The worst movie you have seen?


Recommended Posts

Let's see... there are so many, I will place a list:

1. 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days (the mistake of my life).

2. Cobra.

3. Kangaroo Jack.

4. Super Mario Bros

5. G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra. (Enjoyed the ninja parts, but this movie is a piece of crap).

Traffic is one of the best movies I've seen. BTW.

Alone in the Dark 2, maybe.

no, because this is supposed to be "worst movie you have seen", and people are listing movies that were bad, but by far no the worst, either that or they only watch two movies a year...

Says the one who agrees with Solaris being listed :rolleyes:

Troll 2 - seriously bad in every way - acting, special effects, acting, cinematography, acting, lighting. Oh, there's not a single troll in the movie - no the monsters are goblins. At least the first one had a troll and was reasonably entertaining.

House of the dead - somebody mentioned this one already.

Death Stalker - so bad it's hilarious! This one at least redeems itself in the company of mates and a truckful of alcohol - nudity, blood, decapitations and I'm pretty sure most of the women are ex-pornstars from the 70s and 80s.

Incidently, how do canadians feel that the 2nd highest grossing movie in their country is Porky's! The highest overall is something called Bon Cop, Bad Cop which I've never heard of.

Edited by Roadrunna
lakeview terrace was an awesome movie, really funny in parts and SLJ had a great performance. hardly deserves being called "worst movie" even if you didn't like it. :p

I dunno, the entire group I was with (There was about 8 of us, sure that's not alot, but decent size group of people) Felt the same way I did, I found the movie to be quite boring, and had a very silly plot.

The Wicker Man with Nick Cage.

If you want a 2 min summary of the movie just hit up the link below lol

...

OH GOD NOT THE BEES! MY EYEEEEESS!

Yeah but that movie was so bad it was actually good, if you regard it as a comedy lmao. that bees scene was ****ing gold, and the doll part:

HOWD IT GET BURNED HOWD IT GET BURNED HOWD IT GET BUUUURNNNEEDDDDD

and also the completely ridiculous scene where he is running around in a bear suite punching people.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!