Starcraft 2 Beta


Recommended Posts

They're probably picking people with different specs, so there's no point in knowing the specs of who got chosen. They'll probably choose x-amount of people with low end computers, x-amount with mid-range PC's and x-amount with high-end PC's. Its would be a pretty stupid beta test if everyone had a similar setup.

I figured that was the case. Doesn't hurt to know which systems they chose though. :p

I figured that was the case. Doesn't hurt to know which systems they chose though. :p

Per a post in the SC2 beta forums on Battle.net, the system requirements are so old, my Mom's old *desktop* (P4 Northwood-B 2.4, 2 GB DDR400, X1650 PRO AGP, 7 x32 Ultimate) exceeds them.

And the only reason her even older LAPTOP (which is still running XP, albeit SP3) doesn't meet them is because of the hooptie Radeon 7500 graphics.

The system requirements are among the lowest for a modern (within the past two years) RTS (in fact, lower than the original Sins of a Solar Empire).

The system requirements hurdle is therefore the LEAST of your worries.

Per a post in the SC2 beta forums on Battle.net, the system requirements are so old, my Mom's old *desktop* (P4 Northwood-B 2.4, 2 GB DDR400, X1650 PRO AGP, 7 x32 Ultimate) exceeds them.

And the only reason her even older LAPTOP (which is still running XP, albeit SP3) doesn't meet them is because of the hooptie Radeon 7500 graphics.

The system requirements are among the lowest for a modern (within the past two years) RTS (in fact, lower than the original Sins of a Solar Empire).

The system requirements hurdle is therefore the LEAST of your worries.

It's not a worry about whether he or anyone can run the game or not, it's an interest in perhaps finding a pattern to Blizzard's selection process.

It's not a worry about whether he or anyone can run the game or not, it's an interest in perhaps finding a pattern to Blizzard's selection process.

For the first wave, it seems to be primarily those that have NO history playing SC on BattleNet (or don't own/haven't registered SC at all; I have a legit copy of Anthology but didn't make the first cut).

For the first wave, it seems to be primarily those that have NO history playing SC on BattleNet (or don't own/haven't registered SC at all; I have a legit copy of Anthology but didn't make the first cut).

First wave was primarily Blizzcon keys and with others randomly mixed in.

It's not a worry about whether he or anyone can run the game or not, it's an interest in perhaps finding a pattern to Blizzard's selection process.

This.

For the first wave, it seems to be primarily those that have NO history playing SC on BattleNet (or don't own/haven't registered SC at all; I have a legit copy of Anthology but didn't make the first cut).

First wave was primarily Blizzcon keys and with others randomly mixed in.

Interesting. Surely they'd want StarCraft veterans to play the game. I still haven't received an invitation yet, but I'm still hopeful.

I hope the game balance is good.

Blizzard is creating the game with the biggest intention of balancing around professional tournaments. You can bet the balance will be good.

Interesting. Surely they'd want StarCraft veterans to play the game. I still haven't received an invitation yet, but I'm still hopeful.

I've heard they are focusing on mostly new players right now to see how the ranking and auto matching is working. Along with how things feel for new players. But with all these things, who knows how they are picking people.

As a person who has never played the original starcraft I find it frustrating as hell trying to play online. Everyone who has been playing the original for 10 (or whatever) years has a huge advantage and makes for an incredibly lame and frustrating experience.

As a person who has never played the original starcraft I find it frustrating as hell trying to play online. Everyone who has been playing the original for 10 (or whatever) years has a huge advantage and makes for an incredibly lame and frustrating experience.

That is going to be an issue with any RTS game, it should have at least put you in a ladder that is somewhat suited to your skill level. Did you play all of your 10 placement games?

Really though RTS games are hard to get into competitively just in general, there are certain skills that apply from game to game so people like me who have been playing RTS online since C&C probably will give you a hard time. This is why I can't get any of my friends into RTS, the barrier of entry is too high. The main things is focus on practicing how fast you can build up units and get a good build order to start the game with - don't hesitate to watch the replay of someone who beats you and copy their build order exactly, after a game or two of trying their build order you will start to customize it for your own needs and get a better understanding of the game. Much of the game is going to be simply copying the strategies that beat you until you get better and have a mix of strategies to choose from that you are good at.

Also if you can find someone to play 1v1 against you over and over that is usually an easier way to learn. You wont run into the random off the wall strats you see online so it is a better environment to learn through repetition.

Yeah just to try to play SupCom online and not get raped, good luck with that. Or Counter-Strike for that matter. Most people you see playing online are doing that all day, all the time; the casual players are probably doing something more useful of their time. So expect to get raped. I got half-decent at SC after years of playing, and I still lose most of my games. I expect that to remain true with Starcraft 2. Don't take it too hard on yourself unless you plan on playing professionally.

I am wondering what it takes to get moved to a new ladder, I am ranked 4th in mine right now and it is just a race of who wants to play the most games as far as who gets first, I was at first place on Saturday but I've been slacking since then. Also I'm curious if it matches you against people just from your ladder or everyone, when I was ranked 1st I would still go against people who were "favored" to win, I don't understand how that would make sense unless it is pulling people from other ladders.

  • 2 weeks later...

Haha, I was in the process of doing my monthly password change on all of my accounts and stopped by my Battle.net account and saw this;

Haven't received any mails or nothing about it :/

But anyone who's not in, go check your Bnet account, maybe you got lucky :)

Same here, awesome. (Y)

post-6186-12678124811797_thumb.jpg

GAH! I wish I get selected next wave. Ive played SC for about 3-4 years. First year i was all about 1v1 or teams and wasnt a pro but not a amateur. Then I discovered custom games and never left. Either 3v3 fastest on a big map or Something D lol.

Blizzard please invite me nao.

Haha, I was in the process of doing my monthly password change on all of my accounts and stopped by my Battle.net account and saw this;

SC1.png

Haven't received any mails or nothing about it :/

But anyone who's not in, go check your Bnet account, maybe you got lucky :)

I was about to post this. Same thing happened to me, never got an email, but logged on bnet and saw I was in.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!