Lohan suing E-Trade for $100 million over baby ad


Recommended Posts

http://wonderwall.msn.com/movies/lohan-suing-for-100-million-over-baby-ad-1541882.story?GT1=28135

Lindsay Lohan has filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit over an ad which allegedly used her name and parodied her life for profit.

The "Mean Girls" actress is seeking $100 million in damages and compensation over the commercial for financial firm E-Trade, which depicts a baby girl called Lindsay as a boyfriend stealer and a "milkaholic", reports the New York Post.

The commercial shows a baby boy playing the stock market and apologizing to his girlfriend for not calling

her the night before.

The baby girl then gets suspicious about a rival female baby, referring to her as "that milkaholic Lindsay."

Lohan filed a lawsuit on Monday at Nassau County

Supreme Court over the ad, which debuted during the Super Bowl last month.

The actress' lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, claims Lohan's first name is just as recognizable as other single-word monikers used by stars such as Madonna and Cher.

Ovadia says, "Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit. They used the name Lindsay. They're using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn't they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody's talking about it and saying it's Lindsay Lohan."

The lawyer alleges company bosses used Lohan's "name and characterization" without paying her or asking for her approval, thus violating her rights. Ovadia also insists the company has earned large profits from the promo because it would have been seen by millions of TV viewers watching the Super Bowl.

But chiefs at the advertising firm which created the commercial for E-Trade are dismissing the claims, insisting they chose the name Lindsay at random.

Chris Brown, a spokesperson for the Grey Group, says they "just used a popular baby name that happened to be the name of someone on the account team."

Lohan is seeking $50 million in exemplary damages, as well as $50 million in compensation.

Seriously? Lindsay Lohan is an idiot...I hope this case is dismissed immediately by the Judge. Madonna and Cher are iconic names not only because of the people behind them but because they are not common names. Sorry Lindsay Lohan, but Lindsay is a VERY common name and you can't sue everyone who uses it.

But while they're at it, I think Chris Brown (singer/wifebeater) should sue Chris Brown (Grey Group Spokesperson) for being quoted in this article and possibly confusing people. :)

I have seen this commercial and it wasn't all that funny to me...that is until now. I would never have depicted Lindsay Lohan as the "Linsday" on the commerical. Now I have and that sh*t is funny. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

But if I were Linsday, I would just be happy someone gave me publicity. :yes:

All you gals with the lindsay name'd better change your names or you'll be sued!

You know the worst thing about this is? In this day and age, I wouldn't put it past her if she'd win....

But chiefs at the advertising firm which created the commercial for E-Trade are dismissing the claims, insisting they chose the name Lindsay at random.

Then why add all that other stuff to make it seem like you were talking about Lindsay Lohan?

Some futher info

Internal documents obtained by an Esquire magazine reporter permitted to sit in on the strategy sessions at Grey Group, which produced the spot, reveal creators talked about words to describe a tot named "Deborah." A few weeks later, scribbled notes show "Deborah" scratched out and replaced with "Lindsay," according to Esquire.
Initial descriptions of "Deborah" included "cockadoodle" and "leaking diaper," whereas words written on the same page as Lindsay's name included names like "gutter hound" and "skanky cake," according to the Post.

Info: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35813874

All you gals with the lindsay name'd better change your names or you'll be sued!

You know the worst thing about this is? In this day and age, I wouldn't put it past her if she'd win....

I will not doubt about it, the whole justice system in this country is a joke. If she really win this stupid case I will be laughing at the judges and the whole justice system.

If a person feels that their character, which is their source of income, is being missprepresented, whether you like them or not - they surely have grounds...?

How sad is it that you think "every drunk slut named Lindsay" is a representation of your life? or as the ad implies milk-a-holic overly friendly baby named Lindsay that stayed all night with another's baby-friend?

Then why add all that other stuff to make it seem like you were talking about Lindsay Lohan?

What other stuff?

I will not doubt about it, the whole justice system in this country is a joke. If she really win this stupid case I will be laughing at the judges and the whole justice system.

I would actually not be that surprised if they settle out of court. :)

I'm not sure E*Trade should be the target. They didn't write all that stuff, the ad agency did, they approved the ad, but that doesn't mean they were following the same train of thought or saw the notes. They might have a Lindsay working for them as well, and thought the name was just a funny coincidence. To prove E*Trade did this intentionally and with malice or with intent to harm Lohan will be difficult.

What has that ad done to Lohan that she hasn't done to herself? Will she be suing herself next? Someone should look up "imply" and "infer" in the dictionary. Then that someone should also explain what a dictionary is to Lohan. Then I think all the other Lindsays of the world should sue Lohan for the exact same grounds she's suing.

I heard about this on a radio show on my way to work the other day. The sure fact she thinks cause of the name alone it's her? I guess the milkaholic really hits home :whistle:

Anyway, thats like Apple and their iFail lawsuite over the PODi name including an "i". She needs to get a damn grip and STFU already. :angry:

This is so ridiculous... I can't even imagine. And when I saw the commercial, I never for a second thought of Lindsay Lohan... First, Lindsay is a common name. Second, Lindsay Lohan is NOT anywhere in the class of a Madonna or something. She is NOT recognizable by first name only... lol Third, why is Lindsay Lohan still around? She needs to go away...

hehe, if she won the case, i would expect all the women named lindsay to either sue lohan for portraying their image poorly, or sue lohan for stealing their addiction habits and publicize it without their consent

LMAO!

I'm not sure E*Trade should be the target. They didn't write all that stuff, the ad agency did, they approved the ad, but that doesn't mean they were following the same train of thought or saw the notes. They might have a Lindsay working for them as well, and thought the name was just a funny coincidence. To prove E*Trade did this intentionally and with malice or with intent to harm Lohan will be difficult.

That's an interesting point, but it seems like the buck stops with the company actually doing the advertising... Because they have a larger bank account perhaps? But I don't think I've ever seen a marketing company pulled into something like this...

I'm not sure E*Trade should be the target. They didn't write all that stuff, the ad agency did, they approved the ad, but that doesn't mean they were following the same train of thought or saw the notes. They might have a Lindsay working for them as well, and thought the name was just a funny coincidence. To prove E*Trade did this intentionally and with malice or with intent to harm Lohan will be difficult.

The radio show I heard this on mentioned that supposedly there was a claim that there really is Lindsay on the marketing team...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      593
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!