Zune HD2 Will Be Like iPod Touch for Windows Phone 7


Recommended Posts

Zune HD2 Will Be Like iPod Touch for Windows Phone 7 (Read: Apps! Also, Zune HD Is For Suckers)

Sorry, everybody who bought a Zune HD! You screwed up. It won't be a part of the XNA Game Studio 4.0 party?meaning it won't play those new mobile Xbox Live games for Windows Phone 7?unlike the Zune HD2.

It's through MIcrosoft's XNA Game Studio 4.0 that developers get access to the Xbox Live goodness, using Gamer Services APIs. And that's not in the cards for the plain old Zune HD, according to Microsoft's Klucher:

"Development for the Zune and Zune HD will continue to exist in XNA Game Studio 3.1, however, in XNA Game Studio 4.0, we're encouraging you to migrate your games over to the Windows Phone 7 Series platform."

That's where the Zune HD2 comes in, which Mary Jo Foley hears is in the pipe, and "will be similar to an iPod Touch," and could ship as early as this year. In other words, it'll presumably be a part of that "Windows Phone 7 Series platform" and run Windows Phone 7 apps.

Which is what Microsoft will need?as many devices as possible running WP7 apps to give the platform a running start, and a wide base of them that don't require carrier contracts isn't a bad idea. Like Steve Jobs once supposedly referred to the iPod touch as "training wheels for the iPhone," devices running around with Xbox Live games and Zune music, getting people hooked on the platform early, the people who aren't quite ready for a full phone (though maybe that's where the mysterious Project Pink comes in), is almost a necessity, really.

But, uh, everybody who already bought a Zune HD, especially in the past month. Um, yeah. Sorry, but we told you this could happen. [ZDNet]

Source: Gizmodo

[...]

Sorry, everybody who bought a Zune HD! You screwed up. It won't be a part of the XNA Game Studio 4.0 party—meaning it won't play those new mobile Xbox Live games for Windows Phone 7—unlike the Zune HD2.

[...]

Sorry, article! I didn't screw up. I don't care about games :) Without the application/game flexibility, the Zune HD meets my needs considerably more than the iPod touch, mainly because of the fantastic interface the Zune HD has and the consistency between the Zune HD interface and the few applications it does have. I realise the iPod touch has consistency between its core interface and that of its applications, usually, but the difference is... the Zune HD's interface is so much nicer in my opinion.

It's not just the interface which is nicer, but the screen is so much more colourful on the Zune HD due to it being OLED; the iPod touch doesn't have an OLED screen... Oh, and where is the built-in FM radio on the iPod touch?

Yeah, I think I know who screwed up... the people who bought iPod touches when they could have bought a Zune HD, right? No, because it's all a matter of opinion.

An article is very poorly written when the author cannot understand that different users will have different wants/tastes.

EDIT - To add, I've been so much happier with my Zune HD than I ever was with my iPod touch and I had many applications on my iPod touch.

Edited by Calum

The apps were just an added bonus for me. Only bought the Zune HD to get the enhanced media experience. That said, if the existence of Zune HD2 is confirmed, I hope MS increases the storage to 64GB at the least. That alone will make it worth buying for me. Can't wait to see what else they have in store.

I thought this would happen, it never made sense to me to have an entirely separate OS for a music player when they already have/will have a decent mobile platform. Unfortunately by saying this, MS have pretty much just killed off Zune HD (1) sales, at least from techy users.

Cute but ultimately irrelevant to me until Zune HD2 and the Zune service are available in European markets.

If Microsoft wants the Windows 7 phone platform to be succesful, it needs to be widespread in all markets, from PMPs to smartphones

What's the point in having something 'like an iPod Touch' if a real iPod Touch exists? Just get the iPod.

It reminds me of the Golf adverts we have over here.:laugh:

'It's like an iPod, but not an iPod.' >.>

What's the point in having something 'like an iPod Touch' if a real iPod Touch exists? Just get the iPod.

It reminds me of the Golf adverts we have over here.:laugh:

'It's like an iPod, but not an iPod.' >.>

It's like sex, but it's not sex :whistle: :laugh:

I'm sorry, but I have to say I'm extremely disappointed in Microsoft for this.

I've seen comments on various sites saying Microsoft never promised an app store for the Zune. They didn't, but they obviously made implications. They kept promoting XNA for Zune development, and I'm sorry, but what other implication is there other than if you're going to develop an application for a platform that you'll be able to actually distribute that application in some way? Microsoft made it seem from the outset as though they were attempting to get people to develop games for the Zune so they could sell them.

I fail to see how the Zune can't be upgraded to feature the same app store as the Windows Phone 7 Series. Maybe I'm just dumb, but it should be possible to upgrade the software to do this. The Zune HD is to the Windows Phone 7 Series as the iPod Touch is to the iPhone already, so I'm not sure what the issue is. They already have the same underlying core, so what's the problem?

That said, I don't regret my purchasing a Zune HD instead of an iPod Touch. But now I really do wish I'd have waited. I need a larger capacity than 32GB now anyway, but it's still disappointing.

It does suck for ZuneHD owners who wanted more apps/games, but I wonder if it's just a software thing or maybe something in hardware? For what it's meant to do the ZuneHD is the best imo. Maybe the ZuneHD2 will have something extra that is lacking in the ZuneHD? It could be the same thing(s) that are missing from current WM6.5 phones that doesn't let them upgrade to WP7s?

WE'll have to wait for MiX and see what the ZuneHD2 brings that the ZuneHD lacks to get a better idea. That said, from the get go MS has been very good with updating older Zunes to newer firmwares etc, but there will always come a time where that won't be possible anymore.

Maybe now with the ZuneHD2 they'll finally go international?

Guess they really do want a clean slate to work on. Pity, the Zune HD seems quite juicy with the Tegra chip. I don't think many bought one for Apps anyway, more of a sleek music, video device.

I bet Tegra is just amazing when listening to music! ;)

I bet Tegra is just amazing when listening to music! ;)

You don't really need something like Tegra to run a facebook app. And to be fair, he did say music and video device. Tegra helps when you're decoding 720p out to a HDtv.

I sold my Zune HD. It was a nice device, but for what I needed, it didn't deliver. Despite the fact that there was still no support for hidden wireless connections and the lack of an internal speaker, I went back to the Touch 64 GB.

If version 2 includes these, I may go back, but they need to increase the number of apps too.

I fail to see how the Zune can't be upgraded to feature the same app store as the Windows Phone 7 Series. Maybe I'm just dumb, but it should be possible to upgrade the software to do this. The Zune HD is to the Windows Phone 7 Series as the iPod Touch is to the iPhone already, so I'm not sure what the issue is. They already have the same underlying core, so what's the problem?

Actually, despite what some tech sites are saying - they don't have the same core. Zune HD's firmware indicates it's actually still running on WinCE 5, whilst WinPhone 7 series, is, well, not.

Also keeping in mind that the baseline requirements for these 7 series devices are: Snapdragon or equivalent, 256MB or greater, 800x480 screen resolution. Zune HD, meets none of these. And the Windows Phone 7 series apps will be designed with these specs in mind of course

I do hope the Zune HD2 also has a bigger screen as suggested by the 7 series requirements. The current screen is too small to really make use of it for things like viewing video, typing, or playing a game. The media button could use an improvement, as well. Also, the Home button could use a house logo to make it more obvious to what it really is.

Zune HD2 Will Be Like iPod Touch for Windows Phone 7 (Read: Apps! Also, Zune HD Is For Suckers)

Sorry, everybody who bought a Zune HD! You screwed up. It won't be a part of the XNA Game Studio 4.0 party?meaning it won't play those new mobile Xbox Live games for Windows Phone 7?unlike the Zune HD2.

It's through MIcrosoft's XNA Game Studio 4.0 that developers get access to the Xbox Live goodness, using Gamer Services APIs. And that's not in the cards for the plain old Zune HD, according to Microsoft's Klucher:

That's where the Zune HD2 comes in, which Mary Jo Foley hears is in the pipe, and "will be similar to an iPod Touch," and could ship as early as this year. In other words, it'll presumably be a part of that "Windows Phone 7 Series platform" and run Windows Phone 7 apps.

Which is what Microsoft will need?as many devices as possible running WP7 apps to give the platform a running start, and a wide base of them that don't require carrier contracts isn't a bad idea. Like Steve Jobs once supposedly referred to the iPod touch as "training wheels for the iPhone," devices running around with Xbox Live games and Zune music, getting people hooked on the platform early, the people who aren't quite ready for a full phone (though maybe that's where the mysterious Project Pink comes in), is almost a necessity, really.

But, uh, everybody who already bought a Zune HD, especially in the past month. Um, yeah. Sorry, but we told you this could happen. [ZDNet]

Source: Gizmodo

I have no regrets buying a ZuneHD to replace my ipod touch, the sound is better, the video is better, it was cheaper for more storage. Apps are nothing more then a gimmick, and I will gladly buy the Zune HD2, my ZuneHD has been such a good device.

Actually, despite what some tech sites are saying - they don't have the same core. Zune HD's firmware indicates it's actually still running on WinCE 5, whilst WinPhone 7 series, is, well, not.

Also keeping in mind that the baseline requirements for these 7 series devices are: Snapdragon or equivalent, 256MB or greater, 800x480 screen resolution. Zune HD, meets none of these. And the Windows Phone 7 series apps will be designed with these specs in mind of course

Then why does mine say that it's WinCE 6.0?

0_3a897_a777dced_XL.jpg

I also couldn't be happier with my Zune HD. I bought it on launch day, and plan on keeping it till it dies. It does what it was meant to do, and that was be a portable media player. If you bought it for apps, then you went wrong! MS themselves said the Zune HD is a primary media player, and will not have an app database like the iPod Touch. The apps that are on there are of fantastic quality, unlike the millions of **** iPod Touch applications. Quality > Quantity.

I can see why current Zune HD owners would be ****ed though. They are going to feel "left out" if a ZHD2 comes out. However, my ZHD made me discover the marketplace, and I'm most likely getting a Windows Phone 7, since you can use the marketplace with it. If anything the Zune HD was a good guinea pig to grab/poll consumers with PMP's.

Get the device out to international markets, get it setup with decent floorspace in stores, then we'll talk about any Zune success.

Oh, and where is the built-in FM radio on the iPod touch?

Built in, but disabled :hmmm:

I read that the Broadcom chip inside the second and third gen touches also allow for FM radio, just as it was enabled to enable bluetooth. Apple's probably busy with iPhone OS 4 but they better at least offer a software update to unlock the radio - make it another $9.99 update, I don't care, just make it happen. :pinch:

I also couldn't be happier with my Zune HD. I bought it on launch day, and plan on keeping it till it dies. It does what it was meant to do, and that was be a portable media player. If you bought it for apps, then you went wrong! MS themselves said the Zune HD is a primary media player, and will not have an app database like the iPod Touch. The apps that are on there are of fantastic quality, unlike the millions of **** iPod Touch applications. Quality > Quantity.

I do recall them saying it was a media player, but I don't recall them saying it wouldn't have an app database. And I don't agree that the quality of these apps are above many of the iPod apps. They're not bad quality, but there are far more quality iPod apps.

I do recall them saying it was a media player, but I don't recall them saying it wouldn't have an app database. And I don't agree that the quality of these apps are above many of the iPod apps. They're not bad quality, but there are far more quality iPod apps.

Yeah MS stated when they released the ZHD that it wasn't going to match the iPod Touch in number of apps. And how could they, the iPod was off to a start before the ZHD. The apps that are on the Zune are great, I actually use them all instead of the 2 apps that I find useful on the iPod touch (which I also own thanks to my company). Many people wanted the ZHD to be an iPod Touch, but MS aimed more towards the media instead of the apps, and yes, the Zune HD blows the iPod touch away in sound, video out, and every aspect of being a portable media player.

Yeah MS stated when they released the ZHD that it wasn't going to match the iPod Touch in number of apps. And how could they, the iPod was off to a start before the ZHD. The apps that are on the Zune are great, I actually use them all instead of the 2 apps that I find useful on the iPod touch (which I also own thanks to my company). Many people wanted the ZHD to be an iPod Touch, but MS aimed more towards the media instead of the apps, and yes, the Zune HD blows the iPod touch away in sound, video out, and every aspect of being a portable media player.

No one was expecting them to match the iPod's app database. That's not what you said.

"MS themselves said the Zune HD is a primary media player, and will not have an app database like the iPod Touch."

You said they wouldn't have one like the iPod's. Not that they wouldn't have the same amount.

No one was expecting them to match the iPod's app database. That's not what you said.

"MS themselves said the Zune HD is a primary media player, and will not have an app database like the iPod Touch."

You said they wouldn't have one like the iPod's. Not that they wouldn't have the same amount.

Yes, MS did say this device was intended to be a media player first; you can get that info from sites like ABI, and other places. MS did say apps are not their primary concern. Just think about it, they could have opened up the ZHD to apps and ability for 3rd parties to sell apps, but instead they wanted all the apps to be free, and essentially closed to outside devs. Apple on the other hand lets people create apps, and lets the 3rd party distribute it, as long as they're approved by Apple. MS was using the ZHD as a test bed before a true infrastructure that can combine Windows Mobile + Zune Marketplace + Xbox integration. So, thus the ZHD was never meant to have an app store like the iPod Touch, but this will change if they release the upcoming ZHD2 and WP7.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!