Health care workers refuse to take H1N1 vaccine


Recommended Posts

Source:Article

excerpt from the article

?The truth is that vaccines aren?t effective, generally carry dangerous side effects, and in many cases actually fuel the spread of pandemics,? said Dr. Leonard Horowitz, a Harvard University trained medical researcher who also holds a Master?s Degree in Public Health. ?The fact is that most healthcare workers know this, and they don?t trust that any swine flu vaccine will do anything but cause more problems and potential harm to the patients they care for.?

In Dr. Horowitz?s view, vaccines do more harm than good, and are little more than a way for the pharmaceutical companies to profit from epidemics and side effects.

The scare, however, seemed to have less substance than volume, as the thousands of U.S. deaths that were predicted never happened, Dr. Horowitz added.

?The H1N1 swine flu shot is more of a drug than a vaccine given the list of toxic chemical ingredients causing side effects including Guillain-Barre syndrome, a deadly paralyzing disorder widespread after the 1976 swine flu vaccination campaign.? Dr. Horowitz continued.

?Vaccines are an aberration, and the medical profession and pharmaceutical companies have been playing fast and loose with explaining how vaccines immunize people,? he said. ?Classic immunology draws an important distinction between the terms ?immunize? and ?vaccinate.? By casually substituting ?immunization? for ?vaccination,? the pharmaceutical machine mystifies the masses. More accurately, vaccinations cause hyper-sensitizations. Simply put white blood cell body guards begin to attack far more than desired. Myriad auto-immune diseases and childhood injuries result from vaccinations. However, pseudo-scientists and ignorant health officials confuse this matter with the ?immunization? misnomer. Similarly, they repeat the myth that vaccines, not improvements in hygiene and nutrition, caused the great reduction, or alleged elimination, of deadly human diseases.?


How does somebody like Dr. Leonard Horowitz get a job when they're that obviously wrong?

Just a question not flame baiting here: "Why do you get a vaccine for the flu? which, is from last years strain? makes no sense AND I know this as I was trained as a combat lifesaver(medic) and taught that flu vaccines are from the prior years strain NEVER from the current years? also, don't you have an immune system?

Now some people have compromised immune systems BUT the adjuvants, are meant to "stimulate" the immune system but they over stimulate the immune system and cause people, like myself to have auto-immune disorders?

Thimerosal is banned in many nations and as the wikipedia has stated, 12 out of 21 test subjects using a vaccine for diptheria, 12 died

vaccines are worthless.

Leonard Horowitz sells bottles of water for $20 which, "The instant you touch or taste it, every one of your billions of cells gets super-charged with the essence of LOVE." In other words, he's a scam artist who views sickness as profit.

Thank god entities (i refuse to use the normal word) like this didn't exist 50 years ago or polio would still be here. Im realy not an aggressive person but if one of these little nazis was in the same room as me i would strangle him to death with my bare hands.

How people like this can pout their hate of capitilisim ahead of the lives and welfare of other people is both astonishing and sickening.

Look, set aside what you think of me. I'm investigating this stuff and have found all this information and want to pass it out. I don't want YOU or YOUR families getting hurt of killed by this crazy stuff.

live and let live I always say .

Providing any proof would be a good start.

too easy! : Thimerosal

excerpt:

Introduction

Thimerosal is a mercury-containing organic compound (an organomercurial). Since the 1930s, it has been widely used as a preservative in a number of biological and drug products, including many vaccines, to help prevent potentially life threatening contamination with harmful microbes. Over the past several years, because of an increasing awareness of the theoretical potential for neurotoxicity of even low levels of organomercurials and because of the increased number of thimerosal containing vaccines that had been added to the infant immunization schedule, concerns about the use of thimerosal in vaccines and other products have been raised. Indeed, because of these concerns, the Food and Drug Administration has worked with, and continues to work with, vaccine manufacturers to reduce or eliminate thimerosal from vaccines.

I don't want YOU or YOUR families getting hurt of killed by this crazy stuff

No you don't want big pharma to get bigger and your willing to put that ahead of the lives and well being of other people.

Next paragraph

At concentrations found in vaccines, thimerosal meets the requirements for a preservative as set forth by the United States Pharmacopeia; that is, it kills the specified challenge organisms and is able to prevent the growth of the challenge fungi (U.S. Pharmacopeia 2004). Thimerosal in concentrations of 0.001% (1 part in 100,000) to 0.01% (1 part in 10,000) has been shown to be effective in clearing a broad spectrum of pathogens. A vaccine containing 0.01% thimerosal as a preservative contains 50 micrograms of thimerosal per 0.5 mL dose or approximately 25 micrograms of mercury per 0.5 mL dose.
Leonard Horowitz sells bottles of water for $20 which, "The instant you touch or taste it, every one of your billions of cells gets super-charged with the essence of LOVE." In other words, he's a scam artist who views sickness as profit.

I'll bite. Even if Ol'Len was selling love water for $20, who's making the real profit from sickness?

Flu shots are for people with vulnerable immune systems, there is zero, none, 0, reason for any normal healthy adult or child to mindlessly volunteer for a worthless vaccine that has had practically no clinical trailing (well in Poland, where it was tested on the homeless (resulting in a lawsuit) and something like 13 of the 120 people died), and for which governments have granted immunity from prosecution the vaccine manufacturers so if you do grow a penis from your forehead, you can't sue anyone. And you wonder why you're called sheeple. Geez.

No you don't want big pharma to get bigger and your willing to put that ahead of the lives and well being of other people.

well I tried to warn ya. sorry buddy I will keep my discussion from you.

The Great thimesoral coverup

Thimerosal is the preservative of choice for vaccine manufacturers. First introduced by Eli Lilly and Company in the late 1920s and early 1930s, the company began selling it as a preservative in vaccines in the 1940s. Thimerosal contains 49.6 percent mercury by weight and is metabolized or degraded into ethylmercury and thiosalicylate. Mercury, or more precisely, ethylmercury, is the principle agent that kills contaminants. Unfortunately, mercury also kills much more than that.

The Department of Defense classifies mercury as a hazardous material that could cause death if swallowed, inhaled or absorbed through the skin. Studies indicate that mercury tends to accumulate in the brains of primates and other animals after they are injected with vaccines. Mercury poisoning has been linked to cardiovascular disease, autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia and many other nervous system conditions. That's why the FDA rigorously limits exposure to mercury in foods and drugs. Some common sources of mercury include dental amalgam fillings, various vaccines and certain fish contaminated by polluted ocean waters.

The toxicity of mercury has never been in question. The real question is precisely how much mercury-laced thimerosal is toxic, and what are the possible consequences for our children at low doses?

Eli Lilly and Co. supposedly answered this question for us back in 1930. Concluding thimerosal to be of "a very low order of toxicity . . . for man," the company hired its own doctors to perform thimerosal experiments in Indianapolis City Hospital on meningitis patients during a severe outbreak in 1929. This 60-year-old evidence was still quoted on the company's brochures as recently as 1990. Andrew Waters, who is involved in a lawsuit against Eli Lilly, claims that most critical studies on the toxicity of thimerosal were suppressed by the company until now.

According to that, most people wouldn't even need the multi-dose option... which is the only one that contains Thiomersal.

The proposed mass vaccination vaccine is a multidose vaccine. It is 2 or 3 parts IIRC. The single dose vaccine has not even reached testing, though the employees and family members have been offered firts dibs on the single dose. Suppose it's easier to cover it up if you keep it in house.

Yeah, then there is the other school of thought that the flu outbreak was simply the precursor, the seed sowing, and that it is the vaccination in combination with the swine flu that will genetically recombine to create the actual disease that will do the damage. Interesting if a bit out there.

Edited by O.G
well I tried to warn ya. sorry buddy I will keep my discussion from you.

The Great thimesoral coverup

Lets have a look at some of the other articles on this BS website

Beating Cancer with Nutrition

Alternative Medicine Soars as Pharmaceuticals Sour

Beets are an Alternative Cancer Treatment

No no bias there.

The proposed mass vaccination vaccine is a multidose vaccine. It is 3 parts IIRC. The single dose vaccine has not even reached testing, though the employees and family members have been offered firts dibs on the single dose. Suppose it's easier to cover it up if you keep it in house.

according to reports last week, the H1N1 is so effective that 1 dose is all they say it takes. but they want us to take the H1N1 AND the normal seasonal vaccine..talk about pumping garbage into our veins... :x

Lets have a look at some of the other articles on this BS website

Beating Cancer with Nutrition

Alternative Medicine Soars as Pharmaceuticals Sour

Beets are an Alternative Cancer Treatment

No no bias there.

has it ever occurred to you that maybe nature products, herbals and the like are better for us than these damn drugs? example: these drug commericals take this drug for X problem but side affects are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9... are they even worth the trouble taking?

remember how did we heal ourselves BEFORE big Pharma???? there was no smith/Kline, etc..

has it ever occurred to you that maybe nature products, herbals and the like are better for us than these damn drugs?

No because those darn drugs have had their effectiveness proven via a double blind test . Where as herbals do not.

example: these drug commericals take this drug for X problem but side affects are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9... are they even worth the trouble taking?

And natural products don't have side effects because they do dick , Also the drug will only be proscribed when the problem outweighs side effects and their rate of occurence

remember how did we heal ourselves BEFORE big Pharma???? there was no smith/Kline, etc..

We relied on god.

Your hidden agenda has been exposed, How people like this can pout their hate of capitilisim ahead of the lives and welfare of other people is both astonishing and sickening.

don't look at the narrow picture. they are only reporting what is real. either that or, you're an agent provocateur of some kind.

They have a clear bias and products to sell that makes them an unreliable source of information .

To be fair, we also had a life expectancy of 40. It is the business of pharma to keep people sicker for longer, so they give with one hand yet take with the other.

true. but life has a price then. they don't want caner patients to end their lives. why? they want you to live long as possible to make more $$$. medicine is only a profit industry

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!