[UK] iPhone 4 Handset Prices Announced PAYG


Recommended Posts

Source : Geeky Gadgets

The 16GB iPhone 4 will retail for ?189 on their cheapest 18 month contract which costs ?30 a month, whilst the 32GB iPhone 4 will retail for ?280 on their cheapest ?30 a month contract.

16GB Prices/Tarrifs

vodafone-iphone-4price_11.jpg

32GB Prices/Tarrifs

vodafone-iphone-4price_21.jpg

What does everyone in the UK think about these?! I know O2 have released their tarrif prices, but they have kept the handset prices quiet. Nice to finally see a handset price!

EDIT:

Thought I would do some calculations so people can see the total costs (includes handset price).

16GB 24 Months

25GBP PM = ?789

30GBP PM = ?869

35GBP PM = ?929

40GBP PM = ?1,019

45GBP PM = ?1,080

60GBP PM = ?1,440

16GB 18 Months

30GBP PM = ?729

35GBP PM = ?779

40GBP PM = ?809

45GBP PM = ?869

50GBP PM = ?900

65GBP PM = ?1,170

32GB 24 Months

25GBP PM = ?880

30GBP PM = ?959

35GBP PM = ?1,019

40GBP PM = ?1,109

45GBP PM = ?1,169

60GBP PM = ?1,440

32GB 18 Months

30GBP PM = ?820

35GBP PM = ?869

40GBP PM = ?899

45GBP PM = ?959

50GBP PM = ?989

65GBP PM = ?1,170

EDIT No.2

Apple have the iPhone 4 available for Pre-Order through the Apple Store, I say available however this is not the case. They have the page set up but when you click 'Pre Order' you get sent to a link that doesn't exist.

http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/home/shop_iphone/family/iphone?mco=MTM3NDkwMzI

iPhone 4 16GB PAYG = ?499

iPhone 4 32GB PAYG = ?599.

Not carrier specific by the looks of it at the moment!

Hmm to be honest that is pretty reasonable considering the technology in the iPhone, its about on par with all the android handsets.

My thought exactly.

How does that compare to the 3GS prices when they first got it?

About the same mate from what I have read!

Hmm to be honest that is pretty reasonable considering the technology in the iPhone, its about on par with all the android handsets.

Reasonable? You having a laugh?

?35 per month on an 18 month contract for 300 minutes + ?149 for the LESSER iPhone is reasonable? Wow.

Reasonable? You having a laugh?

?35 per month on an 18 month contract for 300 minutes + ?149 for the LESSER iPhone is reasonable? Wow.

I dont use a lot of minutes so i guess i dont really care, im on a ?15 a month contract and if T-Mobile can give me a similar package to Voda ?25 a month and ?189 for phone id snap it up in an instant.

These prices are ridiculous, at least the Americans get them at a half reasonable price.

You can either pay a huge premium and ?30 per month for an iPhone 4, or get the HTC Desire for FREE for ?30 per month.

I know which I'd choose to be honest.

Dont buy one then, everyone knows Apple products are premium products that cost a lot, early adopters always pay more. Yes you can get a Desire with lower resolution screen, personally i want the screen and app store, ive got an Android phone and the app store pales in comparison to the calibre of apps on iPhone.

Reasonable? You having a laugh?

?35 per month on an 18 month contract for 300 minutes + ?149 for the LESSER iPhone is reasonable? Wow.

All depends on what you use?! For someone like me who is very Text/Data heavy, as opposed to Minutes then it really doesn't bother me. As long as I get Unlimited Texts and a decent amount of Data then I am happy. Minutes are a bonus as I use on average about 100 minutes a month.

You say LESSER, but it's just the capacity that is 'LESSER'. 16GB will be able for me, don't really use my iPhone to store lots of Music/Photos ect....... Apps don't use up much storage either.

You have to weigh up Pro's & Con's of Contract vs PAYG, they have plenty. PAYG with the iPhone you can expect to pay ?450 at the minimum I would say. It's whether people can afford the big outlay to start or not. Contract allows people to 'spread' the cost if you must, most people will be able to sell their previous iPhone 3G or 3GS to cover the cost of the 'Handset' price. If you don't have the luxury of being able to do this, then you have to find other ways to fund it.

Technology is never cheap, especially with highly desirable technology like the iPhone, it's never going to be cheap & networks arent going to offer amazing deals because people are willing to pay the amounts already on offer.

very expensive as always with iphones. HTC Desire is a much better bang for buck phone. Can't wait to see the Motorola and HTC phones in the coming months which will undoubtably conclusively beat the iphone 4 in all areas. The iphone only really wins in battery tests, have that new motion sensor and the higher res screen, can't think of any other positive it has over the EVO 4G. What HTC needs to start doing is advertising more, getting their products onto tv shows and making press unveilings like apple does, they will be able to sell alot more phones this way.

No, only fools think that.

The Desire would cost me about ?180 on the contract i want and it has lesser technology than the iPhone, show me another phone that costs less than ?200 on contract that has 960x640 screen, 5mp camera that is actually decent quality, 720p video capture (without hacks), etc..

The Desire would cost me about ?180 on the contract i want and it has lesser technology than the iPhone, show me another phone that costs less than ?200 on contract that has 960x640 screen, 5mp camera that is actually decent quality, 720p video capture (without hacks), etc..

So having a better screen warrants hundreds of pounds more? I don't see a problem with the Desire screen at all, and I fail to see how the iPhone's "retina" screen will be SO GOOD that it warrants anything more than what it's competitors offer. Good hype though.

The Desire has a very good 5MP camera. So good infact that when my bro's arrived today, we did hand to hand tests with my mates Sony Ericsson Vivaz which DOES have supposed HD recording. We couldn't see any difference in the photos or videos. Me and my bro don't wear glasses either, so it's not like our vision is impaired in anyway.

I'm not saying that the iPhone 4 is bad. I plan on getting one on PAYG. But anyone that get's those ludicrous tariffs posted above deserves to get raped for every penny. Let's see what Three brings to the market.

So having a better screen warrants hundreds of pounds more? I don't see a problem with the Desire screen at all, and I fail to see how the iPhone's "retina" screen will be SO GOOD that it warrants anything more than what it's competitors offer. Good hype though.

The Desire has a very good 5MP camera. So good infact that when my bro's arrived today, we did hand to hand tests with my mates Sony Ericsson Vivaz which DOES have supposed HD recording. We couldn't see any difference in the photos or videos. Me and my bro don't wear glasses either, so it's not like our vision is impaired in anyway.

I'm not saying that the iPhone 4 is bad. I plan on getting one on PAYG. But anyone that get's those ludicrous tariffs posted above deserves to get raped for every penny. Let's see what Three brings to the market.

Its not hundreds of pounds more, on T-Mobile the desire on ?25 a month contract with 300 mins and 300 texts the phone costs ?340. The phone is brand new, after a few months prices will start to come down and you will start to see it being free with certain tarrifs, i dont know why you are ragging on Apple im pretty sure its the mobile networks that set the price of handset offset by monthly tarrif.

I dont care about marketing hyperbole, retina display is an awful name. The iPhone screen though is 960x640, go look at comparison threads the iPhone zoomed all the way out you can read all the small text, on an 800x480/854x480 screen like the myriad of Android phones you cant read the text you have to zoom in, there is more screen real estate and its much higher quality than any android phone out now. The reason it is 960x640 is that the original iphones screens 480x320 divide into iphone 4g resolution which means all those apps wont look as distorted as it would if Apple had gone with the regular 800x480 screen.

Bit harsh saying people deserved to be raped just because they want an iPhone 4g and dont care about the amount of minutes and texts. If you dont like it dont buy it dont whine about it on a forum.

there is more screen real estate and its much higher quality than any android phone out now.

That's bull as the screen is smaller than on the Desire. And the comparisons are a bit dodgy as well. I've got a 3GS sitting infront of me, the New York Times looks no way as bad as some comparisons have shown. Lies-filled marketing to promote the iPhone 4? Maybe.

Bit harsh saying people deserved to be raped just because they want an iPhone 4g and dont care about the amount of minutes and texts. If you dont like it dont buy it dont whine about it on a forum.

What's the point paying over the odd prices for a contract that one may not be content with? Being Sheeple, that's why. If you want to be one, then fine, but I'm still going to criticise.

And didn't you read the bottom? I'm getting the iPhone on PAYG, although not at the stupidly overpriced prices O2 will charge (?549 for the 32GB version). Come on.

That's bull as the screen is smaller than on the Desire. And the comparisons are a bit dodgy as well. I've got a 3GS sitting infront of me, the New York Times looks no way as bad as some comparisons have shown. Lies-filled marketing to promote the iPhone 4? Maybe.

...

From the videos and pictures I've seen so far, the difference is humongous compared to the 3G/3Gs. (Y)

I'm not going to debate whether it's better than the Android line-up or other competitors, however it's a huge improvement from it's predecessors..

What's the point paying over the odd prices for a contract that one may not be content with? Being Sheeple, that's why. If you want to be one, then fine, but I'm still going to criticise.

And didn't you read the bottom? I'm getting the iPhone on PAYG, although not at the stupidly overpriced prices O2 will charge (?549 for the 32GB version). Come on.

You are making pretty big assumptions, i hate Apple, its marketing tactics and its followers but i am a big technology geek. I already stated that i dont give a toss about the low minutes and texts as i get unlimited text bolt on for free with my contract and if i only have to pay an extra ?10 a month to get a phone packed with technology that most phones out today cannot touch then i will pay ?189. That doesnt mean im an Apple fanboy you can try and rationalise your criticism as much as you want.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!