp,file/print)
      123
    • I don't really use it for anything but learning Linux
      140
    • I've only ever used it as a LiveCD, or to recover files from a non-bootable OS
      33
    • Other
      41


Recommended Posts

I've changed to fedora 10 for now. It seems MUCH faster and more responsive than both ubuntu and suse for me. Also they keep they're packaged way more up to date.

Also the boot time is incredible, faster than vista dn other distros I have tried.

Also for some reason suse's grub install ALWAYS nukes my windows vista boot loader whenever I want to remove it, never happens with other distros. It completely corrupts my bcd registry and I can't use any apps like easybcd to rewrite my windows bootloader like I usually do. So be careful installing grub over your windows bootloader with suse 11.1, i've reproduced this happening a couple times.

@rson451- is that the new shift logo you're using for an avatar? That looks pretty sweet. :D

It was my own foolish musings in inkscape. It's gone now for I feel bad representing Shift with the negative posts I tend to make on this forum.

I'm playing around with Ubuntu 9.04 Alpha and I'm very impressed. Ext 4 is really noticeably faster. It just doesn't feel like an alpha. It runs very smooth. I know there will be some rough patches ahead (like currently, as they are upgrading python....a lot of stuff breaks) until we reach final, but the final should be the best ever.

I'm playing around with Ubuntu 9.04 Alpha and I'm very impressed. Ext 4 is really noticeably faster. It just doesn't feel like an alpha. It runs very smooth. I know there will be some rough patches ahead (like currently, as they are upgrading python....a lot of stuff breaks) until we reach final, but the final should be the best ever.

I was going to try that but ati still has no drivers for the new version of xorg the alpha has. and the radeonhd drivers are teh suck on my card.

I was trying to make the switch but then I broke my leg and I was stranded away from any computer with Linux on it , now I'm back and I'm getting ready to get back in the game again ... I use Linux mainly for some of its software and tweaks , there are lots of stuff you can do with Linux and my main system is Xubuntu with XFCE

^ I was a bit surprised but the radeon drivers worked perfectly for my old x1300. That's the first time that ever happened. I knew they were working on the radeon drivers but I didn't know they were that far along.

Yes I have one machine with an old x300 and out of the box compiz works and everything. Hopefully some day that will be the case in my laptop card too.

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm using Arch. I'd been so used to Slackware and I always found it a headache when there weren't packages available had to compile my self (I know things have improved). Arch is all i686 compiled, pacman is a breeze to use.

I know people complain that E17 isn't all that featureful. I just want a GUI that works, is stable and has enough functionality. I think this is the snappiest WM I've ever used. I have the ATI 9.1 Catalyst installed on my system and X.org + E17 it blows away Windows and OS X - speed wise anyways ;)

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

My home has been using Ubuntu only for about 6 months now, and we love it. My rig originally came with Windows vista so I can install it if I want to, but I have just fallen head over heals with Ubuntu and Linux in General. I did download the Windows 7 RC & install it in virtualbox, it's ok but I really can't see any reasons for me to purchase it.

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm dual booting Linux Mint 7 (Gnome) and Windows 7 on all of my machines.

If either Linux or Mac would get their act together when it comes to securing native installs/support for games then I'd be far more inclined to use one of those as my main operating system. Emulation and virtualization simply do not cut it.

As it stands now, I'm in Windows 7 90% of the time because I know that as soon as I get a break in the workload I'm going to fire-up a game and I want it to work full speed without any layers of abstraction between me and my framerate.

It's picky and petty but I build my machines to play games...the fact that you can do work on them is just an unfortunate side-effect ;)

It seems that I had not voted in this year's poll. Strange...

I'm starting to like LXDE. It is the new default desktop for Knoppix (at least the 6.0.1 CD edition). I'm not 100% on this but it seems to be based on openbox (although, it doesn't look anything like other derivatives such as fluxbox). I guess that is why it shares a line on this year's poll.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!