Idiot abuses cat on YouTube


Recommended Posts

Bro' you either obviously didn't watch both videos, didn't really think of the pain the poor creature was feeling or you are a very insensitive person, abusing a creature who feels pain just like you do but cannot express or defend itself is more than enough reason for YouTube to remove this, they remove thousands of copyrighted material everyday, if they wouldn't remove this type of thing I would really be angry at them, dude the kitty was crying in both videos didn't you notice it?

Yeah I get what you're saying, I didn't mean for my post to come off as being insensitive. No human or other animal deserves to be treated like garbage.

Edit: there's a second video? I only saw one.

I find the number of people who are suggesting beating up or killing this guy over the videos to be odd. While I'm not going to say whether or not I agree with the notion of beating seven shades of [something] out of him, it's strange how many people are willing to do that based on actions he did to a cat. Fair enough, people don't want to see a cat get abused - but is killing or beating a stupid kid a justified response to his behaviour?

I also don't understand why people are getting all uppity about this when the same people turn blind eyes to worse things that go on all around the world on a daily basis, and not just to animals, but people too - innocent children at that. I suppose because that sort of thing isn't broadcast on Youtube, it's easier to forget about, or to not be informed of it at all. Bliss in ignorance and all that. I'm not criticising, just commenting - before someone who I didn't mean to offend starts ranting at me :p

I find the number of people who are suggesting beating up or killing this guy over the videos to be odd. While I'm not going to say whether or not I agree with the notion of beating seven shades of [something] out of him, it's strange how many people are willing to do that based on actions he did to a cat. Fair enough, people don't want to see a cat get abused - but is killing or beating a stupid kid a justified response to his behaviour?

I also don't understand why people are getting all uppity about this when the same people turn blind eyes to worse things that go on all around the world on a daily basis, and not just to animals, but people too - innocent children at that. I suppose because that sort of thing isn't broadcast on Youtube, it's easier to forget about, or to not be informed of it at all. Bliss in ignorance and all that. I'm not criticising, just commenting - before someone who I didn't mean to offend starts ranting at me :p

I personally believe in an eye for an eye (if you kill someone, you should have your life taken, etc etc)....so I think at the very least, he should be smacked around and thrown into a wall for a minute or so. As for stuff like this happening on a daily basis, it depends...if you mean stuff like that happening to domestic cats or dogs, then I feel whatever the person does to them, should be done to the person who did it......animals like cows and chickens and what now, I am perfectly OK with killing them as a majority of the time they end up as food no matter how they are killed.

I personally believe in an eye for an eye (if you kill someone, you should have your life taken, etc etc)....so I think at the very least, he should be smacked around and thrown into a wall for a minute or so. As for stuff like this happening on a daily basis, it depends...if you mean stuff like that happening to domestic cats or dogs, then I feel whatever the person does to them, should be done to the person who did it......animals like cows and chickens and what now, I am perfectly OK with killing them as a majority of the time they end up as food no matter how they are killed.

Wow, an eye for an eye? Shouldn't this only apply to inter-human violence?

And your domestic animals vs livestock argument makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Wow, an eye for an eye? Shouldn't this only apply to inter-human violence?

And your domestic animals vs livestock argument makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Each to their own.

This is exactly why there will never be any kind of world peace or anything of the sort, everyone has different values.

As for domestic vs livestock, how does that not make sense? Domestic animals were raised to be around and with humans, therefore you should treat them how you would another person.....livestock is raised for food, they are raised to die and be eaten. Major difference if you ask me.

As for domestic vs livestock, how does that not make sense? Domestic animals were raised to be around and with humans, therefore you should treat them how you would another person.....livestock is raised for food, they are raised to die and be eaten. Major difference if you ask me.

What is considered a "domestic animal" to your country is livestock to another's.

What is considered a "domestic animal" to your country is livestock to another's.

First of all we don't torture livestock; second cats are not livestock anyway. I fail to see your point.

I don't want to see the videos but I really hope these guys get what they deserve. :angry:

The video was recorded in the US which makes the "domestic animal" in the video domestic, not livestock.

That isn't the point. A domestic animal is nothing more than a term, it doesn't make the animal any more important or special than livestock.

First of all we don't torture livestock; second cats are not livestock anyway. I fail to see your point.

Is that a joke? You don't think livestock go through worse treatment than this?

People like that especially at that age (by the sounds of their voices) do extend their "fetish" onto actual human being either through bullying or even worse (if they don't already do it...)

The video is very sad for the cat and I cannot stand any kind of abuse to any pet or human!

If I knew those two in person I'd make sure they were dealt with. The world doesn't need people like that and they just waste tax payers time and money being put to trial and being locked up, they are better off taken from this earth or beaten to an inch of their life.

That isn't the point. A domestic animal is nothing more than a term, it doesn't make the animal any more important or special than livestock.

Nothing more than a term? So an animal sharing a much closer bond with humans than another animal doesn't make it more important than livestock? I have to completely disagree with that statement. Chances are you disagree with my statement, but in the end does it really matter? Everyone has a different view about topics like this, trying to disagree with someone about how they feel about the topic is like trying to prove their wrong when there is no wrong answer.

That isn't the point. A domestic animal is nothing more than a term, it doesn't make the animal any more important or special than livestock.

Yeah, and it sounds like you should get a dictionary and look that term up. There is a difference. That said it's just as wrong to torture any animals, but yes we do kill some animals for food, it's kind of necessary. That's a completely different thing than what happened here.

Is that a joke? You don't think livestock go through worse treatment than this?

No, I'm fairly positive that we don't beat the crap out of livestock and hurt them for fun while making videos of it.

Nothing more than a term? So an animal sharing a much closer bond with humans than another animal doesn't make it more important than livestock? I have to completely disagree with that statement. Chances are you disagree with my statement, but in the end does it really matter? Everyone has a different view about topics like this, trying to disagree with someone about how they feel about the topic is like trying to prove their wrong when there is no wrong answer.
Yeah, and it sounds like you should get a dictionary and look that term up. There is a difference. That said it's just as wrong to torture any animals, but yes we do kill some animals for food, it's kind of necessary. That's a completely different thing than what happened here.

No, I'm fairly positive that we don't beat the crap out of livestock and hurt them for fun while making videos of it.

Your arguments are ridiculous.

Most livestock IS domesticated.

Besides that, how does the fact that YOU are able to better connect with a dog or a cat relate to other people who have stronger relationships with livestock like horses, etc?

Every animal is equally important and cared for less or more in different countries. You can't expect and eye for an eye when the acceptability of killing certain animals is simply based on your society.

Who is advocating torturing horses? Could you just stop ranting, you sound like a crazy PETA freak. Yes we know all kinds of animals get abused, it's sad and it's illegal. What does any of that have to do with these poor cats? Are you trying to say this video was no big deal? What on earth is your point, or do you even have one?

Killing animals for food does not equal hurting animals for absolutely no reason like this case. It just doesn't.

Who is advocating torturing horses? Could you just stop ranting, you sound like a crazy PETA freak. Yes we know all kinds of animals get abused, it's sad and it's illegal. What does any of that have to do with these poor cats? Are you trying to say this video was no big deal? What on earth is your point, or do you even have one?

If you actually read what we began to talk about - "An Eye for an Eye"

You would have known.

Your arguments are ridiculous.

Most livestock IS domesticated.

Besides that, how does the fact that YOU are able to better connect with a dog or a cat relate to other people who have stronger relationships with livestock like horses, etc?

Every animal is equally important and cared for less or more in different countries. You can't expect and eye for an eye when the acceptability of killing certain animals is simply based on your society.

When was the last time a horse was looked at as a main food source?

If domestic is too broad a term for you to understand the difference, how about using pets instead? From what your saying, pets and livestock should be treated the same. When was the last time you let a cow sleep on your couch or on the edge of your bed? Thought so.......

Who is advocating torturing horses? Could you just stop ranting, you sound like a crazy PETA freak. Yes we know all kinds of animals get abused, it's sad and it's illegal. What does any of that have to do with these poor cats? Are you trying to say this video was no big deal? What on earth is your point, or do you even have one?

Killing animals for food does not equal hurting animals for absolutely no reason like this case. It just doesn't.

I think the point was why is this video causing such an uproar when there are loads of other cases of worse situations that nobody bats an eyelid at.

Oh how I wish I lived in Oklahoma at this very moment.

I understand bad things happen to a lot of animals, even worse things. But, him and his friend made a ****ing video, and the cat is defenseless. I hope something worse happens to him, and I hope we can all see.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!