Halo Reach Thread


Recommended Posts

http://kotaku.com/5663727/halo-reach-gets-its-first-map-pack-next-month

First map pack next month, 3 maps for $10. Looks like the same sort of crap maps in Reach. Sigh... was hoping for some quality maps. Even Halo 3 had quality maps!

Definitely passing on this. 3 maps that are going probably be forge haven maps? No thanks.

Give me something like the Pit or Guardian and maybe I'd be all over it. Otherwise no wai.

Not to mention, I think all previous Halo map packs were 3 maps and 800ms points, so it should come as no surprise.

Yeah, you're right. I suppose I should have checked this before running my mouth about Activision starting a trend, lol :p .

Heroic Map Pack and Legendary Map Pack. Both 800 points for three maps.

Definitely passing on this. 3 maps that are going probably be forge haven maps? No thanks.

Give me something like the Pit or Guardian and maybe I'd be all over it. Otherwise no wai.

The Pit would be great. King of the Hill on that map was a favourite among everybody in my group. Personally, I would also like to see Epitaph/Epilogue make a comeback as well. I don't know if anybody else feels that way though :).

The Pit would be great. King of the Hill on that map was a favourite among everybody in my group. Personally, I would also like to see Epitaph/Epilogue make a comeback as well. I don't know if anybody else feels that way though :).

When I was in my MLG phase, KOTH on the Pit was amazing and intense so I def agree.

And.. yeah I think I'd rather play Headhunters in FFA than have to play Epitaph. I hate that map with a passion. That map + doubles has made me rage more than I ever have in my life.

Definitely passing on this. 3 maps that are going probably be forge haven maps? No thanks.

Give me something like the Pit or Guardian and maybe I'd be all over it. Otherwise no wai.

I wish they add Longest, Damnation, Prisoner, Hang'em High and Wizard with exact same layout and same weapons placement. Screw the weapon balancing and heatmap stuff that bungie likes to boast about.

Those maps were fun then and will be fun now in Reach (especially with fall damage back in gameplay).

What gets me is they only bothered to add one invasion map. I really wish they would add more. Its a good gametype that deserves more attention. Either way, 800 points for 3 maps is borderline an Activision move charging 1200 for 4-5 with 2 being remakes. Too pricey for such little content. Going to have to pass until a price reduction or I just may never get them.

And on a worse note, Bungie will probably pull the same stupid ****ing move making certain playlists unplayable unless you buy the map pack. When that happens, no more matchmaking for me.

First off it has always been $10 for the map packs since Halo 2, and they have always been 3 maps. Not sure why you're comparing that to being an "activision move" when that has been the norm for about six years. Second, the map packs usually drop in price. Last, Bungie always makes a playlist for the first month or so which includes only the new maps and at least keep a few playlists which do not require them. They only become required when a new pack is released and the old packs are shifted from the new maps playlist and replaced with the latest ones. Anyone who has played Halo 2 or 3 knows how this works and it should not come as a surprise in the slightest.

@Dhan - Seeing as it is their last game, they should at least pull 4-6 maps from each previous game to remake. I personally want to see Waterworks and Containment make a comeback as well as Terminal, Headlong, Burial Mounds and possibly Turf. I would also like to see the maps you listed.

Not to mention, I think all previous Halo map packs were 3 maps and 800ms points, so it should come as no surprise.

Entirely IMO: Most of those maps at least had interesting layouts. This seems like the exact same kind of style the other Reach maps have been, and as most of the community agrees, they're not that great of maps.

I always waited for those to drop in price anyway.

So my mate has had his level reset to recruit. It's really funny because he was talking all day about how he won't get caught and getting 60,000 XP in a day 3 days running isn't that bad.

He was on Major Grade 2 as well, haha. I'm horrible.

I'm actually really looking forward to these maps. I like invasion, so adding a new invasion map already makes it a winner to me. I think Tempest looks like it'll be pretty fun as well. The first will probably be cool too. At least they appear to be real maps and not just forged maps (some of which are ok). I just get tired of looking at the same ol' textures everywhere when I play a forge map.

When I was in my MLG phase, KOTH on the Pit was amazing and intense so I def agree.

And.. yeah I think I'd rather play Headhunters in FFA than have to play Epitaph. I hate that map with a passion. That map + doubles has made me rage more than I ever have in my life.

Good god, me too! It might just be my least favorite Halo map of all time, and that is really saying something with how many maps there are for all 4 games.

If it's more rank-based ones, I'll rage. :laugh: Epic obviously didn't understand that's not what gamers want, so hopefully Bungie gets it.

I'm not too concerned on the rank based achievements it's the competitive mutliplayer I'm concerned about.. lol.. I am just that bad @ Halo :laugh:

First off it has always been $10 for the map packs since Halo 2, and they have always been 3 maps. Not sure why you're comparing that to being an "activision move" when that has been the norm for about six years. Second, the map packs usually drop in price. Last, Bungie always makes a playlist for the first month or so which includes only the new maps and at least keep a few playlists which do not require them. They only become required when a new pack is released and the old packs are shifted from the new maps playlist and replaced with the latest ones. Anyone who has played Halo 2 or 3 knows how this works and it should not come as a surprise in the slightest.

I stand corrected on calling it an "activision move". Even so it is and always has been too little content for too much. Its just much more noticable on Activisions part as they threw up a $15 dollar pricetag when their standard for MW1 had been 800MSP ($10) for 4 maps, all of them brand new. one extra map tacked on doesnt justify the $5 pricetag hike, especially when 2 were remakes from a previous title. The maps may eventually drop in price , as in the past they have, but there is no 100% guarantee they will. And your last point is completely moot seeing how games like Call of Duty can manage to add DLC into the game without completely neuturing the online component for those that choose not to buy it. MW1 and MW2 always made DLC optional and if one person in your lobby did not own the DLC it disabled the maps from even showing up in the playlists. World at War while still optional was slightly different. It would still throw you into games with the DLC maps but it was not required to play. All you have to do is either vote for another map or back out and complete a new search. This wasnt ideal but it still did not force the DLC on you in order to play the online component. I see no reason why Bungie can not implement something of that nature. And if they don't, then I am done with matchmaking. It affects no one but myself. It is just my personal opinion on the matter. I never stated once it was a surprise either, just an opinion on how I disagree with the way Bungie does business on DLC.

Entirely IMO: Most of those maps at least had interesting layouts. This seems like the exact same kind of style the other Reach maps have been, and as most of the community agrees, they're not that great of maps.

I always waited for those to drop in price anyway.

At least the community I have been playing with likes these maps more. But I guess that is to be the case, many people play with different people.

Edit: Halo Reach Sales

Halo Reach sells 3.3 million units in two weeks, in just North America

http://www.joystiq.c...reaches-upward/

Must be about 5.5 million worldwide in 2 weeks. blink.gif

http://kotaku.com/5665438/halo-reach-rank-cap-should-be-lifted-in-november

Reach cap will be lifted when 117 million daily and weekly challenges are completed.

Pretty much guarantees the next achievements will be rank-based, IMO, given the DLC comes out in November. Lame.

My group was playing this yesterday, and I noticed that they updated the playlists. This could very well be old news, but I'm quite happy with the changes. Team Snipers, Infection, and SWAT have all been segregated to their own playlists, and now you don't have to worry about getting those modes anymore when you play Rumble Pit or Team Slayer. Definitely a step in the right direction :).

Here are the new playlists: http://www.bungie.net/stats/reach/playlists.aspx

I was playing with some friends (split screen) online yesterday and came across a TON of teams who would just absolutely abuse elements of the gameplay.

In one, the entire team utilized armor lock and hoarded the special weapons (rocket launcher and energy sword, for instance), which was extremely annoying. Armor lock is the cheapest power when used collectively. One or two guys would rush us, armor lock, then the rest of the team would rush us, and armor lock. So you never knew who was going to attack you because they took turns armor locking, and if they were about to die they'd immediately armor lock.

They were up by about 10 points on us, so we just decided to play their game and do the same damn thing. It was annoying, but we won 50-49. It's a shame we had to even resort to their technique -- I wish there was more of a rock-paper-scissors mentality to the power ups.

The spawning in this game is seriously messed up. I'm sick of spawning directly in front of someone in the other team, and it seems to happen a lot. I know it's not just me though; people on the other team spawn behind me and in front all the time.

It really needs fixing.

The spawning in this game is seriously messed up. I'm sick of spawning directly in front of someone in the other team, and it seems to happen a lot. I know it's not just me though; people on the other team spawn behind me and in front all the time.

It really needs fixing.

Could only wish although that'll never happen

The spawning in this game is seriously messed up. I'm sick of spawning directly in front of someone in the other team, and it seems to happen a lot. I know it's not just me though; people on the other team spawn behind me and in front all the time.

It really needs fixing.

Spawning system in halo has always been garbage. Other games get questionable too sometimes, MW and MW2 come to mind, but IMO I have not found one yet that has worse spawns than Halo.

Played this last night with my group. Rumble Pit is a lot more fun now that we don't have to constantly worry about ending up with Infection. Hell, I think Rumble Pit might actually be my favourite playlist, since you don't have to worry about ending up playing against some stacked team that abuses the spawn system for the entire match. Or maybe I'm just anti-social :p .

But yeah, we tried to play Team Objective after that, and the spawn system definitely reared its ugly head in. Nothing like spawning with your back turned to an enemy in one-flag CTF...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
    • NTLite 2026.06.11200 by Razvan Serea NTLite is a Windows configuration tool that allows you to modify your existing Windows install or an image yet to be deployed, remove Windows components, configure and integrate, speed up the Windows deployment process. Reduce Windows footprint on your RAM and storage drive memory. Remove components of your choice, guarded by compatibility safety mechanisms, which speed up finding that sweet spot. Windows Unattended feature support, providing many commonly used options on a single page for easy setup. Easily integrate a single or multiple drivers, update or language packages. Package integration features smart sorting, enabling you to seamlessly add packages for integration and the tool will apply them in the appropriate order, keeping hotfix compatibility in check. One of the important new features of NTLite (compared to its predecessors) is the ability to modify an already installed the operating system, by removing unnecessary components. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8.1 and 7, x86 and x64, live and image. Server editions of the same versions, excluding support for component removals and feature configuration. ARM64 image support in the alpha stage. Does not support Checked/Debug, Embedded, IoT editions, nor Vista or XP. NTLite 2026.06.11200 changelog: New Secure Boot Migration support: Verification, certificate staging, and boot-manager/sector update across the Image, Updates, Apply, and Create-ISO pages (2023 CA migration, optional 2011 revocation, Anti-rollback, Boot sector choice etc) Secure Boot Host Readiness: Live host Secure Boot migration monitor and Servicing-task control Option under Image page - C:\Windows row, or load the host as the target - Updates - Secure Boot Image: 'Sort mounted images first' option for the image list in Menu-Settings UI: Hover description card for Components and Unattended pages, selectable text and quick access to Compatibility options Command line: Relay commands into the already-running instance Enables controlling already running NTLite via ntlite.exe Use /NewInstance to launch an additional instance using CLI operations (premium) UI: 'New instance' option via main menu instead of a secondary ntlite.exe prompt Apply: Hide individual Apply-page notes with a per-note dismiss (X), critical excluded Settings: 'Unsigned RDP file launch warnings' tweak (RDP client), bypassing the April 2026 security-update prompt on RDP connections Upgrade Image: Live OS and deployed image editing now unlocked on free/test licenses, same licensing as images Image: 'Recompress' option in manual dialog Remove Editions to shrink the WIM in one session Image: SWM part size set inline on the Apply page and image dialogs, split-size popup retired Image: Relative 'Last change' dates; editions grouped by build time to reduce noise Image: 'Forget - Missing' on the Edit-cache menu to mass drop entries whose folder is gone Components: Root groups reorganized - user-facing groups first, system/critical last Components: Show filter options to view components by Template or App-type, since Apps are now merged into groups Presets: Delete confirmation now lists the multi-selected preset names UI: Design update propagated to the rest of the tool UI: Filter and search match words in any order and partially, better results filtering Components Unattended: Input-locale language derives from the user locale, with an independent keyboard picker, enables combinations previously unavailable Unattended: Input-locale now allows for a user value override Unattended: Localization OOBE WinPE now can be copied with the new WinPE Copy OOBE localization toggle, enter locale settings once for both stages Updates: Downloader greys and locks updates the image already carries (hotfix and MSIX) Updates: Resume interrupted update downloads Command line: Many upgrades, see /?, now prints help to the console or redirected output UI-Translation: Finnish language added, also thanks for Chinese Traditional (Matt), French (tistou77), Italian (clarensio), Russian (RDS), Swedish (1FF), Vietnamese (Vu Anh Vu) Fix Components: Containers removal breaking Apps deployment Components: Microsoft Account had leftovers when Easy Migrate is kept Image: Export to an existing WIM improvements, Append renamed to Merge Image: Improved 26H1 live removal support Image: No more 'X:\ not accessible' popup for certain drives during image scan Presets: Manual image refresh picks up presets added/removed outside the app Tweaks: Disabled visual-effect animations no longer return after first logon on a new profile Tweaks: Live Visual Effects toggles (animations, drag full windows, font smoothing) now apply correctly Download: NTLite 2026.06.11200 | 20.5 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Link: NTLite Home Page | NTLite Features | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Ah. La Fontana De Incontinentia ! Bella ! Bella !
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      257
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      93
    5. 5
      macoman
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!