Recommended Posts

After installing Adobe CS5 Design Premium I'm absolutely amazed by the amount of support files that the application suite apparently requires:

- Location of your choosing - Main application folder

- /Applications - Folder named Adobe holding Adobe Help.app

- /Applications/Utilities - Adobe AIR Application Installer.app, Adobe AIR Uninstaller.app

- /Applications/Utilities - Folder named Adobe Installers containing a single alias to the uninstaller app

- /Applications/Utilities - Folder named Adobe Utilities - CS5 containing two Toolkit folders

- /Library + ~/Library - No less than 13 additional support folders called "Adobe" filled with all kind of files and folders

- /Library/PreferencePanes - Growl

- Cache - Tons of Adobe cache folders

I honestly don't get why this is needed and why stuff like Growl is being forced upon me. Also the Uninstaller fails to get rid of everything even if you tell it to do so. :/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/897518-mac-a-mess-called-adobe-cs5/
Share on other sites

Ever since Mac OS X Snow Leopard the Adobe CS4 Master Collection installer is acting up. When I uncheck unwanted parts folders and (corrupt) applications files are still being created. I find it extremely disappointing that they haven't fixed this with CS5.

How long did it take to install?

The trial version of Design Premium (DMG file) took about 10 minutes to install on my Mac Pro.

How long did it take to install?

I too would like to know, how long does CS5 take to install compared to CS4? Just installing CS4 Photoshop and Dreamweaver takes nearly an hour on my system...

EDIT: As the question was answered above....how long did a similar CS4 package take to install on your system?

Well that wouldn't be a fair comparison since the trial version

A) Doesn't contain all applications. Adobe Acrobat Pro is missing for example

B) The CS5 Master Collection trial weighs in at ? roughly 6 GB while the CS4 Master Collection Retail package consists out of 4 applications DVDs that weigh in at roughly 15 GB total.

If I am bored I always try to remove as much of the application as possible, that is delete help files, readmes, licences, and even dynamic link libraries, plugins, etc that I don't use.

You can do the same.

You can also have a 3rd party app track all the registry keys and files written by Adobe installer...

etc.

Edit,

What I am saying, is make yourself a lited version of Adobe and use that if you don't like the 'mess'.

I too would like to know, how long does CS5 take to install compared to CS4? Just installing CS4 Photoshop and Dreamweaver takes nearly an hour on my system...

EDIT: As the question was answered above....how long did a similar CS4 package take to install on your system?

Well, my computer is VERY old, installing 8 apps took about 2.5 hours. :angry:

Nagisa, it takes me about 10 minutes to install Photoshop CS5 with Dreamweaver. Not sure about cs4, but uninstalling it took much more time than installing cs5 :p

Great to hear, I always dread reinstalling my system from scratch cause Photoshop and Dreamweaver CS4 take as much time to install as it takes me to install 90% of the other apps I use....its freaking annoying.

Well it was the same thing with CS4. It created a lot of mess everywhere. It also ****es me off a LOT.

Actually, I hate Mac apps that create folders in the Applications folder. Seriously… just make it an icon named "Photoshop.app" and that's it. Stuff all the mess in the .app file, that's where it has to go.

But hey, at least it's Intel 64-bit and it starts blazingly fast (here at least). It's just that it's a mess.

And people wonder why the relationship between Adobe Apple gets tensed…

On another note, I think Apple should centralize all the updates of every application on their servers, exactly like iPhone apps. The Software Update app would detect your apps and detect the necessary updates for ALL the system. We wouldn't have **** like Adobe Updater, Microsoft Updater, Parallels Updater, etc. They're a mess to deal with, they’re all different visually and they work differently, and they create a bunch of additional files. I don't know if Apple would need to provide additional APIs to make something like that, but I'm pretty positive on that…

And a big LOL at the guy who said “it’s because you don’t write software and they do”. This is the kind of excuse companies pull and I can’t hold myself from laughing… It’s surely that, yeah.

My gripes are all UI related. Seems like these guys just don't care as some of these have been here for years.

13zbrx2.png

x5wqp2.png

I know these controls used to be Aqua back in CS4. Hell, is that a Windows XP folder?

deo9so.png

More custom made controls?

2zfo4sx.png

Two dropdowns right next to each other. Both different.

2nqfa6r.pnge01qmh.png

That said, it really is more responsive than previous versions. Zooming in and out of images is much quicker (the pixel view at high zoom levels is great). Launch times are much improved. Camera Raw adjustments quicker.

Love the rule of thirds view when cropping (about time). I can also finally move the focus of the keyboard to "Don't save" when quitting now with tab key.

23m06ts.png

n2ml9v.png

104jbkw.png

Lack of Aqua elements is partially because Adobe used Flash to develop certain parts of the Photoshop CS5 interface. And people wonder why Apple doesn't want the same crap to happen on the iPhone.

There is no real reason why the close/minimize/zoom buttons are located in a different place...

GUI-wise I don't think there are many other applications on Mac OS X that parallel the train wreck that is Adobe CS.

I wonder if they fixed the spill over that CS4 has in Windows when you run multiple monitors. Basically, if you maximized a CS4 app (or at least Photoshop and Dreamweaver), you would lose about 5-10 pixels on the left side of an adjacent monitor (at least when the 2nd monitor is on the right) while the application was the focused window. Gets a bit annoying when you run things like Ultramon for a second taskbar and you get a gap between the left side of the screen edge and the left side of the taskbar...

I installed the trial, seems to have a few bugs. I see photoshop.exe remains running when I close an image sometimes (not apple related). That is kinda bothersome, just because I do not know why it would do that.

Filling in the background stuff doesn't work all the time. It has worked on a few photos but sometimes the results are just horrid. Extracting an element from a photograph works well though. Soft edges are easier to deal with. This might be worth buying, I do not know.

I really don't understand why it's so hard for Adobe to follow UI standards as much as possible. Like stated, you've got drop-downs that use different styles, misplaced window widgets, etc. If developing part of the UI using Flash, could they still have not used standard Aqua widgets, especially in that image processor window?

They used Cocoa to make CS5 and yet it looks less native than did CS4.

If developing part of the UI using Flash, could they still have not used standard Aqua widgets, especially in that image processor window?

Apparently not. This is a perfect example really of why Apple has so many problems with iPhone apps being developed through Flash CS5. The user experience is almost always sub-par compared to applications that have been developed using Apple's toolkit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If I ever get that issue I will let you know how I fix it
    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      540
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!