Fill in this poll to help us better your Neowin experience  

150 members have voted

  1. 1. Did you disable them?

    • Yep I did.
      97
    • No I didn't.
      53
  2. 2. Do you agree that Neowin needs ads to survive?

    • No absolutely not.
      25
    • Yes I do.
      125
  3. 3. Do you whitelist Neowin anyways?

    • No, I block all ads.
      48
    • Yes, but block in-text ads
      54
    • Yes, Neowin is whitelisted with in-text ads
      48


Recommended Posts

its kinda hilarious how you "developers" seem to get so personally offended by the feedback of many of the members.

Personally offended? Of course I'm personally offended. You've taken the work of a pile of my personal friends and equated it to garbage.

And sarcastically calling me a "developer" isn't helping your case. Moving to petty insults won't move this debate anywhere.

This thread is *encouraging the disabling of ads.* How are you guys complaining about that?

Reinvent the wheel? How... We aren't the only site that pays news reporters for content. We started this system about 2 years ago. The front page hits improved significantly, and in fact continue to go up every quarter.

We do have "accessible categories". Simply click the category link (or even make your own by using tabs) and you're set to go.

As others have stated, the amount of total payout per month for news reporters is dwarfed by server operations and development. The benefit of having paid reporters to create articles that increase hits and returns far outweighs the amount we are paying them.

As for spearheading member articles to the front page, almost 99.99% of BPN articles on the forums are copy and pasted. We might as well turn the frontpage into an RSS reader if we're going to do that... Before the switch over to non-copy and pasted news, this is exactly what we did. The frontpage was stagnant and nobody really used it.

My mentioning of paying writers for articles wasn't the inference to reinventing the wheel.

The server operations seem grossly disproportionate to what is required... Like I said, paying people to be creative very rarely works out well... There are plenty of members on the forum who would gladly write high quality articles for perks other than money. I looked at the front page and I see a lot of old articles from days ago, being the weekend shouldn't be an excuse for a lack of news posting. That should be the time you guys have an ace to post...

I don't, in the 5 years I have been here, think I would personally class Neowin as a news site. It is well known as an IPB based community forum... Where the members make the content and the fun.

its kinda hilarious how you "developers" seem to get so personally offended by the feedback of many of the members.

To be honest I find it even more hilarious that we have to put up with a minority that continually attempt to insult our intelligence.

If we respond in the manner we are spoken to, those same people go crying to an admin or supervisor. That's quite hilarious actually; and a bit sad.

I don't, in the 5 years I have been here, think I would personally class Neowin as a news site. It is well known as an IPB based community forum... Where the members make the content and the fun.

Just because you don't read the news, doesn't mean that others don't. If I look at the stats in terms of hits on each news story, it's clear to see that our news IS very popular, just looking now, and most of the stories on the front page have over 5k views in <3 days.

Define server operations....

Funny... The moment people question anything done, they are labelled as black sheep.

I personally think much more efficient blades could be used instead of the antiquated 2k5 xeon based machines you are likely using... Colocation costs would be reduced unless you get them for free through stardock.

@ Dave

I think many people know the origins of this site which from memory was known to host questionable downloads in the forum until it went legit. Slap a front page on and call it news all you like, the loyal members who donate, subscribe and don't adblock are what have kept the site forum going.

Personally, I always have the front page loaded in a tab because I like to navigate to the forums via the latest community activity box, which I refresh periodically. I have always found the forums to be a more valuable resource than the front page. IMHO, the forums are somewhat unique to Neowin, as far as quality is concerned. I have no problems with whatever ads are required to maintain the site. I just wish that you would spend more money on the development of the forums than on the front page.

I have 2 suggestions:

1) Like ccuk pointed out, give other perks to news posters. That may be free subscriptions, or even access to a sub-forum full of p*rn.

2) Have a poll. Find out whether members like the front page more or the forums. I am not sure what to make of the statistics the devs have posted in this thread as I don't have much idea about how the site is organized or run. But I am sure a poll will give a better idea as statistics can always lie.

I have 2 suggestions:

1) Like ccuk pointed out, give other perks to news posters. That may be free subscriptions, or even access to a sub-forum full of p*rn.

2) Have a poll. Find out whether members like the front page more or the forums. I am not sure what to make of the statistics the devs have posted in this thread as I don't have much idea about how the site is organized or run. But I am sure a poll will give a better idea as statistics can always lie.?

Yep, other incentives have been discussed for a bit now, and we are working on implementing them.

As for two, we have done polls in the past, the latest being from about a half year ago. We have also done surveys during contests and giveaways that allow members to offer feed back on news and what they'd like to see.

Yep, other incentives have been discussed for a bit now, and we are working on implementing them.

As for two, we have done polls in the past, the latest being from about a half year ago. We have also done surveys during contests and giveaways that allow members to offer feed back on news and what they'd like to see.

Fair enough wrt the first point.?

I would like to see a simple front page vs forums poll. Nothing more and nothing less. I think I have participated in a survey, and remember it being a lot more complicated than this. Sorry if such a poll had already been conducted. I must have missed it somehow in that case.

I have wanted to write editorials for neowin before, but I just never was inspired enough to actually go through with it. A subscriber status might be worth 2-3 editorials or such.

I really don't understand the hostility from both sides however. I will say that I personally open the frontpage, but rarely look at the articles, unless they are exclusive or something that other websites have no discussed. I definitely come here for the forums, whether it be to maintain my own threads or just check the ones I am most interested in.

I do think the community is the most important aspect of this website, but I am not a developer, nor do I know the actual statistics of forum activity vs front page activity. There have been things I haven't agreed with, but this is easily the best general technology forum out there. There are quite a few great forums out there, some that do things neowin can't feasibly do properly (highly specialized technological forums), but the things that are done here are definitely thought out.

Not every one will always agree, but that's what makes this place great. I do think that politics and personal grudges have a lot to play here at times, but regardless, it's an amazing place to be on the internet.

Kudos to the developers...some people will say it's ****, but it isn't. Don't get offended and don't let it bother you; Be proud and continue the good job.

... you are likely using... Colocation costs would be reduced unless you get them for free through stardock.

Exactly my point, you're calling us out based on assumptions you're making with no information at all to back them up.

I would like to see a simple front page vs forums poll. Nothing more and nothing less. I think I have participated in a survey, and remember it being a lot more complicated than this. Sorry if such a poll had already been conducted. I must have missed it somehow in that case.

It is well known that the vast majority of members of any sizeable community are what is known as "the silent majority", and tend not to participate in such polls and put their views forward, whereas the "Vocal minority" which includes a number of the posters in this thread, put their point forwards very loudly, and fail to respect that the vast majority of members are happy with the status quo, and thus feel no need to speak up.

I'm not sure quite how people think we're lying with the statistics I posted earlier. The fact of the matter is that the number I posted IS the number of guests/members online in those areas of the site at that particular time. We have access to the stats (one comes from the forum activity, which you can see at the bottom of the forum index, the other comes from similar code built into the front page), and also apache log file analysis which together tell us which areas of the site are the most popular. I'm not sure what you think the point of us lying to you about that would be to be honest.

The fact is, we did encourage and let the community publish news to the main site for the first 6 years or so, often copying directly from the Back Page News. But we got so many complaints about how shoddy the news was (erm from this community, mainly by people who didn't contribute themselves either), that we decided to pay people to do it.

All of our news posters are actually members of this forum, with an exception of one or two and I believe that we have constantly asked for writers to apply, in this forum. In fact the developers are all members too before they were a developer, most staff positions are actually contributing members who believed they could make Neowin better. Kudos to them and shame on the people who sit back and whine about anything and everything without doing much to advance this community.

So I think Neowin is doing all it can to reward the community already for the input, however theres always a group that will find something wrong in any situation and moan about it.

I think one of the problems here is that some people believe that we should be paying you for the privilege to come here, and in some cases as I've stated above we do. But where you love us giving stuff away and staying up to date, providing the resources; the site needs comeback from its members too.

And, if I had a dollar for everytime I've had to make this point, I'd be a very rich man.

  • Like 3

This proves that Neowin.com is not a profitable website, right?

Wallstreet Journal, The Financial Times... All these resources are locked away for premium members soon enough. It would be a pity to see Neowin join the club by locking away features of the forum.

No it isn't, like I said we sustain the website through the ads, and thats about it.

Often enough we have funds to send people to tech events, and upgrade our servers, but I haven't gotten rich from it yet or been able to buy a new flashy car, let alone a house from running this show.

I was actually refused a mortgage this year, so yeah. But, thats my problem.

No it isn't, like I said we sustain the website through the ads, and thats about it.

Often enough we have funds to send people to tech events, and upgrade our servers, but I haven't gotten rich from it yet or been able to buy a car, let alone a house from running this show.

I was actually refused a mortgage this year, so yeah. But, thats my problem.

Breaking even is good enough (at least for a members who have been visiting this forum for 5 years like me). :)

?

It is well known that the vast majority of members of any sizeable community are what is known as "the silent majority", and tend not to participate in such polls and put their views forward, whereas the "Vocal minority" which includes a number of the posters in this thread, put their point forwards very loudly, and fail to respect that the vast majority of members are happy with the status quo, and thus feel no need to speak up.

I'm not sure quite how people think we're lying with the statistics I posted earlier. The fact of the matter is that the number I posted IS the number of guests/members online in those areas of the site at that particular time. We have access to the stats (one comes from the forum activity, which you can see at the bottom of the forum index, the other comes from similar code built into the front page), and also apache log file analysis which together tell us which areas of the site are the most popular. I'm not sure what you think the point of us lying to you about that would be to be honest.

Trust me, I am not accusing you of lying. I am just saying that there may be something you overlook while getting the statistics. I gave an example earlier. Let me reiterate: I almost always keep the front page open for the recent community activity box. But that doesn't mean I value the front page more than the forums, even though the front page is open most of the time. Is it not possible that since anyone who types in neowin.net ends up on the home page and the articles on the home page get more exposure, leading to more clicks on the front page articles? That was the only reason for asking for a poll like that. I was not questioning your integrity. You have been on this site for longer than me, have contributed a ton more than me, and definitely have a larger right to make decisions. I am just trying to provide suggestions that would help the community grow.

Also, the "vocal minority" would almost certainly vote the same way as the entire community. From what I can see, it is an unbiased sample. There is no correlation between front page lovers and people who are vocal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!