Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Syanide said:

 

@Luc2kI'll be honest, that's one change I didn't like either, but again, we're going back to square one and comparing books and the show. The fact that they made Shae's love for him honest, as opposed to books where he was played, sort of replaced the situation with his first wife. I don't think it changed that much overall for his motives to kill Tywin, but it did weaken the reason for Tyrion to seek him out in the first place. That's the type of shortcut the show takes from time to time that I don't like either, when characters go somewhere (literally or figuratively) because the endpoint demands them to, rather than naturally progressing there.

They should have just committed with one or the other from the start.

 

Didn't really feel anything different between both versions of Shae. She had some extra stuff in the show but the actress didn't pull it off. Actually, it weakened the kill as well because Shae was in actual fact a ######, while Tywin had Tysha gang raped by his garrison and forced Tyrion to be the last one, leading him to believe she was one too (also the reason why he only spends his time in the company of prostitutes). On the other hand, the show did hammer "woe is me, everybody hates me because I'm different!" repeatedly as a secondary motive. I don't know about you, but one of those scenarios would get my blood boiling a hell of a lot faster. Also no shortcut was required, just change the dialogue in two scenes and you're good to go. So little needed for an incredibly more powerful pay off.

 

The scene between the brothers also suffered greatly from this. If they meet again in the show, they'll probably end up hugging each other, while in the books.. let's just say I'm very much looking forward to that family reunion.

 

Spoiler

A Lannister always pays his debts.

 

Edited by Luc2k

@Luc2k Shae's was among the worse acting performances on the show. It's weird, because apparently she's an award winning actress in Germany, yet she was pretty bad in Game of Thrones. I couldn't really put my finger on the reason why, until much later, when I saw a clip of the actress talking about he show, where she struggled with English a bit. I seriously think it affected her performance, because she probably struggled to remember the lines, or had a hard time trying to act and trying to pull it off in English. I know that just because she's not a native speaker doesn't have to mean anything, the guy who plays Jaime pulls of both British and American accents really, really well, but in her case, I think that was the reason.

 

As for Jaime and Tyrion meeting each other again, at first I actually took it as a pretty clear sign it won't happen and that Jaime might bite it before Tyrion comes back to Westeros, but then in season 5 I think, Jaime did state he's fairly bitter about Tyrion, so in fact they just reversed that dynamic.

 

Anyway, I'd still rate the show as a really good adaptation. As much as they change, I do think that they do it mostly do respect the medium they're adapting to. If you want it to be like the books, read the books. The Expanse actually had a reverse problem, at least imo. That show had a few episodes where it really felt like they were just omitting a few pages/paragraphs, and directly adapting others, which really hurt the flow of the episodes. I mean, I didn't read those books, but there was one episode mid-season which really felt... unprocessed. Game of Thrones treats the episode as a single serving unit of the story, and I always like how they incorporate a theme to an episode to an extent, or how a theme will flow throughout. Sometimes when they rearrange stuff, they really elevate the storytelling, e.g. how the Ironborn repeat their phrase a few times ("What is dead may never die") in their scene, which is placed right before the Jon resurrection scene, or even better, in Oathbreaker, how Sam takes on the role of the father, followed by Ned's search for Lyanna at the Tower of Joy, followed by a Daenerys Targaryen scene. There's still a lot to love about the show. And as I mentioned earlier, I can't wait for the character count to further drop, and for the stories and characters to start overlapping even more, it should really give some much needed space for them to grow.

1 hour ago, Syanide said:

@Luc2k Shae's was among the worse acting performances on the show. It's weird, because apparently she's an award winning actress in Germany, yet she was pretty bad in Game of Thrones. I couldn't really put my finger on the reason why, until much later, when I saw a clip of the actress talking about he show, where she struggled with English a bit. I seriously think it affected her performance, because she probably struggled to remember the lines, or had a hard time trying to act and trying to pull it off in English. I know that just because she's not a native speaker doesn't have to mean anything, the guy who plays Jaime pulls of both British and American accents really, really well, but in her case, I think that was the reason.

 

As for Jaime and Tyrion meeting each other again, at first I actually took it as a pretty clear sign it won't happen and that Jaime might bite it before Tyrion comes back to Westeros, but then in season 5 I think, Jaime did state he's fairly bitter about Tyrion, so in fact they just reversed that dynamic.

 

Anyway, I'd still rate the show as a really good adaptation. As much as they change, I do think that they do it mostly do respect the medium they're adapting to. If you want it to be like the books, read the books. The Expanse actually had a reverse problem, at least imo. That show had a few episodes where it really felt like they were just omitting a few pages/paragraphs, and directly adapting others, which really hurt the flow of the episodes. I mean, I didn't read those books, but there was one episode mid-season which really felt... unprocessed. Game of Thrones treats the episode as a single serving unit of the story, and I always like how they incorporate a theme to an episode to an extent, or how a theme will flow throughout. Sometimes when they rearrange stuff, they really elevate the storytelling, e.g. how the Ironborn repeat their phrase a few times ("What is dead may never die") in their scene, which is placed right before the Jon resurrection scene, or even better, in Oathbreaker, how Sam takes on the role of the father, followed by Ned's search for Lyanna at the Tower of Joy, followed by a Daenerys Targaryen scene. There's still a lot to love about the show. And as I mentioned earlier, I can't wait for the character count to further drop, and for the stories and characters to start overlapping even more, it should really give some much needed space for them to grow.

Can't say I know much about the actress apart that she did porn. I found her pretty bad all around, talking or not.

 

I don't know if they'll meet again in either medium, but the book scenario has more potential. It may be bitterness now, but in the book it went from love to threat instantly. To me the show feels like it relies to much on conflicts between positive and negative characters, while failing at it when it's between just positive ones.

 

Personally, I'd rate it between great and fan fiction. The good thing about its state now, is that it's made me so disengaged that I don't feel it has any bearing on the books' story, regardless of what happens. It's conversation material with friends.

 

A lot of foreshadowing is in the books, though it's less in your face like the show. First example with the Ironborn/resurrection just sounds like a cool catchphrase to say before it happens since I don't see any connection between the them, be it physical state, religion or lineage. Your second example puzzles me though because I can't find any meaningful connection between the two, it's all just superficial. If I get this correctly, you're trying to assign aspects of The Seven to various characters, but the Starks don't follow them for example, and to my mind the characters don't really fit these archetypes under scrutiny. Or you're going for Sam = father to an adopted son, but it doesn't exactly fit snugly with Ned's position since Gilly's baby is of no consequence among other things. The baby in the book is a much better fit, but even then it's stretching. Maybe I just misunderstood you, do elaborate.

 

While I wouldn't say a lot to love, there is enough though, like Olly's purple face. Several minutes of him struggling in the noose would have been some good filler.

11 hours ago, Luc2k said:

A lot of foreshadowing is in the books, though it's less in your face like the show. First example with the Ironborn/resurrection just sounds like a cool catchphrase to say before it happens since I don't see any connection between the them, be it physical state, religion or lineage. Your second example puzzles me though because I can't find any meaningful connection between the two, it's all just superficial. If I get this correctly, you're trying to assign aspects of The Seven to various characters, but the Starks don't follow them for example, and to my mind the characters don't really fit these archetypes under scrutiny. Or you're going for Sam = father to an adopted son, but it doesn't exactly fit snugly with Ned's position since Gilly's baby is of no consequence among other things. The baby in the book is a much better fit, but even then it's stretching. Maybe I just misunderstood you, do elaborate.

 

While I wouldn't say a lot to love, there is enough though, like Olly's purple face. Several minutes of him struggling in the noose would have been some good filler.

The Ironborn/Jon was foreshadowing through the words spoken. Jon was dead, then he wasn't. Not subtle, but nice.

 

As for the other (Sam/Ned/Dany), not aspects of the seven, it's foreshadowing about

 

 

 

 

Jon's parentage:

- You have Sam taking on the protective role and 'adopting' Sam Jr. to protect him.

- The next scene is Ned looking for Lyanna. We all pretty much know by know what happens in the tower - he gets Jon to protect and take care of.

- And the next scene is a Targaryen one, again, thematically wrapping it up.

 

 

That's pretty subtle. The show can sometimes be a bit too on-the-nose, but the books aren't really flawless in that regard either. There are so many prophecies, dreams, and hints, that are years away from being revealed, that it can become tiresome. I prefer the show treatment of Jon's parentage, it's been a slow-burn with very subtle hints, and I believe it will gradually be revealed this season. The books probably suffer from GRRM originally planning it as a trilogy, then planting too many hints too early on. Also, I dislike the sheer overuse of prophecies. Not everything has to be destined to happen, like the amount of crap he started cramming into Dany's (fairly boring) story, with Quaithe popping up to "spice" things up.

 

To go back to the show, there is also usually a theme for the episode reflected in the episode name. Oathbreaker: Sam sort of breaks his NW oath to protect Sam Jr, Ned's honor is tested as he does whatever necessary to find his sister, Daenerys didn't follow the Dothraki widow tradition, Arya's could be seen as double, she's betraying who she really is by turning into "No One," but it might as well be a bluff and she's betraying Faceless Men, Smalljon betraying his family's loyalty to the Starks by turning Rickon in, and finally, Jon leaving Night's Watch.

 

That's the stuff that makes an episode a great unit of storytelling, because it ties in various threads of the story that are usually displaced by character location and unrelated narratives. I love that about the show, and when they're not forced to cram too many story beats into a single episode, it tends to work out wonderfully.

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, Syanide said:

As for the other (Sam/Ned/Dany), not aspects of the seven, it's foreshadowing about

 

  Hide contents

Jon's parentage:

- You have Sam taking on the protective role and 'adopting' Sam Jr. to protect him.

- The next scene is Ned looking for Lyanna. We all pretty much know by know what happens in the tower - he gets Jon to protect and take care of.

- And the next scene is a Targaryen one, again, thematically wrapping it up.

 

That's pretty subtle. The show can sometimes be a bit too on-the-nose, but the books aren't really flawless in that regard either. There are so many prophecies, dreams, and hints, that are years away from being revealed, that it can become tiresome. I prefer the show treatment of Jon's parentage, it's been a slow-burn with very subtle hints, and I believe it will gradually be revealed this season. The books probably suffer from GRRM originally planning it as a trilogy, then planting too many hints too early on. Also, I dislike the sheer overuse of prophecies. Not everything has to be destined to happen, like the amount of crap he started cramming into Dany's (fairly boring) story, with Quaithe popping up to "spice" things up.

If what you're saying is intended, I still find the connections too loose and random, however I see how it might stimulate someone that doesn't know the books. I'll give you the prophecies, even though, as I read, I found most rather obscure, until the predicted event happened exactly.

3 hours ago, Syanide said:

To go back to the show, there is also usually a theme for the episode reflected in the episode name. Oathbreaker: Sam sort of breaks his NW oath to protect Sam Jr, Ned's honor is tested as he does whatever necessary to find his sister, Daenerys didn't follow the Dothraki widow tradition, Arya's could be seen as double, she's betraying who she really is by turning into "No One," but it might as well be a bluff and she's betraying Faceless Men, Smalljon betraying his family's loyalty to the Starks by turning Rickon in, and finally, Jon leaving Night's Watch.

 

That's the stuff that makes an episode a great unit of storytelling, because it ties in various threads of the story that are usually displaced by character location and unrelated narratives. I love that about the show, and when they're not forced to cram too many story beats into a single episode, it tends to work out wonderfully.

I don't see what Sam is doing as oath breaking as of yet. I mean they all do it to some degree if you want to be strict, however only outright desertion or betrayal of the Night's Watch should be considered. Say Sam decides to abandon his quest to become a maester and stay with Gilly, excluding unforeseen circumstances of course.

 

Can't see how Ned's honour was tested. The Kingsguard were standing between him and his family and he only put Dayne out of his misery. Maybe you expected him to punish Howland Reed for the backstab. Dany hasn't followed that tradition for several seasons now. Arya is still in training so we can't draw a conclusion either way. Jon died and his wows with that. Doubt there's a stipulation that says one has to resume them if resurrected. Smalljon is the only one I can agree about, although I'm sure the episode title is referring to Jon.

  • 2 weeks later...

Anyone watch the leaked episode that someone ripped from HBO after they accidentally put it online earlier?

 

Spoiler

White-Walkers!

 

Plus you find out why Wylis says Hodor all the time.

 

Good episode!

 

Edited by .Rob
1 hour ago, .Rob said:

Anyone watch the leaked episode that someone ripped from HBO after they accidentally put it online earlier?

 

  Reveal hidden contents

White-Walkers!

 

Plus you find out why Wylis says Hodor all the time.

 

Good episode!

 

Whaaaaaaat? :omg:

 

*downloads* 

 

EDIT: Of course I mean wait until the episode is legally released on the official channels...

Spoiler

The creation of the White Walkers doesn't make sense timeline wise. The Long Night, when they first appeared, was a global event that happened during the Age of Heroes. The Age of Heroes started after the First Men and the children of the forest made peace.

 

I don't remember what the show says about the Age of Heroes or the Long Night and records of that period in the books aren't exactly precise, however I can't help but feel slightly disappointed.

 

4 hours ago, ToneKnee said:

Watched the leaked episode, good episode overall.  If you watch the leak, an Alarm goes off (as it's screen recorded) about 35 minutes, so when it happens, don't think it's your computer doing it haha!

it was a screen capture, I saw a Twitter notification come up in the corner too. someone posted it on HBO Nordic before they were supposed to. I'll still watch it on HBONow later tonight

8 hours ago, Syanide said:

My ######## heart broke.

Agreed! 

 

Spoiler

I guarantee that Bran will cause the wall to fall. He'll go south of the wall with that Mark on him and it'll bust it. Last shot at end of season will be the white king blowing that horn and knocking it down

 

I also have a feeling Bran could possibly be the lord of light? Subtly drawing all the forces to the north to unite and fight the white walkers

 

I've watched that ending several times now, I legit start crying every single time. I never cry watching fiction. To me, this is more tragic than Ned, Red Wedding and Jon combined. Those characters, as unfair their deaths were, still had a say in the situations surrounding them, and at least to an extend had a choice in the matter. Hodor was so pure and so innocent, and to see this messed up fate bestowed upon him... Soulcrushing.

 

It's kind of mindblowing how they turned a punchline character into, what in my opinion is, the most tragic figure of the story.

29 minutes ago, Syanide said:

I've watched that ending several times now, I legit start crying every single time. I never cry watching fiction. To me, this is more tragic than Ned, Red Wedding and Jon combined. Those characters, as unfair their deaths were, still had a say in the situations surrounding them, and at least to an extend had a choice in the matter. Hodor was so pure and so innocent, and to see this messed up fate bestowed upon him... Soulcrushing.

 

It's kind of mindblowing how they turned a punchline character into, what in my opinion is, the most tragic figure of the story.

 

It was heartbreaking to find out that a character only used for comedic effect had such an upsetting and harrowing back story :cry:

On 5/22/2016 at 0:43 PM, Luc2k said:
  Hide contents

The creation of the White Walkers doesn't make sense timeline wise. The Long Night, when they first appeared, was a global event that happened during the Age of Heroes. The Age of Heroes started after the First Men and the children of the forest made peace.

 

I don't remember what the show says about the Age of Heroes or the Long Night and records of that period in the books aren't exactly precise, however I can't help but feel slightly disappointed.

 

It's not hard to believe that The Children made the White Walkers to fight The First Men, but the Night King turned on them and couldn't be controlled, so The Children made peace with The First Men -- enemy of my enemy and all that.  During the Long Night the White Walkers make their way farther south than before and are now known to those in the Riverlands/Reach/Vale, etc.  Once they were driven back, Bran builds The Wall, Night Watch begins, The Children bring Dragonglass, etc.

 

Think of it like this -- The White Walkers live in the Arctic, but during the war they may have fought in Canada against The First Men and The Children.  Peace is made between The First Men (in Canada) and Children, the Age of Heroes begins, etc..  During The Long Night, the White Walkers are able to make their way south deep into America, at which point more of the continent now gives a ###### because it affects us and not those Canucks up in Winterfell.

 

None of it is really recorded because, according to Sam, all we have are runes from the First Men, recorded history doesn't begin until the Andals.

 

On 5/12/2016 at 0:29 PM, Luc2k said:

I don't see what Sam is doing as oath breaking as of yet. I mean they all do it to some degree if you want to be strict, however only outright desertion or betrayal of the Night's Watch should be considered.

"I shall take no wife, hold no lands, father no children."

46 minutes ago, soniqstylz said:

It's not hard to believe that The Children made the White Walkers to fight The First Men, but the Night King turned on them and couldn't be controlled, so The Children made peace with The First Men -- enemy of my enemy and all that.  During the Long Night the White Walkers make their way farther south than before and are now known to those in the Riverlands/Reach/Vale, etc.  Once they were driven back, Bran builds The Wall, Night Watch begins, The Children bring Dragonglass, etc.

 

Think of it like this -- The White Walkers live in the Arctic, but during the war they may have fought in Canada against The First Men and The Children.  Peace is made between The First Men (in Canada) and Children, the Age of Heroes begins, etc..  During The Long Night, the White Walkers are able to make their way south deep into America, at which point more of the continent now gives a ###### because it affects us and not those Canucks up in Winterfell.

 

None of it is really recorded because, according to Sam, all we have are runes from the First Men, recorded history doesn't begin until the Andals.

Yours is pure speculation because as far we know the White Walkers did not exist before the Long Night. The children were losing the war, however they didn't make peace to fight some common enemy; and the Night King was "created" after the Long Night and was most likely killed. I do know of course, that the one in the show has little in common apart from the name.

 

To my understanding, the show portrays the Night King as the first White Walker and we also know he was a Lord Commander of the Night's Watch. The Night's Watch, however, was created after the Long Night to defend the Wall against the north (i.e. White Walkers). So, unless I'm missing something, the show's Night King doesn't make a lick of sense.

 

The long Night was a global even with creatures like the White Walkers present in all cultures not isolated on one continent. If the children created them on Westeros, how did they suddenly spread all over la world? I believe there was a far more powerful entity at play than the children.

42 minutes ago, soniqstylz said:

"I shall take no wife, hold no lands, father no children."

He's taken no wife, he holds no lands and he hasn't fathered any children. What is your point?

Edited by Luc2k
added more on the Night King
  • Like 1
9 hours ago, Luc2k said:

He's taken no wife, he holds no lands and he hasn't fathered any children. What is your point?

He "fathers" a child. I mean, we know it's not his kid, but to protect them he does go around saying it's his kid.

 

Anywho, the latest episode was fine, sort of a setup for the remainder of the season, but nice developments all around, nice to see that Arya's story is finally going somewhere. Daenerys on the other hand, I swear they wrote that bit in just because they were short of an "epic" episode ending. We heard the variation of that speech about a dozen times now. Nice to see Drogon, but goddamn, move yo ass to Westeros already woman.

 

Also (book spoilers):

 

 

Brotherhood without Banners got namedropped, Freys are back, and both Jaime and Brienne are heading towards Riverrun. LSH hype, anyone?

2 hours ago, Syanide said:

He "fathers" a child. I mean, we know it's not his kid, but to protect them he does go around saying it's his kid.

There is a huge difference between fathering a child and looking after one lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!