Recommended Posts

After installing Adobe CS5 Design Premium I'm absolutely amazed by the amount of support files that the application suite apparently requires:

- Location of your choosing - Main application folder

- /Applications - Folder named Adobe holding Adobe Help.app

- /Applications/Utilities - Adobe AIR Application Installer.app, Adobe AIR Uninstaller.app

- /Applications/Utilities - Folder named Adobe Installers containing a single alias to the uninstaller app

- /Applications/Utilities - Folder named Adobe Utilities - CS5 containing two Toolkit folders

- /Library + ~/Library - No less than 13 additional support folders called "Adobe" filled with all kind of files and folders

- /Library/PreferencePanes - Growl

- Cache - Tons of Adobe cache folders

I honestly don't get why this is needed and why stuff like Growl is being forced upon me. Also the Uninstaller fails to get rid of everything even if you tell it to do so. :/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/897518-mac-a-mess-called-adobe-cs5/
Share on other sites

Ever since Mac OS X Snow Leopard the Adobe CS4 Master Collection installer is acting up. When I uncheck unwanted parts folders and (corrupt) applications files are still being created. I find it extremely disappointing that they haven't fixed this with CS5.

How long did it take to install?

The trial version of Design Premium (DMG file) took about 10 minutes to install on my Mac Pro.

How long did it take to install?

I too would like to know, how long does CS5 take to install compared to CS4? Just installing CS4 Photoshop and Dreamweaver takes nearly an hour on my system...

EDIT: As the question was answered above....how long did a similar CS4 package take to install on your system?

Well that wouldn't be a fair comparison since the trial version

A) Doesn't contain all applications. Adobe Acrobat Pro is missing for example

B) The CS5 Master Collection trial weighs in at ? roughly 6 GB while the CS4 Master Collection Retail package consists out of 4 applications DVDs that weigh in at roughly 15 GB total.

If I am bored I always try to remove as much of the application as possible, that is delete help files, readmes, licences, and even dynamic link libraries, plugins, etc that I don't use.

You can do the same.

You can also have a 3rd party app track all the registry keys and files written by Adobe installer...

etc.

Edit,

What I am saying, is make yourself a lited version of Adobe and use that if you don't like the 'mess'.

I too would like to know, how long does CS5 take to install compared to CS4? Just installing CS4 Photoshop and Dreamweaver takes nearly an hour on my system...

EDIT: As the question was answered above....how long did a similar CS4 package take to install on your system?

Well, my computer is VERY old, installing 8 apps took about 2.5 hours. :angry:

Nagisa, it takes me about 10 minutes to install Photoshop CS5 with Dreamweaver. Not sure about cs4, but uninstalling it took much more time than installing cs5 :p

Great to hear, I always dread reinstalling my system from scratch cause Photoshop and Dreamweaver CS4 take as much time to install as it takes me to install 90% of the other apps I use....its freaking annoying.

Well it was the same thing with CS4. It created a lot of mess everywhere. It also ****es me off a LOT.

Actually, I hate Mac apps that create folders in the Applications folder. Seriously… just make it an icon named "Photoshop.app" and that's it. Stuff all the mess in the .app file, that's where it has to go.

But hey, at least it's Intel 64-bit and it starts blazingly fast (here at least). It's just that it's a mess.

And people wonder why the relationship between Adobe Apple gets tensed…

On another note, I think Apple should centralize all the updates of every application on their servers, exactly like iPhone apps. The Software Update app would detect your apps and detect the necessary updates for ALL the system. We wouldn't have **** like Adobe Updater, Microsoft Updater, Parallels Updater, etc. They're a mess to deal with, they’re all different visually and they work differently, and they create a bunch of additional files. I don't know if Apple would need to provide additional APIs to make something like that, but I'm pretty positive on that…

And a big LOL at the guy who said “it’s because you don’t write software and they do”. This is the kind of excuse companies pull and I can’t hold myself from laughing… It’s surely that, yeah.

My gripes are all UI related. Seems like these guys just don't care as some of these have been here for years.

13zbrx2.png

x5wqp2.png

I know these controls used to be Aqua back in CS4. Hell, is that a Windows XP folder?

deo9so.png

More custom made controls?

2zfo4sx.png

Two dropdowns right next to each other. Both different.

2nqfa6r.pnge01qmh.png

That said, it really is more responsive than previous versions. Zooming in and out of images is much quicker (the pixel view at high zoom levels is great). Launch times are much improved. Camera Raw adjustments quicker.

Love the rule of thirds view when cropping (about time). I can also finally move the focus of the keyboard to "Don't save" when quitting now with tab key.

23m06ts.png

n2ml9v.png

104jbkw.png

Lack of Aqua elements is partially because Adobe used Flash to develop certain parts of the Photoshop CS5 interface. And people wonder why Apple doesn't want the same crap to happen on the iPhone.

There is no real reason why the close/minimize/zoom buttons are located in a different place...

GUI-wise I don't think there are many other applications on Mac OS X that parallel the train wreck that is Adobe CS.

I wonder if they fixed the spill over that CS4 has in Windows when you run multiple monitors. Basically, if you maximized a CS4 app (or at least Photoshop and Dreamweaver), you would lose about 5-10 pixels on the left side of an adjacent monitor (at least when the 2nd monitor is on the right) while the application was the focused window. Gets a bit annoying when you run things like Ultramon for a second taskbar and you get a gap between the left side of the screen edge and the left side of the taskbar...

I installed the trial, seems to have a few bugs. I see photoshop.exe remains running when I close an image sometimes (not apple related). That is kinda bothersome, just because I do not know why it would do that.

Filling in the background stuff doesn't work all the time. It has worked on a few photos but sometimes the results are just horrid. Extracting an element from a photograph works well though. Soft edges are easier to deal with. This might be worth buying, I do not know.

I really don't understand why it's so hard for Adobe to follow UI standards as much as possible. Like stated, you've got drop-downs that use different styles, misplaced window widgets, etc. If developing part of the UI using Flash, could they still have not used standard Aqua widgets, especially in that image processor window?

They used Cocoa to make CS5 and yet it looks less native than did CS4.

If developing part of the UI using Flash, could they still have not used standard Aqua widgets, especially in that image processor window?

Apparently not. This is a perfect example really of why Apple has so many problems with iPhone apps being developed through Flash CS5. The user experience is almost always sub-par compared to applications that have been developed using Apple's toolkit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      599
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!