Recommended Posts

Hello.

Why not make a World Trade Center in a virtual world like Second Life or similar programs but with a moving background scenary of the plane krasches, then the fires and the collaps (explosions) of the buildings.Like a virtual movie of the catastrofy with a time line through the event.Then make it possible for people who experienced the event to log in with his own virtual person before it happens and walk around in the event as they did in reallity 9/11 2001 and show people where they were, when they saw something. They stop the time and set a marker on the position and time, that they witness something and then write, set up pictures and videos that they have.Then they start the time again and walk, drive and so on to the next place of the disaster where they saw, heard or experienced things, set a marker and set up the information. Then when thousands of people set up where they where and where they walked, ran or drove a car, people then will be able to see the WTC virtual video, filled with virtual people who move around in the city and its buildings.Viewer can then stop the time at any moment of the disaster and zoom in on any place on the street or in a building and read what people experienced at that time, by clicking on the person and get the information.I really want to know where people where in the buildings when they heard explosions and so on and this is a way to get a picture of what happened.This would be a open environment so that any whitness can log in and set up theire story. And anybody is allowed to get a copy of the virtual world so they can help build it up with details that is relevant to the catastofic event.It will all be moderated by people that people trust. If it all work out the truth will be revealed of what happened but in the virtual world.

------------------------------------------

It would also be interesting to do other events in history by this way, like wars and other disasters and why not social events that people and groups of people have experienced or that historians can build, so that people can see what happened in the past, but as a virtual world event.

In this way people can see the event just as they want from any position with any zoom.

If you want to see it all from one person you just follow him through the event or if you want to see it the next time from a police or just 100 feet over the ground, you just follow that one or a path, as a invisible flying camera.

Do you want it?

Regards M.Sc. Magnus

Edited by magi
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/793090-911-witness-virtual-world-event/
Share on other sites

we know what happend, two planes were hijacked and flown into each building.

What is someone saying "i was in blah blah office, some floors below and heard a big loud crash"m going to do ?

Whell many people who walked out of WTC 1,2 and 7 said they heard explosions in the buildings before they collapsed and firefighters experienced explosions in the building and did see exploded floors and disasters when ther where in the buildings.

It would be interesting to see in a virtual world of WTC where they where when they experienced it.

And if thousands of people tell where they were when they heard explosions then maybe it is possible to get a better picture of what happened and what was going on in the buildings.

I just want to know what happened and maybe this is one way to try to find out what happened.

Peace

M.Sc. Magi

--

Whell many people who walked out of WTC 1,2 and 7 said they heard explosions in the buildings before they collapsed and firefighters experienced explosions in the building and did see exploded floors and disasters when ther where in the buildings.

It would be interesting to see in a virtual world of WTC where they where when they experienced it.

And if thousands of people tell where they were when they heard explosions then maybe it is possible to get a better picture of what happened and what was going on in the buildings.

I just want to know what happened and maybe this is one way to try to find out what happened.

Peace

M.Sc. Magi

--

Well obviously... There's this thing we call electricity it runs off a grid and when a grid or associated connections are broken damaged or deteriorated they can explode and catch fire and whatnot else. I just don't see the point in fueling more conspiracy theories or putting people in a position of having to go through something which is best forgotten.

All a person needs to do to find out what happened, is to watch stuff like "In Plane Site" and then you can draw your own conclusions! Or conversely just accept what the "authorities" tell you what the truth is!

Exactly. Let people believe what they want. Also, I doubt anyone would want to relive 9/11.

--

Have nobody here heard about the thermite in the dust of the WTC?

Have anybody here seen "loos change" and similar videos on youtube?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM

Go to youtube and search for 9/11 , wtc , thermite , nanothermite and so on.

M.Sc. Magi

-

There is NO WAY that the WTC buildings were brought down by the planes.

Nearly 8 years later and there are still people who simply can't accept the fact that thousands of gallons of jet fuel burning inside a building can weaken steel to the point of failure. Why is it so hard for you conspiracy theorists to accept that?

Shouldn't this be in Area 51?

Nearly 8 years later and there are still people who simply can't accept the fact that thousands of gallons of jet fuel burning inside a building can weaken steel to the point of failure. Why is it so hard for you conspiracy theorists to accept that?

Shouldn't this be in Area 51?

Because the jet fuel couldn't burn hot enough or for long enough to weaken the steel to point of failure????

There is NO WAY that the WTC buildings were brought down by the planes.

When you have a structure like a sky scraper and you apply massive amounts of heat, at or near the top, and the steel starts to weaken it will buckle under the weight and all the weight has to go somewhere. Massive heat and gravity is what caused those building to collapse.

Because the jet fuel couldn't burn hot enough or for long enough to weaken the steel to point of failure????

It can't burn hot enought to MELT steel but it has been shown over and over again (which you people all seem to ignore) that it can certainly weaken it enough for the weight of the floors above it to collapse, bringing them down onto lower floors.

Why is it so hard to believe that The GOVT couldnt create something to pass legislation like -PATRIOT ACT- or what is happening with our Economy now- we all are not blind to things some choose to not believe that evil can happen - it does just sit back with a open mind and you will see the truth-m Wow amazing what banks can do to the economy isnt it when they get a HUGE BAILOUT and nothing changes a few pockets fattened for doing the job they were told to do. Just saying we need to bring change ourselves we the people or is it us controlled by our puppet govt....

Nearly 8 years later and there are still people who simply can't accept the fact that thousands of gallons of jet fuel burning inside a building can weaken steel to the point of failure. Why is it so hard for you conspiracy theorists to accept that?

Shouldn't this be in Area 51?

Why do you just accept what you are told and not question it? I know people that lost loved ones that day, it's sickening that people don't really want to know what happened. The "offical" story is BS, and anyone that looks at it objectively will agree that it doesn't add up.

Why would anyone in some tiny country in the middle east want to go to war with the USA? It doesn't make sense.

Check the links in my sig for what really happened on 9/11, although I have to warn you, most people would write it off as "conspiracy theories" so it's probably not for you.

One more thing, doesn't it seem strange that when someone mentions conspiracies people unconsciously hear "conspiracy theories", it's almost as if we have been carefully brainwashed to associate conspiracies with crazy people and crazy theories.

Edited by s1k3sT
Why do you just accept what you are told and not question it? I know people that lost loved ones that day, it's sickening that people don't really want to know what happened. The "offical" story is BS, and anyone that looks at it objectively will agree that it doesn't add up.

Why would anyone in some tiny country in the middle east want to go to war with the USA? It doesn't make sense.

Check the links in my sig for what really happened on 9/11, although I have to warn you, most people would write it off as "conspiracy theories" so it's probably not for you.

One more thing, doesn't it seem strange that when someone mentions conspiracies people unconsciously hear "conspiracy theories", it's almost as if we have been carefully brainwashed to associate conspiracies with crazy people and crazy theories.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

Everyone knows loose change is BS. I never mentioned loose change. I would recommend "the calling" on thecrowhouse.com

That page you linked to is right about one thing, loose change is wrong, and the proof is that the maker is still alive. That DOESN'T mean all the points covered in loose change are wrong, but the overall message behind the film is not right.

One more thing, doesn't it seem strange that when someone mentions conspiracies people unconsciously hear "conspiracy theories", it's almost as if we have been carefully brainwashed to associate conspiracies with crazy people and crazy theories.

These were counter measures very well executed to just desbelieve everyone who question the 'oficial' story so they just get a label "nut conspiracy theorists"....that?s almost social engineering.

And to all of you who just seat back and don?t even allow others to raise a question, and don?t even blink an eye to what they say without calling them "f..ing nuts conspiracy theorist" : 'You must be prety comfortable in your cozy 'matrix', don?t you? Do you want the red pill?'

Edited by Rilkeanheart

I was hoping this was a copy and paste job which we could all laugh and shake our heads about. Unfortunately, it looks like this is original content. 4chan couldn't even make this up. I'm stunned.

"Hey wouldn't it be cool if you could relive one of the most traumatic experiences of your life in The Sims?! You could see all your coworkers with exclamation points in the bubbles over their heads as they died! :woot: "

Can we just let this issue rest in peace like the people who lost their lives that day?

We've got more important things to fight about .. like.. how the moon landing was faked.

/Sarcasm.

But yeah, seriously, it's been forever ago, and we really need to just let it rest.

Who cares what it was. I nearly lost someone extremely close to our family because of the events of 9/11 and it's extremely uncomfortable bringing it up.

I find it funny there has never been a large conspiracy theory that has been proven, yet people still hold tight to the beliefs that things are true even when its disproved right in front of them.

Conspiracy theorists = religious fanatics, blind to reality.

I find it funny there has never been a large conspiracy theory that has been proven, yet people still hold tight to the beliefs that things are true even when its disproved right in front of them.

Conspiracy theorists = religious fanatics, blind to reality.

+1

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's Aurora 1.5 weather model could make hurricane predictions a lot better by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched a major update for its open-access Aurora Earth-system foundation model, Aurora 1.5. This extension adds 22 new weather variables that are relevant to energy, agriculture, transport, and climate risk. Additionally, it provides hourly temporal resolution and probabilistic ensemble forecasting. If you have ever tracked a hurricane or typhoon, you might be aware that there are various forecasting models available. The best of the bunch are generally considered to be the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble models. Well, with Aurora 1.5, Microsoft claims its model outperforms on 88.9% of evaluated targets. This model also performs better against its previous version, with testing showing that the ensemble median achieved a one-third lower track error for tropical cyclones, such as Hurricane Helene. While open access to Aurora 1.5 is great news for researchers, agencies, companies, and civil society, Microsoft will also be integrating it into its commercial products such as Microsoft Weather. We all know that AI can give some dodgy outputs, so it wants to couple Aurora 1.5 with physics-based models, such as ECMWF, rather than replace them. The best cyclone forecasts are those that draw from multiple models, and drawing in Aurora 1.5’s predictions will just add more depth to the composite forecast, potentially helping to make people safer. You can read the model’s paper or head over to GitHub to download it.
    • I started using Vivaldi again after maybe 2-3 years. I dunno what I didn't like about them. Maybe Floorp was just a shade better.
    • Google launches LiteRT.js to make AI and ML workloads faster in the browser by Paul Hill Google has just launched LiteRT.js, a new library that enables machine learning models to run locally within the web browser, bypassing the need for server-side processing. The firm said this will bring native AI performance to web browsers via its mobile-focused LiteRT runtime, though LiteRT.js also works on desktops. The new library uses WebAssembly and hardware acceleration such as WebGPU and WebNN to replace the slower TensorFlow.js, which uses a slower JavaScript-based kernel. The LiteRT runtime has been reserved for Android and iOS until now. With today’s update, Google is exposing the runtime via WebAssembly to turn the browser into a more capable platform for AI and ML workloads. The search giant claims that this new runtime delivers 3x greater speeds over existing solutions on current hardware. Specifically, it was tested on a 2024 Apple MacBook Pro with M4 Silicon. In the real world, for users on older hardware or using browsers with different engines, performance could vary significantly. For developers looking to switch over from TensorFlow.js, the process is straightforward. If you already have a .tflite file, you just need to switch your JavaScript runtime to LiteRT.js. However, if you have a TensorFlow/Keras SavedModel, then you can use the LiteRT Converter built into the Python TensorFlow package. You can read more about the conversion process on Google for Developers. Going forward, it will be interesting to see whether Google eventually sunsets or de-prioritizes TensorFlow.js in favor of LiteRT.js. It will also be interesting to see how it really performs on other hardware besides a MacBook. Source: Google
    • AltSendme 0.5.0 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.5.0 changelog: Web version available at app.altsendme.com Zero analytics, please raise issues as you come across them Harden app trust boundaries More test coverage - added end-to-end test cases verifying receiver temporary directory lifecycle and resume behavior Added disarm mechanism to AutoCleanupDir to support preserving partial downloads for resume Bug fixes Download: AltSendme 0.5.0 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      BenTuckett1997 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      SRODERICK earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Community Regular
      Case_f went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Month Later
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BrianMunton earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      399
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      152
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!