DEFINITIVE: Which Linux Distro? (poll for 2009)


The Definitive Linux Poll for 2009!  

809 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Linux Distro? (multiples allowed, if you use a couple)

    • Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu/*buntu
      361
    • Debian/Mepis/Knoppix/Kanotix/Xandros/Elive/Other Debian
      50
    • Fedora Core/Redhat/RHEL/CentOS/WBEL
      78
    • OpenSUSE/SUSE/Novell
      53
    • Gentoo/Sabayon
      32
    • Mandriva/PCLinuxOS
      22
    • Slackware/Slax/Zenwalk
      18
    • Arch/Shift
      66
    • Linspire/Freespire
      3
    • Damn Small/Puppy
      12
  2. 2. Which destop environment / window manager? (multiples allowed)

    • GNOME
      366
    • KDE
      135
    • XFCE
      57
    • fluxbox/blackbox/openbox/LXDE
      48
    • Enlightenment/E17
      13
    • IceWM
      4
    • TWM or something equally basic
      5
    • GUI? pft. CLI or die!
      23
    • other
      18
    • whatever my distro came with. Is there a choice?
      15
  3. 3. I use Linux for... (multiples allowed)

    • Desktop (for school, work, home, games)
      359
    • Media Centre (primarily for videos & music)
      113
    • Server (web,ftp,file/print)
      123
    • I don't really use it for anything but learning Linux
      140
    • I've only ever used it as a LiveCD, or to recover files from a non-bootable OS
      33
    • Other
      41


Recommended Posts

Arch + Gnome on my main desktop w/ Windows 7 dual boot

Ubuntu + Gnome on my laptop, just for ease of install and the whole power management thing, for some reason works better in Ubuntu, but willing to change to Arch once I get some time to tinker around

My opinion of Linux has risen in the last 6 months from "wtf" to "usable". As a development environment, it's not bad, with Eclipse, Code::Blocks, Netbeans and now Monodevelop (C# on Linux - woot!). Not having Visual Studio around is quite painful though, and Eclipse keeps causing JVM crashes no matter what I do. It took me a while to get used to installing programs with the package manager, but it's a nice system overall, even though it doesn't always get the latest or best version of the software. I use Ubuntu as my main OS at work because in order to run Windows you have to install all their monitoring crap that slows the system to a crawl. It's fun to watch my system boot in 30 seconds when my colleagues have to wait like 10 minutes to get into Windows XP.

I still use Windows, but the 7 RC version, and in a VM on Ubuntu. :p And at home, it's Vista SP1 and will stay so until Windows 7 appears on MSDNAA.

  • 1 month later...

I'd like to suggest Sabayon for those who haven't tried it. I recently switched to Sabayon KDE from kubuntu and have found it to be a breath of fresh air compared to the buggy kubuntu. Plus it comes with all the necessary codecs already installed for avi, mp3, etc.

  • 2 weeks later...

I've tried many distros, but I've settled on Windows XP (I have no need to change yet) setup with all the open source software I need, and with Cygwin installed. Cygwin is not Unix or Linux, but it lets me do everything I want to do the Unix way while never having to leave the underlying Windows I'm already booted in. As a an old non-GUI computer user going back to Apple II and Radio Shack TRS-80 days, I love the way Cygwin lets me do things. I would choose Ubuntu though, if it wasn't that I have only one computer, and it's a laptop on which some of the convenience features just won't work fully in Linux (some indispensable touchpad features, wifi not reliable, fan can't be controlled and system overheats).

If we're talking a full desktop system, a full installation of Ubuntu but using Openbox or Fluxbox as the window manager is what I like best. I say, install it all, and then use it minimal style if that's what you want.

Mandriva 2009.1 x64

Kde 4.2.4 (upgrading to 4.3 once it's released)

Desktop

I've tried Ubuntu, openSuse and Sabayon before, but thzey all had their share of problems :pinch:

Now here on Mandriva, finally everything's working fine - Ati driver, network/internet, compiz etc. :cool:

So I then decided to give it an extended trial and ended up switching to it full-time :woot:

I don't see a desktop thread here, so I'll put mine right here (click for big).

The gadget is Automatik from SuperKaramba, desktop theme is Vistar 7. Both are from kde-look.org (got them via the "Get new stuff" option in the corresponding theme selectors).

post-276924-1248571889_thumb.jpg

I use Kubuntu Linux Karmic Koala (9.10a2) in conjuction with KDE 4.3RC3 (4.2.98). GNOME is too ugly for me...

Gnomes never had a reputation for being pretty though, so no big surprise :laugh:

Stopped using Linux on my home computer, it is flat out slow (since it's 4 year old hardware). At work, I use it as a server, and sometimes as a desktop for playing around. Using Fedora for the server, and Ubuntu on a test machine. These machines are beasts, Core 2 Extremes, 8GB RAM, RAID 0, overkill for what we need it for, but hey we have the budget :D

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

^ I was a bit surprised but the radeon drivers worked perfectly for my old x1300. That's the first time that ever happened. I knew they were working on the radeon drivers but I didn't know they were that far along.

When it comes to Linux as Desktop, or even FreeBSD, "OLD VGA is Good, actually Old VGA is best"... especially when we talk about ATi, since nVidia has a better support. I never had drivers problems with old systems, as for more recent ones, it's such a pain. Even the 64 bit support (still drivers related, not flash or things like that) is not so good, so rather ignore you 4 GB + ram and go with x86, yet most recommend you go with AMD64 if you system is capable...

  • 6 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Ubuntu and opensuse (Y)

Nothing beats GNOME imho, after trying it in Ubuntu...

Usually I've used it for recoveries live-usb/cd/dvd trials and to tinker with it...

I've got it installed as second of three OS's on my netbook :)

Glassed Silver:mac

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!