[winxp] GUIDE: Making your windows folder smaller!


Recommended Posts

1 more way 2 make windows folder smaller and get more free disk space - is running periodically Dupe Checker Pro.

It's the best duplicate files finder and disk cleaner. From the analog applications I tried, Dupe Checker showed to me the most wanted result and stability work.

Some useful features is - finding dupes by name, content, size, byte-by-byte...

Check it on: http://www.atory.com/Dupe_Checker_PRO/

or get on Download.com: http://www.download.com/Dupe-Checker-Pro/3...tml?tag=lst-0-6

That's a pretty big accusation, my friend. Are you saying NeoMayem stole his guide?

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=80511

Or, I stole my guide?

http://www.graphixanstuff.com/Forum/index.php?showtopic=1692

Did you see the date on that page you posted?

Written By: Private Pyle

Date: 5-31-04

Did you notice the the date that particular member of that forum joined it?

Join Date: Apr 2004

Looks to me like someone posted NeoMayhem's guide on that site without giving him credit for it...and you're just out to start trouble, my friend, without checking the facts.

i am using windows 2000 pro with sp4

there is a folder Installer in the windows directory

can i delete it?

the content are:

 Volume in drive D is IBM2
 Volume Serial Number is 1461-7B40

 Directory of D:\WIN2K\Installer

01/21/2004  01:37a              65,536 100f3907.mst
10/13/2004  01:58a             611,328 1105ea.msi
06/09/2001  04:48a             251,392 1136c4e.msi
03/21/2003  10:53p           2,262,016 148a41f.msi
07/11/2003  02:52a           2,268,672 14edda.msi
02/05/2003  01:19a           1,479,168 1661f9cb.msi
06/08/2001  04:53p             262,656 189f9.msi
06/11/2003  08:15p             756,736 1b8edd2a.msi
05/06/2004  05:21p              65,536 2530dd9.mst
06/11/2004  02:07a               3,584 2e1c12c3.mst
08/11/2004  07:12p           2,803,200 2e1c12c6.msi
08/12/2004  12:13a             378,368 2f3198c8.msi
07/03/2003  07:29p             785,408 353619.msi
10/13/2004  08:55p           7,466,496 40f65b6.msi
12/06/2003  02:59p           2,539,008 425ea0cd.msp
12/15/2003  02:23a           1,540,096 429bea39.msi
01/21/2004  01:39a              65,536 52a8024.mst
05/06/2004  05:18p              65,536 52a826e.mst
11/18/2004  03:36p              53,248 5643b.mst
08/02/2002  10:46p          27,412,992 5a0fa.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p             787,968 5a0fb.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p             628,224 5a0fc.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p              81,920 5a0fd.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p             556,544 5a0fe.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p              57,856 5a0ff.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p             526,848 5a100.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p             754,688 5a101.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p           2,501,632 5a102.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p             698,368 5a103.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p             426,496 5a104.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p           3,084,800 5a105.msp
08/02/2002  10:46p             115,200 5a106.msp
07/18/2004  08:58p           1,213,440 6489d.msi
07/08/2004  12:09a             999,936 64a5c68.msi
04/05/2003  11:55p             751,104 6aeac.msi
10/13/2004  01:37a           1,988,096 6f3dc.msi
09/09/2003  11:31a             792,576 a2326.msi
11/18/2004  03:38p              53,248 ab63bd2.mst
05/22/2003  09:10p             522,752 b84caff.msi
04/24/2004  03:49p           1,390,592 d9f1364.msi
08/04/2001  07:45p           2,332,672 dd2ce.msi
06/01/2004  01:59a             470,016 fd64a45.msi
12/11/2002  07:39p          10,995,712 WMEncoder.msi
08/04/2001  09:43p      <DIR>          {00010409-78E1-11D2-B60F-006097C998E7}
07/02/2003  06:42p      <DIR>          {0FFCBC14-E43C-4DD8-9F48-7F6997149A3E}
12/15/2003  02:23a      <DIR>          {5058B085-AA79-41E5-A726-681B4C4B846E}
07/18/2004  08:58p      <DIR>          {63CB7620-B423-4BF1-A7E4-75BB8B64740E}
07/11/2003  02:52a      <DIR>          {6BE2A4A4-99FB-48ED-AE1E-4E850389F804}
06/08/2001  04:53p      <DIR>          {6F716D8C-398F-11D3-85E1-005004838609}
10/13/2004  01:37a      <DIR>          {8855FF30-19CE-4CB1-A654-87B38369CCE1}
10/13/2004  01:58a      <DIR>          {9541FED0-327F-4DF0-8B96-EF57EF622F19}
09/07/2003  11:18p      <DIR>          {AC76BA86-7AD7-1033-7B44-000000000001}
10/13/2004  08:55p      <DIR>          {C3C538E5-524C-4253-AA74-0EEEF34990EA}
06/01/2004  01:59a      <DIR>          {D48EAA77-E526-41EB-894C-BD6A17EABD95}
02/05/2003  01:19a      <DIR>          {E38C00D0-A68B-4318-A8A6-F7D4B5B1DF0E}
09/09/2003  11:31a      <DIR>          {E9F81423-211E-46B6-9AE0-38568BC5CF6F}
              44 File(s)     82,867,200 bytes
              13 Dir(s)     880,861,184 bytes free

I'm not familiar with Windows 2000 Pro with SP4, but those *.msi file should have to do with your installing stuff...and importantly, after the stuff is installed, uninstalling that same stuff.

In XP the *.msi files are in C:\WINDOWS\Installer, and other installation files are in C:\Program Files\InstallShield Installation Information...and I usually leave those on my installation. Although, I could remove them if I wanted to uninstall my stuff manually.

My full 7-PART Guide For Slimming Down XP-SP2 is at Jan's site. She has it pinned and all in one piece for easy reference...

http://www.graphixanstuff.com/Forum/index.php?showtopic=1692

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
1. c:\windows\system32\dllcache\

NOTE: DON?T DELETE THIS FOLDER, JUST ALL THE FILES INSIDE! This folder uses a LOT of hard drive space, it holds a backup of every system file that windows uses. Deleting this will cause a SFC error when you replace a system file instead of windows putting back the original file. For people who want to mod there system, this is a good thing.

..the heck? There's no dllcache folder in my system32.:wacko:o:

Anyways, nice guide. It took about a second of my boot time. That's not much, but at least it's something;);)

A very nice gal in England created and is hosting a forum for Bold_Fortune. (That's me.) Why, I have know idea.

I wasn't that interested at first, and thanked her for the kind thought. But then I thought, what if I could create a place where people could go to learn and have fun?

The Bold_Fortune Forum isn't going to have a lot of rules. There aren't going to be armed guards with badges at the doors censoring your posts. I'm not there to supervise, nor to baby sit. I'm there to have fun, to learn, and maybe help a few people with their computer questions.

I'll be putting up my complete Slimming Down XP Guide, where you can reference it in it's entirety.

Anyway, take a look. Join in if you like. You have a question, don't be afraid to ask. It's just getting started, so don't expect a lot right now. But, just wait...it's going to be a fun place...without a lot of rules...but with some good information...and some good people.

http://www.hollow-refuge.net/Bold/

I finally got my Guide To Slimming Down Windows XP in its completed form setup on my site. I'll be there should you have any questions...

http://www.hollow-refuge.net/Bold/viewtopic.php?t=22

Hope you find it helpful being all in one piece and all in one place like it is.

I finally got my Guide To Slimming Down Windows XP in its completed form setup on my site.  I'll be there should you have any questions...

http://www.hollow-refuge.net/Bold/viewtopic.php?t=22

Hope you find it helpful being all in one piece and all in one place like it is.

585265593[/snapback]

very very good job man (Y) I can see more deep in the morning and try it thanks (Y)

Site update...

A very nice gal in England created and is hosting The Bold_Fortune Forums. (That's me.) Why? I have know idea.

I wasn't much interested at first, and thanked her for the kind gesture. Then I thought, what if I could create a place where people could go to learn and have fun..but made it different from other forums?

The Bold_Fortune Forums isn't going to have a lot of rules. There aren't going to be armed guards with badges at the doors censoring your posts. I'm not there to supervise, or babysit youngsters. I'm there to have fun, to learn, and maybe help a few people with their computer questions.

2McAbre is there lending his computer expertise.

I put up my complete Slimming Down Windows XP Guide, where you can reference it in it's entirety.

Anyway, take a look. Join in if you like. Have a question? Don't be afraid to ask.

It's just getting started, so don't expect too much right now. But just wait. It's going to be a fun place. Without a lot of rules. With some good information offered. Some good people to talk with.

You can even cuss if you enjoy cussing. No one is going to delete your post. You can even complain about things that really bug you in the "I'm Mad As Hell, And I'm Not Going To Take It Anymore!" section.

There's even a special section called "The Great Computing Debates." Where perris can argue freely the benefits of his way of setting the pagefile.

And, feel free to give a plug to your favorite site in the "Shamelessly Give Your Site A Good Plug" section.

NeoWin has been incredibly good--and certainly open-minded enough--to allow me the freedom I needed to hammer out some of my Slimming Down Windows XP Guide here on this wonderful forum. I sincerely hope they feel free to promote their incredible site there, too. I know I always shall. Thanks, NeoWin.

http://www.hollow-refuge.net/Bold/

Deleting stuff following your guide seems like the files for Active Directories Service are needed for the Services Admin Tool to work.

585314980[/snapback]

Not according to my installation. iron2000. I can't say what your problem with accessing Services could be, though. I'm okay in that area.

These are the files related to Active Directory Service:

Active Directories Service

Deleted these 3 files from C:\WINDOWS\system32\wbem

dsprov.dll

dsprov.mfl

dsprov.mof

Deleted these 11 files from C:\WINDOWS\system32

activeds.dll

activeds.tlb

adsldp.dll

adsldpc.dll

adsmsext.dll

adsnt.dll

dsprop.dll

dsquery.dll

dssec.dat

dssec.dll

dsuiext.dll

As I was telling someone on my site who was having a problem connecting to his network after removing Active Directories Service...activeds.dll is ADs Router Layer DLL. It doesn't appear to have anything to do with the Services Administrative Tools. It's a Service in and of itself.

In regards to the  "dllcache folder inside system32", you need to go to "Folder Options" -----"View" and tick the box that lets you see hidden system files...

Then check out System32 folder for that elusive dllcache

584853074[/snapback]

I have this thread in my saved topics and had noticed it back on the front page yesterday after somebosy replied to it. Made me decide to browse through it again. I have now checked 3 of my machines and NONE of them have the dllcache folder. Is this because I have tweaked the registry to always unload dll's?

To be honest, I have looked this over several times, but just can't bring myself to remove the items suggested. I believe I keep my systems well cleaned out, tweaked, and managed and space isn't really an issue.

I don't see a whole lot of replies where somebody has actually gone through and done everything suggested here. Many of them say thanks, but I'll check it later. Should make a pole question out of that!

It has nothing to do with that tweak to Always Unload Dlls. I don't have a clue why you can't find the dllcache folder on three different machines. They are all running Windows XP, correct?

You say, "To be honest, I have looked this over several times, but just can't bring myself to remove the items suggested."

Then don't. No one is telling you to remove any files. Removing files isn't for everybody.

Unfortunately, the discussions we have here about files--just like the file removing guide itself--get lost because the thread moves along so fast. It's become a really long thread.

If you've noticed, this is a very big topic. I have other such threads about Slimming Down XP on other forums, too. They too number in thousands of hits also. Their questions and responses also make them very long threads.

What I have done on this new site of mine is place my entire Slimming Down Windows XP Guide in one place, and locked it to keep it's integrity. Then I created below another forum entitled, "Discussions About Slimming Down Windows XP" made specifically for questions like these about the guide.

http://hollow-refuge.net/Bold/index.php?si...0d18d32fc118c4b

I finally got my Guide To Slimming Down Windows XP in its completed form setup on my site.  I'll be there should you have any questions...

http://www.hollow-refuge.net/Bold/viewtopic.php?t=22

Hope you find it helpful being all in one piece and all in one place like it is.

585265593[/snapback]

Nice guide man :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!