Health care workers refuse to take H1N1 vaccine


Recommended Posts

What potential issue will take a couple of years to manifest? The mercury (thermisol) will be gone from your system in 18 days if you abstain from eating fish during that period.

We don't know.. vaccine is not really thoroughly tested. Besides Guillain-Barre syndrome.

"There could be unknown side effects. Something could happen. But we think that is highly unlikely," says infectious disease and vaccine expert Mark Mulligan, MD, executive director of the Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center in Atlanta.
If I remember science class correctly, mercury is poison and shouldn't be ingested. Kind of like how you don't eat wood chips or stick metal objects into electrical sockets lol.

There is mercury in food as well. Chances are you ingest mercury every day. If you eat fish, you get even higher doses of mercury. Lots of things that you are exposed to every day are "poison" and can kill you in sufficient quantities. Even water can kill you.

We don't know.. vaccine is not really thoroughly tested. Besides Guillain-Barre syndrome.

But the swine flu vaccine is not much different from the other flu vaccines that have been tested on a massive scale over several decades. The claims that we could suddenly start growing new limbs or turn purple isn't based in any fact.

If I remember science class correctly, mercury is poison and shouldn't be ingested. Kind of like how you don't eat wood chips or stick metal objects into electrical sockets lol.

http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t000718b.html

But the swine flu vaccine is not much different from the other flu vaccines that have been tested on a massive scale over several decades. The claims that we could suddenly start growing new limbs or turn purple isn't based in any fact.

Well to be honest with you I'm more concerned about getting a serious neurological issue which is a fact that this vaccine can cause no matter what chances. You can still get screwed up and I haven't heard about this with any other vaccine.

I think it should be a requirment for anyone working with many different who may have weak immune systems, i mean health care workers come into contact with many ppl, if they picked up the virus they could easily pass it on to sum1 who has a weak immune system and could then possibly die from it.

As for side effects tbh they are minimal, u probably take more mecury through food than through this one injection. And no you cant get the flu from the injection, or get any virus through vaccines, as it either contains the dead virus this can't replicate, or ite contains virus specific proteins or parts of the virus so in some cases it doesnt even contain the virus. And if u did happen to get the flu a day or 2 after the injection, the vaccine doesnt make u instantly immune, it takes 2-3days for u to show flu symptoms so u could have either picked it up before the injection or jsut after.

I personally wont have the injection as im healthy, have a good immune system, the flu strain isnt that deadly (its as bad as seasonal flu, nothing special, just the media blowin it out of proportion) and i dont work with ppl who may have a weak immune system

Well to be honest with you I'm more concerned about getting a serious neurological issue which is a fact that this vaccine can cause no matter what chances. You can still get screwed up and I haven't heard about this with any other vaccine.

Uhm... The notice that it can in extremely rare cases trigger Guillain-Barre Syndrome (and most of the other side-effects listed) is based on this knowledge about other flu vaccines. It's not a claim that is based on the swine flu vaccine at all. It is just assumed that the risk is there, like it is with the other flu vaccines.

If I remember science class correctly, mercury is poison and shouldn't be ingested. Kind of like how you don't eat wood chips or stick metal objects into electrical sockets lol.

There are certain amounts of mercury that is considered to be safe. Certain cultures have eaten fish as part of their daily lives for generations. The tiny amount of mercury present in a vaccine is relatively comparable to eating one tuna steak.

We don't know.. vaccine is not really thoroughly tested. Besides Guillain-Barre syndrome.

Then you're just making stuff up. The swine flu vaccine is a minor tweak to the seasonal flu vaccine and that is the mostly widely tested vaccine that we have. Something that is a one in a million possibility isn't worth worrying about when considering that your risk from the swine flu itself is greater. Sure, you might think that the risks from swine flu are minor but they are greater than the risks from the vaccine and that is all that should matter.

Wheres the problem? Nature creatus virus's and infections science cures them .

This vaccine is for people with weak immune systems. Not for the general public

Thats a contradiction.

Key word being normal :rolleyes:

Why would i need a flu vaccine im 23 and perfectly healthy

I am going to ask the general views of this thread a question. Have any of you ever had the flu before? Seriously because if you did you would not be against this vaccine at all. I work in a healthcare environment everyday as an IT administrator for a clinic. I see patients coming in with masks coughing so hard like they are about to cough a lung up. Sorry but there is no way I am going to be catching that **** that they have. Shoot me up with the vacinnes you got. For healthcare yes some companies do require the shots or you find another job but thats more so to cover their butts. Think about it if all the workers get sick who is going to take care of the patients, and the ones who are able to function while having the flu come to work and risk giving it to more patients making others sick. The thing is I would rather be safe than sorry because having the flu is one of the worst experiences a person can go thru. You all can spout that mombojombo about vacinne effectiveness but to me something is better than nothing.

Uhm... The notice that it can in extremely rare cases trigger Guillain-Barre Syndrome (and most of the other side-effects listed) is based on this knowledge about other flu vaccines. It's not a claim that is based on the swine flu vaccine at all. It is just assumed that the risk is there, like it is with the other flu vaccines.

The risk of complications for the h1n1 vaccine will be the same since it is basically the same vaccine.

The risk of complications for the h1n1 vaccine will be the same since it is basically the same vaccine.

Exactly! People seem to think this is some radically new and experimental vaccine when it's really just a plain old flu vaccine targeted at a certain strain of the virus, somewhat similar to how the seasonal flu vaccine changes every year.

It's the risk of the actual virus that is believed to be different this time, not the vaccine. People then extrapolate that the vaccine must therefore also be more dangerous.

I think the risk is low. I know several people who have taken the vaccine and none of them have had any complications whatsoever.

I know people who've had weakness and a sore arm for a few days.. but hey.. i'd rather that than be dead.

  • 1 month later...

Might be a repost but didn't see.

Best Page in the Universe: I hope I get swine flu

and I agree with Maddox. My brother apparently got sick back in nov and docs said tests said it was swine flu. I was next to this kid taking care of him for a few days and he got better. Did I get sick? No. I have an immune system that works. And if you do get sick, deal with it. It's not going to kill you.

Don't take the vaccine. It's not worth it to you than it is for the companies that profit from making treatments than cures.

If you're a woman and you're worried about mercury content, get the one for pregnant women. Here in canada doctors are offering it because they are low on the regular vaccine at least in my area and they have WAY too much of the other. It still has mercury, but much less.

I think the risk is low. I know several people who have taken the vaccine and none of them have had any complications whatsoever.

I have to take that back. One local girl got very sick from taking the vaccine and now can no longer walk.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!