BUG - Unable to change MAC address In Windows 7 32bit


Recommended Posts

Jusr to let anyone else who is having this issue know theyre not alone.

Plenty of people across the net have reported this to MS, i have since Beta, and we have all been ignored by MS so far.

More proof that nothing has changed at MS...............

Anyhoo, if you cant change your MAC under Windows 7 32bit (64bit apparently is working), then welcome to the club.

Maybe in 4 or 5 months when SP1 hits, we, the ignored and forgotten may actually be able to connect to the internet........

For the time being, im just sitting back in XP and watching the bug list for windows 7 grow.

If theres any justice, MS has finally signed their own death warrant with yet another hurried and bug-laden product.

There shouldn't be any reason to have to SPOOF the MAC address to connect to the internet.

Agreed ^

What are you trying to do? Steal hotel internet or someones wireless or something? lol Or have a funny router setup?

Not once in my work as a technician have I ever had to deal with a case where I had to change someones MAC address to (legally) access the internet.

There shouldn't be any reason to have to SPOOF the MAC address to connect to the internet.

Umm, there are hundreds of reasons.

For example, my ISP requires that you register your MAC address before having internet service. Whenever I change network cards, I would have to call+wait for hours for them to update the MAC address if I didn't spoof it.

Likewise, a University I used to work with only allowed one networked device per person on the administrative network. It had to be changed manually in an enormous text file in order to be updated. It was official policy for people to spoof their first registered MAC address if they received a new computer.

Both of the above use fully switched network, so it would be impossible for someone to sniff it.

I could go on, but it is a very important feature of any networked OS.

What is wrong with your current MAC address? blocked by your neighbours :p ? im joking but is there any real reason to change it.

For example, my ISP requires that you register your MAC address before having internet service. Whenever I change network cards, I would have to call+wait for hours for them to update the MAC address if I didn't spoof it.

Likewise, a University I used to work with only allowed one networked device per person on the administrative network. It had to be changed manually in an enormous text file in order to be updated. It was official policy for people to spoof their first registered MAC address if they received a new computer.

ISP requires registering your MAC address? bizarre.

"official policy for people to spoof their first registered MAC address if they received a new computer" - well if its official there's pretty much no point implementing the rule in the first place.

For example, my ISP requires that you register your MAC address before having internet service.

Serious? Thats pretty stupid.. I mean, I can think of SOME good reasons... But thats still overall a stupid system to have..

Is that common over there? No ISPs do that here in Australia, and I hope they don't start doing it soon.

And you make it sound like you change network cards every few days, why not get a decent one, register it, and stick with it?

Unless there is a limit on the number of MAC addresses you can register - give them a ring and start registering every single possible combination - see how many they enter before they get fed up and tell you not to bother any more :p If there is no limit stated anywhere their system will most likely stop accepting after so many - if they tell you you cannot registered any more - request to cancel your account without penalty and move to a better ISP.

ISP requires registering your MAC address? bizarre.

"official policy for people to spoof their first registered MAC address if they received a new computer" - well if its official there's pretty much no point implementing the rule in the first place.

For a fully switched wired network, it is important for security. Nobody can get your MAC address apart from gaining physical access to your computer. If they do this, then it is your responsibility. Only the first router knows your MAC address in both cases, hence the reason it is used to identify the user.

Nobody can get your MAC address apart from gaining physical access to your computer.

Oh.... you have a lot to learn.

1) Routers (both that cheap linksys all the way up to the $20k cisco) store tables of MAC addresses

2) Every IP frame set across the network has a MAC address that is easily readable

3) Its pretty easy to do a net discover (or ARP) to see the MACs of every NIC on a network.

Srsly, go to command and type "arp -a". Even shows my VMs which are under a different subnet.

And all you have to do to get a MAC you don't already have in your ARP table is to ping it. Even if it doesn't respond (like in a network that blocks ping), it will get its MAC.

For a fully switched wired network, it is important for security. Nobody can get your MAC address apart from gaining physical access to your computer. If they do this, then it is your responsibility. Only the first router knows your MAC address in both cases, hence the reason it is used to identify the user.

Wireshark? Only takes one command to find MAC address on a wired or wireless network.. MAC filtering is nowhere near as secure as some people think these days..

For a fully switched wired network, it is important for security. Nobody can get your MAC address apart from gaining physical access to your computer. If they do this, then it is your responsibility. Only the first router knows your MAC address in both cases, hence the reason it is used to identify the user.

Um a simple packet sniffer (like wireshark) will give you the list of macs connected to the router...

Serious? Thats pretty stupid.. I mean, I can think of SOME good reasons... But thats still overall a stupid system to have..

Is that common over there? No ISPs do that here in Australia, and I hope they don't start doing it soon.

And you make it sound like you change network cards every few days, why not get a decent one, register it, and stick with it?

Well for most ISPs that don't require a modem, it is. How else would they know who is using the Internet and who to charge? Even cable and non-authenticated DSL require the same thing. It's just that they require you to register the cable/DSL modems MAC address and not your own. Which is basically the same protocol.

My building is pretty old...newer installs have per port accounting; which allows for not registering. However, since you are limited to 2 IP addresses, they still require you to register the two you want. If they didn't have it, I could use a network card that supports dozens of virtual ethernet cards and get as many public IP addresses as I want.

So it's pretty smart actually.

1. Your ISP is stupid, I only ever had to register a modem MAC. Why does your ISP not just give you a ID/PW to authenticate? Thats simpler by a LOT.

2. Your University is stupid, Mine allowed 4 MAC addresses per student and the student could add or remove and MAC's they wanted any time via a website.

Anyway to answer you question google in 2 seconds:

This supposedly works in Windows 7... (but I have read people doing it "the normal way" as they did in vista and XP but only certain mac address formats appear to be working and depending on if you device supports it).

http://www.gorlani.com/publicprj/macmakeup/macmakeup.asp

Check google first next time btw:

Network and Sharing Center > Change adapter settings > right click on adapter name, then Properties > Configure > Advanced tab > Network adress

By default, "Not present" value it's on. Just click on the blank field and write the MAC address you want (without the lines, eg. 00FB0R...).

I found that on the first page after one search - just tried and it worked for me.

Oh.... you have a lot to learn.

1) Routers (both that cheap linksys all the way up to the $20k cisco) store tables of MAC addresses

2) Every IP frame set across the network has a MAC address that is easily readable

3) Its pretty easy to do a net discover (or ARP) to see the MACs of every NIC on a network.

Srsly, go to command and type "arp -a". Even shows my VMs which are under a different subnet.

Wireshark? Only takes one command to find MAC address on a wired or wireless network.. MAC filtering is nowhere near as secure as some people think these days..
Um a simple packet sniffer (like wireshark) will give you the list of macs connected to the router...

Wow, no offense guys, but you need some networking 101.

Your MAC address is only sent between your port and the router in these setups. The router does per port isolation, and doesn't provide any switching between the ports. Instead, it take the IP layer stuff, copies it to a new frame, and sets the source MAC address to its own and sends it upstream. There is no way for anybody else, apart from the people managing the router, to capture your MAC address.

According to that logic, I can get your local PCs MAC address from the WAN port of your regular Linksys router :rolleyes:

1. Your ISP is stupid, I only ever had to register a modem MAC. Why does your ISP not just give you a ID/PW to authenticate? Thats simpler by a LOT.

2. Your University is stupid, Mine allowed 4 MAC addresses per student and the student could add or remove and MAC's they wanted any time via a website.

1. And what modem would I register? I don't have a modem nor do other people that use the same ISP. It is Ethernet to home. :rolleyes:

2. Did I not say administrative network? I have NFI what the student network is like, I didn't deal with it.

We don't need networking 101 simply because your UNIs setup is different and we didnt use our mind powers to assume thats how its configured.

I've worked with Australia's Department of Commerce in support before, and even their network is vunerable to things like wireshark to find a MAC address, and yes I used it once, And that was done by turning on a laptop, and shoving an ethernet cable from it into the wall port, not having direct access to the router. So don't try and tell me its not possible.

It all depends on the router, network in general, and its configuration.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!