Halo Reach Thread


Recommended Posts

I think that Sethos has the same frustration as me with Halo 3 (didn't buy Reach yet but got in the beta) : overtrained players!!!

You search a game ... wait 5 seconds before doing that ... search players between 10 seconds and 2 minutes ... wait 1 minute for map selection ... wait 5 seconds for game launching ... wait for map loading ... wait for game start ... and then finally you are in a game with overtrained players that already know every centimeter of the map. F***ing frustrating.

I'm not sure I will be buying Reach although I was/is a big fan of Halo MP until Halo 3, heck I even have a 2 meter tal statue of Master Chief in my room. I might buy it just for SP.

I've always been a huge fan of the Halo franchise, until Halo 3, as well. The campaign was great, but the multiplayer was definitely disappointing for me, coming out of Halo:CE & Halo 2.

I still pre-ordered Reach and picked it up at the midnight release.

I haven't played through the campaign just yet (starting that, tonight) but I can definitely tell you that the multiplayer--at least for me--closely resembles Halo 2; at least way more than Halo 3 did. A lot of the maps use very familiar elements from Halo:CE and Halo 2 maps, which is super exciting to me. The gameplay gets my blood pumping the way Halo 2 did, and Halo 3 always failed to do.

I don't know if anyone aside from myself and my boyfriend have noticed the throwback to the previous games, but I can tell you that I definitely recommend giving it a chance if you enjoyed the first two as much as you say.

-Emily

I should upload some clips I have from it. If you have **** around you, you can crouch behind it then sort sneak attack on them. There's a few maps on Reach you're able to do this on. Otherwise if you have a shotgun (majority of the Hunter ones did), that will help with it a bit.

You should really find it A LOT easier since you can sprint around them non-stop to get it.

Or use hologram so they try to melee the holo then you can sneak behind.

Or the camo

Or use hologram so they try to melee the holo then you can sneak behind.

Or the camo

Except not all of the maps you have hunters on have those armor locks available. Many of them you only have sprint as default. None of them had camo at all--I don't even remember seeing camo at all throughout campaign.

are you able to shoot through the hologram decoys? i was on a sniper map and took this guy's shields off, then he sent out a decoy right in front of him and i took another shot. he was directly behind so the decoy must have stopped the shot. that sucks if you ask me, i thought it was just a hologram not a solid thing. maybe i just missed though.

anyone know?

are you able to shoot through the hologram decoys? i was on a sniper map and took this guy's shields off, then he sent out a decoy right in front of him and i took another shot. he was directly behind so the decoy must have stopped the shot. that sucks if you ask me, i thought it was just a hologram not a solid thing. maybe i just missed though.

anyone know?

No, you can't unfortunately. I don't know how many bullets to kill off the holo but I do know it takes two melees. I like beating down my own holo.

are you able to shoot through the hologram decoys? i was on a sniper map and took this guy's shields off, then he sent out a decoy right in front of him and i took another shot. he was directly behind so the decoy must have stopped the shot. that sucks if you ask me, i thought it was just a hologram not a solid thing. maybe i just missed though.

anyone know?

I'm fairly certain you do shoot right through them. In fact, you can see them fizzle away for half a second when they're shot.

No, you can't unfortunately. I don't know how many bullets to kill off the holo but I do know it takes two melees. I like beating down my own holo.

I stand corrected. I thought you could even run right through them? I guess I haven't paid much attention.

No, you can't unfortunately. I don't know how many bullets to kill off the holo but I do know it takes two melees. I like beating down my own holo.

Wow, I didn't know that. That makes that ability significantly more powerful than I thought it was. Would it be too easy to identify as the decoy if the bullets went through it?

Wow, I didn't know that. That makes that ability significantly more powerful than I thought it was. Would it be too easy to identify as the decoy if the bullets went through it?

They're extremely easy to identify, anyways, because of their lack of the red name over their heads that real players have.

Wow, I didn't know that. That makes that ability significantly more powerful than I thought it was. Would it be too easy to identify as the decoy if the bullets went through it?

If they're just standing there or running into a wall; I'd say it's obvious :p.

Your reticule won't be red when you aim your sights on them. Remember that and you can always avoid 'em.

See:

542402049.png

373358803.png

I'm guessing they used it because the

"Forerunners"

were the "parents" and the humans were the "child" needing access after they were gone?

That would make sense because in

Halo 2 the Covenant know they need a reclaimer to use the key (index) which is why Keyes and Johnson were taken by Tarturus. They didn't know this from what was presented in H1, and can only assume they figured this out in H2 by 343.

Or, after re watching the cinematics I think the latchkey is Halo, and the "blind jump" Cortana made as we know wasn't a real blind jump. After all the original books stated so. Cortana was sent to find Halo for ONI and she did. This is referenced in the lab when you receive Cortana. Halo 04 is the artifact mentioned and is the game changer Halsey mentions..

Wow! I don't think I ever had this much fun playing a X360 game. I started playing at 10:30pm and, to my surprise, stopped playing at 2:30am after checking the time. It really didn't feel like 4 hours went by. I tried the campaign, firefight, and a MP game. This might be the best purchase I made in a while.

Wow! I don't think I ever had this much fun playing a X360 game. I started playing at 10:30pm and, to my surprise, stopped playing at 2:30am after checking the time. It really didn't feel like 4 hours went by. I tried the campaign, firefight, and a MP game. This might be the best purchase I made in a while.

Argh, my copy still hasn't shipped yet thanks to Amazon's SUPA SAVING! :wacko:

the MP is the same as Halo 3/ODST far as i can tell, which is a good thing. the single player i find very underwhelming and forced, it's definitely not the epic tale Halo 3 was, nor the heartfelt actionfest ODST provided. so far the whole package gets an 8/10 from me.

Really really enjoying Reach, Gettin my ass wooped in MP atm, but still enjoying it. Also spent 2 hours (no idea how) smashing a golf ball with a gravity hammer in Forge.

saying that, does anyone have a gold trial code i can have? mine just ran out. :cry:

If you still need one check your PM's. I've got a couple more spare if anyone is in need.

Well, to get to the source of this:

1) Are you compensating for Bloom?

2) Are you host in every match?

3) What and where specifically does this happen most and with what weapons?

I've been doing amazingly well with both the sniper and DMR in terms of headshots so I honestly have no idea why you are experiencing such poor hitboxes. Unless you've been dooped several times by the hologram.

Headshots is not a problem, I have played just two games in MP matchmaking and in second game, I personally got 6 headshots without any problem(20 total in my team). DMR and Needler rifle are ****ing awesome. cool.gif

http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Reach/GameStats.aspx?gameid=24133590&player=hhMahadev

I am not sure if he is trying to score a headshot with single squeeze on trigger when shields are still not down. That's possible only with a sniper, isn't it?

Isn't it like 4 shots to take down shields and 1 headshot to score kill for DMR? I think it's about 4-5 shots for needler rifle as well.

So I sat down and played some matchmaking Firefight and ended up playing until I finished all of yesterday's daily challenges. Then I started and finished this week's weekly challenge. It was so easy. Just replay mission 2 on heroic, sprint through the whole level (skipping the small plot points), run past most of the fights, and you can finish the mission in under 20 minutes. Then just wait for the challenge to update, replay mission 2 from start to finish, and repeat until you get 9/9. It's boring, but easy. :laugh:

Also while playing Firefight in matchmaking, I was getting headshot's just fine on the NPC enemies. There was some lag, but I was still able to do the daily challenge of 100 headshots within half a dozen games. And I suck at FPS games using a controller, so that's got to say something. I'm not sure if it's different when playing against people, but I just wanted to put in my opinion that the hit boxes don't seem too far off.

So I sat down and played some matchmaking Firefight and ended up playing until I finished all of yesterday's daily challenges. Then I started and finished this week's weekly challenge. It was so easy. Just replay mission 2 on heroic, sprint through the whole level (skipping the small plot points), run past most of the fights, and you can finish the mission in under 20 minutes. Then just wait for the challenge to update, replay mission 2 from start to finish, and repeat until you get 9/9. It's boring, but easy. :laugh:

Also while playing Firefight in matchmaking, I was getting headshot's just fine on the NPC enemies. There was some lag, but I was still able to do the daily challenge of 100 headshots within half a dozen games. And I suck at FPS games using a controller, so that's got to say something. I'm not sure if it's different when playing against people, but I just wanted to put in my opinion that the hit boxes don't seem too far off.

FYI.

Matchmaking - Co-operative - Score Attack - Gruntpocalpyse. Start with a DMR and pistol. Should take 6-10 minutes depending on how aggressive you are. Should get 100+ kills with 90 of 'em being headshots.

FYI.

Matchmaking - Co-operative - Score Attack - Gruntpocalpyse. Start with a DMR and pistol. Should take 6-10 minutes depending on how aggressive you are. Should get 100+ kills with 90 of 'em being headshots.

Haha, "Gruntpocalypse" I love it. I'll remember that for the next time the co-op headshot daily comes up. Thanks . (Y)

I just remembered why I hate Halo multiplayer so much -- in game types (or maps) with vehicles, people just camp the vehicles and go after people without vehicles for the duration of the match. This would not be so much a problem if the vehicles were capable of being destroyed relatively easily, a la Battlefield, but no, that's definitely not the case -- especially with Banshees. And on the non-vehicle maps, people just find spots to hide/camp.

Maybe that's why I love Firefight so much -- I don't have to deal with such stupidity.

Oh man

I just got to the part where you go in space, that is AWESOME.

I love this game.

Entirely IMO, but the game goes downhill from there rather quickly. The missions leading up to that were brilliant, but after that it reverts to Halo 3-style gameplay, which was very disappointing.

Haha, "Gruntpocalypse" I love it. I'll remember that for the next time the co-op headshot daily comes up. Thanks . (Y)

Also should mention for that time your getting the best credit ration you can (so far). Not getting any commendations, just normal kills and medals from credits, getting roughly 1.1k to 1.3k. Seems to be the highest so far.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!