New Gran Turismo 5 scans show night racing and boxart


Recommended Posts

You keep going on about the immersion of that ****ty 3D in the context of driving, talking about some weak ass immersion that won't even touch the surface of the real thing and is then rendered completely out of context! YOU brought 3D up in relation to OUR discussion about the thrill of real-life racing.

but 3d glasses is still closer on topic than real life driving, since GT5 will have 3d glasses support

and i really think that there will be more 3d glasses and copies of GT5 sold, than there will be sports cars... driving a sports car will and should remain an exotic and exclusive experience, while GT5 and 3d glasses are relevant to alot of people...

And that wasn't the discussion, you basically took one of my posts completely out of context which was said in a totally different discussion and then you add something completely irrelevant - Please don't ever do that again and learn how to take part of a discussion, that would be swell.

Is that also how you communicate with your peers, take a random sentence in a discussion and then say something totally unrelated?

And that wasn't the discussion, you basically took one of my posts completely out of context which was said in a totally different discussion and then you add something completely irrelevant - Please don't ever do that again and learn how to take part of a discussion, that would be swell.

Is that also how you communicate with your peers, take a random sentence in a discussion and then say something totally unrelated?

it may have sounded random to you, but that was assuredly not my intention

your talk of driving experience , while appropriate, is out of reach for the masses, unlike readily available consumer electronics and video games

it is most definitely relevant to the discussion in the sense that 3d will bring the gaming experience towards that of actual driving, i have already made the point that it will not take the experience all the way there...

I was talking about one, single aspect of the driving experience that can't be enhanced or re-created with 3D glasses, ever. I wasn't talking about it in general. So you basically started another discussion on top of mine by taking something out of context, hence the confusion. I didn't mean to be hostile, I just hate when someone takes discussions out of context or completely misses the point, adding something unrelated on top of it.

And now we're just beating a dead horse again and again, I'm off.

lol Sethos, everywhere i go on this forum seems to be after you having a battle :p only joking!

but I dont think GT5 needs 3D, its going to be amazing, especially if I'm right in thinking that it is going to be in 1080p HD?

I was really looking forward to GT5 but after playing the Demo there are 2 things that I really don't like about it at all.

And that 1 being the control. I think it just plain sucks! I can not for the life of me keep my car on the track! I keep hitting into the walls. This is not how people drive in real life. And my second issue is what is with all the screeching noise? There is was too much screeching noise going on in this game.

Other then those 2 things GT5 looks amazing!

Its just very sad if this is how the control is going to be for all cars ireful2.gif

Anyone here agree with me?

I used to play a game call World Racing on the PC which had great control and you were able to stay on the road most of the time. I wish GT5 was like that.

I was really looking forward to GT5 but after playing the Demo there are 2 things that I really don't like about it at all.

And that 1 being the control. I think it just plain sucks! I can not for the life of me keep my car on the track! I keep hitting into the walls. This is not how people drive in real life. And my second issue is what is with all the screeching noise? There is was too much screeching noise going on in this game.

Other then those 2 things GT5 looks amazing!

Its just very sad if this is how the control is going to be for all cars :(

Anyone here agree with me?

I used to play a game call World Racing on the PC which had great control and you were able to stay on the road most of the time. I wish GT5 was like that.

It's explained perfectly cleary the demo is on professional physics as it's purpose is for GT Acadmey to recruit people who can actually drive. Winners go onto actually race a real car.

It's NOT a proper GT5 demo.

ps. Sorry Seth buddy, no time.

I was really looking forward to GT5 but after playing the Demo there are 2 things that I really don't like about it at all.

And that 1 being the control. I think it just plain sucks! I can not for the life of me keep my car on the track! I keep hitting into the walls. This is not how people drive in real life. And my second issue is what is with all the screeching noise? There is was too much screeching noise going on in this game.

Other then those 2 things GT5 looks amazing!

Its just very sad if this is how the control is going to be for all cars :(

Anyone here agree with me?

I used to play a game call World Racing on the PC which had great control and you were able to stay on the road most of the time. I wish GT5 was like that.

GT5 isn't designed to be a game where you pick up the controller and become an expert in 10 minutes, it takes more practice than other games. having said that, you should be able to get the basics sorted fairly quickly...

first thing i did was change the throttle to a trigger button, then you can adjust it as needs be. wheelspinning is generally a result of too much power too soon. try to graduate it slightly.

A suggestion to the new racers, map the keys to the R2 and L2 triggers, as that's the only mappable buttons on the controller that let's you have the full control over the throttle and breaks. The standard controls, the X and square button works like an on or off key and they are completely useless.

AB: Okay (Y)

Edited by Sethos
Would GT5 be a lot better control wise if I used a racing wheel?

I have never owned a racing wheel before but if it would make playing GT5 better control wise then I would get one.

If you can't drive with the controller, no chance with the wheel either I'd think. "Upgrading" to a wheel will only help you take lines more accurately and control your speed and breaking a lot more precisely.

The standard controls, the X and square button works like an on or off key and they are completely useless.

They're not that useless (and certainly aren't on/off keys). It can be tricky to get fine control of the throttle quickly but it is certainly possible to control the throttle/brake with the normal X/Y keys.

They're not that useless (and certainly aren't on/off keys). It can be tricky to get fine control of the throttle quickly but it is certainly possible to control the throttle/brake with the normal X/Y keys.

Well, you go ahead and use them then :p

yeah i don't get why GT by default maps the accel and brake to those buttons when you have pressure sensitive trigger buttons... Especially in a simulator where hitting the brake to a certain point or accelerator can shave off seconds here and there.

Sorry if this was posted elsewhere, i did a quick browse and didnt see it.. i just saw this and was left in awe...holy **** it looks better than i anticipated. it just looks....REAL!

-snip-

It looks amazing, but that's the replay mode...so it's unscaled. The actual game play will be different.

Sorry if this was posted elsewhere, i did a quick browse and didnt see it.. i just saw this and was left in awe...holy **** it looks better than i anticipated. it just looks....REAL!

You realise that some of that is real ;)

You realise that some of that is real ;)

i think the comparison between the ingame graphics and real life , that was the point of the video

and there's only one or two points in the video where i can definitely say for sure if its in-game or real life, like the birds arent realistic and the reflections are abit pixelated....

but other than that...

Edited by carmatic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!