New server ordered


Recommended Posts

does it beat my webbox for animerising.net? 8 cores, 16 GB ram

info :)

processor : 0

vendor_id : GenuineIntel

cpu family : 6

model : 23

model name : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz

stepping : 6

cpu MHz : 1994.883

cache size : 6144 KB

physical id : 0

siblings : 4

core id : 0

cpu cores : 4

apicid : 0

initial apicid : 0

fdiv_bug : no

hlt_bug : no

f00f_bug : no

coma_bug : no

fpu : yes

fpu_exception : yes

cpuid level : 10

wp : yes

flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority

bogomips : 3989.76

clflush size : 64

power management:

processor : 1

vendor_id : GenuineIntel

cpu family : 6

model : 23

model name : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz

stepping : 6

cpu MHz : 1994.883

cache size : 6144 KB

physical id : 1

siblings : 4

core id : 0

cpu cores : 4

apicid : 4

initial apicid : 4

fdiv_bug : no

hlt_bug : no

f00f_bug : no

coma_bug : no

fpu : yes

fpu_exception : yes

cpuid level : 10

wp : yes

flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority

bogomips : 3990.04

clflush size : 64

power management:

processor : 2

vendor_id : GenuineIntel

cpu family : 6

model : 23

model name : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz

stepping : 6

cpu MHz : 1994.883

cache size : 6144 KB

physical id : 0

siblings : 4

core id : 2

cpu cores : 4

apicid : 2

initial apicid : 2

fdiv_bug : no

hlt_bug : no

f00f_bug : no

coma_bug : no

fpu : yes

fpu_exception : yes

cpuid level : 10

wp : yes

flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority

bogomips : 3990.03

clflush size : 64

power management:

processor : 3

vendor_id : GenuineIntel

cpu family : 6

model : 23

model name : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz

stepping : 6

cpu MHz : 1994.883

cache size : 6144 KB

physical id : 1

siblings : 4

core id : 2

cpu cores : 4

apicid : 6

initial apicid : 6

fdiv_bug : no

hlt_bug : no

f00f_bug : no

coma_bug : no

fpu : yes

fpu_exception : yes

cpuid level : 10

wp : yes

flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority

bogomips : 3990.04

clflush size : 64

power management:

processor : 4

vendor_id : GenuineIntel

cpu family : 6

model : 23

model name : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz

stepping : 6

cpu MHz : 1994.883

cache size : 6144 KB

physical id : 0

siblings : 4

core id : 1

cpu cores : 4

apicid : 1

initial apicid : 1

fdiv_bug : no

hlt_bug : no

f00f_bug : no

coma_bug : no

fpu : yes

fpu_exception : yes

cpuid level : 10

wp : yes

flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority

bogomips : 3990.04

clflush size : 64

power management:

processor : 5

vendor_id : GenuineIntel

cpu family : 6

model : 23

model name : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz

stepping : 6

cpu MHz : 1994.883

cache size : 6144 KB

physical id : 1

siblings : 4

core id : 1

cpu cores : 4

apicid : 5

initial apicid : 5

fdiv_bug : no

hlt_bug : no

f00f_bug : no

coma_bug : no

fpu : yes

fpu_exception : yes

cpuid level : 10

wp : yes

flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority

bogomips : 3990.05

clflush size : 64

power management:

processor : 6

vendor_id : GenuineIntel

cpu family : 6

model : 23

model name : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz

stepping : 6

cpu MHz : 1994.883

cache size : 6144 KB

physical id : 0

siblings : 4

core id : 3

cpu cores : 4

apicid : 3

initial apicid : 3

fdiv_bug : no

hlt_bug : no

f00f_bug : no

coma_bug : no

fpu : yes

fpu_exception : yes

cpuid level : 10

wp : yes

flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority

bogomips : 3990.03

clflush size : 64

power management:

processor : 7

vendor_id : GenuineIntel

cpu family : 6

model : 23

model name : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz

stepping : 6

cpu MHz : 1994.883

cache size : 6144 KB

physical id : 1

siblings : 4

core id : 3

cpu cores : 4

apicid : 7

initial apicid : 7

fdiv_bug : no

hlt_bug : no

f00f_bug : no

coma_bug : no

fpu : yes

fpu_exception : yes

cpuid level : 10

wp : yes

flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority

bogomips : 3990.05

clflush size : 64

power management:

For performance I would say no, for file servers and print servers yes virtulise!

Having virtualized everything from file and print servers, IIS and Apache webservers, Microsoft and MySQL servers, Microsoft Exchange, Active Directory domain controllers, Oracle, various application servers, and 250+ virtual desktops... I can say with some authority, you don't take a (significant) performance hit when you virtualize correctly. With a desktop virtualization solution like VMWare Fusion/Workstation or Microsoft Virtual PC, you do, because you don't really have solid hardware access. With a virtualization hypervisor like VMWare ESX or Microsoft Hyper-V, the game is totally different.

Computer hardware, and especially servers, are far more powerful then what any one operating system and application combination can take advantage of. VMWare wouldn't be making money hand over fist if the only thing people were doing with it was virtualizing print servers.

In terms of being a single point of failure, you actually create a more robust infrastructure with virtualization. I used to think the same thing up until a few years ago, but look up ESX vMotion or Hyper-V Live Migration, and see what I'm talking about. It would require a NAS/SAN which isn't in the equation right now I'm sure. If you were virtualized, any hardware failure that required a system to be taken off line would be simply migrating the virtual guests to another host, all with NO network connection loss. It could also handle automatically migrating systems based on resource usage.

Congrats on the new server BTW.

Having virtualized everything from file and print servers, IIS and Apache webservers, Microsoft and MySQL servers, Microsoft Exchange, Active Directory domain controllers, Oracle, various application servers, and 250+ virtual desktops... I can say with some authority, you don't take a (significant) performance hit when you virtualize correctly. With a desktop virtualization solution like VMWare Fusion/Workstation or Microsoft Virtual PC, you do, because you don't really have solid hardware access. With a virtualization hypervisor like VMWare ESX or Microsoft Hyper-V, the game is totally different.

Computer hardware, and especially servers, are far more powerful then what any one operating system and application combination can take advantage of. VMWare wouldn't be making money hand over fist if the only thing people were doing with it was virtualizing print servers.

In terms of being a single point of failure, you actually create a more robust infrastructure with virtualization. I used to think the same thing up until a few years ago, but look up ESX vMotion or Hyper-V Live Migration, and see what I'm talking about. It would require a NAS/SAN which isn't in the equation right now I'm sure. If you were virtualized, any hardware failure that required a system to be taken off line would be simply migrating the virtual guests to another host, all with NO network connection loss. It could also handle automatically migrating systems based on resource usage.

Congrats on the new server BTW.

Exactly, without a NAS/SAN and more servers of a similar size to migrate to should one fail, virtualisation isn't really an option.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • WinToHDD 7.0.2.2 by Razvan Serea WinToHDD is a handy and useful software which allows you to install or reinstall Windows (Vista/2008 or later) without using a CD/DVD/USB drive. With this All-in-One Microsoft Windows deployment tool, you can easily reinstall Windows, install Windows onto disks other than the one where your Windows is installed, or clone existing Windows installation to other disk. Furthermore, you can use it to create a Windows installation USB containing all your Windows installation ISO files, then you can install Windows (Vista/2008 or later) from the same USB drive on both BIOS and UEFI computers. WinToHDD features: Install/reinstall Windows from ISO, WIM, ESD without using CD/DVD/USB.Improved Clone Windows to another disk without reinstalling Windows, apps.Improved Easily bypass Windows 11 system requirements (TPM 2.0, RAM, internet connection, etc).Improved Encrypt Windows partition with BitLocker when installing or cloning. Install any version of Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista, Server 2008 or later (64 & 32 bits) from same USB drive on both BIOS and UEFI computers. Fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Note: WinToHDD 7.0.2.2 changelog is not yet available. Download: WinToHDD 7.0.2.2 | 36.6 MB (Freemium) Links: Home Page | Free vs Pro Comparison | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hello, Version 19 of ESET's consumer offerings are 64-bit only. The 32-bit installers are for Version 18, which were announced in this Neowin article. In addition to ESET NOD32 Antivirus, ESET Internet Security, ESET Smart Security Premium, and ESET Security Ultimate, both ESET Safe Server and ESET Small Business Security v19.1.14.0 have been released as well. Direct download links: ESET Safe Server (x64) | ESET Safe Server (ARM64) ESET Small Business Security (x64) | ESET Small Business Security (ARM64) Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • I can name 10x that on why not to switch.... It's funny outlook/office are going towards web app wrappers, and then MS is now preaching native apps again.... ugh can we just pick a lane and stay in it
    • Absolutely NOBODY has suggested such a conclusion. I am affirming the sober reality check that AV2's overall market adoption will take longer than AV1's adoption rate -- which, by the way, is the whole point of the article! While PCI-SIG is productive (on paper), other WGs have created all sorts of confusing progress plans that consumers have tuned-out of their improvements... HTML/W3C, USB, HDMI, BT, WIFI (ieee802.11) as a few other groups where spec naming conventions, split progress paths, overlapping ambitions... I'm not critiquing the AV specs group; I'm simply affirming that adoption for AV2 faces headwinds beyond the macroeconomics of it all.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!