Recommended Posts

Well, MS confirmed that it's not final RTM. I just won 10 internets.

Nope, they have not confirmed that 7600 isn't the RTM. Neither have they said it will be.

Who cares anyway.

MSDN & TechNet Subscribers: Subscribers will be able to download the final version of Windows 7 a few weeks after we announce RTM.

This is what I care about, Now I have this build, that is near final, and a few weeks later, I will get it legally from Technet :)

you don't believe in numerology? the study of numbers? Everything in life happens because of number sequences...build 7600? you will become rich and live a meaningful life. Build 7601? The Mayans were right and the world ends in 3 years. see what i mean? It's all in the numbers dude.

Hey guiez my calandar endz at December 31st 2009 so da world is going to end der i dont see any 2010 calanderz!!!

Seriously. The Mayan's didn't really want to plan past a thousand years+ (or less) so they didn't create the calendar.

Seriously.

I'm starting to get annoyed with all these OMGOMGOMOGM ZOMFG ITS NOT RTM threads all over the net.

Jeez.

I'm more annoyed by people trying to brag about how they called it out on not being the final build. Like they should be rewarded. Even though they were far from the first to say it probably wasn't the actual final build.

They haven't confirmed anything about specific build numbers. Your title was wrong as it was "7600 is NOT RTM" so I have changed it. 7600 is still RTM.

They said RTM is not finished, right?

So if this one was leaked and they haven't finished the final rtm yet, that makes leaked build not final rtm, right?

They said RTM is not finished, right?

So if this one was leaked and they haven't finished the final rtm yet, that makes leaked build not final rtm, right?

Why are you so obsessed with this? It'll be done in a couple weeks anyway. Now you're just starting to get really dramatic over nothing.

They said RTM is not finished, right?

So if this one was leaked and they haven't finished the final rtm yet, that makes leaked build not final rtm, right?

No it does not. They have not finished the final RTM yet, it means what it means, they have not choosen the final build to be used, do you think they compile it, and then an hour later announce it ?

They probably take at least a few days to properly test it.

I doubt the leaked build will be the RTM, it still could easily be though.

They said RTM is not finished, right?

So if this one was leaked and they haven't finished the final rtm yet, that makes leaked build not final rtm, right?

No, that's a clueless statement just like your thread title here. Going around the forums spreading misinformation when you have no clue whatsoever to how the build process works is reckless. I am not saying I know every last detail about the build process but over the years I have visited the Redmond build labs, Windows team and various different teams involved in the build process for previous versions of Windows. Unless things have changed rapidly since the last Windows beta (Vista) then they compile the RTM build and test it vigorously, this doesn't mean that 7600.16384 has been ditched because they have said they are not ready to announce RTM, it simply means they might not be finished testing it fully. On the flip side it could mean that 16385 is on its way and will require the same testing. Either way from experience of past Windows betas it's a safe bet that 7600 is the RTM build number and we are just waiting confirmation on the specific subset build (the 16384) number.

In my own personal opinion I believe 16384 might not be RTM as I know that they had planned to announce it yesterday and they even put a press release out about it yesterday by mistake (more info about that here). Either they need to perform some additional checks on it or they decided Ballmer was best to announce it or that 16385 is on its way and they start the checks again. Time will tell :)

UPDATE: looks like 16385 could have been compiled but it's worth noting that it appears to be only the WDK at the moment and not the client. Unclear right now.

Edited by Tom W
No, that's a clueless statement just like your thread title here. Going around the forums spreading misinformation when you have no clue whatsoever to how the build process works is reckless. I am not saying I know every last detail about the build process but over the years I have visited the Redmond build labs, Windows team and various different teams involved in the build process for previous versions of Windows. Unless things have changed rapidly since the last Windows beta (Vista) then they compile the RTM build and test it vigorously, this doesn't mean that 7600.16384 has been ditched because they have said they are not ready to announce RTM, it simply means they might not be finished testing it fully. On the flip side it could mean that 16385 is on its way and will require the same testing. Either way from experience of past Windows betas it's a safe bet that 7600 is the RTM build number and we are just waiting confirmation on the specific subset build (the 16384) number.

In my own personal opinion I believe 16384 might not be RTM as I know that they had planned to announce it yesterday and they even put a press release out about it yesterday by mistake (more info about that here). Either they need to perform some additional checks on it or they decided Ballmer was best to announce it or that 16385 is on its way and they start the checks again. Time will tell :)

UPDATE: looks like 16385 could have been compiled but it's worth noting that it appears to be only the WDK at the moment and not the client. Unclear right now.

I couldn't see a good reason why you closed my thread, so this is the last post I am putting up on Neowin, bye!!

Bye

OK, I changed my mind, I understand your reason is to keep it in few and early threads, and there is this thread not only earliest on starting, but earliest in reporting and confirming the RTM build 7600.16384. I'll stick to it until the confirmed RTM Final Build(I expect to make the earliest report too). :D

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=793314

OK, I changed my mind, I understand your reason is to keep it in few and early threads, and there is this thread not only earliest on starting, but earliest in reporting and confirming the RTM build 7600.16384. I'll stick to it until the confirmed RTM Final Build(I expect to make the earliest report too). :D

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=793314

Yeah. It's just getting irritating and confusing for all seeing so many threads about the same thing.

Yeah. It's just getting irritating and confusing for all seeing so many threads about the same thing.

Mr. Tom W: just a matter of interest, how come my thread reporting and confirming the build 16385 with all kinds of facts were locked, and another new guy just starting a thread of 16385 with no supporting material were OK? :blink:

Edit: just saw another new guy started another new thread............

Edited by FaiKee
Well, Wzor was correct. Windows 7 is RTM (13 July).

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/wa...009keynote.mspx

Edit: ****, wrong thread.

The scheduled rtm build day was Friday and the sign off on monday. After some issues with build 7600.16384 the rtm release schedule is delayed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • BS, I've yet to run into a typical pc user that uses it at all, let alone half the population.
    • Codec Tweak Tool 6.7.7 by Razvan Serea This tool is a Swiss army knife for managing codecs and codec settings. Codec Tweak Tool will scan for broken filters and remove them. If the tool detects something that is broken, it will then prompt you with the details and you will be given the option to remove the broken item. Generate a detailed log of all installed codecs and filters, enable/disable more than 250 popular codecs and filters (if they are installed), manage preferred source filters, and reset settings. With this tool you can do things like: Scan the registry to detect and remove broken references to codecs and filters. Enable/disable more than 200 popular codecs and filters (if they are installed). Manage preferred source filters (a.k.a. splitters). Detect broken codecs and DirectShow filters. Fix problems with the standard DirectShow filters of Windows. A fix for a specific sound problem. Generate a text file with detailed information about all installed codecs and DirectShow filters, along with other relevant system information. Reset settings to recommended values for many popular codecs and DirectShow filters. Configure audio output settings for several popular audio decoders. Several configuration options for a few DirectShow filters that don't have an easily accessible interface for those options. Easy access to the configuration interfaces of various codecs and DirectShow filters Backup the settings of several codecs and DirectShow filters. Replace your current settings with those from a previous backup. Manage DirectShow filters - Enable or disable DirectShow filters. Manage ACM/VFW codecs - Enable or disable ACM/VFW codecs. Enable or disable DirectX Media Objects. Configure your preferred DirectShow source filters (a.k.a. splitters) for several common file extensions. Enable or disable the generation of thumbnails for several common video file formats in Windows Explorer. Download: Codec Tweak Tool 6.7.7 | 1.5 MB (Freeware) View: Codec Tweak Tool Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The site is pretty sparse on features / tech specs. Can I plug it into a PC/hone/Switch via USB-C and use it as an external display? If so, what's the virtual resolution of the screen, the refresh rate, PPI of the image etc? Is the text crisp enough to use for coding at say 12pt? Is it good enough for playing dark games, like say Path of Exile 2? How about fast games like car racing games? Just how do they expect anyone to order this thing without giving out all this info?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      546
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      158
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      neufuse
      65
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!