More on LIVE Bans, HDD Crippling, Possible Ban Causes


Recommended Posts

You know, there's a way to put the NAND into "read only" mode so if MS tries to ban your box, it wont be able to disable that stuff (of course there's no online play, still, but HD installs still work). It's a simple one wire solder, perhaps that would be better?

You know, there's a way to put the NAND into "read only" mode so if MS tries to ban your box, it wont be able to disable that stuff (of course there's no online play, still, but HD installs still work). It's a simple one wire solder, perhaps that would be better?

that sounds a lot better, any link? :)

that sounds a lot better, any link? :)

<snipped>

Disclaimer: I don't think this is against any of Neowin's rules as it doesn't in any way promote piracy, it merely prevents the crippling of the device itself. If, however, it IS against the rules, then feel free to remove the link but keep in mind it was not intentional on my part.

Also, if you're interested a program was released today called "XVal" (Version 2.0 by Redline99) which attempts to check if your console has logged any "bad things" offline. It does all this by taking some numbers from your dashboard's system menu and decrypting them. It's still kind of experimental at this stage and even a "clean" secdata doesn't mean you are safe, but its possibly an indication.

I can't link directly to this one, but its at the "usual places".

Edited by Colin-uk

I don't have an XBox or a PS3 though I have the impression that the policy is the same. If this thing is banned permanently, there can't be a transfer of ownership so these things are more useful it seems in the landfill. It still the choice of the user to Mod, but it seems wasteful to outright ban systems never to be used again. MS could at least give a credit toward purchase of a new Xbox, have the banned one sent back and refurbished.

I think if MS did that, then they would DEFINITELY be accused of being money-grabbing gits. However, I would much prefer they offer some kind of warranty transfer for second hand consoles. There's no denying there's a huge market out there and it's definitely not fair on those who can't afford a brand new console and end up getting shafted with a banned one. I guess you could argue that it's their fault for not testing the hardware before they buy, but what if it wasn't banned at the time and got banned a week or a month or a year later? Or quite simply, why should the consumer HAVE to worry about such things?

I think if MS offered a second-hand refurb of the console, unbanning it and giving it a clean bill of health for a reasonable sum, it would be much better for everyone.

here is something interesting:

http://cgi.ebay.com/Xbox-360-Banned_W0QQ...

unmodified console gets banned after 3 months of online play?

Maybe it was modded but the guy never knew it? I've never played my 360 online and I've modded it.

My warranty seal is still intact too...poor guy lol. Most likely if I sell it, I'm not going to say that the console has been banned, because technically it hasn't, it will if the person plays online :p

Maybe it was modded but the guy never knew it? I've never played my 360 online and I've modded it.

My warranty seal is still intact too...poor guy lol. Most likely if I sell it, I'm not going to say that the console has been banned, because technically it hasn't, it will if the person plays online :p

Oh how nice of you. This is why I never buy crap off of ebay.

Has anyone used that XVal program.

It apparently can read the 360's NAND and tell if anything has been written to it

All zeros apparently means your fine to go on Live!

Im not trying live lol..even though i got all 0's :p

Maybe it was modded but the guy never knew it? I've never played my 360 online and I've modded it.

My warranty seal is still intact too...poor guy lol. Most likely if I sell it, I'm not going to say that the console has been banned, because technically it hasn't, it will if the person plays online :p

:no:

Technicalities ftl (N)

Has anyone used that XVal program.

It apparently can read the 360's NAND and tell if anything has been written to it

All zeros apparently means your fine to go on Live!

Im not trying live lol..even though i got all 0's :p

It doesn't read the NAND, it decrypts a status message from the dashboard. That status, however, is only part of the picture and all 0's doesn't mean you're safe, it just means that 360 hasn't been flagged client-side yet. It could still be banned server side at any moment, though.

This is not the first banwave Microsoft has done. If anything, Microsoft has been pretty consistent with their ban waves, having one in November of EVERY year (and they used to have one around Aprilish time as well). This is nothing new and all the hoo-ha its generating is nothing new, either. Give it a few months and ebay will be back to normal.

This is not the first banwave Microsoft has done. If anything, Microsoft has been pretty consistent with their ban waves, having one in November of EVERY year (and they used to have one around Aprilish time as well). This is nothing new and all the hoo-ha its generating is nothing new, either. Give it a few months and ebay will be back to normal.

Kushan you of all people know they've never banned this many people at once :laugh:

Nothing will be "back to normal" that quickly as hysteria will continue around any firmware release for a while.

No, but there's never been so many 360s around, either. I'm pretty sure that, on the whole, about the same percentage of 360 users were banned and since it has such worldwide press, most people looking to buy a 360 off of ebay will be aware of the bans and most people looking to sell 360s will have the sense to mention that their console is NOT banned. So a few weeks while all of the sellers try to offload the banned consoles will pass and, for the most part, they'll give up and/or sell them at a discount. That's what happened last time.

EDIT: HDD mods are fine, for now. MS can just disable them if they want, rather than ban the whole console and yet they've not even chose to do this.

No, but there's never been so many 360s around, either. I'm pretty sure that, on the whole, about the same percentage of 360 users were banned and since it has such worldwide press, most people looking to buy a 360 off of ebay will be aware of the bans and most people looking to sell 360s will have the sense to mention that their console is NOT banned. So a few weeks while all of the sellers try to offload the banned consoles will pass and, for the most part, they'll give up and/or sell them at a discount. That's what happened last time.

EDIT: HDD mods are fine, for now. MS can just disable them if they want, rather than ban the whole console and yet they've not even chose to do this.

So drive firmware is the only reason right now? Damned if I am paying the exuberant official hdd prices.

No, but there's never been so many 360s around, either. I'm pretty sure that, on the whole, about the same percentage of 360 users were banned and since it has such worldwide press, most people looking to buy a 360 off of ebay will be aware of the bans and most people looking to sell 360s will have the sense to mention that their console is NOT banned. So a few weeks while all of the sellers try to offload the banned consoles will pass and, for the most part, they'll give up and/or sell them at a discount. That's what happened last time.

EDIT: HDD mods are fine, for now. MS can just disable them if they want, rather than ban the whole console and yet they've not even chose to do this.

If MS did successfully detect the firmware then no, there is much higher % of people banned this time. In the past bannings have typically come only from people playing bad rips - If it's firmware detection this time you potentially add anyone with a modded console into the mix.

Yeah, people were banned this time regardless if they were playing rips or not. If your 360 was flashed = banned.

There is no evidence of that whatsoever because quite frankly who would have a flashed 360 and not be playing rips...

This is no different then people who would cheat in MMO's, get banned, and then swear up and down they never ever cheated...yeah..

There is no evidence of that whatsoever because quite frankly who would have a flashed 360 and not be playing rips...

Dude...it's pretty unanimous Microsoft can detect 'different' firmwares. The theory is along the lines of :- NXE had some 'self'destruct' code and was collecting firmware information and reported this back to Microsoft.

here's a quote from a guy who reckons he works in the XBL department :

we have found a way to read the firmware. the nxe update has allowed us to do a check on the current firmware installed on the dvd drive

the reason this was not flagged was because the code was not active. as you might have heard it was discussed about a ?self destruct? code embedded in the nxe update and even before that. this was that code it wasn?t a self destruct code but actually a check that was done on all drives

this check was begun when the update was to ?prepare for the last.fm facebook and twitter? this in fact was the code sent out to begin checks on ALL xboxs

these checks would send us information on the firmware written to the drive not the exact kind but we did a extensive form of hash check on the drive and could actually find out if it was modified in anyway

this was particularly easy on the lite-on as it was actually manufactured to serve for this purpose as our testing model

we will not ban all consoles at once and yes all information about you has been collected a long time ago

we have THOUSANDS of xboxs reporting bad checks meaning modified firmware. not all people will be banned and all the bans are done at randomn times

multiple checks have been done over this amount of time so we could asure the modified xboxs were truely modified and not just returning corrupt data

So i dunno but that sounds pretty reasonable

Plus there has been numerous reports of people buying a brand new 360 and flashing it and not playing a copied game (or one that they copied themselves) and getting banned in about 30 mins..

Microsoft finally :pught up :p

Dude...it's pretty unanimous Microsoft can detect 'different' firmwares. The theory is along the lines of :- NXE had some 'self'destruct' code and was collecting firmware information and reported this back to Microsoft.

here's a quote from a guy who reckons he works in the XBL department :

So i dunno but that sounds pretty reasonable

Plus there has been numerous reports of people buying a brand new 360 and flashing it and not playing a copied game (or one that they copied themselves) and getting banned in about 30 mins..

Microsoft finally caught up :p

Sounds about right, that's what I was thinking they were doing. Personally the only thing I did on Live is play Uno lol no big loss for me

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      558
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!