Lohan suing E-Trade for $100 million over baby ad


Recommended Posts

http://wonderwall.msn.com/movies/lohan-suing-for-100-million-over-baby-ad-1541882.story?GT1=28135

Lindsay Lohan has filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit over an ad which allegedly used her name and parodied her life for profit.

The "Mean Girls" actress is seeking $100 million in damages and compensation over the commercial for financial firm E-Trade, which depicts a baby girl called Lindsay as a boyfriend stealer and a "milkaholic", reports the New York Post.

The commercial shows a baby boy playing the stock market and apologizing to his girlfriend for not calling

her the night before.

The baby girl then gets suspicious about a rival female baby, referring to her as "that milkaholic Lindsay."

Lohan filed a lawsuit on Monday at Nassau County

Supreme Court over the ad, which debuted during the Super Bowl last month.

The actress' lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, claims Lohan's first name is just as recognizable as other single-word monikers used by stars such as Madonna and Cher.

Ovadia says, "Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit. They used the name Lindsay. They're using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn't they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody's talking about it and saying it's Lindsay Lohan."

The lawyer alleges company bosses used Lohan's "name and characterization" without paying her or asking for her approval, thus violating her rights. Ovadia also insists the company has earned large profits from the promo because it would have been seen by millions of TV viewers watching the Super Bowl.

But chiefs at the advertising firm which created the commercial for E-Trade are dismissing the claims, insisting they chose the name Lindsay at random.

Chris Brown, a spokesperson for the Grey Group, says they "just used a popular baby name that happened to be the name of someone on the account team."

Lohan is seeking $50 million in exemplary damages, as well as $50 million in compensation.

Seriously? Lindsay Lohan is an idiot...I hope this case is dismissed immediately by the Judge. Madonna and Cher are iconic names not only because of the people behind them but because they are not common names. Sorry Lindsay Lohan, but Lindsay is a VERY common name and you can't sue everyone who uses it.

But while they're at it, I think Chris Brown (singer/wifebeater) should sue Chris Brown (Grey Group Spokesperson) for being quoted in this article and possibly confusing people. :)

I have seen this commercial and it wasn't all that funny to me...that is until now. I would never have depicted Lindsay Lohan as the "Linsday" on the commerical. Now I have and that sh*t is funny. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

But if I were Linsday, I would just be happy someone gave me publicity. :yes:

All you gals with the lindsay name'd better change your names or you'll be sued!

You know the worst thing about this is? In this day and age, I wouldn't put it past her if she'd win....

But chiefs at the advertising firm which created the commercial for E-Trade are dismissing the claims, insisting they chose the name Lindsay at random.

Then why add all that other stuff to make it seem like you were talking about Lindsay Lohan?

Some futher info

Internal documents obtained by an Esquire magazine reporter permitted to sit in on the strategy sessions at Grey Group, which produced the spot, reveal creators talked about words to describe a tot named "Deborah." A few weeks later, scribbled notes show "Deborah" scratched out and replaced with "Lindsay," according to Esquire.
Initial descriptions of "Deborah" included "cockadoodle" and "leaking diaper," whereas words written on the same page as Lindsay's name included names like "gutter hound" and "skanky cake," according to the Post.

Info: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35813874

All you gals with the lindsay name'd better change your names or you'll be sued!

You know the worst thing about this is? In this day and age, I wouldn't put it past her if she'd win....

I will not doubt about it, the whole justice system in this country is a joke. If she really win this stupid case I will be laughing at the judges and the whole justice system.

If a person feels that their character, which is their source of income, is being missprepresented, whether you like them or not - they surely have grounds...?

How sad is it that you think "every drunk slut named Lindsay" is a representation of your life? or as the ad implies milk-a-holic overly friendly baby named Lindsay that stayed all night with another's baby-friend?

Then why add all that other stuff to make it seem like you were talking about Lindsay Lohan?

What other stuff?

I will not doubt about it, the whole justice system in this country is a joke. If she really win this stupid case I will be laughing at the judges and the whole justice system.

I would actually not be that surprised if they settle out of court. :)

I'm not sure E*Trade should be the target. They didn't write all that stuff, the ad agency did, they approved the ad, but that doesn't mean they were following the same train of thought or saw the notes. They might have a Lindsay working for them as well, and thought the name was just a funny coincidence. To prove E*Trade did this intentionally and with malice or with intent to harm Lohan will be difficult.

What has that ad done to Lohan that she hasn't done to herself? Will she be suing herself next? Someone should look up "imply" and "infer" in the dictionary. Then that someone should also explain what a dictionary is to Lohan. Then I think all the other Lindsays of the world should sue Lohan for the exact same grounds she's suing.

I heard about this on a radio show on my way to work the other day. The sure fact she thinks cause of the name alone it's her? I guess the milkaholic really hits home :whistle:

Anyway, thats like Apple and their iFail lawsuite over the PODi name including an "i". She needs to get a damn grip and STFU already. :angry:

This is so ridiculous... I can't even imagine. And when I saw the commercial, I never for a second thought of Lindsay Lohan... First, Lindsay is a common name. Second, Lindsay Lohan is NOT anywhere in the class of a Madonna or something. She is NOT recognizable by first name only... lol Third, why is Lindsay Lohan still around? She needs to go away...

hehe, if she won the case, i would expect all the women named lindsay to either sue lohan for portraying their image poorly, or sue lohan for stealing their addiction habits and publicize it without their consent

LMAO!

I'm not sure E*Trade should be the target. They didn't write all that stuff, the ad agency did, they approved the ad, but that doesn't mean they were following the same train of thought or saw the notes. They might have a Lindsay working for them as well, and thought the name was just a funny coincidence. To prove E*Trade did this intentionally and with malice or with intent to harm Lohan will be difficult.

That's an interesting point, but it seems like the buck stops with the company actually doing the advertising... Because they have a larger bank account perhaps? But I don't think I've ever seen a marketing company pulled into something like this...

I'm not sure E*Trade should be the target. They didn't write all that stuff, the ad agency did, they approved the ad, but that doesn't mean they were following the same train of thought or saw the notes. They might have a Lindsay working for them as well, and thought the name was just a funny coincidence. To prove E*Trade did this intentionally and with malice or with intent to harm Lohan will be difficult.

The radio show I heard this on mentioned that supposedly there was a claim that there really is Lindsay on the marketing team...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Is a fast food restaurant a good metric to compare against?
    • Grand Theft Auto VI pricing revealed alongside Ultimate Edition and pre-loading details by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Last week, Rockstar revealed Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will be starting soon, and just a day ahead of that, now the studio has announced the official pricing for the highly anticipated game. This has been a hotly debated topic among fans and industry veterans for a long time, considering the game is expected to be the biggest entertainment product launch ever. The confirmed pricing for the Grand Theft Auto VI standard edition is $79.99, which Rockstar says gives access to the "single-player experience set in the biggest, most immersive evolution of the series yet." This follows what most of our readers thought would happen with the pricing too. At the same time, a $99.99 Grand Theft Auto VI: Ultimate Edition has been confirmed as well, which lands with "an exclusive collection of premium vehicles, weapons, apparel, and action threaded across all aspects of Jason and Lucia’s story." Pre-ordering will also give fans extra bonuses, including a Vintage Vice City Pack of cosmetic items as well as a free month of GTA+. Head to the official website of the game here to check out all the cosmetic rewards the Ultimate Edition and pre-orders bring. Interestingly, the studio does not mention Grand Theft Auto VI multiplayer at all in today's announcement. Perhaps this will arrive later, following the campaign launch, or the studio is keeping that reveal for a later date. Digital pre-orders for Grand Theft Auto VI will begin on June 25, 2026, at midnight local time across regions for Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. The title is slated to launch on November 19 on those same platforms. Pre-loading for Grand Theft Auto VI will kick off on November 12, giving players a week to get the game ready on their consoles. As for the physical edition, Take-Two has confirmed that this will be available without a disc, with the box only containing a download code inside. This will be purchasable starting November 12, giving players who take this route time to pre-load the title as well.
    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      120
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!