WMP12 win7 7100, Stop WMP12 from touching folder.jpg files


Recommended Posts

If you get rid of the reserved system file 'albumartsmall.jpg' for whatever reason, then at any later point when small thumbnails are shown (shell, Media Center, Windows Media Player) you may trigger the album art extractor which will refresh the folder.jpg/albumartsmall.jpg pair.

There's no reason to just make a "folder.jpg" file unless you are deliberately trying to cause this. :)

How can I try to trigger the extractor? I been playing around in WMP and MCE and myFolder.jpg files are ok and have not been resized.

  • 2 weeks later...

Honestly, I am really tired of this problem.

Why can't someone just add a "Don't screw with my album art under any circumstance whatsoever because I have a larger brain than you, dear computer" checkbox, or make it a registry change if you don't want to expose it to the masses...

So if I am understanding this correctly, the way to prevent this from happening is to remove or in most cases, not create the folder.jpg files and make sure the high-res art work is embedded in the music files. I really HATE WMP12. Version 11 was good, but this problem with album artwork has to change. This isn't 2001 with 15" monitors. Even iTunes downloads it's artwork in 600X600 resolution.

I am thinking of removing WMP and going to Media Monkey for ripping and organization and WMC for playing music files. MS has dumbed down WMP way to much for my liking.

Yes, you should probably consider "folder.jpg" and "albumartsmall.jpg" reserved file names that would be a horrible plan to touch. Inserting the art into the files would be the correct plan.

This should generally have been consistent since day one... more people are enjoying album art these days so it's more noticeable.

Do yourself a favor and remove WMP and install Winamp 552 Pro. It is far superior than WMP, just about anything is. :rolleyes:

Do yourself a favour, and don't troll threads where it isn't warranted, this is about WMP within the Windows 7 Beta, not a debate about the relative merits of WMP and Winamp.

As for the topic, someone needs to pop into the WMP design team, and tell them that 800x600 went out of fashion 10 years ago. Low res album art looks awful on high resolution displays, and why Microsoft feel that there is some need for it to fiddle with your album art anyway, lord only knows.

  • 1 month later...

Any news here? Just did a new scan with MP11 on VISTA and MP replaced many folder.jpgs. Then after that started my xbox360, opend MediaCenter and after selecting the folder where all my mp3s are MediaCenter did even a better job nearly all .jpgs are now replaced...

I hope this will be not the case in the Windows 7 final...

Christian

  • 2 weeks later...
Yes, you should probably consider "folder.jpg" and "albumartsmall.jpg" reserved file names that would be a horrible plan to touch. Inserting the art into the files would be the correct plan.

This should generally have been consistent since day one... more people are enjoying album art these days so it's more noticeable.

This topic is insane. How hard is it to understand that it's a horrible policy to allow WMP12 to degrade a user's pre-existing album art?!? I don't mind WMP12 filling in the gaps for me where I don't already have album art but ruining all of your high resolution art just by running the program is ridiculous!

And Zach, I have to say, you've been rather unhelpful in this thread. The OP has stated how this happens, other people have confirmed it, and still more complain about the problem on a simple Google search. There's nothing to debate here, WMP is doing something it shouldn't be doing and this needs to be changed.

Microsoft wants people to use WMP, right? WMP is consistently hated by a lot of people, right? Well maybe MS should just shut up and listen to people who want to use it but can't because it does something wrong.

This topic is insane. How hard is it to understand that it's a horrible policy to allow WMP12 to degrade a user's pre-existing album art?!? I don't mind WMP12 filling in the gaps for me where I don't already have album art but ruining all of your high resolution art just by running the program is ridiculous!.
You know there is an option in WMP to fill in missing gaps only, right?
This topic is insane. How hard is it to understand that it's a horrible policy to allow WMP12 to degrade a user's pre-existing album art?!? I don't mind WMP12 filling in the gaps for me where I don't already have album art but ruining all of your high resolution art just by running the program is ridiculous!
The biggest culprit should generally be folder.jpg without a matching albumartsmall.jpg .
And Zach, I have to say, you've been rather unhelpful in this thread. The OP has stated how this happens, other people have confirmed it, and still more complain about the problem on a simple Google search. There's nothing to debate here, WMP is doing something it shouldn't be doing and this needs to be changed.
I apologize for any misperceptions. I believe my earlier comments about folder.jpg evidently being a reserved file name is probably the most interesting point to note.

I apologize if my attempts to help people understand this concern a little more clearly are in any fashion misconstrued. folder.jpg is a reserved file name according to everything you and I are seeing here. My comments might be illuminative or might not be, but it seems like you should:

* only update the art within the file directly

* not count on folder.jpg being 'your' file

The biggest culprit should generally be folder.jpg without a matching albumartsmall.jpg .

I apologize for any misperceptions. I believe my earlier comments about folder.jpg evidently being a reserved file name is probably the most interesting point to note.

I apologize if my attempts to help people understand this concern a little more clearly are in any fashion misconstrued. folder.jpg is a reserved file name according to everything you and I are seeing here. My comments might be illuminative or might not be, but it seems like you should:

* only update the art within the file directly

* not count on folder.jpg being 'your' file

I understand that's what people should do to avoid this problem, and it's good to know that and have it documented so thank you, but at the end of the day this is still a problem.

And, yes, there is supposedly an option to only fill in the gaps but others are reporting it's not working so I'm not even going to let WMP access the internet or touch my files.

The settings in question do not affect the reserved file name 'folder.jpg', hence my comments.

Your comments are interesting and important, but that's not the way the player works and there is pretty much no mechanism to do so. It's a good suggestion... but it doesn't work that way. :( This is why my two points:

* only update the art within the file directly

* not count on folder.jpg being 'your' file

are probably highly relevant.

Plus if you update the art within the file, it's more portable. :)

  • 2 months later...
A simple Process Monitor review of the player shows

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\MediaPlayer\Preferences]

"LargeAlbumArtSize"=dword:00000320

"SmallAlbumArtSize"=dword:00000190

might be interesting. They will not affect everything. They max out at 800(x800). Use at your own risk.

i need to bump this thread as i have run into the folder.jpg issue in this thread and think i may have a solution.

if you add the below values it appears that WMP will NOT generate new folder.jpg OR AlbumArtSmall.jpg files. IF folder.jpg (or AlbumArtSmall) already exist(s), it does not resize it but mearly sets the HIDDEN and SYSTEM attributes. so if you have a folder.jpg and/or an albumartsmall.jpg file at 1500x1500, it will leave them alone (except for hiding them...).

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\MediaPlayer\Preferences]

"LargeAlbumArtSize"=dword:ffffffff

"SmallAlbumArtSize"=dword:ffffffff

can anyone out there verify this? i tired with a brand new database and a few albums. a quick outside verification would be great. thanks.

  • 2 years later...

i need to bump this thread as i have run into the folder.jpg issue in this thread and think i may have a solution.

if you add the below values it appears that WMP will NOT generate new folder.jpg OR AlbumArtSmall.jpg files. IF folder.jpg (or AlbumArtSmall) already exist(s), it does not resize it but mearly sets the HIDDEN and SYSTEM attributes. so if you have a folder.jpg and/or an albumartsmall.jpg file at 1500x1500, it will leave them alone (except for hiding them...).

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\MediaPlayer\Preferences]

"LargeAlbumArtSize"=dword:ffffffff

"SmallAlbumArtSize"=dword:ffffffff

can anyone out there verify this? i tired with a brand new database and a few albums. a quick outside verification would be great. thanks.

I know this thread is old but I just had to say that this registry setting works!! I've been looking for years for a way to correct the whole shrinking album art issue and for anyone who cares, this is it!! Thanks!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      557
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!