New server ordered


Recommended Posts

This is just a heads up that we have ordered another new server to replace the original (single) dedicated server we first bought in Feb 2005 (which is now dying).

Currently we have:

Server 1 - Main SQL (And email ever since the dev server died)

Server 2 - Dev server and uploads (server 3 was running out of disk space) <- this one will be removed from the mix

Server 3 - MySQL backup, Sphinx(search), IRC, Services (will be integrated with ignition), Staff folders

Server 4 - Apache

Server 5 - Apache

New server plan:

Server 1 - Main SQL 1 <- this was added last year

Server 2 - Main SQL 2 <- this will be the new server

Server 3 - Search, IRC, Staff Folders & Dev

Server 4 - Apache

Server 5 - Apache

This comes with our continuing commitment to offer streamlined service and strive for 100% uptime, and give back to the community a portion of our ad revenue to better services here.

The estimated structure change will most likely take place in December, and possibly coincide with the site upgrade to a completely new news content management system and upgrade to IPB3.

The new server is a Poweredge r300 Quad Core Xeon L5410 Processor2x6M Cache, 2.33GHz, 1333MHz FSB, which is the same as the server we bought last year.

Forgot to mention that we've increased the stock 16GB to 24GB RAM and we've ordered larger disks (not sure how big). :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woohoo, great stuff!

In the end it's all a cover for the Staff Christmas Party they're actually paying for ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its nice to see the owners/partners believe in Neowin enough to buy a whole new server rather than try to bodge the old one. I shall click on a few more adverts than i usually do, every little helps in my own small way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like hearing about upgrades.

What is it that we were always forced to say at PC World..

Oh yeah..

FANTASTIC NEWS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it not better to get a single server and have everything virtualised on it using vmware esxi or something?

For performance I would say no, for file servers and print servers yes virtulise!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it not better to get a single server and have everything virtualised on it using vmware esxi or something?

I'm not a massive fan of having a single point of failure ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course a single point of failure is a single starting point for diagnostics and trouble shooting.

I'm not a massive fan of having a single point of failure ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious, but how come you use Apache?

Would it not be better using NGINX or Lighttpd?

Even a mix with Static by NGINX/Lig and dynamic by PHP..

Also Litespeed is nice but quite pricey...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.