Halo Reach Thread


Recommended Posts

He isn't saying "the game sucks in my opinion". He is makiing an objective judgment that the game sucks from his opinions. The game has no clear problems, therefore it isn't a bad game but a game he doesn't like.

I'm sorry, what? How can my posts, representing my opinion be anything besides that? Where did I claim to be speaking on behalf of someone?

Oh, so we're back to the rave a few years back when we had to tag everything with "imo" or else we would be speaking on the behalf of entire nations? C'mon.

AND to something more relevant, anyone having problems with Bungie's Reach page? Uploaded a few screenshots earlier and a video, only one screenshot up that gives me an error and no video to render.

Got the game today finally! Woot!

Popped that bad boy in, did the install, unlocked the armor, designed my guy and hopped into the campaign. I can't wait to do my review for this game. So far, the game is just ****ing amazing. The single player (so far) is THE best SP of all the Halo's to date. Finally we get some decent cut scenes, some actual acting, open environments, silky smooth game play.

The multiplayer is probably the best multiplayer on console to date as well. I can't believe the same company responsible for ODST turned around and made this diamond. Features are endless, no lag, excellent detection, NAILED the maps, FORGE....the best.

Time to get back to the goods!

He isn't saying "the game sucks in my opinion". He is makiing an objective judgment that the game sucks from his opinions. The game has no clear problems, therefore it isn't a bad game but a game he doesn't like.

Yes he is. That's what we all say. Something is bad or good based on judgement we give it. You see it has no clear problems. Sethos sees otherwise. I see otherwise. I'm sure other see others will see like you and other will see worse or better than both of us.

And I'm not sure what you mean with your analogy. Some people can eat the same bread their entire lives and never get tired of it. To others it can get pretty bland quickly. To me, Halo is a bread I can eat forever regardless of it changing or not. That may just not be the case for Sethos. I'm also not lecturing you, I'm giving you the options available. My background is pretty FPS heavy to (Goldeneye, Battlelfied 1942/2/Bad Company), Counterstrike CS1.6 and Source, Half Life 1/2, Quake III and IV, UT2k4, FEAR 1/2 and all the Halo games and I like all of them for the specific reasons. I think I have yet to run into a shooter I really absolutely think was a BAD game. Yet still I disagree with your observations and find them an exaggeration.

I find it an exaggeration that you have played so many FPS and didn't find one that was bad. You see what I did there? I used my opinion to counter your opinion. That makes me right in my eyes and wrong in yours. Case closed.

And just in case it isn't obvious, this post is IMO.

I'm sorry, what? How can my posts, representing my opinion be anything besides that? Where did I claim to be speaking on behalf of someone?

Oh, so we're back to the rave a few years back when we had to tag everything with "imo" or else we would be speaking on the behalf of entire nations? C'mon.

AND to something more relevant, anyone having problems with Bungie's Reach page? Uploaded a few screenshots earlier and a video, only one screenshot up that gives me an error and no video to render.

IMO, it's still best to use IMO because people get ****y over the smallest things (IMO) even when it's just a difference of opinion. :p

has anyone figured out how to unlock more helmets? I know there are more than 13. According to This site there are 20 helmets..

Captain, Major and LT Colonel. Those are the pre-req for ones I haven't purchased. Most helmets require you to purchase whatever was before it before you can get it.

Anyone else have trouble unlocking "They've Always Been Faster"? I did what it said and the achievement didn't unlock.

Did you try it on "Easy"? I tried "Keep it clean" on easy and it did not unlock, I had to do it on Normal.

Dunno if its been mentioned, but...

Microsoft Game Studios VP Phil Spencer just announced at the company's TGS press conference that Halo: Reach made $200 million on its first day at retail. We know that's not much of a stretch for you all to imagine, but it seemed like an important facticle to grasp. If most of those copies were sold at the $60 MSRP, that's about 3.3 million units.

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/09/15/halo-reach-grabs-200-million-day-one/

Well, Boz, I guess we're just going to have to disagree, because I didn't think any of the previous Halo games even had a good storyline.

What, and this one did? The original Halo was great. The whole thing was wrapped up, it was compelling yet simple, full of twists...Halo was an enigma the player was there to solve. The game was interesting. Okay, so Halo 2 wasn't as good but it was still good, and everything got a bit messy with Halo 3, but the stories in the past three were much better than Reach. Reach

had boring characters, no twists in a story everyone knew, and not enough happened

.

After thinking about the story for a day, has anyone made sense of the term

"latchkey"

?

I only know it from the term

"latchkey child"

which means a child who is given a key to his home so he can gain access to it because both his parents are likely to be at work when he finishes his school day.

I'm guessing they used it because the

"Forerunners"

were the "parents" and the humans were the "child" needing access after they were gone?

I'm sorry, what? How can my posts, representing my opinion be anything besides that? Where did I claim to be speaking on behalf of someone?

Oh, so we're back to the rave a few years back when we had to tag everything with "imo" or else we would be speaking on the behalf of entire nations? C'mon.

AND to something more relevant, anyone having problems with Bungie's Reach page? Uploaded a few screenshots earlier and a video, only one screenshot up that gives me an error and no video to render.

Saying "it sucks" to me isn't very opinionated. It sounds like a definite decision and judgement, which isn't objective in the slightest. I don't mind people saying they don't like the game but that isn't how you were saying it at all. I can't immediately assume it is nothing but an opinionated statement when you are saying it in such a definite matter. I'm not asking for an "in my opinion" every three seconds. Just a less hostile statement of that opinion. Or at least the addition of some certain phrases that may make it more apparent that you aren't making a definite judgement such as "to me" or "for me" or even "from what I've played". I can only go from what is typed.

Saying "it sucks" to me isn't very opinionated. It sounds like a definite decision and judgement, which isn't objective in the slightest. I don't mind people saying they don't like the game but that isn't how you were saying it at all. I can't immediately assume it is nothing but an opinionated statement when you are saying it in such a definite matter. I'm not asking for an "in my opinion" every three seconds. Just a less hostile statement of that opinion. Or at least the addition of some certain phrases that may make it more apparent that you aren't making a definite judgement such as "to me" or "for me" or even "from what I've played". I can only go from what is typed.

So I was being too definitive? What.The.F

Does anyone's opinion really matter? The game has sold amazingly well, there's loads of people playing online and professional and amateur reviewers alike are all gushing over it. You can't please all of the people all of the time.

I'm not really all that into the Halo series - I've only played Halo CE, ODST and Reach and have never read any of the books but I'm more than happy with the purchase :thumbup:

Oh and to those thinking the Halo series ended right here? Are you kidding? Maybe if Reach bombed in the ratings it would but I'm more than certain MS will resurrect the series at some point. Maybe an MMPORG or maybe they will invent a new enemy for humanity to face - maybe the Forerunners will return. It'll happen.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!