F1 World Championship 2009 Thread



Recommended Posts

Let the idiot continue with his watered down vision of F1, if he thinks names like Lola, USF1, Superfund, and iSport are going to be any replacement for Renault, Ferrari, Toyota, and BMW then he is just stupid.

Until this idiot retires, F1 will continue going downhill

My god, those last few seconds were good! Webber takes pole, then Button nicks it a few seconds later, then Vettel from out of nowhere snatches it!

Really looking forward to tomorrow! :)

Car weight

Pos Driver Team Weight (kg)

1. Sebastian Vettel RBR Renault 649.5

2. Jenson Button Brawn Mercedes 655.5

3. Rubens Barrichello Brawn Mercedes 652.5

4. Mark Webber RBR Renault 656.0

5. Jarno Trulli Toyota 652.0

6. Kimi Raikkonen Ferrari 658.0

7. Felipe Massa Ferrari 654.0

8. Fernando Alonso Renault 644.5

9. Nico Rosberg Williams Toyota 660.0

10. Robert Kubica BMW Sauber 664.0

11. Nick Heidfeld BMW Sauber 681.5*

12. Kazuki Nakajima Williams Toyota 680.4*

13. Timo Glock Toyota 689.0*

14. Heikki Kovalainen McLaren Mercedes 665.0*

15. Adrian Sutil Force India Mercedes 668.5*

16. Lewis Hamilton McLaren Mercedes 696.5*

17. Nelson Piquet Renault 689.6*

18. Sebastien Buemi STR Ferrari 686.5*

19. Giancarlo Fisichella Force India Mercedes 688.5*

20. Sebastien Bourdais STR Ferrari 701.0*

Off the line, the anti-stall kicked in on Barrichello's car, then later he clipped his front wing on the back of ... maybe Nelson Piquet? That moved his pit stop up by 2/3 laps, and then later he was complaining that he couldn't get the car into 7th gear for overtaking and the straights.

oh what a boring race, button can cruise to his title now its a shame cause the few laps vettel could put pressure on him he lost the line in one corner already. but now nothing can stop him, vettel is too far away and barrichello has to do what he had to do as schueys team-mate already. playing 2nd fiddle.

felipe massa saves ferrari from another pointless race, at least.

So I guess under next year's 'gold medal' driver's championship system, Button is three wins away from the title...

Was just thinking that. I really hope they wont implement it. To be honest I think it would be safe to say it was already won. Not that it isn't this. Boring already. As soon as Button overtook Vettel, I thought great, another boring race.

Off the line, the anti-stall kicked in on Barrichello's car, then later he clipped his front wing on the back of ... maybe Nelson Piquet? That moved his pit stop up by 2/3 laps, and then later he was complaining that he couldn't get the car into 7th gear for overtaking and the straights.

I am wondering if the poor getaway and the gearbox are related, he had to replace one after the bad getaway at Australia because he overtorqued it, could possibly be a repeat of that problem

Medals aren't being used next year afaik

No mention of it in the latest FIA rules draft so let's hope it has been shelved for good

Also, Red Bull and Ferrari better get their acts together fast otherwise this championship could be even more dominated than 2002 and 2004, and no discredit to Brawn, but I believe the in-season testing ban is a large part of the relatively static performances of the teams

Mosley to meet with teams today

Formula 1 teams are due to meet with FIA president Max Mosley in London today to try and reach a last-minute deal over entries for next year, AUTOSPORT has learned, with the governing body having made clear the compromises it is willing to offer.

With the entry list for the 2010 championship due to be announced by the FIA tomorrow morning, efforts are increasing to reach a resolution that will head off the threat of current manufacturer teams walking away from F1.

Although there have been suggestions in the past few days that the two sides are edging near a resolution, there still appears to be differences between the two parties about the way forward for next year.

However, AUTOSPORT has learned that Mosley is willing to soften the FIA's approach to next year - which includes scrapping a two-tier category ? even though he insists a budget cap must be in place in 2010.

In a letter Mosley sent to Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo following his last meeting with teams in Monaco, a copy of which has been seen by AUTOSPORT, Mosley said that there was some ground for manoeuvre in what the FIA would be willing to accept for next year.

"We can agree that all teams race under the same 2010 rules," said Mosley, referring to the original proposal for a two-tier F1 that had been a major bone of contention for a lot of teams.

"These would be as published, but with the technical and sporting advantages originally offered to cost-cap teams deleted."

Rather than having performance benefits, the FIA said it was willing to give new teams the opportunity to work on technology transfer deals with established outfits ? as has been hinted about by Frank Williams in recent days.

Mosley added: "Instead of these advantages, we will facilitate know-how transfer between certain current teams and new entrants at least for 2010 and possibly for 2011."

One thing Mosley is not willing to back down on though is the introduction of a budget cap ? even if the figure is made very high for next year.

He said he was willing to propose: "A cap in 2010. This could be as high as 100 million Euros, but we must have a cap and we must have certainty... For 2011, again we must have certainty with a cap at ?40 million (or if preferred 45 million Euros)."

However, Mosley said that a compromise could be introduced whereby one highly paid member of staff would be allowed to be outside the budget cap ? which would help those outfits who have star names, like Adrian Newey or Ross Brawn, on board.

Furthermore, the FIA said it was willing to sign a Concorde Agreement 'broadly' along the lines of the version sent to it prior to the Monaco Grand Prix, plus a renaming of the cost cap ? which has been a big issue for the teamSource: ource: Autosport

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!