Lohan suing E-Trade for $100 million over baby ad


Recommended Posts

http://wonderwall.msn.com/movies/lohan-suing-for-100-million-over-baby-ad-1541882.story?GT1=28135

Lindsay Lohan has filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit over an ad which allegedly used her name and parodied her life for profit.

The "Mean Girls" actress is seeking $100 million in damages and compensation over the commercial for financial firm E-Trade, which depicts a baby girl called Lindsay as a boyfriend stealer and a "milkaholic", reports the New York Post.

The commercial shows a baby boy playing the stock market and apologizing to his girlfriend for not calling

her the night before.

The baby girl then gets suspicious about a rival female baby, referring to her as "that milkaholic Lindsay."

Lohan filed a lawsuit on Monday at Nassau County

Supreme Court over the ad, which debuted during the Super Bowl last month.

The actress' lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, claims Lohan's first name is just as recognizable as other single-word monikers used by stars such as Madonna and Cher.

Ovadia says, "Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit. They used the name Lindsay. They're using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn't they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody's talking about it and saying it's Lindsay Lohan."

The lawyer alleges company bosses used Lohan's "name and characterization" without paying her or asking for her approval, thus violating her rights. Ovadia also insists the company has earned large profits from the promo because it would have been seen by millions of TV viewers watching the Super Bowl.

But chiefs at the advertising firm which created the commercial for E-Trade are dismissing the claims, insisting they chose the name Lindsay at random.

Chris Brown, a spokesperson for the Grey Group, says they "just used a popular baby name that happened to be the name of someone on the account team."

Lohan is seeking $50 million in exemplary damages, as well as $50 million in compensation.

Seriously? Lindsay Lohan is an idiot...I hope this case is dismissed immediately by the Judge. Madonna and Cher are iconic names not only because of the people behind them but because they are not common names. Sorry Lindsay Lohan, but Lindsay is a VERY common name and you can't sue everyone who uses it.

But while they're at it, I think Chris Brown (singer/wifebeater) should sue Chris Brown (Grey Group Spokesperson) for being quoted in this article and possibly confusing people. :)

I have seen this commercial and it wasn't all that funny to me...that is until now. I would never have depicted Lindsay Lohan as the "Linsday" on the commerical. Now I have and that sh*t is funny. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

But if I were Linsday, I would just be happy someone gave me publicity. :yes:

All you gals with the lindsay name'd better change your names or you'll be sued!

You know the worst thing about this is? In this day and age, I wouldn't put it past her if she'd win....

But chiefs at the advertising firm which created the commercial for E-Trade are dismissing the claims, insisting they chose the name Lindsay at random.

Then why add all that other stuff to make it seem like you were talking about Lindsay Lohan?

Some futher info

Internal documents obtained by an Esquire magazine reporter permitted to sit in on the strategy sessions at Grey Group, which produced the spot, reveal creators talked about words to describe a tot named "Deborah." A few weeks later, scribbled notes show "Deborah" scratched out and replaced with "Lindsay," according to Esquire.
Initial descriptions of "Deborah" included "cockadoodle" and "leaking diaper," whereas words written on the same page as Lindsay's name included names like "gutter hound" and "skanky cake," according to the Post.

Info: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35813874

All you gals with the lindsay name'd better change your names or you'll be sued!

You know the worst thing about this is? In this day and age, I wouldn't put it past her if she'd win....

I will not doubt about it, the whole justice system in this country is a joke. If she really win this stupid case I will be laughing at the judges and the whole justice system.

If a person feels that their character, which is their source of income, is being missprepresented, whether you like them or not - they surely have grounds...?

How sad is it that you think "every drunk slut named Lindsay" is a representation of your life? or as the ad implies milk-a-holic overly friendly baby named Lindsay that stayed all night with another's baby-friend?

Then why add all that other stuff to make it seem like you were talking about Lindsay Lohan?

What other stuff?

I will not doubt about it, the whole justice system in this country is a joke. If she really win this stupid case I will be laughing at the judges and the whole justice system.

I would actually not be that surprised if they settle out of court. :)

I'm not sure E*Trade should be the target. They didn't write all that stuff, the ad agency did, they approved the ad, but that doesn't mean they were following the same train of thought or saw the notes. They might have a Lindsay working for them as well, and thought the name was just a funny coincidence. To prove E*Trade did this intentionally and with malice or with intent to harm Lohan will be difficult.

What has that ad done to Lohan that she hasn't done to herself? Will she be suing herself next? Someone should look up "imply" and "infer" in the dictionary. Then that someone should also explain what a dictionary is to Lohan. Then I think all the other Lindsays of the world should sue Lohan for the exact same grounds she's suing.

I heard about this on a radio show on my way to work the other day. The sure fact she thinks cause of the name alone it's her? I guess the milkaholic really hits home :whistle:

Anyway, thats like Apple and their iFail lawsuite over the PODi name including an "i". She needs to get a damn grip and STFU already. :angry:

This is so ridiculous... I can't even imagine. And when I saw the commercial, I never for a second thought of Lindsay Lohan... First, Lindsay is a common name. Second, Lindsay Lohan is NOT anywhere in the class of a Madonna or something. She is NOT recognizable by first name only... lol Third, why is Lindsay Lohan still around? She needs to go away...

hehe, if she won the case, i would expect all the women named lindsay to either sue lohan for portraying their image poorly, or sue lohan for stealing their addiction habits and publicize it without their consent

LMAO!

I'm not sure E*Trade should be the target. They didn't write all that stuff, the ad agency did, they approved the ad, but that doesn't mean they were following the same train of thought or saw the notes. They might have a Lindsay working for them as well, and thought the name was just a funny coincidence. To prove E*Trade did this intentionally and with malice or with intent to harm Lohan will be difficult.

That's an interesting point, but it seems like the buck stops with the company actually doing the advertising... Because they have a larger bank account perhaps? But I don't think I've ever seen a marketing company pulled into something like this...

I'm not sure E*Trade should be the target. They didn't write all that stuff, the ad agency did, they approved the ad, but that doesn't mean they were following the same train of thought or saw the notes. They might have a Lindsay working for them as well, and thought the name was just a funny coincidence. To prove E*Trade did this intentionally and with malice or with intent to harm Lohan will be difficult.

The radio show I heard this on mentioned that supposedly there was a claim that there really is Lindsay on the marketing team...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I agree, especially if it is cloud sourced, like this one is.. but I wouldn't say no to a local AI assistant similar to the Zettlab one which would be really helpful with my large Photos library, but also to perform tasks like installing Docker apps rather than me having to do it via Docker Compose, but I don't think we're quite there yet. Synology Photos is somewhat AI, you can ask it to search for certain people (if you have tagged them and it will attempt to match similar photos to the person) and if you put a search term in for "cars" for example, it will show you all photos with a car.
    • I doubt that Google will keep the same price... it may go up from that list published.
    • Sennheiser's audiophile grade HD 600 hits lowest ever price on Amazon Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen If you are in the market for high-quality audiophile-grade over-ear headphones then Sennheiser's HD 600 are a great choice for sure, especially today on Prime Day 2026 as the product has hit its lowest ever price (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Sennheiser HD 600 has long been regarded as a reference headphone for listeners seeking a detailed and natural listening experience. It is an open-back design that is built around the idea of acoustic transparency which is essentially said to allow sound waves to move freely for a more spacious and accurate presentation by reducing turbulence and the type of distortion that can result from it. At the heart of the product is Sennheiser’s proprietary driver system featuring a 42 mm driver paired with a lightweight diaphragm and aluminum voice coils. The company says this design helps deliver fast response times and better articulate sound across the audible frequency range. Comfort and durability are also key aspects of the HD 600 as the headphones feature soft velour ear pads designed for extended listening sessions. The HD 600 comes with a detachable 3-meter cable, a 6.3 mm stereo connector, and a 3.5 mm adapter for compatibility with a wide range of audio equipment. The technical specs of the Sennheiser HD 600 are given in the table below: Specification Value Transducer Principle Dynamic, Open-Back Ear Coupling Circumaural (Over-Ear) Frequency Response 12 Hz – 40,500 Hz Sound Pressure Level (SPL) 97 dB (1 V) Impedance 300 Ω Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) < 0.1% (1 kHz, 1 V) Cable Length 3 m (9.8 ft) Connector 3.5 mm Stereo Jack Plug Included Adapter 6.3 mm (1/4") Stereo Jack Adapter Weight 260 g Magnetic Field Strength 1.8 mT Driver Size 42 mm Dynamic Driver Diaphragm Size 38 mm Get it at the link below: Sennheiser HD 600: $237.00 (Sold by Electronics Expo, Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $449.95) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • So the card is targeted at headphone users - so the review should be from someone that uses this - maybe I can review a card next time.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!