WMP12 win7 7100, Stop WMP12 from touching folder.jpg files


Recommended Posts

I haven't checked my own install (currently at work) but all my artwork is in my songs and I don't have/create folder.jpg. In Now playing, my artwork is proper high res version. May I ask why are you creating folder.jpg when they are not required in the first place?

turn on hidden files and you will see them.

tried this little scenario. had WMP12 running for about 30+ minutes (watching video), it managed to resize almost all my folder.jpg to 200x200. Removed all small folder.jpg files. Started zune and zune manged to replace all folder.jpg in correct res. Then started WMP12 again, and WMP started resizing them again.

zachdms you keep mentioning album art extractor, if it was just an extractor then it should extract the correct res from the file and place correct folder.jpg. This is album art resizer.

Cool: it sounds like you can reproduce this. So what is the minimal set of data required to reproduce this? Maybe zip up that data set?

Yes, I am completely avoiding the "resizer" discussion in a) an attempt to understand how are you hitting this behavior and b) my non-understanding of the documentation surrounding the RC. If I did know "b", it'd still be of value to avoid the resizer discussion in order to understand why you are seeing this behavior and how you got into that state. If some random tagging app is plugging into the shell folder.jpg logic without writing albumartsmall.jpg, for example, it'd be good to get that app fixed up. I am not willing nor able to discuss the resizer at this time, other than to point again to my earlier comment which may seem prescient at some later point:

Are there Windows 7 RC release notes out? I'd think there might be the place for more information on this subject. A quick Process Monitor spelunk shows a couple obvious points of interest, but perhaps MS has some better communication on that subject.

If we can put the horse before the cart (actually understanding why you're seeing that behavior), that would be great. :)

not sure why I only noticed this right now with Win7 and WMP12, but this has been going on for quite sometime

quick seach on google, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ei=...jpg&spell=1

There are quite a few people that really don't like this "feature" Wouldn't it be simplier for WMP to leave folder.jpg alone, fine it can create the albumartsmall.jpg.

Another note zune doesn't resize folder.jpg files, why is WMP doing it. Is zune software team seperate from wmp team?

Didn't know people still used WMP.

Been using Media Player Classic Home Cinema 64 for about 2 years now

MPC is great for what it does, but comparing it to WMP is like comparing a swiss army knife with a bread knife. For me, MPC is far too basic to ever replace WMP, and I am also not overly impressed with the sound quality MPC produces either.

For me WMP11 is perfect, fantastic in design but I find the design of 12 to be awful, it is convoluted and ugly. The removal of the graphical equaliser has also annoyed me.

not sure why I only noticed this right now with Win7 and WMP12, but this has been going on for quite sometime
It would be good to understand why you're seeing this.

If you're going to attempt to treat system hidden files are "your" files, you're going to want to be sure you plug in to the system well.

I searched and deleted all desktop.ini (except main My Music one) and all *.jpg. One hour and a reboot later with no WMP running and only Zune playing a playlist, I don't see any file created yet. Show Hidden/system files is turned on.

There is some disk activity by Zune - it is accessing all mp3.

You guys are right :blush: All of my 500x500 artwork is now a 200x200 folder.jpg.

nekrosoft13, how do you trigger Zune resizing it back to hi-res?

Zune had all my hi-res images in cache, all I had to do is search for folder.jpg in music folder. Remove all of them. Run Zune and zune automatically restored all hi-res folder.jpg.

But then becareful, because when you start WMP, it will start reszing them again.

They should've looked at foobar2000's developers' hands; their policy is clear: Neither the client, or any plugin is allowed to update tags silently by default/without user's clear confirmation.

excactly, what WMP is doing now can be compared to malware. It does things that user doesn't want.

^-- The trick with fixing any "library" corruption is getting the steps required to reproduce that corruption such that they can track down how it's getting corrupted in the first place and fix that.

This ties in with me asking for how to reproduce specific concerns. Imagine that you had someone impassioned about an issue: it's probably a really good plan to attempt to get data from them that might solve the problem for everyone as opposed to prematurely say "oh have you tried this alternative" which leaves everyone minus them in the same basic condition.

The steps required are really simple.

Add music directory located on seperate partition (or external USB hard drive) to the Music Library through explorer (right-click---->Properties etc) wait for indexing to get finished, fire up WMP12 and stare at empty library, except for sample tunes. Same for Videos library. Removing and re-adding them through WMP12 instead of Explorer doesn't seem to help.

I've had WMP12 open for several hours now and nothing.

To be honest, I'm probably missing something, for which I would gladly eat humble pie, as I'd rather use WMP than third party apps as it suits my needs nicely, but Foobar and MPC-HC are waiting in the wings.

Library corruption issues belong in a different thread, I'd think. :)

In the Windows 7 RC version, you will need to manually stop the Windows Media Player Network Sharing Service previous to using the "reset Media Library" option. This should be fixed for the final release.

I would greatly appreciate if people would not sidetrack this thread with any issue other than "WMP touching folder.jpg files" per thread title. That way you create your own thread and get better help there where other people can more easily discover it to both help you and benefit from it. :)

If you keep the Folder.jpg and get rid of the other .jpg files does it still resize it ti 200x200 later on?

Also try a mp3 files that does not have embedded art and use your own Folder.jpg, does it still resize to 200x200?

I am testing both of the methods with mp3 files that have embedded art and a few that dont to see if this work and so far my Folder.jpg files have not been resized. I have update from the internet options turned off also. If I remove the files from the library and add them back in then the Folder.jpg goes back to 200x200.

If you get rid of the reserved system file 'albumartsmall.jpg' for whatever reason, then at any later point when small thumbnails are shown (shell, Media Center, Windows Media Player) you may trigger the album art extractor which will refresh the folder.jpg/albumartsmall.jpg pair.

There's no reason to just make a "folder.jpg" file unless you are deliberately trying to cause this. :)

A simple Process Monitor review of the player shows

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\MediaPlayer\Preferences]

"LargeAlbumArtSize"=dword:00000320

"SmallAlbumArtSize"=dword:00000190

might be interesting. They will not affect everything. They max out at 800(x800). Use at your own risk.

I know there is at least one person from WMP team on the forums.

While Win7 is still being developed, please stop WMP12 from touching folder.jpg files fore music folders.

I had most files at 500x500 at least, and WMP12 changed them all to 200x200.

Zune doesn't resize files, why is WMP12 doing it, WMP11 does it sometimes as well, time to get rid of this stupid "feature".

200x200 jpg looks horrible on Media Player, like zune for example.

Do yourself a favor and remove WMP and install Winamp 552 Pro. It is far superior than WMP, just about anything is. :rolleyes:

Do yourself a favor and remove WMP and install Winamp 552 Pro. It is far superior than WMP, just about anything is. :rolleyes:
Awesome. If anybody feels that way, go to "Optional Features" and turn off WMP.

I'll assume that everybody that's not retarded and is still reading the thread has an actual interest in discussing WMP and Windows 7 beta/RC functionality as opposed to trolling about favorite players du jour . lol :)

I'm down for discussing WinAMP and Windows 7 in a WinAMP thread. It's a great player that you and I both want to work excellently on Windows 7. But hijacking technical discussions for opinion wars is lame and a half. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!