Halo Reach Thread


Recommended Posts

Managed to get "Heat in the Pipe" in 31 minutes.. except.. I accidentally had mythic on, so might be able to shave that off a bit in the future. For anyone that wants (or needs to) get all firefight related achievements (excluding 15k from MM) you can grab this gametype: http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Reach/FileDetails.aspx?fid=182262&player=iLL%20Cupcakes.

I set it up so that elites will always spawn, no drop pods and your first load-out is set to use needler with jetpack. Achievements you can get:

  • A Spoonful of Blamite - Killed 10 enemies in Firefight or Campaign with a supercombine explosion without dying.
  • Lucky M - Earned a Triple Kill while Jetpacking in Campaign, Firefight or Matchmaking.
  • Crowd Control - Earned a Killionaire medal in Firefight.
  • Firestarter - Scored 50,000 points in a Firefight game.
  • Blaze of Glory - Scored 200,000 points in a Firefight game.
  • Heat in the Pipe - Scored 1,000,000 points in a Firefight game.
  • Game, Set, Match - Completed a Firefight set on Legendary without dying.

There are a couple others you can get in Firefight too but chances are you might have gotten them from campaign (kill 10 enemies with DMR and kill 10 enemies with M6G pistol.)

<snipped>

Same thoughts as me really, even the thing about what happens to Noble 6. I don't really see how so many reviews are heaping so much praise on the story.

Just read about no co-op campaign for those with the new 4gb slim, ouch..... Looks good though :)

Ouch, really? That sucks.

Same thoughts as me really, even the thing about what happens to Noble 6. I don't really see how so many reviews are heaping so much praise on the story.

Ouch, really? That sucks.

Yep, guess it's another way for MS to push the drives though.

http://www.neowin.ne...ox-360-slim-4gb

14HaloReach.jpg

How on earth is 4GB not enough space? emot-iiam.gif

Same thoughts as me really, even the thing about what happens to Noble 6. I don't really see how so many reviews are heaping so much praise on the story.

It's Halo.

Here's my beef. I really expected Noble 6 to be master chief. The only one who survives and becomes master chief. Actually I wouldn't mind the way it ended for the whole Spartan team if we at least saw how Master Chief got into the whole thing. I really expected Reach to end where Halo begins and we see how Master Chief looks like in this new engine. I would be up cheering if I saw him at the end of this game.

Master Cheif is John 117 or somethign like that and from what i understand he was at reach during testing/training but wasnt mission ready till after

Well finally got the game today.. played it through in one sitting.. from 1pm to right now (so about 7 hours on normal). Even on normal this is probably the only Halo that was challenging. Overall it wasn't a bad game but there aren't any real twists or turns. What we knew happened.

Overall the game ended and I was really disappointed at the ending.

Here's my beef. I really expected Noble 6 to be master chief. The only one who survives and becomes master chief. Actually I wouldn't mind the way it ended for the whole Spartan team if we at least saw how Master Chief got into the whole thing. I really expected Reach to end where Halo begins and we see how Master Chief looks like in this new engine. I would be up cheering if I saw him at the end of this game.

But no.. it ended so plainly. Nothing. No bang, no master chief, nothing. Kortana is on board of Pillar of Autumn and that's it.

To be honest, what was the whole point of Kortana saying how she chose Noble 6. Chose for what? Wasn't that the thing about master chief. Kortana chose him. So natural assumption was that Noble 6 ends up being master chief.

Whatever the case, i really expected to see master chief and how he gets into the events of Halo 1.

I was really disappointing. Campaign felt more like preparation for Firefight than story based thing and homage to previous Halo games.

While I haven't played the game and don't mind the spoilers, we already knew what Master Chief was tasked with during the fall of Reach, so it is well known he wouldn't have been Noble 6.

If you don't feel the same way about the story that's fine, it's the same with any game or movie or book. But if the majority do, then it stands to reason it's overall good. Saying "it's halo" means jack, it's not like slapping a well known brand name on something with a crappy story can save it, case in point, FF13. Or a long list of big name movies that also have weak stories that aren't worth much.

Apparently it's not a space issue, it's a "you're using a flash drive, not a hard drive" issue.

This does seem a problem with a few games, I was a bit annoyed as I bought an Arcade and was using a 16Gb flash drive, only to find out some games didn't recognise it as a storage medium. I ended up buy a second hand hard drive :-/

How on earth is 4GB not enough space? emot-iiam.gif

Just read about no co-op campaign for those with the new 4gb slim, ouch..... Looks good though :)

Yep, guess it's another way for MS to push the drives though.

http://www.neowin.ne...ox-360-slim-4gb

Halo always needed HDD for co-op play (Halo 3 and ODST have same requirement). It's nothing new.

Someone already tested the game and didn't like it:

That vid was funny to watch.

Cleary does not know how the game works etc, but still funny to watch.

And what gets me is the amount of people hung up on Graphics. Always complaining etc, to me Gameplay is probably most of what I want form a game.

So I just finished campaign solo on Normal (first run ~8 hrs) and was a bit underwhelmed by the story. I didn't find it as engrossing as Halo 1-3 and will rate it on the same scale as ODST.

The game play on the other hand is top notch and even on Normal I was surprised by the enemy AI (friendlies are as dumb as ever). I love how the sniper and DMR feel and other weapons seemed to be improved as well.

Few noticeable graphical glitches but nothing as bad as Dirty Larry mentioned. I noticed frame rate issue in the first cut scene itself. The forge world phasing seemed to have introduced few campaign bugs, I could move boxes in dead people and they would phase just as in Forge!

My biggest disappointment is probably music and over all audio quality, couple of times I couldn't understand dialogs.

Also I like how bungie completely closed it, leaving no way for Microsoft to put out sequels on a bungie game without bungie.

+gameplay

+graphics

+scale (everything is bigger!)

+weapons

+explosion sounds

+enemy AI

-story

-music

-audio (at times, mostly good)

-friendly AI

For those of you wanting Heat in the Pipe. Just do whatever has said (Invincible, Unlimited Ammo w/o reloading) and turn skulls on for all three rounds. But also, go in and where it says Sqaud: Random, change it to Ordered (which will be selections below you. Fill it up with the top notch Elite, Hunter, and Brute (lowest points) teams and you'll easily be pulling in around 1.5k points for one kill. Took me 45 minutes, to do the full 1mill this way. I also, changed my loadout to rocket default and just spamm'd that on Corvette. I also turned off dropship so they would come faster and through doors, where I could shoot a few rockets to take 'em out quickly. Shouldn't get past the 3rd set (maybe 4th).

Nice tip, wish I had known that before lol :)

only just started it, but the MP is better than ever with the new stuff they added. That's the crux of the thing, the single player isn't as epic as i hoped for so far, less so than Halo 3 and ODST, which i loved. The improved visuals are a boon, no doubt, and for the revamped online on its own this is more than worse the price of admission.

All the data pad locations:

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/09/14/halo-reach-data-pad-location-guide-videos/

Microsoft fixing HDD requirement for Xbox 360 S 4gb model:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2010-09-15-ms-working-to-resolve-reach-co-op-issue

Microsoft has reassured Halo: Reach fans that it's trying to fix an issue that prevents 4GB Xbox 360 owners from playing Reach's campaign cooperatively, Eurogamer has been told.

Eurogamer was contacted by a number of Halo: Reach owners about the issue this morning.

Owners of the 4GB Xbox 360 (that 4GB is internal memory) who try to join a co-op campaign are greeted by this message: "One or more players do not have the hard drive required for this game type."

Microsoft's official Halo: Reach FAQ reads:

Q1: The error "One or more players do not have an Xbox 360 Hard Drive. An Xbox 360 Hard Drive is required to play co-op on Xbox LIVE or system link" occurs when I try to play. Why?

A1: One or more players do not have a certified Xbox 360 hard drive attached to their Xbox 360 console. Some multiplayer aspects of Halo: Reach require an Xbox 360 certified hard drive.

Online reports suggest USB memory sticks do not fill in for the absent storage. Halo 3: ODST suffered a similar limitation.

With Microsoft's costly ?80 hard drive not on sale till later this month (it's out now in the US), some UK Halo: Reach owners are currently unable to access one of the game's most compelling features.

This morning Microsoft insisted the limitation is "temporary", but could not say when it will be fixed.

A Microsoft spokesperson told Eurogamer: "We are aware of the issue and are quickly working to resolve it."

According to Nukezilla, the problem only affects the new slim 4GB Xbox 360, and standard multiplayer remains unaffected.

Halo: Reach trumps Halo 3

Bungie has tweeted that Halo: Reach is already smashing Halo 3's records.

"Reach already surpassed the all-time highest record for Halo 3 concurrent unique users on LIVE. Woot!" read the tweet.

Which means Halo: Reach is well on its way to top of Major Nelson's Live Activity charts and in a strong position to make a run at becoming the biggest-selling 360 game of all time. As we reported yesterday, Ladbrokes is offering 5/6 odds on that being the case.

http://www.oxm.co.uk/article.php?id=22305

Hot dang!

has anyone else tried invasion yet? it reminds me quite a lot of unreal tournament's assault mode. it's great fun.

Hmmm Really? I LOVED that mode in UT, so although I was already looking forward to checking it, this really makes me want to check it out now.

I bought the game yesterday on my way home from work. I played through the first 9 chapters on the campaign. So far it's a lot of fun. And, it feels significantly harder than previous Halo games. I'm playing on Normal, and Hunters take forever to put down. Even grunts are a pain sometimes. Sadly, I will never be able to get some of the achievements. But, other than that I'm a happy camper.

I died several times trying this, but is it possible to assassinate a Hunter?

So I just finished campaign solo on Normal (first run ~8 hrs) and was a bit underwhelmed by the story. I didn't find it as engrossing as Halo 1-3 and will rate it on the same scale as ODST.

The game play on the other hand is top notch and even on Normal I was surprised by the enemy AI (friendlies are as dumb as ever). I love how the sniper and DMR feel and other weapons seemed to be improved as well.

Few noticeable graphical glitches but nothing as bad as Dirty Larry mentioned. I noticed frame rate issue in the first cut scene itself. The forge world phasing seemed to have introduced few campaign bugs, I could move boxes in dead people and they would phase just as in Forge!

My biggest disappointment is probably music and over all audio quality, couple of times I couldn't understand dialogs.

Also I like how bungie completely closed it, leaving no way for Microsoft to put out sequels on a bungie game without bungie.

+gameplay

+graphics

+scale (everything is bigger!)

+weapons

+explosion sounds

+enemy AI

-story

-music

-audio (at times, mostly good)

-friendly AI

I agree with you on most aspects, but I don't agree on the music. I loved the music, which is really rare for a video game.

Random, but I think one of the things that impresses me so much about Reach is the atmosphere. The atmosphere in the previous Halo games were all absolute crap. The map designs were so bland -- inside buildings, there was literally nothing except a button on a wall and an elevator (in most). The buildings in this actually seem like they were inhabited, and most have a really unique design. It kinda reminded me of Half-Life 2 in that regard.

So, kudos to Bungie for taking what I've long considered one of the weakest aspects of Halo and making it into one of the best.

I bought the game yesterday on my way home from work. I played through the first 9 chapters on the campaign. So far it's a lot of fun. And, it feels significantly harder than previous Halo games. I'm playing on Normal, and Hunters take forever to put down. Even grunts are a pain sometimes. Sadly, I will never be able to get some of the achievements. But, other than that I'm a happy camper.

I died several times trying this, but is it possible to assassinate a Hunter?

I've only been able to kill Hunters in 2 ways - unmounting a plasma turret or several headshots from the semi-automatic rifle.

Tried using shotguns and assault rifle but you get melee'd or run out of ammo :/

The game sorta dictates your options by limiting the types of gun you're likely to have available before you face a hunter which kinda sucks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!