F1 World Championship 2009 Thread



Recommended Posts

To be honest I was expecting worse, but evidently the way the team has reacted to the scandal has convinced the FIA they have the right intent. Pleased with the outcome, as a fine would be very hard to absorb, and nobody wants cars to be removed from races. Lets hope this is the last piece of controversy surrounding McLaren for a few years so we can get back to the ontrack action

here we go again.

stupid FIA rules

Refuelling ban confirmed for 2010 season

The FIA has confirmed a ban on refuelling from the 2010 season, the governing body citing cost-saving reasons for its introductions

"It was confirmed that from 2010, refuelling during a race will be forbidden in order to save the costs of transporting refuelling equipment and increase the incentive for engine builders to improve fuel economy (to save weight)," said the FIA in a statement following a meeting of the World Motor Sport Council.

The governing body also confirmed that tyre blankets will be banned from 2010 and that the ban on other tyre-heating devices will be maintained.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/74948

----------

FIA confirms ?40m budget cap for 2010>

The FIA has announced that Formula 1's cost cap will be increased to ?40 million when it is introduced next season.

The original figure mooted was ?30 million, but has been revised upwards following consultation with Formula 1 teams instigated by FIA president Max Mosley last week.

The FIA confirmed that the budget cap would run from January 1 to December 31, with the ?40 million figure covering all team expenditure, with certain exceptions.

Most notable among these is that engine costs will not be included in the budget capped expenditure for 2010.

Also excluded from the budget cap are marketing and hospitality, driver pay, fines and penalties imposed by the FIA, anything that teams can demonstrate has no influence on its on-track performance and dividends paid from profits relating to participation in the championship.

The FIA will allow those teams that sign up to the budget cap to have increased technical freedom to make it easier to compete with the uncapped teams. This includes adjustable front and rear wings as well as an engine that can run without a rev limit.

In addition, the budget cap teams will be allowed unlimited testing outside of the racing season, and will not be restricted by the wind tunnel scale and speed stipulations

The budget cap will be monitored by a new Costs Commission that will be set up to ensure that teams are adhering to the regulations. A chairman and two commissioners will be appointed to the body by the WMSC for a term of three years.

It was also stipulated that one of the commissioners should be an expert in finance and the other someone with high-level experience in motor sport.

The governing body also annouced that the maximum number of cars permitted to enter the championship has been increased to 26, from 24.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/74947

McLaren & Williams are against the two tier rules.

check more news at http://www.autosport.com/

Increased car weight (Y) Means KERS is viable for everyone and 15kg extra weight isn't that much.

Refueling ban (N) Can see it going the way of the 1 tyre set. We'll lose all the great opening stints with lighter cars at the back coming through the field.

Budget cap (N) Either it's for everyone or no one, you can't have a cap for some.

Today marks a sad anniversary in the world of Formula One: On May 1st 1994 Ayrton Senna died following a high-speed accident at the San Marino GP.

F1 lost one of the greatest drivers ever there and then - if not the greatest.

As an example of his racecraft, watch the first lap of the 1993 European GP at Donington:

Ferrari warns budget cap may hurt F1

mosley's reply -

Mosley: F1 could survive without Ferrari

FIA president Max Mosley has insisted that Formula 1 could live without Ferrari in response to Luca di Montezemolo's criticism of the budget cap regulations.

The Ferrari chairman hit out at the introduction of the budget cap in a letter to the FIA revealed by AUTOSPORT yesterday.

In the letter di Montezemolo said the budget cap could undermine the credibility of the sport and be difficult to implement. He suggested that "all aspects of the new regulations should be carefully reviewed."

But Mosley insists that the ?40 million budget cap is vital for the health of F1, saying that if Ferrari was to be lost to F1 it would simply be "sad". He added that he expects it to be difficult for the team to justify its opposition to the budget cap to the Ferrari board given the amount of money it could save.

"The sport could survive without Ferrari," Mosley told James Allen in the Financial Times. "It would be very sad to lose Ferrari. It is the Italian national team.

"I hope and think that when a team goes to its board and says, 'I want to go to war with the FIA, because I want to be able to spend ?100m more than the FIA want me to spend,' the board will say, 'Why can't you spend ?40m if the other teams can do it?'"

Mosley emphasised that the FIA would not back away from the budget cap and that it is vital for the financial health of F1 in both the long and short term.

"The cost cap is here to stay," he said. "There is room for discussion, it might go up or down in 2011 and if the economy picks up, say in 2014, then it might go up. You might adjust the cap in the interests of the sport, but you'll have everyone on a level playing field.

"The credit crunch hasn't really hit F1 yet. Obviously we lost Honda, but the real crunch will come when current contracts come to be renewed.

"Those contracts were signed before their share prices took a dump. I believe FOM [Formula One Management, the commercial rights holder of F1] will not be able to give the teams as much money as they have."

Mosley admitted that policing the budget cap would be difficult, but that any suspected irregularities would be thoroughly investigated.

"The difficulty and danger of cheating would be enormous," Mosley told the FT. "If we had the slightest suspicion that anyone was cheating, we'd send a team in to check. That's part of the deal.

"The [inland] Revenue can't put even one tax inspector into each business on a permanent basis, we can put several in."

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/74995

R.I.P Ayrton

And yes, we are in a recession. Thing is though, Formula 1 is called Formula 1 for a reason... It is (apparently) the world's premier motorsport category, a playground for the rich and famous. Cost savings in areas that fans don't notice is one thing, but capping the budgets totally goes against Formula 1's DNA, and IMO any teams that can't handle the cost shouldn't be in the sport in the first place.

Personally I wouldn't be upset at all for Ferrari to leave F1, but the fact is that in this instance I totally agree with them, budget capping goes against what the sport stands for. It also interests me that for some reason the relationship between the FIA and Ferrari appears to be souring somewhat.

R.I.P Ayrton

And yes, we are in a recession. Thing is though, Formula 1 is called Formula 1 for a reason... It is (apparently) the world's premier motorsport category, a playground for the rich and famous. Cost savings in areas that fans don't notice is one thing, but capping the budgets totally goes against Formula 1's DNA, and IMO any teams that can't handle the cost shouldn't be in the sport in the first place.

Personally I wouldn't be upset at all for Ferrari to leave F1, but the fact is that in this instance I totally agree with them, budget capping goes against what the sport stands for. It also interests me that for some reason the relationship between the FIA and Ferrari appears to be souring somewhat.

That's been my understanding of what F1 is/was. It is the top shelf of motor racing, and it costs big bucks to play in the big league. A lot of things that F1 teams develop for their cars eventually trickle down to our street cars. There's plenty of spec series you can go racing in that don't cost anything close to what it does in F1. To me it sounds like that's what they (Max and Bernie) are trying to do, turn F1 into just another spec series and it's killing the essence of what F1 is all about, but I can understand (somewhat) what they are doing. It would be boring to see only 4-5 teams running because they are the only ones that have the cash to race.

That's been my understanding of what F1 is/was. It is the top shelf of motor racing, and it costs big bucks to play in the big league. A lot of things that F1 teams develop for their cars eventually trickle down to our street cars. There's plenty of spec series you can go racing in that don't cost anything close to what it does in F1. To me it sounds like that's what they (Max and Bernie) are trying to do, turn F1 into just another spec series and it's killing the essence of what F1 is all about, but I can understand (somewhat) what they are doing. It would be boring to see only 4-5 teams running because they are the only ones that have the cash to race.

Thing is though, by the time they decide on budget caps, we will be somewhat out of the recession and be prepearing for 2010. I don't think teams will worry that much then.

I like the 10M given to new teams idea though!

Totally agree with you CrashGordon. That what F1 is all about. The problem is that Bernie always wants more money. At all cost. Since it will be cheaper to start/run an F1 team, there will be new teams. New teams = more money in the pockets of Bernie. He doesn't care if it ruins the sport.

That's been my understanding of what F1 is/was. It is the top shelf of motor racing, and it costs big bucks to play in the big league. A lot of things that F1 teams develop for their cars eventually trickle down to our street cars. There's plenty of spec series you can go racing in that don't cost anything close to what it does in F1. To me it sounds like that's what they (Max and Bernie) are trying to do, turn F1 into just another spec series and it's killing the essence of what F1 is all about, but I can understand (somewhat) what they are doing. It would be boring to see only 4-5 teams running because they are the only ones that have the cash to race.

Agreed, but to be honest the FIA are partly to blame for that as well. IMO the introduction of KERS was really badly timed, and the fact that they keep messing about with the rules are forcing teams to spend large amounts of money re-designing their cars all of the time.

The simple fact is, that the teams that can't afford to race are applauding the cap, and those that can are against it. And for once I agree with them, like I stated F1 is a big boys competition.

And IMO, there will always be enough teams in F1, I don't ever see it getting down to a 4-5 team situation.

Seriously though, Max and Bernie between them are just destroying the sport, its ludicrous.

Agreed, but to be honest the FIA are partly to blame for that as well. IMO the introduction of KERS was really badly timed, and the fact that they keep messing about with the rules are forcing teams to spend large amounts of money re-designing their cars all of the time.

The simple fact is, that the teams that can't afford to race are applauding the cap, and those that can are against it. And for once I agree with them, like I stated F1 is a big boys competition.

And IMO, there will always be enough teams in F1, I don't ever see it getting down to a 4-5 team situation.

Seriously though, Max and Bernie between them are just destroying the sport, its ludicrous.

I've never quite understood how they were reducing cost when making major rule changes either.

I totally agree with you... Max and Bernie need to get out of there!

Who likes the idea of giving 10M to new teams?

That's a fine idea, it at least helps a new team get going, but where's the 10mil coming from, Uncle Max or Uncle Bernie giving hand outs?

I totally agree with you... Max and Bernie need to get out of there!

Who likes the idea of giving 10M to new teams?

That doesn't really bother me, it is giving new teams an incentive to get started, and it comes from Bernie... The rich feeding the poor so to speak.

I've never quite understood how they were reducing cost when making major rule changes either.

That's a fine idea, it at least helps a new team get going, but where's the 10mil coming from, Uncle Max or Uncle Bernie giving hand outs?

It is coming from FOM in the form of Bernie and I believe it is in the form of an advance of a percentage of any team's first year prize money. As for cost saving, this year it has been in the form of reduced testing milage and engine regulations. Next season it carries over to bans on refuelling and other stuff.

Ecclestone says he will protect Ferrari

Formula 1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone says he will protect Ferrari's position in the team's row with FIA president Max Mosley over the introduction of budget caps.

Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo said last week the budget cap rules could cause serious damage to the sport.

That led Mosley to say over the weekend that Formula 1 could survive without Ferrari if the team does not adapt to the rules.

"The sport could survive without Ferrari," Mosley told the Financial Times. "It would be very sad to lose Ferrari. It is the Italian national team.

"I hope and think that when a team goes to its board and says, 'I want to go to war with the FIA, because I want to be able to spend ?100m more than the FIA want me to spend,' the board will say, 'Why can't you spend ?40m if the other teams can do it?'"

Speaking to The Times newspaper, Ecclestone said he won't let Mosley "destroy" Ferrari.

"I won't let it happen," Ecclestone told the newspaper.

"The trouble with Luca is that you shouldn't let Max ever be in a position where he can start a debate or an argument. He's reasonably clever and you won't win.

"Even if you do win, it's like you being in the audience and me being there with the microphone. You say something smart and I don't give you the microphone — it's as easy as that."

Ecclestone, however, insisted the budget cap idea could still work if the teams and the FIA manage to agree on some important points.

"It would appear that everyone is in favour of the cap, including Ferrari, if we can get them to agree, which we can," Ecclestone added.

"However, there is concern over the amount that is referred to in the cap for some of the teams and also the two-tier system. So these are probably not monumental things to sort out."

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/75055

-------

update

http://www.williamshybridpower.com/

Williams Hybrid Power Ltd has developed a novel, patented technology aimed at providing a cost effective, environmentally friendly, solution for mobile energy recovery and storage. Having developed the technology for the demanding and harsh environment of Formula One racing, the company is now making the technology available to meet the demands of the wider transport and mobile energy storage market.

The flywheel is electrically driven, and can be considered as an electro mechanical battery, which can replace a conventional battery or Ultra capacitor pack in a hybrid system. Our flywheel technology has unique features which enable us to provide class leading solutions for hybrid vehicles. The unique feature, protected by worldwide patent, is the Magnetically Loaded Composite. In essence this feature means that we can produce a wholly composite flywheel, which integrates the magnets of the electric motor into the composite. The key benefit this brings is that the flywheel system can be made significantly smaller and lighter than conventional flywheels, and also runs at very high efficiencies of between 97 - 99 %

The flywheel system is manufactured using conventional, scalable, manufacturing technologies and therefore provides the opportunity for cost effective volume production.

did you guys see that?

Williams F1 have built KERS system for city bus transports, metro railways... (still are approching them).

Williams F1 KERS is very different from other F1 teams' KERS.

it doesnt have battery like ferrai f1 have, everything is done with just the Flywheel

watch a small video - how Williams F1 KERS works

post-250041-1241456130.jpg

Edited by san.W10

Mosley's son found dead

FIA president Max Mosley's son Alexander has been found dead at his London home.

Alexander Mosley, who was a 39-year-old economist, was discovered by a relative at his home in Notting Hill yesterday afternoon. He has not yet been formally identified.

"We were called at 16.20pm on Tuesday to reports of a male found dead at a property in W11," said a statement from Scotland Yard.

"He was pronounced dead at the scene. The man is in his late thirties.

"We believe we know the identity of the deceased. The Coroner's office has been informed."

The FIA has expressed its sympathy for the Mosley family.

"The FIA extends sincere condolences to the Mosley family on the sad news of the death of Alexander Mosley," said a statement from motorsport's governing body.

"Our thoughts are with Alexander's family and friends, and we would request that the media respect the Mosley family's privacy at this difficult time."

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/75074

FP1 result

awup9y.png

BMW have made quite an improvement, but ferrari are still in 9 & 11th.

anyways, its just practice session, most probably they are simulating something, or ...? :p

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/75109

-------------------------

Brawn GP partner with Terminator Salvation in Spain

:D

53s2oo.png

In advance of the worldwide release of the highly-anticipated motion picture Terminator Salvation, Brawn GP have joined forces with Sony Pictures Releasing International to feature imagery from the film on the team’s cars over the Spanish Grand Prix weekend. Terminator Salvation will be released in the US on May 21 and globally from May 27.

The BGP001s of Jenson Button and Rubens Barrichello will carry the distinctive Terminator Salvation imagery on the rear wing throughout the Barcelona meeting...

.

http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2009/5/9318.html

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!