Recommended Posts

Well, MS confirmed that it's not final RTM. I just won 10 internets.

Nope, they have not confirmed that 7600 isn't the RTM. Neither have they said it will be.

Who cares anyway.

MSDN & TechNet Subscribers: Subscribers will be able to download the final version of Windows 7 a few weeks after we announce RTM.

This is what I care about, Now I have this build, that is near final, and a few weeks later, I will get it legally from Technet :)

you don't believe in numerology? the study of numbers? Everything in life happens because of number sequences...build 7600? you will become rich and live a meaningful life. Build 7601? The Mayans were right and the world ends in 3 years. see what i mean? It's all in the numbers dude.

Hey guiez my calandar endz at December 31st 2009 so da world is going to end der i dont see any 2010 calanderz!!!

Seriously. The Mayan's didn't really want to plan past a thousand years+ (or less) so they didn't create the calendar.

Seriously.

I'm starting to get annoyed with all these OMGOMGOMOGM ZOMFG ITS NOT RTM threads all over the net.

Jeez.

I'm more annoyed by people trying to brag about how they called it out on not being the final build. Like they should be rewarded. Even though they were far from the first to say it probably wasn't the actual final build.

They haven't confirmed anything about specific build numbers. Your title was wrong as it was "7600 is NOT RTM" so I have changed it. 7600 is still RTM.

They said RTM is not finished, right?

So if this one was leaked and they haven't finished the final rtm yet, that makes leaked build not final rtm, right?

They said RTM is not finished, right?

So if this one was leaked and they haven't finished the final rtm yet, that makes leaked build not final rtm, right?

Why are you so obsessed with this? It'll be done in a couple weeks anyway. Now you're just starting to get really dramatic over nothing.

They said RTM is not finished, right?

So if this one was leaked and they haven't finished the final rtm yet, that makes leaked build not final rtm, right?

No it does not. They have not finished the final RTM yet, it means what it means, they have not choosen the final build to be used, do you think they compile it, and then an hour later announce it ?

They probably take at least a few days to properly test it.

I doubt the leaked build will be the RTM, it still could easily be though.

They said RTM is not finished, right?

So if this one was leaked and they haven't finished the final rtm yet, that makes leaked build not final rtm, right?

No, that's a clueless statement just like your thread title here. Going around the forums spreading misinformation when you have no clue whatsoever to how the build process works is reckless. I am not saying I know every last detail about the build process but over the years I have visited the Redmond build labs, Windows team and various different teams involved in the build process for previous versions of Windows. Unless things have changed rapidly since the last Windows beta (Vista) then they compile the RTM build and test it vigorously, this doesn't mean that 7600.16384 has been ditched because they have said they are not ready to announce RTM, it simply means they might not be finished testing it fully. On the flip side it could mean that 16385 is on its way and will require the same testing. Either way from experience of past Windows betas it's a safe bet that 7600 is the RTM build number and we are just waiting confirmation on the specific subset build (the 16384) number.

In my own personal opinion I believe 16384 might not be RTM as I know that they had planned to announce it yesterday and they even put a press release out about it yesterday by mistake (more info about that here). Either they need to perform some additional checks on it or they decided Ballmer was best to announce it or that 16385 is on its way and they start the checks again. Time will tell :)

UPDATE: looks like 16385 could have been compiled but it's worth noting that it appears to be only the WDK at the moment and not the client. Unclear right now.

Edited by Tom W
No, that's a clueless statement just like your thread title here. Going around the forums spreading misinformation when you have no clue whatsoever to how the build process works is reckless. I am not saying I know every last detail about the build process but over the years I have visited the Redmond build labs, Windows team and various different teams involved in the build process for previous versions of Windows. Unless things have changed rapidly since the last Windows beta (Vista) then they compile the RTM build and test it vigorously, this doesn't mean that 7600.16384 has been ditched because they have said they are not ready to announce RTM, it simply means they might not be finished testing it fully. On the flip side it could mean that 16385 is on its way and will require the same testing. Either way from experience of past Windows betas it's a safe bet that 7600 is the RTM build number and we are just waiting confirmation on the specific subset build (the 16384) number.

In my own personal opinion I believe 16384 might not be RTM as I know that they had planned to announce it yesterday and they even put a press release out about it yesterday by mistake (more info about that here). Either they need to perform some additional checks on it or they decided Ballmer was best to announce it or that 16385 is on its way and they start the checks again. Time will tell :)

UPDATE: looks like 16385 could have been compiled but it's worth noting that it appears to be only the WDK at the moment and not the client. Unclear right now.

I couldn't see a good reason why you closed my thread, so this is the last post I am putting up on Neowin, bye!!

Bye

OK, I changed my mind, I understand your reason is to keep it in few and early threads, and there is this thread not only earliest on starting, but earliest in reporting and confirming the RTM build 7600.16384. I'll stick to it until the confirmed RTM Final Build(I expect to make the earliest report too). :D

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=793314

OK, I changed my mind, I understand your reason is to keep it in few and early threads, and there is this thread not only earliest on starting, but earliest in reporting and confirming the RTM build 7600.16384. I'll stick to it until the confirmed RTM Final Build(I expect to make the earliest report too). :D

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=793314

Yeah. It's just getting irritating and confusing for all seeing so many threads about the same thing.

Yeah. It's just getting irritating and confusing for all seeing so many threads about the same thing.

Mr. Tom W: just a matter of interest, how come my thread reporting and confirming the build 16385 with all kinds of facts were locked, and another new guy just starting a thread of 16385 with no supporting material were OK? :blink:

Edit: just saw another new guy started another new thread............

Edited by FaiKee
Well, Wzor was correct. Windows 7 is RTM (13 July).

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/wa...009keynote.mspx

Edit: ****, wrong thread.

The scheduled rtm build day was Friday and the sign off on monday. After some issues with build 7600.16384 the rtm release schedule is delayed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a couple to mention, and they still run great on Windows 11 Adobe Lightroom Version 2 Alcohol 120% CLZ Book, Comic, Game, Movie, & Music Collector (PC - No longer sold / Grandfathered in - now mobile apps/online only) DVDDecrypter ISO Buster Pro version 1.9.1 (Still supports HD-DVD too) Nero Burning Rom 8 (Only the burning software, no backup, media converter, etc)   OpenAL (Runtime) PowerDVD 12 Ultra SPTD (SCSI Pass through Direct Driver) UltraISO Windows Media Encoder 9 WinImage You can tell I still sport an optical drive    
    • Linux 7.1 arrives with an NTFS overhaul and major hardware performance boosts by Paul Hill The founder of the Linux kernel has just announced the availability of Linux 7.1. This is a stable version of the kernel that will now be tested by various Linux distributions before it is shipped to users through update managers. Some users, like those on Debian, for example, might not get it for a long time, if at all, while Fedora users can expect it in the near future. With Linux 7.1 out on time, the merge window for Linux 7.2 is now open, giving contributors the opportunity to send in major new features that have been waiting for the last two months. Torvalds warned that he is currently travelling and will be in another timezone, so timing for the merge window may be irregular due to timezone differences and limited internet access. Torvalds said that he has already fetched early pull requests to allow him to do some offline work, but the travel could still cause disruption. Right now, he is not planning to extend the release, but did consider it. He said he might later regret not extending, though. In terms of this last week of development for Linux 7.1, Torvalds said there were no major or alarming changes. This week consisted mostly of smaller driver updates to GPU, networking, and sound, networking fixes, trace tooling fixes, and misc minor fixes. The shortlog this week lists fixes for driver bugs, memory leaks, I/O and USB fixes, networking and RDMA fixes, DRM/graphics fixes, and tooling and verification improvements. Specific fixes include USB series heap-overflow and buffer overflow fixes, and multiple use-after-free, memory-leak, and refcount corrections across subsystems such as i2c, zram, gpio, and net. There are fixes for graphics drivers, including amdgpu, i915, and virtio, as well as hypervisor and virtualization tweaks affecting mshv, vmbus, and hyperv. According to Phoronix, anyone running Linux 7.1 should look out for the new NTFS driver, Intel FRED for improved performance on Panther Lake and future CPUs, faster graphics with Intel Arc Battlemage, and improvements for older AMD Radeon GPUs. If you are running Linux on your computer and everything is fine, then you don’t need to worry about updating to Linux 7.1 as a priority; just wait for it to be pushed to you. If you have tried Linux on hardware but it didn’t work properly, trying again with a distro that uses Linux 7.1 could cause Linux to work on your machine, thanks to the new hardware support.
    • you can also do this with this tool: PowerSettingsExplorer made by mbk1969 at 3dguru forum.. I found it by accident researching on modern standby and annoying quirks of it in 2022
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.1 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.1 changelog: Added An option to customize notification sounds (#1259) Fixed Ongoing notification was laggy on Samsung One UI devices (#1269) Improved Updated Translations Minor UI/UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.1 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • watching him because of the Mr Klinton cat
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      139
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!