More on LIVE Bans, HDD Crippling, Possible Ban Causes


Recommended Posts

You know, there's a way to put the NAND into "read only" mode so if MS tries to ban your box, it wont be able to disable that stuff (of course there's no online play, still, but HD installs still work). It's a simple one wire solder, perhaps that would be better?

You know, there's a way to put the NAND into "read only" mode so if MS tries to ban your box, it wont be able to disable that stuff (of course there's no online play, still, but HD installs still work). It's a simple one wire solder, perhaps that would be better?

that sounds a lot better, any link? :)

that sounds a lot better, any link? :)

<snipped>

Disclaimer: I don't think this is against any of Neowin's rules as it doesn't in any way promote piracy, it merely prevents the crippling of the device itself. If, however, it IS against the rules, then feel free to remove the link but keep in mind it was not intentional on my part.

Also, if you're interested a program was released today called "XVal" (Version 2.0 by Redline99) which attempts to check if your console has logged any "bad things" offline. It does all this by taking some numbers from your dashboard's system menu and decrypting them. It's still kind of experimental at this stage and even a "clean" secdata doesn't mean you are safe, but its possibly an indication.

I can't link directly to this one, but its at the "usual places".

Edited by Colin-uk

I don't have an XBox or a PS3 though I have the impression that the policy is the same. If this thing is banned permanently, there can't be a transfer of ownership so these things are more useful it seems in the landfill. It still the choice of the user to Mod, but it seems wasteful to outright ban systems never to be used again. MS could at least give a credit toward purchase of a new Xbox, have the banned one sent back and refurbished.

I think if MS did that, then they would DEFINITELY be accused of being money-grabbing gits. However, I would much prefer they offer some kind of warranty transfer for second hand consoles. There's no denying there's a huge market out there and it's definitely not fair on those who can't afford a brand new console and end up getting shafted with a banned one. I guess you could argue that it's their fault for not testing the hardware before they buy, but what if it wasn't banned at the time and got banned a week or a month or a year later? Or quite simply, why should the consumer HAVE to worry about such things?

I think if MS offered a second-hand refurb of the console, unbanning it and giving it a clean bill of health for a reasonable sum, it would be much better for everyone.

here is something interesting:

http://cgi.ebay.com/Xbox-360-Banned_W0QQ...

unmodified console gets banned after 3 months of online play?

Maybe it was modded but the guy never knew it? I've never played my 360 online and I've modded it.

My warranty seal is still intact too...poor guy lol. Most likely if I sell it, I'm not going to say that the console has been banned, because technically it hasn't, it will if the person plays online :p

Maybe it was modded but the guy never knew it? I've never played my 360 online and I've modded it.

My warranty seal is still intact too...poor guy lol. Most likely if I sell it, I'm not going to say that the console has been banned, because technically it hasn't, it will if the person plays online :p

Oh how nice of you. This is why I never buy crap off of ebay.

Has anyone used that XVal program.

It apparently can read the 360's NAND and tell if anything has been written to it

All zeros apparently means your fine to go on Live!

Im not trying live lol..even though i got all 0's :p

Maybe it was modded but the guy never knew it? I've never played my 360 online and I've modded it.

My warranty seal is still intact too...poor guy lol. Most likely if I sell it, I'm not going to say that the console has been banned, because technically it hasn't, it will if the person plays online :p

:no:

Technicalities ftl (N)

Has anyone used that XVal program.

It apparently can read the 360's NAND and tell if anything has been written to it

All zeros apparently means your fine to go on Live!

Im not trying live lol..even though i got all 0's :p

It doesn't read the NAND, it decrypts a status message from the dashboard. That status, however, is only part of the picture and all 0's doesn't mean you're safe, it just means that 360 hasn't been flagged client-side yet. It could still be banned server side at any moment, though.

This is not the first banwave Microsoft has done. If anything, Microsoft has been pretty consistent with their ban waves, having one in November of EVERY year (and they used to have one around Aprilish time as well). This is nothing new and all the hoo-ha its generating is nothing new, either. Give it a few months and ebay will be back to normal.

This is not the first banwave Microsoft has done. If anything, Microsoft has been pretty consistent with their ban waves, having one in November of EVERY year (and they used to have one around Aprilish time as well). This is nothing new and all the hoo-ha its generating is nothing new, either. Give it a few months and ebay will be back to normal.

Kushan you of all people know they've never banned this many people at once :laugh:

Nothing will be "back to normal" that quickly as hysteria will continue around any firmware release for a while.

No, but there's never been so many 360s around, either. I'm pretty sure that, on the whole, about the same percentage of 360 users were banned and since it has such worldwide press, most people looking to buy a 360 off of ebay will be aware of the bans and most people looking to sell 360s will have the sense to mention that their console is NOT banned. So a few weeks while all of the sellers try to offload the banned consoles will pass and, for the most part, they'll give up and/or sell them at a discount. That's what happened last time.

EDIT: HDD mods are fine, for now. MS can just disable them if they want, rather than ban the whole console and yet they've not even chose to do this.

No, but there's never been so many 360s around, either. I'm pretty sure that, on the whole, about the same percentage of 360 users were banned and since it has such worldwide press, most people looking to buy a 360 off of ebay will be aware of the bans and most people looking to sell 360s will have the sense to mention that their console is NOT banned. So a few weeks while all of the sellers try to offload the banned consoles will pass and, for the most part, they'll give up and/or sell them at a discount. That's what happened last time.

EDIT: HDD mods are fine, for now. MS can just disable them if they want, rather than ban the whole console and yet they've not even chose to do this.

So drive firmware is the only reason right now? Damned if I am paying the exuberant official hdd prices.

No, but there's never been so many 360s around, either. I'm pretty sure that, on the whole, about the same percentage of 360 users were banned and since it has such worldwide press, most people looking to buy a 360 off of ebay will be aware of the bans and most people looking to sell 360s will have the sense to mention that their console is NOT banned. So a few weeks while all of the sellers try to offload the banned consoles will pass and, for the most part, they'll give up and/or sell them at a discount. That's what happened last time.

EDIT: HDD mods are fine, for now. MS can just disable them if they want, rather than ban the whole console and yet they've not even chose to do this.

If MS did successfully detect the firmware then no, there is much higher % of people banned this time. In the past bannings have typically come only from people playing bad rips - If it's firmware detection this time you potentially add anyone with a modded console into the mix.

Yeah, people were banned this time regardless if they were playing rips or not. If your 360 was flashed = banned.

There is no evidence of that whatsoever because quite frankly who would have a flashed 360 and not be playing rips...

This is no different then people who would cheat in MMO's, get banned, and then swear up and down they never ever cheated...yeah..

There is no evidence of that whatsoever because quite frankly who would have a flashed 360 and not be playing rips...

Dude...it's pretty unanimous Microsoft can detect 'different' firmwares. The theory is along the lines of :- NXE had some 'self'destruct' code and was collecting firmware information and reported this back to Microsoft.

here's a quote from a guy who reckons he works in the XBL department :

we have found a way to read the firmware. the nxe update has allowed us to do a check on the current firmware installed on the dvd drive

the reason this was not flagged was because the code was not active. as you might have heard it was discussed about a ?self destruct? code embedded in the nxe update and even before that. this was that code it wasn?t a self destruct code but actually a check that was done on all drives

this check was begun when the update was to ?prepare for the last.fm facebook and twitter? this in fact was the code sent out to begin checks on ALL xboxs

these checks would send us information on the firmware written to the drive not the exact kind but we did a extensive form of hash check on the drive and could actually find out if it was modified in anyway

this was particularly easy on the lite-on as it was actually manufactured to serve for this purpose as our testing model

we will not ban all consoles at once and yes all information about you has been collected a long time ago

we have THOUSANDS of xboxs reporting bad checks meaning modified firmware. not all people will be banned and all the bans are done at randomn times

multiple checks have been done over this amount of time so we could asure the modified xboxs were truely modified and not just returning corrupt data

So i dunno but that sounds pretty reasonable

Plus there has been numerous reports of people buying a brand new 360 and flashing it and not playing a copied game (or one that they copied themselves) and getting banned in about 30 mins..

Microsoft finally :pught up :p

Dude...it's pretty unanimous Microsoft can detect 'different' firmwares. The theory is along the lines of :- NXE had some 'self'destruct' code and was collecting firmware information and reported this back to Microsoft.

here's a quote from a guy who reckons he works in the XBL department :

So i dunno but that sounds pretty reasonable

Plus there has been numerous reports of people buying a brand new 360 and flashing it and not playing a copied game (or one that they copied themselves) and getting banned in about 30 mins..

Microsoft finally caught up :p

Sounds about right, that's what I was thinking they were doing. Personally the only thing I did on Live is play Uno lol no big loss for me

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. What???
    • What part of "you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever" is not clear enough?
    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!